Connect with us

Science

Kids are sucking down baby food pouches at record rates. ‘We’re going to pay for it,’ experts say

Published

on

Kids are sucking down baby food pouches at record rates. ‘We’re going to pay for it,’ experts say

Every week, Caitlin Scuttio stops by Target and piles her cart with pureed food pouches for her 4-year-old and twin 18-month-olds sons.

In goes a 24-pack of unsweetened applesauce. Then a 24-pack of the fruit and veggie blend. And finally, the yogurt pouches for her oldest son’s breakfast. “He’d eat six apple sauce pouches a day if I let him,” Scuttio said.

Total monthly pouch budget: $200.

“They have such a choke hold on my family. I can’t imagine our grocery list without it at this point,” she said. “We are definitely a pouch family.”

Sales of baby food pouches have increased 900% over the last decade. Pouches are now the most popular baby food on the market.

Advertisement

And they aren’t alone. Sales of food pouches — soft bags with plastic spouts for easy consumption — have increased 900% since 2010, overtaking jarred purees as the predominant baby food on the market. Parents generally spoon-feed jars of pureed foods for a few months in the first year of life when introducing solids, but pouches marketed to parents of toddlers and older children have prolonged pureed food eating by years.

While the occasional pouch can be part of a healthy diet, doctors and nutritionists are raising concerns that an overreliance on pouches can interfere with nutrition, long-term food preferences, dental hygiene and even speech and language development. And marketing practices can leave parents confused about what’s actually inside the packages.

“Pouches are highly processed foods,” said Dr. Steven Abrams, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School. “They certainly serve as a quick snack, but we need to make sure that pouches don’t make up too much of a toddler’s diet. We want kids to learn to chew and eat foods like meat, and fruits and vegetables that are not processed.”

A woman leans toward a drawer filled with pouches

Heidi Martinez gathers baby food pouches for her three kids at their home in Pittsburg, Calif. She said she always buys the pouches with at least one vegetable.

Advertisement

What’s inside varies greatly — some contain only fruit, while others have a mix of vegetables, grains, yogurt and even meat. Whereas many jarred foods contain a single ingredient like pureed peas or carrots, pouches are more often a blend that features a sweet fruit such as apple or pear as the primary ingredient.

A 2019 study found that infant and toddler food in pouches contained significantly more sugar per serving than foods available in other forms of packaging.

To be sure, there is not an epidemic of children who don’t know how to chew. But Dr. Mark Corkins, a pediatric gastroenterologist at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center who chairs the American Academy of Pediatrics committee on nutrition, said he sometimes sees children who are so reliant on the smooth, sweet taste of pouches that they have developed food and texture aversions and refuse to eat regular fruits or vegetables.

“In the long run we’re going to pay for it,” he said.

A logo that states "Los Angeles Times early childhood initiative" in colorful lettering.

Engage with our community-funded journalism as we delve into child care, transitional kindergarten, health and other issues affecting children from birth through age 5.

Advertisement

Why are baby food pouches so popular?

Pouches are convenient: Unlike glass jars, they don’t shatter when dropped and toddlers can suck down the slurry without help from a caregiver.

A woman holds a food pouches in her hand.

Pouches are convenient because they don’t shatter when dropped, and toddlers can suck down the slurry without help from a caregiver.

“It is so dang hard to be a parent of young children in the U.S. Having [pouches] on an airplane, having them in the car — it is so convenient that I would never take that away from parents. I used pouches with my children,” said Bridget Young, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Rochester School of Medicine.

Advertisement

“The industry has gone from jars to pouches because it’s more cost-effective and convenient,” said Dr. Tanya Altmann, a pediatrician in Calabasas and author of the book What to Feed Your Baby. But it’s what’s inside that’s important, and “not all pouches are created equal.”

As a tool, she said, pouches “can be a contributor to a family’s nutrition,” but not a prime source. Those without added sugars or salt may even have advantages over other processed snacks.

Heidi Martinez, a mother of three in Pittsburg, Calif., said she always buys the pouches with at least one vegetable. As her oldest son goes through “picky stages, I like that he is still getting some kale and beets,” she said. “I don’t know that they’re actually healthier but I feel better about it.”

A mother plays with her young children on the floor.

Heidi Martinez plays with her sons while they eat from pouches. “I don’t know that they’re actually healthier but I feel better about it,” she said of pouches that include vegetables.

At the age of 7, he eats two to three pouches a day.

Advertisement

Manufacturers appeal to parents by marketing a pouch as “all natural,” “organic” or containing vegetables.

But the advertising on the front of a pouch doesn’t necessarily reflect what’s inside. A green pouch advertised as broccoli-pear might turn out to be little more than pear puree. And a pouch labeled something like turkey dinner “might be apple sauce with a whisper of turkey,” Young said. “And there’s nothing wrong with apple sauce. But there is something wrong when you think you’re feeding your child turkey.”

Parents of picky eaters may be particularly vulnerable to this kind of marketing.

“It’s kind of the perfect storm, when the child is transitioning to solids and trying new foods,” said Fran Fleming-Milici, director of marketing initiatives at the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Health at the University of Connecticut. “You’re not sure of the nutrition that the child is getting.

Martinez said the real appeal, however, is the pouch itself. She considers pouches to be in the same category as a smoothie or yogurt, but in an easy to-go form.

Advertisement
A boy hangs upside down on playground equipment.

Ezekiel Martinez, 7, eats from a pouch while hanging upside down at a park. He eats two to three pouches a day.

The slippery slope of sweet, smooth purees

The early years of a child’s life are crucial for developing lifelong healthy eating habits. Babies are born with a preference for sweet foods, said Jill Castle, a pediatric dietitian in Massachusetts and author of the book “Kids Thrive at Every Size.” Typically, a child must be repeatedly introduced to various foods to get them used to different textures and flavors, such as the taste of vegetables.

Advertisement

It’s hard to beat the convenience of pouches — they’re easy to throw in a diaper bag or hand to a screaming toddler in the car. But experts warn relying on them too much could be a problem.

Fruit puree can disguise the taste of vegetables, reinforcing sweetness, Castle said.

If a child’s diet consists mostly of pouches, “when you actually give them chopped-up carrot and peas that roll around the plate, they’re not used to that at all,” and may refuse it, said Daisy Coyle, who researches pouches at the George Institute for Global Health in Sydney, Australia.

Advertisement

Ideally, lumpy textures should be introduced as early as possible so the child can learn to use their tongue and jaw to manipulate and swallow food, a process that requires 30 different muscles to work together, said Susan Greenberg, a speech pathologist at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles. “We think it’s a natural process, but it’s like learning to walk,” she said.

A variety of textures is also crucial to developing a child’s long-term food preferences. “If you prolong purees and don’t introduce lumpy foods by 10 months, we have evidence that by 15 months and even 7 years, it influences food acceptance,” Greenberg said.

The full sensory experience of eating food is also important, she added — getting messy, using spoons, fingers and tiny fists to squish food and smear on a highchair and face.

A five-year-old boy with a food pouch.

Lucas Martinez, 5, snacks while at a park.

Dentists also have concerns about what pouches mean for oral hygiene. Dr. Francisco Ramos-Gomez, director of the UCLA Center for Children’s Oral Health, said the way purees such as apple sauce stick to the teeth is different from eating an actual apple, and it sits on a child’s teeth before being washed. This prolonged exposure increases the acidity of the mouth, erodes the teeth and causes cavities.

Advertisement

But it’s all a matter of moderation, Greenberg said. “Pouches are easy, and we live in a world that’s really busy these days. I think we can all agree that it’s not a bad thing. It just can’t replace the other things.”

Do toddlers really need their own special food?

By about 12 months old, typically developing children do not need pureed food. “It was always a goal to get kids off of purees by 9 months and get them onto table food,” Castle said. “By 1 year, you’re sitting at the table with your family, and you’re eating what the whole family is eating.”

Toddlers and young children can eat most anything that an adult can eat, as long as it’s cut or prepared in a way that’s appropriate for their eating skills and doesn’t make it a choking hazard.

But brands have invented a whole new, lucrative category of toddler foods, from pouches and teething crackers to bars and puffs, Fleming-Milici said.

Advertisement

The major pouch manufacturers — including Gerber, Plum Organics and Happy Family Organics — did not respond to requests for comment from The Times.

In the last 12 months, American families have spent more than $466 million on baby food pouches, according to data from the market research firm NIQ.

Mario Martinez prepares snacks at a kitchen counter

Mario Martinez prepares snacks for his three sons.

The “Wild West” of the baby food aisle

As opposed to the tightly regulated U.S. infant formula sector, baby and toddler foods do not have their own special marketing and production rules; they are subject to the same requirements as adult foods.

Advertisement

“The baby food market is like the Wild West,” Castle said.

The World Health Organization came up with its own nonbinding set of standards for baby food, which included limits on fat, sugar and sodium. It also requires clear labeling of ingredients and prohibits the use of health, nutrition and marketing claims on the packaging.

A study by Coyle earlier this year published in the journal Nutrients found 60% of the baby or toddler food products for sale at the top 10 grocery stores in the U.S. failed to meet the WHO nutritional recommendations. Almost all packages included at least one prohibited marketing claim, and some had as many as 11.

Earlier this year, the FDA recalled 3 million cinnamon applesauce pouches that contained extremely high levels of lead, after dozens of children across the United States were found to be suffering from lead poisoning. The FDA does not currently set heavy-metal limits or require baby food manufacturers to test for them.

“We really need to have some U.S.-based regulations, or decide we’re following the World Health Organization’s regulations. But there needs to be more tight control,” Castle said. “These are some of our youngest, most vulnerable members of our population.”

Advertisement

Instead of blaming families for overusing pouches, she said, new regulations, healthier ingredients that target key nutrients, and more transparent advertising are needed. “Even just having more pouches that are predominantly veggie based and less sweet would be a really positive change,” she said.

Lucas Martinez eats from a baby food pouch at a park

Lucas Martinez eats from a pouch. Manufacturers appeal to parents by marketing a pouch as “all natural,” “organic” or containing vegetables.

How to see through marketing pitches

To select the healthiest pouches, nutritionist Young recommends ignoring the advertising on the front of the package — including the name of the product.

Instead, flip to the back, where the ingredients are listed in order of how much is in the package, and look for pouches that list the veggies first. A pouch that lists apple first probably will be mostly applesauce.

Advertisement

Beth Saltz, a pediatric dietitian in Woodland Hills, said a general rule of thumb is to make sure that all of the ingredients listed could be sold in the grocery store. If the ingredients include things such as “organic tapioca starch” or “pea protein isolate,” or even natural coloring, you might reconsider.

“A little toddler does not need those,” she said.

This article is part of The Times’ early childhood education initiative, focusing on the learning and development of California children from birth to age 5. For more information about the initiative and its philanthropic funders, go to latimes.com/earlyed.

Advertisement

Science

Opinion: Menopausal women have a lot at stake in this election

Published

on

Opinion: Menopausal women have a lot at stake in this election

Perhaps you’ve heard: Menopause is having a moment. Celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey and Drew Barrymore have begun speaking out about coping with symptoms and self-worth. Halle Berry shouted from the steps of the Capitol: “I’m in menopause, OK?!”

As menopause advocates, we have long seen this “moment” as overdue, spurring necessary conversations for millions who would otherwise suffer through menopause in silence and shame. It’s a relief to see the topic discussed openly — even if some of the conversations are sparked by odd viral moments on the campaign trail, such as a recent remark by a Republican Senate candidate who thinks it’s “a little crazy” that women past 50 would vote on the issue of reproductive rights.

It’s not at all crazy — and bodily autonomy is not solely about pregnancy and abortion. Menopausal women have a lot at stake on the ballot this year.

Like our younger counterparts, we too must be able to make informed choices about our health. We deserve access to affordable, competent medical care and treatment from trained professionals. We have every right and reason to demand lawmakers and political leaders invest in our well-being, our dignity, our humanity.

Nor are we some niche special interest group. There are legions of us, 75 million strong in the U.S., in some stage of perimenopause, menopause or post menopause.

Advertisement

Here are three issues critical to menopause care that we urge voters to consider.

First, equity in federal funding for medical research. The National Institutes of Health allocates only 10.8% of its $45-billion budget to women’s health, according to the most recent tally (2020), although women make up more than half of the U.S. population. Of that, only a tiny fraction goes to research targeting midlife and menopause — an amount so small it can’t even be computed, given that menopause-specific research is part of a “subcategory of a subcategory,” according to neuroscientist Lisa Mosconi.

In March, President Biden signed an executive order creating a national task force, the White House Women’s Health Research Initiative, with a call for a $12-billion investment in women’s midlife and menopause research. As part of that commitment, just last month the U.S. Department of Defense announced a new $500-million disbursement. Meanwhile, Congress introduced a slate of bipartisan bills this session — the Advancing Menopause and Mid-Life Women’s Health Act in the Senate and three corresponding proposals in the House — all of which would increase funding for research and education about menopause symptoms and treatments. Those are all positive steps, and it is critical that they remain a priority for Congress and the White House. We must pay attention to funding for women’s health research when we go to the polls.

Second, menopause shows up in down-ballot races too. Governors, state legislators, city council members and other officials such as health commissioners and members of boards of regents can reinforce federal commitments via oversight roles — including of publicly funded universities and other entities that produce medical and scientific research. Many of these offices also have the power to increase — or decrease — access to affordable care.

This summer Louisiana passed a historic law mandating insurance coverage of menopause treatments. The California Assembly recently held public hearings about menopause in the workplace; the New Jersey Senate introduced legislation that would establish an interagency council on menopause to undertake research, disseminate evidence-based knowledge and develop state-supported treatment services. Every candidate across the country should be called upon to support initiatives like these.

Advertisement

Third, education is essential. Although half the population in the U.S. will experience menopause, most patients struggle to find a doctor who can help them. Why? According to a Mayo Clinic survey, 20% of U.S.-based medical residents in the fields of obstetrics, family and internal medicine reported having zero menopause training; a mere 7% of those surveyed said they felt adequately prepared to treat menopausal patients. One of the House bills, a bipartisan effort, would create a national public awareness campaign and fund nationwide medical education initiatives. Licensing boards are already catching on: This month, the Federation of State Medical Boards agreed to provide continuing medical education credits for physicians who view a new PBS film on menopause, “The M Factor” (for which one of us was an executive producer).

Other issues at stake in this election, such as access to IVF and hormonal contraceptives — as well as threats to the independence of federal agencies including the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration — can also significantly affect the lives of women nearing or in menopause.

Voters who are menopausal — as well as those who have menopausal family members or may be on the brink of perimenopause themselves, typically women in their 30s and 40s — are a mighty force. Reproductive health is their fight too.

Anthropologist Margaret Mead famously stated: “There is no greater power in the world than the zest of a postmenopausal woman.” Zest is great. So is a robust policy agenda. Women should vote like their lives depend on it, because they do.

Jennifer Weiss-Wolf, executive director of the Birnbaum Women’s Leadership Center at New York University School of Law, is the author of the forthcoming “Period. Full Stop. The Politics of Menopause.” Tamsen Fadal, a journalist and co-executive producer of “The M Factor,” is the author of the forthcoming “How to Menopause: Take Charge of Your Health, Reclaim Your Life, and Feel Even Better Than Before.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

Video: NASA Launches Mission to Study Jupiter’s Moon

Published

on

Video: NASA Launches Mission to Study Jupiter’s Moon

new video loaded: NASA Launches Mission to Study Jupiter’s Moon

transcript

transcript

NASA Launches Mission to Study Jupiter’s Moon

Europa Clipper will study whether Europa, Jupiter’s fourth-largest moon, possesses ingredients and conditions favorable for life.

“Ignition. And liftoff! Liftoff of Falcon Heavy with Europa Clipper, unveiling the mysteries of an enormous ocean lurking beneath the icy crust of Jupiter’s moon Europa.” “And there we heard the call for Max Q. The vehicle is passing through maximum dynamic pressure. Next thing up in about two minutes will be booster engine cutoff, where we see the two —” “SpaceX’s own recovery ship go cosmos.” “And there you see them falling away into space. That is the only part —” “Separation confirmed.” “And there you go: NASA’s Europa Clipper probe embarking on a long awaited mission to study Jupiter’s icy moon Europa.”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Science

Continue Reading

Science

NASA launches Europa Clipper to see if Jupiter’s icy moon has ingredients for life

Published

on

NASA launches Europa Clipper to see if Jupiter’s icy moon has ingredients for life

A SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket lifted off from Cape Canaveral, Fla., on Monday morning carrying a NASA probe designed to explore Jupiter’s icy moon Europa and search for the building blocks of life.

With the Europa Clipper now on its 1.8-billion mile, 5½-year journey to the solar system’s largest planet, NASA has officially retired a “tremendous amount of risk on the mission,” according to Jordan Evans, Europa Clipper project manager at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab.

The flight’s initial stages went according to their carefully choreographed plan.

The spacecraft lifted off at 9:06 a.m. Pacific time, and the side boosters that helped fuel its fiery ascent broke away from the rocket a little more than three minutes into the flight. The main booster shut down and fell back to Earth about a minute later.

The fairing that secured Clipper at the top of the rocket separated about 4½ minutes into the flight.

Advertisement

After an initial eight-minute burn, the spacecraft entered a “coasting orbit” around Earth. A second, shorter engine burn positioned Clipper on a trajectory to exit Earth’s embrace.

Teams at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Cañada Flintridge applauded when the spacecraft separated from the rocket a little more than an hour after the launch. With its twin solar panels still folded up tight, the probe resembled a cube.

Friends and family of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory employees watch Europa Clipper mission launch programming at JPL’s von Karman Auditorium in Pasadeana.

(Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

“Please say goodbye to Clipper on its way to Europa,” said Pranay Mishra, the mission’s flight director at JPL.

A second round of cheers erupted about five minutes later, when direct communication with the spacecraft was confirmed.

Mission managers noted signs that the propulsion system failed to vent, but the craft rolled into its desired position. That was seen as evidence that the propulsion system is working fine.

Clipper’s journey to Europa will not be direct. It will get a gravity assist by sling-shotting around Mars early next year, then boomerang back around Earth in late 2026 before zooming toward Jupiter and the gas giant‘s icy, dynamic moon.

The probe is scheduled to arrive in 2030 and gather data for more than four years.

Advertisement

When the mission ends, Clipper will fly itself into one of Jupiter’s rocky moons to ensure the spacecraft doesn’t contaminate Europa.

The launch was initially scheduled for Thursday, but Clipper spent that day secured in SpaceX’s hangar to ride out Hurricane Milton. The skies over Florida’s space coast were clear with few wispy clouds Monday morning.

Scientists have advocated for a Europa mission for decades, ever since NASA’s Galileo probe found that the moon likely has a subterranean global ocean, heated by Jupiter’s gravitational forces compressing and stretching the moon’s core as it orbits the gas giant at break-neck speed.

With water, an energy source in the form of heat, and potentially organic compounds, scientists say Europa could be hospitable for alien life.

While orbiting Jupiter, Clipper will fly by Europa dozens of times and use its array of scientific instruments to study the dynamics of the moon’s subterranean ocean and look for organic compounds, a potential indicator of life.

Advertisement

The $5-billion Europa Clipper mission was designed and built by JPL . It’s the largest planetary probe ever built by NASA .

To launch the spacecraft, SpaceX employed its Falcon Heavy rocket, a variant of its Falcon 9 with an extra booster strapped to each side.

While SpaceX usually attempts to recover its boosters, this time, it let them fall into the ocean — expending all of their propellant on getting Clipper out of Earth’s gravity instead of saving some fuel to land. The fairings that protect the spacecraft as it leaves Earth will be recovered.

“The community is really fortunate to have new rockets with these heavy lift capabilities available to them,” said Matthew Shindell, planetary science and exploration curator at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. “If you were trying to launch a mission like this a decade ago, you couldn’t do it.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending