Connect with us

Politics

Video: Mahmoud Khalil Lands at Newark After Months of Detention

Published

on

Video: Mahmoud Khalil Lands at Newark After Months of Detention

The fight is far from over. The genocide is still happening in Gaza. Israel is still waging a full war against Palestinians, across Palestine. OK? He’s not resisting me. I didn’t notice what happened. You’re going to have to come with us. I’m coming with you. No way. You know one thing and the one thing. We’re just going for it. Again. Let’s go back, go back. Back up. Back up. Everyone agrees that the persecution based on political speech is wrong and it is a violation of all of our First Amendment rights, not just Mahmoud’s. They are violating the law, and they know that they are violating the law, and they are trying to use these one-off examples to intimidate everyone else. That back. Oh, Mr.. LeBron. Back. Track. Back. How do you feel? Today. Oh. My back up. Which back up back up, back up, back again. Let’s go back, go back. Back up. Back up. Back. Back up. Back. Back. Back. Right. Oh. It’s another. Back. Oh my gosh! Listen. You know. Present. Well, what are these guys? I mean, I’ve been coming. The US government is funding this genocide, and Columbia University is investing in this genocide. This is what I was protesting. This is what I will continue to protest with every one of you. Not only if they threaten me with detention. Even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine. And again. I just want to go back and just continue the work that I was already doing, advocating for Palestinian rights. A speech that should actually be celebrated then, rather than punished as this administration wants to do. But we will take a few questions to say to the Trump administration. Thank you. It’s time. Just the fact that I am here. It’s it’s a message, the fact that all these attempts to suppress pro-Palestine voices, has, have, have failed now. So this is the message. My my existence is a message. The Palestinian existence is a message to this administration. You have to be free. How does it feel to be free? To be honest, I’m. I’m still trying to, just comprehend that. Of course it feels great. When I was on the inside, it was free. It’s just I was locked up. The fact that they put me in that place, that didn’t mean that I was not free. I continued to advocate for Palestinians, for the emigrants who are left behind in that facility. That 1200 men who. All of them are incredible men who the Trump administration are trying to portray as whether criminals or just like illegals, as they say. And as I said yesterday, whether you are a citizen, an immigrant, anyone on this land, you’re not illegal. That doesn’t make you less of a human. And this is what the administration is trying to do to do humanize me, to dehumanize the the the immigrants. We humanize anyone who actually does not agree with what the. Right. Thank you everyone. First of all, first and foremost, I think we speak on behalf of so many people across this country, across the state of New York, but also across so many communities, in the United States, in welcoming my family home, to be here and to be reunited with his wife and his newborn son. Khalil was in prison for 104 days by this administration, by the Trump administration, with no grounds and for political reasons, because Mahmoud Khalil is an advocate for Palestinian human rights. He has been accused, baselessly, of horrific allegations simply because the Trump administration and our overall establishment disagrees with his political speech. This was a form his detention by Ice being taken from his home, as well as as other advocates. Miss Osric in in Boston, Massachusetts, ripped off of the street being taken is wrong. It is illegal. It is a violation of his First Amendment rights. It is an affront to every American, and we will not allow, and we will continue to resist the politicization and the continued political persecution that Ice is engaged in. And so we welcome Mahmood home. We will continue to support. I also want to thank the incredible work of CCR, the ACLU, new IMU, and many other advocacy organizations, the lawyers and organizers on the ground who have supported his family. And I have to, of course, thank my staff in office. Maureen, doctor who has done so much incredible work as well in in ensuring that, Mahmood gets the justice and dignity that he deserves. And so right now, right now, we hope that. And we wish for Mahmood and his family to be able to enjoy some peace after an incredibly difficult 104 days. But we also have a path ahead of us. This is not over and we will have to continue to support this case. And I also want to thank I know we have represented from Senator Schumer’s office and others because everybody agrees. Everyone agrees that the persecution based on political speech is wrong and it is a violation of all of our First Amendment rights, not just Mahmood. Thank you very much. It feels relief. President Trump, I think the thing that we know first and foremost is that, the Trump administration knows that they are waging a losing legal battle. They are violating the law, and they know that they are violating the law, and they are trying to use these one off examples to intimidate everyone else from not going to school from not using their speech, etc.. And so we hope we’ve seen that a judge has tossed it, tossed out their actions not just once, but twice. And we hope to continue, to advocate for the administration to follow the law, frankly. Thank you. Mr.. How do you. Well, first, friends, thank you so much. For everything. Not only for today. It’s just for everyday, like, just use words. Use your words to support your messages. Have kept me going.

Politics

Video: Trump Settled a Case With Himself. Was That Legal?

Published

on

Video: Trump Settled a Case With Himself. Was That Legal?

new video loaded: Trump Settled a Case With Himself. Was That Legal?

The Trump administration this week created a $1.8 billion fund to dole out taxpayer dollars to the president’s political allies, and declared that Mr. Trump is immunized from tax audits. Our chief legal affairs correspondent, Adam Liptak, explains how these legally questionable moves test the Constitution’s limits on the president’s power.

By Adam Liptak, Paul Abowd, Nikolay Nikolov, Rafaela Balster, Jon Miller and Whitney Shefte

May 21, 2026

Continue Reading

Politics

Rep. Tom Kean Jr. says he expects to return to Congress ‘in the next couple of weeks’ after missing 100 votes

Published

on

Rep. Tom Kean Jr. says he expects to return to Congress ‘in the next couple of weeks’ after missing 100 votes

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Rep. Tom Kean Jr., R-N.J., said Thursday that he expects to return to Congress “in the next couple of weeks” after missing 100 consecutive House votes during an extended absence tied to what his office has described only as a “personal health matter.”

“My doctors are confident that I’m on the road to a full recovery,” Kean, 57, told the New Jersey Globe in his first public comments since stepping away from Capitol Hill in March.

“I understand the need for public transparency, and I appreciate the support of my constituents,” he added. “I anticipate that in the next couple of weeks, I’ll return to voting and to the campaign trail.”

Kean last voted on March 5 and has missed every House roll call vote since then, according to GovTrack. His absence has drawn heightened attention because Republicans hold a slim majority in the House and because Kean represents one of the country’s most competitive congressional districts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Advertisement

TOM KEAN JR’S PROLONGED ABSENCE PUTS PRESSURE ON HOUSE REPUBLICANS’ RAZOR-THIN MAJORITY

Rep. Tom Kean Jr., R-N.J., is running for a third House term in 2026 after fending off Democratic challengers in prior election cycles. (Getty Images)

His office has repeatedly declined to disclose details about the illness, saying only that the congressman is focused on recovery and expected to return “soon.” Fox News Digital reached out to a representative for Kean for additional comment.

Last week, Kean’s father, former New Jersey Gov. Tom Kean Sr., told NJ.com that his son was recovering from a “serious illness.”

“You can’t say definitely, but their best guess is now he’ll be out in two or three weeks,” Kean Sr. said, referring to doctors treating his son. “Any time you’ve been through a serious illness, you can’t be 100% the day you get back. You’re gonna be able to do things, but gradually ramping up.”

Advertisement

COMPLEX PARTIAL SEIZURE RULED AS CAUSE OF PAUSING EPISODE DURING HOUSE FLOOR SPEECH, DEM CONGRESSMAN SAYS

Tom Kean Jr., GOP candidate for New Jersey’s 7th Congressional District, speaks at his election night party in Basking Ridge, N.J., on Nov. 8, 2022. (Stefan Jeremiah/AP)

Kean Sr. also said doctors expect his son to make a full recovery but declined to discuss the diagnosis.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters this week that he had spoken with Kean recently but was unaware of details surrounding the congressman’s condition.

“We’re expecting him back here soon. He’s had a medical issue,” Johnson said Wednesday. “I don’t even know the details.”

Advertisement

JOHNSON WARNS HOUSE REPUBLICANS TO ‘STAY HEALTHY’ AS GOP MAJORITY SHRINKS TO THE EDGE

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill while House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., listens. (Mariam Zuhaib/AP)

The absence has become a growing political issue in New Jersey as Democrats target Kean’s swing district. Kean is running unopposed in the Republican primary on June 2, while several Democrats are competing for their party’s nomination.

Earlier this month, a top Kean aide told The New York Times, “There’s no cameras where Tom is.”

Kean consultant Harrison Neely said this week the congressman remains committed to seeking reelection.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“What I can tell you is that the congressman is dealing with a personal health matter. He is focused on his recovery,” Neely told the New York Post.

Fox News Digital’s Adam Pack contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Influencer files complaint against Steyer campaign, alleging violations

Published

on

Influencer files complaint against Steyer campaign, alleging violations

A political influencer has filed a complaint against Tom Steyer’s campaign for governor, saying the committee failed to notify her of disclosure requirements, as required by law, when she was paid to meet with Steyer in March and later produced social media content from the meeting.

What’s more, she said the Steyer campaign falsely accused her of posting paid content in support of Steyer’s chief Democratic rival, Xavier Becerra, and failing to disclose it in a complaint filed by the billionaire’s campaign this week.

Maggie Reed, who regularly posts satirical takes on politics to roughly half a million followers on Instagram and TiKTok under the username mermaidmamamaggie, said she was actually paid by Steyer’s campaign and signed an agreement that barred her from disclosing the payment.

She posted, and later deleted, a video from her meeting with Steyer in March.

Advertisement

“In plain terms: the Committee paid for political content, structured it to look like an ordinary creator’s organic opinion, and used a non-disclosure agreement to keep the public from learning the truth,” says the complaint, filed Thursday with California’s Fair Political Practices Commission.

Steyer’s campaign disclosed in a campaign filing that it had paid the agency that represents Reed $5,000 for digital advertising, but didn’t indicate that the payment was connected to Reed’s meeting with Steyer or her production of content.

The Steyer campaign said that while it did pay to meet with Reed, it left the decision of whether to create content entirely up to her.

Since then, Reed has produced several videos expressing support for Becerra, the former California congressman and U.S. secretary of Health and Human Services, but she said that she was not paid to produce those videos and that they reflected her genuine support for Becerra’s campaign.

Becerra has been the top Democrat in recent polling in the race, maintaining a narrow edge over Steyer and a firm grip on one of the top two spots in the June 2 primary that would send him to the general election in November.

Advertisement

Reed’s complaint is the latest volley in a back and forth involving the use of paid influencers in the gubernatorial race.

Two influencers who support Becerra — but were not paid by his campaign — filed a complaint last week saying that a number of influencers had created paid content in support of Steyer but failed to disclose so in their posts.

Steyer’s campaign then filed a complaint earlier this week in which it leveled accusations against Reed and another influencer named Jay Gonzalez, who is now a paid staffer on the Becerra campaign. The complaint alleges that Gonzalez made several pro-Becerra posts after joining the campaign and belatedly amended them to include disclosure that they were sponsored.

The Becerra campaign has maintained that it does not otherwise pay influencers to produce content on its behalf.

Steyer’s complaint included screenshots of an email sent to Reed’s talent agency by a gubernatorial campaign gauging her interest in producing paid content.

Advertisement

While the screenshots produced in Steyer’s complaint did not disclose who had sent the inquiry, Reed said in her complaint that the request had come from a staffer for the gubernatorial campaign of former Los Angeles Mayor and California State Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa.

Disclosure of paid political content by social media creators is required in California thanks to a law passed in 2023.

Influencers themselves are required to disclose that a post they created was sponsored, but campaigns are required to notify them of the requirement.

Violation of the law doesn’t trigger civil, criminal or administrative penalties, but the Fair Political Practices Commission has the right to take violators to court and request that a judge force compliance with the law.

The agreement Reed signed with Steyer’s campaign, which was attached to her complaint, indicated that she needed to follow all applicable state, federal and local laws, but made no specific mention of her requirement to disclose that content she produced was sponsored.

Advertisement

The agreement did specify that Steyer’s campaign might need to disclose the payment.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending