Connect with us

Politics

Texts Show Ginni Thomas’s Embrace of Conspiracy Theories

Published

on

Texts Show Ginni Thomas’s Embrace of Conspiracy Theories

Two days after the 2020 election, Virginia Thomas, the spouse of Justice Clarence Thomas, texted an previous good friend, Mark Meadows, the chief of employees to President Donald J. Trump.

She despatched messages that had been making the rounds on pro-Trump websites, the place anger over the election echoed her personal uncooked emotions, together with this passage: “Biden crime household & poll fraud co-conspirators (elected officers, bureaucrats, social media censorship mongers, faux stream media reporters, and so forth) are being arrested & detained for poll fraud proper now & over coming days, & shall be residing in barges off GITMO to face navy tribunals for sedition.”

Then she added of this fanciful, if chilling, set of conspiracy theories: “I hope that is true.”

She texted Mr. Meadows once more the following day. “Don’t concede,” she wrote. “It takes time for the military who’s gathering for his again.”

The messages have been amongst a flurry of textual content site visitors between Ms. Thomas and Mr. Meadows that was revealed this previous week, a part of a trove of paperwork beforehand turned over to the Home committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol. (Ms. Thomas has overtly opposed the committee and known as for Republicans who serve on it to be expelled from the Home Republican convention.)

Advertisement

A tough-line conservative activist, Ms. Thomas had lengthy been seen with suspicion by the Republican institution. But her affect had risen in the course of the Trump administration, particularly after Mr. Meadows, who like Ms. Thomas has roots within the Tea Celebration motion, grew to become chief of employees. Now, an examination of her texts, woven along with latest revelations of the depth of her efforts to overturn the election, exhibits how firmly she was embedded within the conspiratorial fringe of right-wing politics, whilst that fringe was drawing ever nearer to the middle of Republican energy.

The disclosures add urgency to questions on how Ms. Thomas could have leveraged her marriage to Justice Thomas, who could be ruling on elections circumstances all through the battle over the 2020 vote and past. As his spouse agitated for Mr. Trump and his aides to show apart the election outcomes, Justice Thomas was Mr. Trump’s staunchest ally on the Supreme Courtroom and has remained so. This 12 months, in January, he was the one justice who famous a dissent when the courtroom allowed the discharge of data from the Trump White Home associated to the Jan. 6 assault.

Calls intensified this previous week for Justice Thomas to step other than such circumstances. Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, mentioned on Friday that Justice Thomas “must recuse himself from any case associated to the Jan. 6 investigation, and may Donald Trump run once more, any case associated to the 2024 election.”

The Thomases have been a fiercely shut couple for many years. In his memoir, Justice Thomas wrote that they have been “one being — an amalgam” and known as her his “greatest good friend.” She usually makes use of comparable language to explain her husband.

In one in every of his texts to Ms. Thomas, Mr. Meadows known as the election a “battle of fine versus evil” and added: “Evil all the time seems to be just like the victor till the King of Kings triumphs. Don’t develop weary in effectively doing. The battle continues.”

Advertisement

“Thanks!! Wanted that!” Ms. Thomas replied. “This plus a dialog with my greatest good friend simply now… I’ll attempt to preserve holding on. America is price it!”

Ms. Thomas’s texts to Mr. Meadows faucet right into a deep effectively of debunked conspiracy theories. References to the rounding up of elected officers, reporters and bureaucrats for navy tribunals at Guantánamo Bay are drawn from QAnon, which imagines Devil-worshipping leaders working the nation and trafficking youngsters.

But within the days after the election, Ms. Thomas had much more standing to take motion than most who embraced such canards. As Mr. Trump courted Justice Thomas throughout his years in workplace — interested by his reputation among the many Republican base and likewise about rumors that he may retire, aides mentioned — the justice’s spouse gained rising entry to the White Home.

Although some Trump aides got here to view her with such suspicion that they assembled opposition analysis meant to break her standing with Mr. Trump — amongst different issues, she pressed the president to rent individuals who couldn’t cross background checks, the aides mentioned — her clout grew with time.

The arc of her political profession had additionally led her to a robust new platform. Ms. Thomas had began out working for institution right-leaning organizations just like the Heritage Basis and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. However her want for extra radical change had led her to the Tea Celebration, and more and more to the occasion’s fringes. Mr. Meadows, who was appointed chief of employees in March 2020, held comparable views and has attended conferences of Groundswell, a bunch that Ms. Thomas based in 2013 after consulting with Stephen Okay. Bannon, who would later grow to be Mr. Trump’s chief strategist.

Advertisement

With their model of conservatism ascendant, Ms. Thomas had been appointed in 2019 to the nine-member board of CNP Motion, an offshoot of a secretive however influential conservative group known as the Council for Nationwide Coverage, whose membership consists of leaders of the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation, the Household Analysis Council and the Federalist Society.

The New York Instances Journal, in a profile of the Thomases printed final month, detailed CNP Motion’s assertive function in efforts to overturn the presidential election. That included circulating a doc to its members in November 2020 urging them to strain Republican lawmakers in swing states to problem the outcomes and appoint alternate slates of electors: “Demand that they not abandon their Constitutional obligations throughout a time corresponding to this,” the doc mentioned.

In one in every of her texts, the contents of which have been earlier reported by The Washington Publish and CBS Information, Ms. Thomas despatched Mr. Meadows a hyperlink to a video that includes Steve Pieczenik, a former State Division official who was claiming that mail-in ballots had been watermarked as a part of an elaborate authorities sting operation to catch voter fraud. Mr. Pieczenik beforehand appeared on a webcast with the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and claimed that the 2012 faculty bloodbath in Newtown, Conn., was a false-flag operation, a notion that has been totally debunked.

On Nov. 19, Ms. Thomas promoted the efforts of Sidney Powell, the Trump lawyer who spent a lot of the postelection interval spreading conspiracy theories. “Sidney and her group are getting inundated with proof of fraud,” Ms. Thomas wrote to Mr. Meadows. “Make a plan. Launch the Kraken and save us from the left taking America down.”

That very same day, Ms. Powell held a information convention with Rudolph W. Giuliani, one in every of Mr. Trump’s legal professionals, on the Republican Nationwide Committee headquarters in Washington. There, she laid out baseless allegations {that a} cabal that included Chinese language software program companies, worldwide shell firms and the financier George Soros had conspired to hack America’s voting machines.

Advertisement

At the moment, Ms. Powell was within the early phases of getting ready 4 federal lawsuits that might current this purported plot as a motive for judges to overturn the election outcomes. She nicknamed her fits the “Krakens,” referring to a large octopus-like sea creature.

By Dec. 10, John Eastman, a former Supreme Courtroom clerk for Justice Thomas and a detailed good friend of the Thomases, went on “Warfare Room,” a podcast hosted by Mr. Bannon.

Mr. Eastman urged the Supreme Courtroom to intervene and mentioned the nation was within the midst of a constitutional disaster. Behind the scenes, he was advising Mr. Trump and his marketing campaign on a proposal thought to be outlandish by many different legal professionals — that Vice President Mike Pence may refuse to simply accept swing-state electoral votes and ship them again to the state legislatures when he presided over the certification of the election in a joint session of Congress on Jan. 6. Mr. Eastman’s function would solely grow to be totally clear months later.

Across the similar time, CNP Motion, with Ms. Thomas on its board, circulated a report titled “5 States and the Election Irregularities and Points,” specializing in 5 swing states the place Mr. Trump and his allies have been already urgent litigation.

The report warned that point was working out for the courts to “declare the elections null and void”; an accompanying e-newsletter pressed for swing states to show again the voters’ will and identify an alternate slate of electors. Cleta Mitchell, a good friend of Ms. Thomas who was one of many election legal professionals advising Mr. Trump, was a co-author of the report.

Ms. Thomas has not responded to requests for remark. In not too long ago printed remarks, she downplayed her function at CNP Motion but additionally mentioned she had attended the Jan. 6 rally on the Ellipse in Washington and “was disillusioned and pissed off that there was violence that occurred following a peaceable gathering.”

Advertisement

One of many rally organizers, Dustin Stockton, informed The Instances that Ms. Thomas had performed a mediating function amongst completely different factions of organizers forward of the rally. Ms. Thomas disputed that account and mentioned she “performed no function with those that have been planning and main the Jan. 6 occasions,” a declare undercut by her communications with Mr. Meadows, who was deeply concerned in planning the protests that led as much as the storming of the Capitol.

A variety of her allies and associates have rallied round her in latest weeks. Two fellow members of the Council for Nationwide Coverage — Edwin Meese III, who was lawyer normal within the Reagan administration, and J. Kenneth Blackwell, a former Ohio secretary of state — printed a joint protection of the Thomases earlier this 12 months. Current reporting about her, they wrote, amounted to “cancel tradition taken to a degree that threatens our establishments of presidency” and was an try “to delegitimize a distinguished and senior member of the best-functioning department of the federal authorities by smearing his spouse.”

But within the fast aftermath of Jan. 6, the Council for Nationwide Coverage circulated in its e-newsletter a memo, written by one in every of its members, that outlined methods to make the Capitol riot appear extra palatable. “Drive the narrative that it was principally peaceable protests,” the memo suggested. “Amplify the considerations of the protesters and provides them legitimacy.”

On Jan. 10, Ms. Thomas texted Mr. Meadows to specific her disgust that Mr. Pence had not gone together with efforts to maintain Mr. Trump in energy. “We live in what seems like the top of America,” she wrote. “Most of us are disgusted with the VP and are in listening mode to see the place to battle with our groups. Those that attacked the Capitol should not consultant of our nice groups of patriots for DJT!! Wonderful instances. The tip of liberty.”

In her speeches and communications with different activists, Ms. Thomas often invokes her husband’s identify. Final summer time, she invited Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, a Republican, to talk at a gathering of Groundswell, which she known as a “cone of silence coalition.” In an e mail to Mr. DeSantis’s employees, which was obtained via a public data request by the watchdog group American Oversight, she wrote that the justice had been involved with the governor “on varied issues of late.”

Advertisement

“We begin and finish every assembly with prayer, however the Left has all of the cultural establishments now and appear to be weaponizing them towards conservatives and fundamental freedoms,” she mentioned in her e mail, including that she hoped Mr. DeSantis may “choose us up and refocus us — as Washington isn’t the place our hope lies.”

Politics

Texas could bus migrants directly to ICE for deportation instead of sanctuary cities under proposed plan

Published

on

Texas could bus migrants directly to ICE for deportation instead of sanctuary cities under proposed plan

Texas could implement a plan to bus migrants directly to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in an effort to get them processed for deportation, according to media reports. 

The move would be a departure from the state’s program, part of Operation Lone Star, that has bussed thousands of migrants to sanctuary cities, a source told the New York Post. It has yet to be approved by Gov. Greg Abbott. 

Fox News Digital has reached out to Abbott’s office and ICE. 

“We are always going to be involved in border security so long as we’re a border state,” a Texas government source told the newspaper. “We spent a lot of taxpayer money to have the level of deterrent that we have on the border, and we can’t just walk away.”

TRUMP SAYS MEXICO WILL STOP FLOW OF MIGRANTS AFTER SPEAKING WITH MEXICAN PRESIDENT FOLLOWING TARIFF THREATS

Advertisement

Migrants board a city bus to a shelter intake center after traveling on a bus from Del Rio, Texas, to the Port Authority Bus Terminal in New York City on May 13, 2023. (Victor J. Blue)

Abbott has been especially aggressive in combating illegal immigration, bussing migrants to blue cities in an effort to bring attention to the border crisis. Under the proposed plan, buses chartered by Texas from border cities will be taken to federal detention centers to help ICE agents process migrants quickly, the Post reported.

Texas has been in a legal fight with the Biden administration over its efforts to curb illegal immigration. On Wednesday, an appeals court ruled that the state has the right to build a razor wire border wall to deter migrants. 

Officials have also offered land to the incoming Trump administration to build deportation centers to hold illegal immigrant criminals.

LIBERAL NANTUCKET REELS FROM MIGRANT CRIME WAVE AS BIDEN SPENDS THANKSGIVING IN RICH FRIEND’S MANSION

Advertisement

“My office has identified several of our properties and is standing by ready to make this happen on Day One of the Trump presidency,” Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham said during a visit to the border Tuesday.

Authorities have also warned of unaccompanied migrant children being caught near the border. On Thursday, a 10-year-old boy from El Salvador told state troopers in Maverick County, Texas, that he had been lost and left behind by a human smuggler. 

The boy was holding a cellphone and crying, Texas Department of Public Safety Lt. Chris Olivarez posted on X. The child said his parents were in the U.S. 

APPEALS COURT RULES TEXAS HAS RIGHT TO BUILD RAZOR WIRE BORDER WALL TO DETER ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION: ‘HUGE WIN’

On Sunday, troopers encountered an unaccompanied 2-year-old girl from El Salvador holding a piece of paper with a phone number and her name. She told authorities that her parents were also in the U.S. 

Advertisement

That morning, state troopers also encountered a group of 211 illegal immigrants in Maverick County. Among the group were 60 unaccompanied children, ages 2 to 17, and six special interest immigrants from Mali and Angola. 

“Regardless of political views, it is unacceptable for any child to be exposed to dangerous criminal trafficking networks,” Olivarez wrote at the time. “With a record number of unaccompanied children and hundreds of thousands missing, there is no one ensuring the safety & security of these children except for the men & women who are on the frontlines daily.”

He noted that the “reality is that many children are exploited & trafficked, never to be heard from again.” 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Opinion: On homelessness, liberal California and the ultraconservative Supreme Court largely agree

Published

on

Opinion: On homelessness, liberal California and the ultraconservative Supreme Court largely agree

What does a small, solidly Republican city in Oregon have in common with California’s largest liberal enclaves? All breathed a sigh of relief this year thanks to the far-right U.S. Supreme Court.

The court’s conservative bloc ruled in favor of the city of Grants Pass, Ore., in June, overturning a key lower court ruling on homelessness and clearing the way for local governments to crack down on sleeping in public spaces regardless of the availability of housing or shelter. California’s response to the ruling has become a vivid reminder of not just the intractability of the homelessness epidemic but also the tension between national liberal politics and local policy in Democratic-dominated states and cities.

Some 186,000 people across California lack consistent shelter. Roughly 84% of the state’s voters believe homelessness is a “very serious” problem, a Quinnipiac University poll found, and Democrats and Republicans were in similarly broad agreement on that assessment, at 81% and 85%, respectively. In that light, it’s not surprising that California officials have wasted no time since Grants Pass in implementing their preferred “solution” to the homelessness problem.

From San Diego to San Francisco, state and local workers began disassembling makeshift shelters and camps and displacing the homeless people living in them. Within days, entire blocks were remade across the state. Residents rallied to social media platforms such as Reddit and Nextdoor to exchange strategies for getting homeless encampments removed from their own neighborhoods.

Other California residents have taken the Supreme Court’s ruling and Democratic officials’ exuberant co-sign as further evidence of the nation’s growing disdain for society’s most marginalized. Reports spread of homeless people being ejected from campsites with little or no warning, their pets taken away and medications lost, among other indignities.

Advertisement

The American Civil Liberties Union and other advocacy groups have condemned the Grants Pass ruling. The chief executive of the National Alliance to End Homelessness said it set a “dangerous precedent.” But the precedent set by California Democrats has arguably been far more dangerous.

During the initial waves of the Golden State’s housing crisis, in the late 1970s, Democratic politicians were reluctant to be seen as overtly antagonistic to the state’s homeless people, many of them veterans of the nation’s wars in Vietnam and Korea. But as the homeless population has grown and diversified, officials have faced deepening NIMBY sentiment not just in California’s well-heeled liberal cities but also in Democratic-leaning working-class communities that increasingly experience the highest rates of homelessness and related problems such as loitering and blight. As a result, anti-homeless policies have become more politically appealing despite being painfully at odds with inclusivity and other virtues Democrats signal on the national stage.

Addressing the housing crisis has been a quintessential and enduring social justice cause for Democrats, encompassing themes that tend to unify the party, including health, economic and racial equity. According to one survey, 82% of homeless adults in California reported having experienced a serious mental health condition, and 65% had used illicit drugs at some point. The state’s Black people are disproportionately affected by homelessness: Despite making up only about 5% of California’s total population, they represent roughly 25% of its homeless people. Such statistics helped liberals frame homelessness as a product of Republican policies weakening social services and promoting unchecked capitalism.

But that view has lost support as homelessness has become more dramatic and visible over the last decade. In some of California’s liberal enclaves, homeless encampments have become full-blown tent cities. Scenes of squalor, drug use and petty crime have spawned a subculture of gonzo-style documentary videos racking up hundreds of thousands of views on YouTube. San Francisco and Los Angeles have the most prominent crises, inviting scrutiny of the latter city’s readiness to host the 2028 Olympics.

Democrats’ conundrum is whether authorities should roust, fine and imprison people residing in public spaces in the interest of answering the broader community’s quality-of-life concerns. Critics have argued that such criminalization is a cruel distraction and that more affordable housing is the only way to meaningfully address the crisis.

Advertisement

Gov. Gavin Newsom and his predecessor, Jerry Brown, devoted billions of dollars to homelessness prevention and affordable housing even as the homeless population generally continued to grow. Newsom was quick to seize on the conservative Supreme Court’s permission to put punishment ahead of housing, warning cities that if they don’t remove encampments, they risk losing state funding. San Francisco Mayor London Breed, who just lost a reelection bid partly because of concerns about homelessness, likewise promised to be “very aggressive” in removing encampments. Never mind that those displaced by the state’s homeless sweeps often end up occupying another nearby space and returning at a later date.

So how did we get here? California’s ruling Democrats have tried to have it all ways, largely cultivating and tolerating deeply bureaucratic housing development standards while amplifying a booming tech industry populated by employees willing to pay top dollar for homes, dramatically boosting prices. And although Newsom and others have heralded emergency housing and other measures to answer the crisis, the total capacity is far short of the unhoused population. That’s partly because new facilities are often rebuffed by cities such as the L.A. suburb of Norwalk, which recently enacted a moratorium on homeless shelters.

Reducing and preventing homelessness, whatever the underlying motivations, is one of the few civic concerns that bind the political parties together in an age of stark polarization. Beyond the obvious moral merits of the cause, it could provide a road map to arrive at bipartisan solutions for other challenges facing the state and country. Unfortunately, the consensus on homelessness is coalescing around a prescription with little chance of long-term success.

Jerel Ezell is an assistant professor of community health sciences at UC Berkeley.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Politics

Biden thankful for smooth transition of power, urges Trump to 'rethink' tariffs on Canada and Mexico

Published

on

Biden thankful for smooth transition of power, urges Trump to 'rethink' tariffs on Canada and Mexico

President Biden on Thanksgiving said he was thankful that the transition of power to a second Trump administration has gone smoothly, while urging the incoming commander-in-chief to “rethink” threats to impose steep tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods. 

“I hope that [President-elect Trump] rethinks it. I think it’s a counterproductive thing to do,” Biden told reporters Thursday on the island of Nantucket, Massachusetts, where he was spending the holiday with family. “We’re surrounded by the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Oceans and two allies — Mexico and Canada. The last thing we need to do is begin to screw up those relationships. I think that we got them in a good place.”

Earlier this week, Trump vowed to impose 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada in an effort to get both nations to do more to stop the flow of illegal immigrants and illicit drugs into the U.S. Trump spoke with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo on Wednesday, and both apparently came to an understanding, he said. 

CHINA FREES US PASTOR AFTER NEARLY 20 YEARS OF WRONGFUL DETAINMENT

President Biden shakes hands with Nantucket police officers during a visit to a fire station on Thanksgiving in Nantucket, Massachusetts, on Thursday. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Advertisement

“She has agreed to stop Migration through Mexico, and into the United States, effectively closing our Southern Border,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “We also talked about what can be done to stop the massive drug inflow into the United States, and also, U.S. consumption of these drugs. It was a very productive conversation!”

Trump also threatened to impose an additional 10% tariff on China. Biden said Chinese President Xi Jinping “doesn’t want to make a mistake.”

“I am not saying he is our best buddy, but he understands what’s at stake,” he said. 

DONALD TRUMP CALLS ON THE NEW YORK TIMES TO APOLOGIZE FOR ‘GETTING YEARS OF TRUMP COVERAGE WRONG’

President Biden talks to the media

President Biden talks to the media during a visit to a Nantucket fire station on Thanksgiving in Nantucket, Massachusetts, on Thursday. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

President Biden also said Thursday that illegal border crossings have been “down considerably” since Trump’s first term in office. Trump heavily campaigned on the border crisis that exploded after Biden took office. 

Advertisement

The president also said he was pleased with the cease-fire deal between Israel and Lebanon and that he was “very, very happy” about China releasing three Americans who were “wrongfully detained” for several years. 

Regarding the transition from his presidency to a second Trump administration, Biden said he wants the process to occur without any hiccups.  

President Biden in front of fire truck and officers

President Biden talks to the media in Nantucket, Massachusetts, on Thursday. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

 

“I want to make sure it goes smoothly. And all the talk about what he is going to do and not do, I think that maybe it is a little bit of internal reckoning on his part,” he said. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending