Connect with us

Politics

The Pentagon is investigating extremism in the military. Here’s how bad the problem is

Published

on

NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

The Pentagon’s most up-to-date seek for extremists throughout the ranks was simply the most recent failure to search out proof that the navy is a breeding floor for violent radicals, a Fox Information assessment has discovered.

The Division of Protection recognized fewer than 100 situations of confirmed extremist exercise in 2021, the Pentagon reported in December. Regardless of vital rhetoric from Democrats, media pundits and activists, the discovering was unsurprising to greater than 30 present and former service members who spoke with Fox Information.

“I observed zero extremism throughout my time within the navy,” Matthew Griffin, a former Military Ranger, instructed Fox Information. “None. Did not witness it in any respect.”

Every service member echoed related remarks, explicitly saying they’d by no means seen any extremist habits.

Advertisement

US Marine Corps recruits participate within the conventional Eagle, Globe and Anchor medal ceremony. (Photograph by Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Photos)
(Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Photos)

NAVY BARRED FROM ACTING AGAINST RELIGIOUS VACCINE REFUSERS

The service members Fox Information interviewed ranged from cadet to main. They spanned 5 branches and the political spectrum, and their service dates way back to 1980.

Being unable to search out even 100 extremists within the navy “is successful story and exhibits that extremism shouldn’t be a big downside,” a former command sergeant main mentioned.

Many mentioned the service would even stamp out extremism since it will hurt unit cohesion – a essential part to fight effectiveness throughout the branches. Additionally they instructed Fox Information that the navy serves as a kind of melting pot that exposes recruits to unfamiliar cultures and folks.

Advertisement

“Even in case you are type of a bit of s–t, you might have to have the ability to depend upon the folks with you or else you may die or get harm actual unhealthy,” Jariko Denman, a retired Military Ranger, instructed Fox Information. “The entire type of ignorance that results in extremist habits, it is squashed since you’re immersed in all these different cultures, you are immersed with all these different varieties of folks.”

WATCH JARIKO DENMAN’S FULL INTERVIEW:

***VIDEO HERE***

Provided that investigations have repeatedly did not show a systemic downside, many service members instructed Fox Information that dedicating vital time to pursuing extremists would finally take away from fight readiness.

Additionally they mentioned that senior officers are conscious {that a} widespread problem doesn’t exist, however received’t push again as a result of they’re extra involved with falling in line to attain promotions.

Nonetheless, activists and others have argued that even just a few extremists with navy coaching might create a large danger. They often level to the Oklahoma Metropolis bomber, a veteran who killed greater than 150 folks, together with kids.

Advertisement

The Pentagon, together with its report on extremists within the navy, supplied up to date steering on figuring out and dealing with extremists throughout the ranks.

“If somebody had that type of habits that they exhibited and acted on or one thing, they’d not final,” one soldier who retired as a sergeant main with Particular Forces after 27 years within the Military instructed Fox Information. “There’s so many checks and balances within the navy that it’d actually be laborious to cover these type of emotions.”

The Pentagon didn’t reply to a request for remark.

Repeated investigations discovered few extremists

The Pentagon and out of doors investigators alike have sought to establish extremists among the many ranks, however none have turned up greater than a handful out of the two.1 million lively responsibility service members, Fox Information’ assessment discovered.

After DOD reported in 2018 that simply 18 service members had been disciplined or discharged for extremist exercise over a five-year interval, critics mentioned the Pentagon wasn’t trying laborious sufficient.

Advertisement

“They all the time say the numbers are small, and due to that, it isn’t a precedence,” Carter Smith, a 30-year Military prison investigator, instructed The New York Instances in 2019. “So yearly they get a report primarily based on what they had been by no means in search of.”

He mentioned the navy wanted to ascertain a job pressure to observe extremist networks.

Marine Corps recruits are run through a simulated resupply exercise. (Photo by Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images)

Marine Corps recruits are run via a simulated resupply train. (Photograph by Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Photos)
(Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Photos)

US COMMANDER ON AMERICAN MILITARY PRESENCE IN EUROPE AFTER UKRAINE CONFLICT: ‘WE’RE GOING TO STILL NEED MORE’

The 2021 DOD report boasted enhancements to its course of for catching extremists throughout the ranks earlier than indicating that it discovered lower than 100 situations.

The report additionally mentioned the variety of doubtlessly violent radicals has elevated over time. However that declare is unattainable to confirm for the reason that Pentagon didn’t present a precise determine and even point out whether or not it discovered greater than it did in 2018.

Advertisement

Even with exhaustive investigations, there’s no proof that extra extremists within the navy could be uncovered.

Frontline and ProPublica partnered on a triple-byline information investigation in 2018. The three reporters carried out dozens of interviews, combed via 250,000 confidential messages and reviewed social media and different web posts.

All instructed, they recognized six folks with navy ties in Atomwaffen, an anti-government white supremacist group. Three had been employed by the Military or Navy on the time, and the opposite three had been veterans.

Moreover, a College of Maryland group reported that from 1990 via 2021, “461 people with U.S. navy backgrounds dedicated prison acts that had been motivated by their political, financial, social, or non secular objectives.”

Nevertheless it famous that 120 of these – or about one-quarter – had been charged for breaching the Capitol constructing on Jan. 6, 2021. The report additionally identified that these with navy background made up lower than 12% of the folks charged with crimes associated to extremism over the 31-year interval.

Advertisement

PIE CHART HERE

“Students are usually in settlement that there isn’t a single profile of an extremist,” the report mentioned.

Additional, almost 84% of the 461 recognized had been now not within the navy once they dedicated a prison act of extremism, in keeping with the College of Maryland report. Virtually 40% had left the service 15 or extra years earlier than they had been arrested for extremism, whereas simply over 15% had been out for 2 or fewer years.

BAR CHART HERE

In the meantime, the top of the Pentagon’s anti-extremism working group, Bishop Garrison, mentioned supporting former President Trump is supporting racism and extremism, the Every day Caller Information Basis beforehand reported.

Advertisement

Excessive-profile white supremacists had navy backgrounds

Critics have argued that even a small variety of extremists with navy expertise might pose a big menace.

“The numbers is likely to be small, however they’re like a drop of cyanide in your drink,” Carter instructed The New York Instances in 2019. “They’ll do loads of injury.”

The College of Maryland group decided that extremists with navy backgrounds killed 314 folks over the 31-year interval. Greater than half had been from a single occasion.

The infamous Oklahoma bomber, Timothy McVeigh, was a adorned Gulf Conflict veteran who was radicalized earlier than becoming a member of the Military.

Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. (Photo by Bureau of Prisons/Getty Images)

Oklahoma Metropolis bomber Timothy McVeigh. (Photograph by Bureau of Prisons/Getty Photos)

DOD MOVES TO COUNTER ‘EXTREMISM’ IN RANKS, TOP REPUBLICAN WARNS AGAINST ‘VIRTUE SIGNALING’

Advertisement

About 4 years after he was honorably discharged, McVeigh bombed a federal constructing in Oklahoma Metropolis in 1995, killing 168, together with 19 kids, and injuring a whole lot extra.

Different high-profile extremists have additionally had navy ties, together with Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Louis Beam, Aryan Nations founder Richard Butler and White Patriot Celebration chief Frazier Glenn Miller.

Atomwaffen founder Brandon Russell was serving in Florida’s Nationwide Guard when he was arrested in 2017 after authorities discovered a stash of explosives, together with the identical substance McVeigh used.

Russell, who stored a framed image of McVeigh on his dresser, in keeping with the Division of Justice, was sentenced to 5 years in jail.

In the meantime, almost one-quarter of troops polled in a Navy Instances survey mentioned they witnessed white nationalism throughout the ranks, although it’s unclear how that phrase was outlined. Subsequent surveys by the publication reported related findings.

Advertisement

A number of service members instructed Fox Information they might have witnessed racism or bigotry amongst rookies. However they mentioned that was completely amongst new recruits who hailed from hometowns with little variety and had little publicity to different teams of individuals.

“They will carry these opinions with them as a result of it is what they know,” Denman mentioned. “As soon as they had been within the navy they usually might truly see folks from different cultures and backgrounds and all these items, they’re like, ‘Oh, that was dumb.’”

Advocates have additionally mentioned that extremist teams actively strive recruiting veterans. Steering DOD launched alongside its 2021 report known as for a program to assist service members keep away from such recruitment as they transition out of the navy. 

Specializing in a non-existent downside harms fight readiness, service members say

Each service member Fox Information interviewed for this story – on and off the report – mentioned they by no means witnessed extremism throughout their time within the navy.

“Over three a long time within the navy, I by no means noticed this as a difficulty,” an Military veteran who did 4 excursions in Iraq and Afghanistan mentioned.

Advertisement

Griffin added: “I feel the media is certainly exacerbating this problem. They’d their speculation that the navy is filled with extremists they usually’re prepared to go down on the ship simply to state so.”

Denman, whose grandfathers, father and older brother had been all within the navy, mentioned the cost is “completely not truthful, and it sheds a very piss poor mild on the navy as a complete.”

Jariko Denman, a former Army Ranger, spoke to Fox News about extremism in the military.

Jariko Denman, a former Military Ranger, spoke to Fox Information about extremism within the navy.

NAVY EXTENDS BOOT CAMP TO ENCOMPASS ‘EXTREMISM’ AND SEXUAL ASSAULT

“Seeing all these folks of all walks of life – completely different races, completely different creeds, completely different sexual orientations – all this doing nice issues collectively, after which to have our authorities are available and say ‘the navy has an extremism downside,’ it is a slap within the face,” Denman continued. “It is an insult to all these folks which can be on the market doing the fitting factor.”

Nonetheless, Denman, in addition to an lively responsibility Navy officer mentioned they felt it was essential to make sure extremism wasn’t an issue.

Advertisement

“All of us are higher served when we’ve got kind of a center of the street type of viewpoint about issues,” the officer mentioned. “Anyone who’s polarized might be not wholesome for our democracy.”

However many service members mentioned specializing in one thing they imagine isn’t a difficulty harms fight readiness because it takes up time officers might spend getting ready troops for battle.

“If we burden the navy management with a lot different points, we’re actually taking away from what the navy is there for. That is to defend our borders and to execute American coverage,” a former Particular Forces sergeant, whose son is within the Military, instructed Fox Information.

Weeks earlier than the Kremlin launched its invasion of Ukraine, Tyler Allcorn, a former Inexperienced Beret operating for Congress in Colorado as a Republican instructed Fox Information: “We have to spend much less time on these witch hunts focusing on our personal troopers and spending extra time centered on strategic threats like China and Russia and any others which can be threatening our nation.”

“If Joe Biden had put this a lot time into growing an exit technique for Afghanistan than he does focusing on our personal troopers …  then perhaps the 13 service members who misplaced their lives again in that nation could be alive as we speak,” Allcorn added.

Advertisement

Many service members instructed Fox Information they believed senior management, together with Protection Secretary Lloyd Austin and Joint Chiefs of Employees Chairman Mark Milley, knew extremism wasn’t a systemic problem, however had been too afraid to oppose that narrative.

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Secretary of Protection Lloyd Austin. (Photograph by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Photos)
(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Photos)

“I imagine Austin and Milley went alongside complete heartedly,” the previous command sergeant main mentioned, noting how Milley instructed Congress he needed to know “white rage.”

Others mentioned senior officers care extra about advancing their careers. In consequence, the service members mentioned, these officers received’t press towards their superiors once they see unhealthy orders.

“There’s an try and politicize our navy to weed out officers who do not buy hook, line and sinker into this new age modernity,” the four-tour Military veteran mentioned. Senior officers “lack the ethical braveness to say, ‘Hey boss, that is actually silly.’”

Nickaylah Sampson, who dropped out of West Level final 12 months, mentioned she “met officers firsthand simply who flat out instructed me the one method to make rank is by fulfilling the desires of the officers forward of you it doesn’t matter what it’s.”

Advertisement

A Particular Operations Central deputy commander argued that this rising tradition precipitated the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, Fox Information beforehand reported.

“If you get in that basic officer space, you do not need to rock the boat with whoever is presently in workplace or who you assume might be in workplace,” Denman, who careworn his hate for officers, instructed Fox Information. The navy will “by no means do issues for the advantage of a selected political occasion, however I do assume that loads of the choices are made or not made by loads of the higher-level brass like generals with politics in thoughts.”

Many service members additionally noticed the hunt for extremists as politically unbalanced, disproportionately focusing on the fitting whereas ignoring left-wing extremists. Final 12 months, Austin ordered a stand-down to debate extremism, however gave commanders discretion in learn how to deal with it.

An lively responsibility particular operations officer instructed Fox Information that her commander introduced a slide present throughout the stand-down that depicted Accomplice Gen. Robert E. Lee, Osama bin Laden and the QAnon Shaman – the shirtless, horn-bearing Capitol rioter.

Advertisement

“I instantly was like, ‘OK, that is politicized to me, as a result of if you are going to put one finish of the political spectrum up towards Osama bin Laden, then why not put somebody up towards the left finish of the political spectrum?’” the service member mentioned. She advised exhibiting a rioter from the 2020 Black Lives Matter demonstrations burning down a constructing.

The DOD’s 2021 steering additionally tightened some restrictions and forbid service members from liking or sharing extremist content material on social media.

“If the American authorities goes to go and surveil the social media accounts of over two million navy patriots and heroes for extremism, then I feel they need to additionally monitor the social media accounts of Joe Biden’s administration, Nancy Pelosi and doubtless all of the Democrats in Congress,” Allcorn instructed Fox Information. “I assure you are going to discover greater than 100 extremists in that group.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Biden aims to change negative narrative after rough debate with Trump

Published

on

Biden aims to change negative narrative after rough debate with Trump

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President Biden, on the day after the most consequential political performance of his decades-long career, aimed to address Democratic Party panic after his disastrous debate performance in his first faceoff with former President Trump.

“I know I’m not a young man, to state the obvious,” Biden, who at 81 is the oldest president in the nation’s history, told cheering supporters at a Friday afternoon rally in the crucial battleground state of North Carolina.

Advertisement

“Folks, I don’t walk as easy as I used to. I don’t speak as smoothly as I used to. I don’t debate as well as I used to,” Biden acknowledged. “But I know what I do know. I know how to tell the truth. I know right from wrong. And I know how to do this job. I know how to get things done. And I know, like millions of Americans know, when you get knocked down you get back up.”

And the president, pointing to his 2024 rematch with Trump, emphasized, “I would not be running again if I did not believe with all my heart and soul that I can do this job.”

A RASPY BIDEN DELIVERS A HALTING DEBATE PERFORMANCE IN SHOWDOWN WITH TRUMP

President Biden speaks at a post-debate campaign rally June 28, 2024, in Raleigh, N.C. (Allison Joyce/Getty Images)

As Biden worked to calm his party, his campaign repeatedly highlighted what it described as record-breaking fundraising both during and after the debate as it seemingly aimed to deflect from a brutal narrative coming out of the showdown in Atlanta.

Advertisement

WHAT THE NEW YORK TIMES IS ASKING BIDEN TO DO

And Biden’s campaign on Friday morning announced that it hauled in $14 million in fundraising Thursday and Friday morning, which it highlighted as “a sign of strength of our grassroots support.”

Struggling with a raspy voice and delivering rambling answers, Biden struggled during portions of the debate. The president did sharpen his answers as the debate progressed, calling out his Republican predecessor in the White House for numerous falsehoods throughout the 90-minute debate.

Trump and Biden on debate stage

President Biden (right) and former President Trump participate in the CNN Presidential Debate in Atlanta.  (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

But Biden’s uneven and, at times, halting performance grabbed the vast majority of headlines from the debate and sparked a new round of calls from political pundits and publications and some Democrats for the president to step aside as the party’s standard-bearer. Top Biden allies pushed back against such talk as they defended the president and targeted Trump for lying throughout the debate.

And the Biden campaign spotlighted that the 11 p.m. ET hour Thursday night — the one hour after the debate — “was the single best hour of fundraising since the campaign’s launch in April 2023.”

Advertisement

WHAT BIDEN SAID AT HIS FIRST POST-DEBATE RALLY

A Biden campaign adviser, who asked to remain anonymous to speak more freely, told Fox News the fundraising is “an important sign that there’s a bit of disconnect between national narratives and where supporters are.”

Following his rally in Raleigh, North Carolina, the president and first lady Jill Biden traveled to New York City, where they joined superstars Elton John and Katy Perry and top Democratic Party elected officials to unveil the city’s Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center. The grand opening was timed to kick off New York City’s Pride weekend and mark the 55th anniversary of the historic rebellion that marked a turning point for LGBTQ+liberation.

Joe Biden hauls in big bucks in fundraising during and after his debate with Donald Trump

President Biden speaks during the grand-opening ceremony for the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center Friday, June 28, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson)

Biden then headlined a campaign fundraiser Friday evening in New York City that his campaign touted was “the largest LGBTQ fundraising event in political history.”

On Saturday, the president was scheduled to attend two more top dollar fundraisers in the wealthy communities of East Hampton, New York, and Red Bank, New Jersey.

Advertisement

“Biden‘s record grassroots fundraising from the day of the debate is critical. It helps blunt the criticism from Biden’s performance,” veteran political strategist and Democratic National Committee member Maria Cardona told Fox News.

Cardona, a top Biden supporter, said spotlighting the fundraising “reminds Democrats that there is enthusiasm for the president and urgency to make sure that the liar and criminal Donald Trump doesn’t get close to the Oval Office.”

A Democratic strategist and presidential campaign veteran said team Biden’s focus on fundraising “is their best and maybe their only card to play.”

But the strategist, who was granted anonymity to speak more freely, emphasized “there’s no amount of money that can reverse the damage that was done at the debate and the president confirming everyone’s worst suspicions and fears about him and his age and not being up to the job. Period.” 

Advertisement

But Trump campaign senior adviser Brian Hughes discounted the fundraising.

“As of last week, the Biden campaign has spent $100 million on cable, TV and radio. They’ve spent money on a bloated organization. Yet President Trump’s lead has grown in battleground states, and now we see polling and enthusiasm on the ground putting Virginia and Minnesota in play for the GOP nominee for the first time in many election cycles,” Hughes told Fox News.

The Trump campaign, enjoying the post-debate narrative, had no need to immediately emphasize its own fundraising.

But the campaign told Fox News Friday afternoon it brought in $8 million the day of the debate.

Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley, a top Trump ally, said hours earlier in an interview on Fox News’ “Fox and Friends” that “the donations have been coming in, very strong, very steady. And that’s because the people saw his positioning last night during the debate. The donations, especially the small dollar online donations that we’re getting in right now, are really a reflection of the enthusiasm that the president brings to the campaign.”

Advertisement

And Trump campaign senior adviser Chris LaCivita told Fox News Digital Thursday night the debate performance was “added rocket fuel” to the former president’s fundraising and in “motivating the troops.”

Dan Eberhart, an oil drilling CEO and a prominent Republican donor, is raising money for Trump after earlier supporting Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in the GOP presidential nomination race. 

“The donors I have texted with are now more confident of a Trump win,” Eberhart said. “For any donors that were still on the sideline, last night was the push they needed to put their chips on Trump.”

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Column: A Supreme Court ruling may help Jan. 6 rioters. Here's why it's less likely to help Trump

Published

on

Column: A Supreme Court ruling may help Jan. 6 rioters. Here's why it's less likely to help Trump

The Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer vs. United States, which came down among a bevy of blockbuster opinions Friday, was much anticipated for its potential impact on the prosecutions of hundreds of Jan. 6 rioters as well as former President Trump, who was charged under the same law. The court’s ruling was largely of a piece with the conservative justices’ proclivity for narrowing criminal laws they perceive as imprecise and likely to trap the unwary. The majority opinion by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. contends that the Justice Department’s position on the obstruction statute at hand would “criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct.”

The decision is of course good news for Joseph Fischer, a Jan. 6 defendant who moved to dismiss one of the charges against him. Fischer barged into the Capitol on that day and was also charged with assaulting a federal officer, among other offenses. But the court held that he could not be charged under a federal law against obstructing an official proceeding for joining the melee that delayed the certification of the 2020 presidential election, ruling that the law is limited to conduct affecting the integrity or availability of records that could be evidence in an official proceeding.

Trump will certainly try to argue that the court’s decision also requires dismissal of two counts against him under the same law in the federal Jan. 6 case. Many of the rioters were, like Fischer, charged under the statute and could benefit from the ruling as well. But the decision isn’t likely to favor the majority of the marauders, and it’s even less likely to help Trump.

In the case of the rioters, a study in Just Security persuasively suggests that even if the statute is unavailable to charge them in the wake of the Fischer decision, the government can still prosecute the same conduct in other ways.

The ruling probably won’t be useful to Trump for another reason.

Advertisement

The lawyerly debate in Fischer comes down to the meaning of the word “otherwise.” Following a section of the law that prohibits altering or mutilating a record, the law goes on to criminalize conduct that “otherwise obstructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding.“ The question is whether the law thereby applies to any obstruction of an official proceeding or only to acts that affect the integrity or availability of records to be used in the proceeding.

But Trump’s alleged conduct certainly affected the integrity or availability of records, namely the valid slates of presidential electors. His purported scheme was designed to undermine the legal impact of those slates and replace them with fraudulent certificates forged at the behest of his inner circle.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s concurring opinion in the case underscores this point. After endorsing the majority’s understanding of “otherwise,” she concludes that Fischer might still be charged under the statute because the “official proceeding” in question “plainly used certain records, documents, or objects — including, among others, those relating to the electoral votes themselves.”

Jackson’s hypothetical analysis concerns Fischer himself, but it seems she also means it to encompass the conduct of the former president. While Trump is not alleged to have destroyed or altered a document, he is alleged to have “otherwise” impaired the legal effectiveness of the certificates.

The dissenting opinion in the case, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett and joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, is an interesting postscript. Barrett argues that the government’s reading of the text of the statute might be expansive but is in keeping with its plain meaning. The opinion is among those suggesting Barrett, a Trump appointee, is staking out the center of the court in certain important cases.

Advertisement

But the most pressing question raised by this decision and the presidential immunity opinion expected Monday is whether they will undermine the various criminal charges against the former president. The bottom line in this case is that it shouldn’t, and I don’t think it will. Trump will surely move to dismiss the charges on this basis, but I expect U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to reject that argument, which would allow the case to proceed as charged — unless, of course, the defendant returns to the White House and makes the entire prosecution go away.

Harry Litman is the host of the “Talking Feds” podcast and the Talking San Diego speaker series. @harrylitman

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump says 'biggest problem' not Biden's age, 'decline,' but his policies in first appearance since debate

Published

on

Trump says 'biggest problem' not Biden's age, 'decline,' but his policies in first appearance since debate

At former President Trump’s first rally since the presidential debate, he argued the nation’s “biggest problem” is not President Biden’s age and “decline,” but his destructive policies.

Speaking to a crowd of more than 1,000 at Historic Greenbrier Farms in Chesapeake, Virginia, Friday, Trump took a victory lap after the first 2024 presidential debate.

Trump told supporters every voter should ask one question before heading to the polls Nov. 5.

“The question every voter should be asking themselves today is not whether Joe Biden can survive a 90-minute debate performance, but whether America can survive four more years of crooked Joe Biden in the White House,” he said.

TRUMP, BIDEN SPAR OVER GOLF HANDICAPS AS THEY TRY TO CONVINCE VOTERS THEY ARE NOT TOO OLD FOR THE PRESIDENCY

Advertisement

Former President Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Historic Greenbrier Farms in Chesapeake, Va., July 28, 2024. (Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)

Former U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin

Former President Trump, a Republican presidential candidate, shakes hands with Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin during a rally at Greenbrier Farms June 28, 2024, in Chesapeake, Va.  (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

“Remember, the biggest problem for our country is not Joe Biden’s personal decline,” Trump said. “It’s that Joe Biden’s policies are causing America’s decline at a level that we’ve never seen before.

“That’s why this November, the people of Virginia and the people of America are going to tell crooked Joe Biden, ‘You’re fired.’”

Joe Biden

Biden said he is committed to winning the election, brushing aside mounting calls from prominent Democrats to step aside following his disastrous debate against Republican Donald Trump. (Cornell Watson/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

President Biden addressed his campaign performance at a rally in Raleigh, North Carolina, saying, “I don’t debate as well as I used to.

BIDEN’S INNER CIRCLE SILENT AS PARTY REELS FOLLOWING ‘EMBARRASSING’ DEBATE PERFORMANCE

Advertisement

“I know how to do this job. I know how to get things done,” he told a roaring crowd that chanted “Four more years.”

“The choice in this election is simple,” Biden said. “Donald Trump will destroy our democracy. I will defend it.”

Joe and Jill Biden

President Biden and first lady Jill Biden delivered remarks at a campaign rally at the Jim Graham Building at the North Carolina State Fairgrounds in Raleigh, N.C., June 28, 2024. (Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Biden’s age and mental acuity have been at the forefront as voters inch closer to Election Day.

Biden, 81, is the oldest president in history and has faced skepticism from voters and Republican lawmakers about his ability to do the job.

Advertisement

Biden would be 86 at the end of a second term, while Trump would be 82.

Continue Reading

Trending