Connect with us

Politics

Trabajadores de los supermercados del sur de California autorizan una huelga en medio de las negociaciones contractuales

Published

on

Afectados por dos años de estrés pandémico, decenas de miles de trabajadores de comestibles del sur de California votaron abrumadoramente para autorizar una huelga si los supermercados no cumplen con sus demandas salariales mientras se reanudan las negociaciones sobre un nuevo contrato en las próximas semanas.

La votación, realizada durante cinco días, podría dar lugar a paros en algunos mercados de Albertsons, Vons, Pavilions y Ralphs que se extienden desde el centro de California hasta la frontera con México.

El sindicato United Meals and Industrial Staff anunció que el 95% de los votantes de siete sindicatos locales aprobaron una posible huelga.

El contrato de tres años que cubre a 47.000 trabajadores de 540 tiendas expiró el 6 de marzo. Las negociaciones sobre un nuevo convenio comenzaron en enero, pero se estancaron hace tres semanas. Los trabajadores pretenden obtener mejoras salariales sustanciales, un aumento de las horas mínimas para los trabajadores a tiempo parcial y comités de salud y seguridad en cada tienda, ya que persiste la preocupación por la pandemia.

“Estas empresas deben venir a la mesa dispuestas a negociar un acuerdo justo o vamos a tener que llevar esta lucha a otra parte”, dijo Kathy Finn, secretaria-tesorera del sindicato UFCW Native 770 de Los Ángeles y principal negociadora.

Advertisement

La negociación se reanudará el miércoles.

Rachel Fournier, miembro del comité de negociación de la UFCW Native 770, se encuentra en la sede del sindicato en Los Ángeles mientras los miembros preparan las señales de huelga.

(Christina Home / Los Angeles Instances)

La votación, que permite a los líderes sindicales convocar una huelga si no se alcanza un pacto, aumenta la presión sobre dos de las mayores cadenas de supermercados del país: Kroger, la empresa matriz de Ralphs, y Albertsons, propietaria de Vons y Pavilions.

Advertisement

El enfrentamiento se produce en un momento de malestar laboral en todo el país. Los trabajadores de los supermercados, conscientes de su condición de “esenciales”, se han atrincherado, no sólo en California, sino también en Oregón, Colorado y otros estados.

Los empleados de otras grandes empresas, como Amazon y Starbucks, están tratando de sindicalizarse. Y la escasez de mano de obra está afectando las industrias de todo el país, ya que los empleados cambian de trabajo para obtener un salario más alto. La inflación está subiendo a niveles récord en California y en todo Estados Unidos.

A diferencia de la huelga de casi cinco meses de los supermercados del sur de California en 2003 y 2004, durante la cual toda la fuerza de trabajo del sindicato se retiró después de que las cadenas presionaran para recortar los salarios y los beneficios, la autorización de este mes se enmarca como una acción de “práctica laboral injusta”. De acuerdo con la ley federal, esto permite realizar paros en determinadas tiendas en lugar de una huelga whole.

El sindicato argumentó ante la Junta Nacional de Relaciones Laborales que los supermercados buscaban intimidar e influenciar ilegalmente a los trabajadores, algo que las empresas niegan.

La angustia de los trabajadores de las tiendas ha aumentado con el paso del tiempo, ya que su salario no se ajusta al alto coste de la vida en el sur de California y las empresas han trasladado a más de dos tercios de su plantilla a tiempo parcial.

Advertisement

En 2020 el salario digno para el área de Los Ángeles, -definido como el ingreso mínimo para que un trabajador pueda satisfacer sus necesidades básicas- oscilaba entre 19,22 dólares para una persona soltera sin hijos y 34,01 dólares para familias con dos adultos trabajando y tres hijos, según los últimos datos de una calculadora de salario digno creada por el Instituto Tecnológico de Massachusetts.

La UFCW pide que los trabajadores mejor pagados desde hace tiempo -los empleados de alimentación que incluyen a los cajeros y a los reponedores de estanterías- reciban un aumento de 5 dólares por hora al remaining de un nuevo contrato de tres años. Actualmente ganan 22,50 dólares por hora después de cinco a siete años. Las empresas ofrecieron un aumento de 1,80 dólares.

Un tercio de la plantilla pertenece a la categoría de dependientes de alimentos.

Otro tercio de los trabajadores de los supermercados, los dependientes de mercancías generales, incluidos los preparadores de alimentos y los reponedores no alimentarios, ganan ahora un máximo de 17,02 dólares la hora. El sindicato quiere aumentar ese salario en 8 dólares por hora en tres años, alegando que realizan un trabajo related al de los empleados de alimentación mejor pagados. Las empresas ofrecieron 2 dólares.

La negociación aún no ha comenzado en el tercio menos remunerado de la fuerza de trabajo: los empacadores y los ayudantes de los oficinistas que ganan un poco más del salario mínimo estatal de 15 dólares.

Advertisement

Kroger y Albertson’s ofrecen beneficios médicos y de jubilación a diferencia de muchos minoristas no sindicalizados. Las propuestas salariales de la UFCW “conducirían a 400 dólares más en las facturas mensuales de comestibles para la mayoría de los hogares del sur de California [y] empujan a los clientes a los competidores no sindicalizados que no respetan la negociación colectiva”, dijo John Votava, director de asuntos corporativos de Ralph.

Los mercados no sindicalizados, como Complete Meals y Dealer Joe’s, propiedad de Amazon, son competidores feroces. Y los minoristas no sindicalizados como Walmart y Goal han ampliado sus negocios de comestibles en los últimos años.

Los supermercados tradicionalmente operan con márgenes de ganancia del orden del 2%. Pero la pandemia disparó los ingresos a medida que los restaurantes cerraban y más gente comía en casa. El beneficio operativo de Kroger casi se duplicó a 4.300 millones de dólares de 2019 a 2021.

En 2020, la compañía pagó 1.300 millones de dólares a los inversionistas, un dinero que, según los trabajadores, debería haberse destinado a pagarles más mientras enfrentaban los riesgos de la COVID-19 en el trabajo. El presidente ejecutivo de Kroger, Rodney McMullen, fue criticado por cobrar un paquete de pago de 22,4 millones de dólares en 2020 -el mayor de su historia-, incluso cuando la empresa puso fin a una bonificación por riesgo de 2 dólares la hora para los trabajadores de primera línea después de dos meses.

A pair of hands hold a poster before a strike vote for grocery workers in Southern California.

Una huelga afectaría a decenas de miles de trabajadores de 540 tiendas de comestibles que se extienden desde el centro de California hasta la frontera con México.

(Christina Home / Los Angeles Instances)

Advertisement

Cuando las ciudades de Los Ángeles y Lengthy Seashore aprobaron el año pasado ordenanzas que exigían a las cadenas ofrecer varios meses de paga por riesgo, Ralphs cerró cinco mercados diciendo que eran “financieramente insostenibles”.

“Los trabajadores de los supermercados son esenciales”, dijo John Grant, presidente del Native 770. “No son fácilmente reemplazables dada la escasez de mano de obra. No queremos otra interrupción, pero estamos preparados para la huelga”.
Entre ellos estaba Rachel Fournier, una cajera de 44 años, que ha trabajado 17 años en un Ralphs de Los Ángeles. Su salario por hora es ahora de 22,50 dólares, el máximo de la empresa. A pesar de sus reiteradas peticiones, nunca ha podido conseguir la categoría de tiempo completo.

“Trabajar 28 horas a la semana no paga el alquiler”, cube. “Con eso no es suficiente para alimentar a tus hijos”.

Los trabajadores a tiempo completo obtienen unas prestaciones ligeramente mejores y más vacaciones, dijo, por eso el sistema informático de la empresa señala a los trabajadores cuyas horas aumentan “y te bajan para evitar que cumplas los requisitos”.

Advertisement

El marido de Fournier es discapacitado tras un accidente de coche, y ella ha acogido a su hermana y a una compañera de piso como huéspedes para completar sus gastos de fin de mes. Sin embargo, cube, se queda sin dinero frecuentemente.

“Hace veinte años este period un trabajo de clase media”, cube. “Pero las empresas nos han ido apretando y exprimiendo con magros aumentos salariales en los últimos contratos”.

En dos años, 7.709 trabajadores de comestibles del Native 770 han contraído el COVID-19, según los datos facilitados al sindicato por las tiendas. La pandemia ha creado “un espíritu de que tenemos que defendernos”, dijo Fournier. “La gente está harta y quiere salir a la calle”.

A man posing for a photo. Behind him are people working at a white table, cutting out signs and organizing boxes.

Marco Escalante, de 46 años, que trabaja en el turno de noche en el Vons de Echo Park, quiere convertirse en trabajador de tiempo completo, pero dijo que suele trabajar 30 horas a la semana.

(Margot Roosevelt / Los Angeles Instances)

Advertisement

Marco Escalante, de 46 años, también estaba en la sede, apilando carteles en preparación para la huelga.

Tras 24 años en un Vons de Echo Park, Escalante gana 22,50 dólares la hora en un turno de medianoche a 8:30 de la mañana apilando estantes. Le gustaría trabajar a tiempo completo, pero normalmente sólo gana 30 horas a la semana.

Teniendo en cuenta la inflación, la oferta de la empresa de 60 centavos más por hora para cada uno de los próximos tres años supone un recorte salarial y “una bofetada en la cara”, dijo.

Escalante, que tiene una esposa trabajadora y tres hijos, fue uno de los líderes de la huelga de 2003-04. “Después de casi cinco meses, nos quebraron”, recordó. “Desde entonces, cada contrato ha sido de 20 centavos por aquí, 20 centavos por allá. Hace 15 años ganaba más dinero que ahora”.
La pandemia ha cambiado la dinámica de la negociación, dijo. “Nuestros miembros enfermaron y llevaron la enfermedad a casa. Los clientes hacían problemas en las tiendas. Y las empresas decían que sólo teníamos un número determinado de días de enfermedad, así que teníamos que venir a trabajar. No han mostrado ninguna empatía por nuestros sacrificios”.

Escalante ve un sentimiento pro-sindical cada vez más fuerte entre los trabajadores más jóvenes. Autorizar una huelga, dijo, demuestra a las empresas: “Sabemos que han obtenido miles de millones de beneficios y no tenemos miedo de salir”.

Advertisement

Para leer esta nota en ingléshaga clic aquí

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Trump sways independent voters over Biden on immigration in Fox News Digital focus group

Published

on

Trump sways independent voters over Biden on immigration in Fox News Digital focus group

Former President Trump appeared to earn significant approval from Republican and independent voters who were part of a Fox News Digital focus group during his response to President Biden’s claims about immigration during the CNN Presidential Debate on Thursday night.

When CNN moderator Jake Tapper asked Biden to inform voters how he can curb the record-high numbers of illegal immigrants crossing the border, the two presidential contenders sparred over their immigration policies, which ended in Biden calling Trump a “liar” and Trump appearing to not understand a portion of Biden’s responses.

After touting Congress’ bipartisan border package that lawmakers bucked earlier this year, Biden said “we find ourselves in a situation where when [Trump] was president, he was separating babies from their mothers, put them in cages, making sure that the families were separated.”

FIRST 2024 TRUMP-BIDEN PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE: TOP CLASHES OVER ISSUES FROM THE BORDER TO UKRAINE

Former President Trump appeared to earn significant approval from Republican and independent voters during his response to President Biden’s claims about immigration. (Fox News Digital)

Advertisement

“That’s not the right way to go. What I’ve done since I’ve changed the law, what’s happened? I’ve changed it in a way that now you’re in a situation where there are 40% fewer people coming across the border illegally. That’s better than when he left office. And I’m going to continue to move until we get the total ban on the total initiative relative to what we can do with more Border Patrol and more asylum officers,” Biden said.

During Biden’s remarks, Republican and independent voters who took part in the Fox News Digital focus group gave the president low approval. When Trump responded, however, the approval from the same voters shot up, indicating support for the former president’s positions on the subject. 

Republican approval lines are color-coded red, while independents’ are color-coded yellow and Democrats’ blue.

BIDEN’S HIT ON TRUMP OVER ‘SUCKERS’ AND ‘LOSERS’ REPORT BACKFIRES WITH INDEPENDENTS: FOCUS GROUP

Donald Trump at CNN presidential debate

Former President Trump speaks during a presidential debate in Atlanta on Thursday. (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP)

Trump, appearing to not understand Biden, responded: “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence, I don’t think he knows what he said, either.”

Advertisement

“Look, we had the safest border in the history of our country,” Trump added. “All he had to do was leave it, all he had to do was to leave it. He decided to open up our border, open up our country, to people that are from prisons, people that are from mental institutions, insane asylum, terrorists — we have the largest number of terrorists coming into our country right now.”

Joe Biden at CNN debate

President Biden stands at his podium during the first presidential debate of the 2024 election cycle in Atlanta on Thursday. (Kevin D. Liles for The Washington Post)

Approval from Democratic voters who took part in the real-time reaction gave Biden high marks for his remarks on immigration. During Trump’s rebuttal, Democratic approval dropped significantly.

Fox News’ Jamie Joseph contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Politics

Opinion: Joe Biden has always put duty to country first. Will he do it again now?

Published

on

Opinion: Joe Biden has always put duty to country first. Will he do it again now?

“I hope Joe Biden runs for president.” That was the headline of a column I wrote back in March of 2019. I believed then that “at a time when Trump continues to go lower and lower, Biden brings to the national stage the strength, decency and sense of duty that are sorely needed in our political discourse.”

Five years later, duty to country is required of Joe Biden once again.

This time, however, the act of duty that is needed is one of tremendous personal sacrifice — something the president is all too familiar with given the personal tragedies he has had to overcome over the years. It will require strength. It will require introspection. It will require him to do something that is against his nature. That act of duty and sacrifice is also one that embodies the very essence of our democratic process — to voluntarily relinquish power.

No one can question Biden’s commitment to our country. He is a patriot, through and through. He has cemented his place in the history of our nation. He has conducted himself with honor and integrity and sincerity. Now he has the chance to finish his story with an act of selflessness and dignity.

Democrats often say November 2024 is the most important election of our lifetime. That a return to power by Donald Trump and his MAGA allies would spell doom for our country and put us on a path to authoritarianism and dictatorship. That the starting point for a Trump sequel is Jan. 6 and that the instruments of democracy would be forever altered.

Advertisement

If we accept that the stakes of this election are spectacularly high, it is essential that the Democratic Party put forward the absolute best, most competitive ticket possible. After watching Thursday night’s debate, it is abundantly clear that a Biden-led slate is not that.

There are plenty of things about the debate to criticize: The format, CNN’s cowardly decision to withdraw from basic journalistic fact checking, and any and all conversations about golf. But none of that mitigates Biden’s uninspiring performance. And while it is a natural reflex for the Biden team to chalk it up as one bad night, the warning signs are as prevalent as ever that the 81-year-old president was just acting his age.

Now, let’s be clear, if the choice in November is ultimately between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, it is still not a difficult decision to vote for Biden. The issues matter more than the man. On democracy, a woman’s right to choose, economic equality, gun reform, climate change and more, it has to be Biden over Trump. But most issue-oriented voters already know this, and they are not the voters who will determine the outcome of this election.

It’s the still undecided folks in a few swing states, who mostly reside to the right of the Democratic Party and the left of the Republican Party, who need to turn out and vote against Trump.

Voters who have never voted need to be presented with a reason to do so now. Republicans who have never voted for a Democrat need to have a reason to vote against their party’s pick. It is unlikely that Biden will be that reason.

Advertisement

I have a limitless amount of respect and admiration for the president. He reflects the character and leadership our country deserves. He has had one of the most consequential presidencies in American history. But he can’t defeat time.

I say this with all the respect in the world: Your country needs you, Joe Biden. Just not in the way you may want.

Kurt Bardella is a contributing writer to Opinion and a NewsNation contributor. @KurtBardella

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

First 2024 Trump-Biden presidential debate: Top clashes over issues from the border to Ukraine

Published

on

First 2024 Trump-Biden presidential debate: Top clashes over issues from the border to Ukraine

Heated exchanges ensued between former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden during the CNN Presidential Debate on Thursday night, as the two rivals went head-to-head during their second debate since 2020. 

Illegal immigration, abortion, and inflation were among the top issues on the debate stage, as well as climate change and the Israel-Hamas and Russia-Ukraine wars.

The debate comes as Biden and Trump are the frontrunners for the Democratic and Republican parties respectively. This is the first televised debate between the candidates for this election cycle and a second hosted by ABC is scheduled to be held in September. 

Trump did not participate in the Republican primary debates, while the Democratic National Convention (DNC) threw its full support behind Biden and did not hold any debates among his challengers.

BIDEN CAMP DODGES ANSWERING IF PRESIDENT PLANS TO USE PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING DRUGS BEFORE DEBATE

Advertisement

President Biden and former President Trump.  ((AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson and Evan Vucci))

Here are the top clashes from Thursday’s debate:

1. “I really don’t know what he said,” Trump-Biden immigration clash

When CNN moderator Jake Tapper asked President Joe Biden to inform voters why he can curb the record-high numbers of illegal migrants crossing the border during Thursday night’s debate, Biden and Trump sparred over their immigration policies, which ended in Biden calling Trump a “liar” and Trump appearing to not understand a portion of Biden’s responses.

After touting Congress’s bipartisan border package that lawmakers bucked earlier this year, Biden said “we find ourselves in a situation where when he was president, he was separating babies from their mothers put them in cages, making sure that the families were separated.”

“That’s not the right way to go. What I’ve done since I’ve changed the law, what’s happened? I’ve changed it in a way that now you’re in a situation where there are 40% fewer people coming across the border illegally, that’s better than when he left office. And I’m going to continue to move until we get the total ban on the total initiative relative to what we can do with more Border Patrol and more asylum officers,” Biden said.

Advertisement

But Trump, appearing to not understand Biden, responded: “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence, I don’t think he knows what he said either.”

“Look, we had the safest border in the history of our country,” Trump continued. “All he had to do was leave it, all he had to do was to leave it. He decided to open up our border, open up our country, to people that are from prisons, people that are from mental institutions, insane asylum, terrorists – we have the largest number of terrorists coming into our country right now.”

TRUMP, BIDEN SPAR OVER GOLF HANDICAPS AS THEY TRY TO CONVINCE VOTERS THEY ARE NOT TOO OLD FOR THE PRESIDENCY

Biden and Trump debate

US President Joe Biden speaks as he participates in the first presidential debate of the 2024 elections with former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump at CNN’s studios in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 27, 2024. (Getty Images)

2. ‘Alley cat morals,’ Trump-Biden clash over Stormy Daniels allegations

Biden accused former President Trump of “having sex with a porn star” and said he has “the morals of an alley cat,” but the presumptive Republican nominee maintained that he did not, and accused Biden of being behind his legal cases because “he can’t win fair and square.” 

“How many billions of dollars do you owe civil penalties for molesting a woman in public? For doing a whole range of things—having sex with a porn star…while your wife was pregnant?” Biden said. “You have the morals of an alley cat during the night, sir.” 

Advertisement

Trump fired back denying the allegations.

“I didn’t have sex with a porn star, number one,” he said. “Number two, that was a case that was started, and they moved a high-ranking official—DOJ—into the Manhattan DA’s office to start the case.” 

Trump was referring to Matthew Colangelo, who served as a senior DOJ official in the Biden administration, and left to join Bragg’s prosecution team. 

3. ‘I will have that war settled between Putin and Zelinsky as President-Elect before I take office,’ Trump-Biden spar over Ukraine-Russia war

Trump threw several jabs at Biden for giving billions of dollars to Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy to continue its defense against the Russian invasion that began in February 2022 and said if elected, he’d have the war “settled” before taking office.

“He’s given $200 billion, that’s a lot of money,” Trump said. “I don’t think there’s ever been anything like it. Every time that Zelinsky comes to this country. He walks away with $60 billion. He’s the greatest salesman ever.”

Advertisement

“The money that we’re spending on this war, we shouldn’t be spending. It should have never happened. I will have that war settled between Putin and Zelinsky as President-Elect before I take office on January 20. I’ll have that war settled. People being killed so needlessly, so stupidly and I will get it settled, and I’ll get it settle fast before I take office.”

In response, the current president said, “The fact is that Putin is a war criminal.”

“He’s killed 1000s and 1000s of people and he has made one thing clear, he wants to reestablish what was part of the Soviet empire, not just a piece, he wants all of Ukraine,” he said.

“By the way, all that money we give Ukraine from weapons we make here in the United States, give them the weapons, not the money at this point, and I made our NATO allies produce as much funding for Ukraine as we have – that’s why it’s that’s why we’re strong,” he said. 

A RASPY BIDEN GETS OFF TO A HALTING START AGAINST TRUMP IN THE FIRST 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DEBATE

Advertisement
Trump Biden border

This composite image shows President Biden, former President Trump and the southern border. ((AP Photo/Gerald Herbert and Fox News))

4. Trump-Biden spar over cognitive abilities, golf handicaps: ‘You are a child’

During the CNN Presidential Debate, CNN moderator Dana Bash presented the age Biden and Trump would be at the end of a potential second term.

Biden would be 86. Trump would be 82. 

Biden defended his age, saying he “spent half my career being criticized about being the youngest person in politics. I was the second-youngest person ever elected to the United States Senate, and now I’m the oldest. This guy is three years younger and a lot less competent.” 

But Trump reminded that he has taken two cognitive tests. 

“I aced both of them, as you know, we made it public. He took none. I’d like to see him take one. Just want a real easy one,” Trump said. 

Advertisement

Trump, an avid golfer, said Thursday night that he recently “won two club championships—not even senior—two regular club championships.” 

“To do that, you have to be quite smart and you have to be able to hit the ball a long way and I do it,” Trump said. “He doesn’t do it. He can’t hit a ball 50 yards. He challenged me to a golf match—he can’t hit a ball 50 yards.” 

“I’ve seen you swing. I know your swing,” Trump fiered back. “Let’s not act like children.” 

But Biden replied: “You are a child.” 

Advertisement
Trump and Biden debate

Debate dial shows Democratic voters react favorably towards Biden’s comments on the economy.   (Fox News Digital)

5. Biden-Trump exchange jabs over criminal records

While Biden reminded Trump that the “only person” that has a felony record on the debate stage is Trump, the former president said “when he talks about a convicted felon, his son is a convicted felon.”

“At a very high level, his son is convicted,” Trump said, adding that he’d seek “retribution,” referring to a potential November election victory. 

“As soon as he gets out of office, Joe could be a convicted felon with all of the things that he’s done,” he continued. “He’s done horrible things, all of the death caused at the border, telling the Ukrainian people that we’re gonna want a billion dollars if you change the prosecutor, otherwise, you’re not getting a billion dollars. If i ever said that, that’s quid pro quo.”

“This man is a criminal. This man, you’re lucky, you’re lucky. I did nothing wrong. We have a system that was rigged and disgusting,” Trump said.

Meanwhile, Biden pushed back at the idea that he has done any wrongdoing “is outrageous.”

Advertisement

“It’s simply a lie,” Biden responded. “Number two, the idea that you have a right to seek retribution against any American just because you’re president is wrong. No president has ever spoken like that before. No president in our history has spoken like that before.” 

Fox News Digital’s Brooke Singman contributed to this report. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending