Connect with us

Vermont

Windham County independent launches rare challenge for Vermont House speakership against Jill Krowinski – VTDigger

Published

on

Windham County independent launches rare challenge for Vermont House speakership against Jill Krowinski – VTDigger


Rep. Laura Sbilia, I-Dover, listens during a meeting of the House Enivironment and Energy Committee at the Statehouse in Montpelier on Friday, April 19. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

House Speaker Jill Krowinski, D-Burlington, has a challenger for her position leading Vermont’s state House of Representatives.

Five-term independent state Rep. Laura Sibilia of Dover on Tuesday announced her bid against Krowinski for the House’s top leadership post. In an email sent to her House colleagues, Sibilia said the House is wanting for “improved communication, collaboration and nonpartisan problem-solving.”

“While the governor shares some responsibility for the current climate, we must hold ourselves accountable as legislators and improve our communication with all members, branches of government, and, most importantly, Vermonters. Vermont and our public institutions cannot afford an extended political stalemate.”

Krowinski has occupied the role of speaker since 2021. Her own ascension to the office was thanks, in part, to a political ousting — after her predecessor, former House Speaker Mitzi Johnson, D-South Hero, lost her reelection bid in November 2020.

Advertisement

In a written statement issued hours after Sibilia’s own announcement, Krowinski confirmed that she plans to run for reelection as House speaker.

“Currently, my focus has been on connecting with Vermonters in all 14 counties and hearing their thoughts,” Krowinski wrote Tuesday night. “It’s been a privilege to campaign in all corners of the state from Wilmington to Lyndon, Ludlow to St Albans. Knocking on doors and connecting with Vermonters has only solidified my belief that we can, and must, continue to take on the big issues we have ahead of us this biennium.”

In her email announcing her candidacy, Sibilia didn’t name her incumbent opponent, or take direct shots at her. But in an interview Tuesday evening, she offered more biting criticism.

“I will say that I believe she is almost universally well liked,” Sibilia said of Krowinski. “But there are significant numbers of members who are really concerned about our inability to get work done.”

That work, according to Sibilia, is on policy matters related to education, health care and Vermont’s overall cost of living. She said she is “concerned about our ability to communicate to Vermonters about what is happening — to reflect back to Vermonters what they, themselves, are telling us around affordability, around education, around healthcare.”

Advertisement

In her statement Tuesday night, Krowinski wrote of the challenges bound to face legislators in 2025, “These are complex issues that impact communities differently, and if there were easy solutions, we would have already acted.”

Sibilia is running for the House’s highest leadership position during an election cycle when Republican Gov. Phil Scott is campaigning harder than he has in years to help elect Republicans down the ballot. The aim, he says, is to break Democrats’ two-thirds supermajority in both the House and Senate, and moderate two chambers led by leaders who both hail from deep blue Chittenden County. (Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Baruth, D/P-Chittenden Central, also lives in Burlington.)

Sibilia, by contrast, lives in Dover in Windham County, co-chairs the House’s rural caucus and is one of only three independents in the House.

“I am not a member of the supermajority, so it’s not a mystery to me that what I am doing is difficult because of that,” Sibilia told VTDigger.

But after months of hearing her colleagues gripe against House leadership, Sibilia believes “it is a distinct possibility” she reaches the 76-vote threshold to oust Krowinski. And by challenging Krowinski to the role, she said her 149 House colleagues will have a rare choice. (Krowinski did not face competition for the role in 2023.)

Advertisement

“I’ve had many contested races myself. Contests are good for democracy,” Sibilia said. “And I’m not afraid to fail, but I’m also not on a fool’s errand, and this is not a stunt. I have done extensive work, and I believe it is appropriate, given that work and the encouragement and support that I have received, for there to be a choice.”





Source link

Vermont

State audit finds delays and gaps in Vermont’s food and lodging inspections – VTDigger

Published

on

State audit finds delays and gaps in Vermont’s food and lodging inspections – VTDigger


Vermont Auditor of Accounts Doug Hoffer speaks at a press conference hosted by Democratic gubernatorial candidate Lt. Gov. David Zuckerman in South Burlington on Oct. 20, 2020. File photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

The Office of the State Auditor found significant shortcomings with how the Vermont Department of Health reviews complaints related to food and lodging establishments, according to a recent report.

The report is the first audit of four planned for the coming months by Auditor Doug Hoffer and his staff, part of an effort to assess how the state government responds to Vermonters’ complaints. 

The department’s Food and Lodging program is responsible for ensuring that Vermont restaurants, hotels, and other similar establishments, follow the state’s health and sanitation regulations and protocols. The program provides licenses and inspects more than 6,000 food establishments and regulates lodging facilities, while addressing the complaints it receives from the public.

The audit selected 45 complaints for review out of the 1,081 complaints the program received between 2022 and 2024. The types of complaints that come in include allegations of unsanitary conditions, bed bug infestations, inadequate cooking and contaminated food equipment. Inspectors have to first verify if the complaints are true, and if so, recommend corrective actions.

Advertisement

However, the audit found that inspections were not always conducted within the required timeframe, and, in some cases, inspectors did not follow up to verify if the problems were resolved. Of the complaints reviewed, 16 of them were not investigated in the timeframe required. Seven out of the 10 complaints with more serious allegations were not investigated within the required two days. Two of them were not investigated at all.

Additionally, inspectors closed 18 of the 26 complaints that required corrective actions without confirming if the problems had been resolved. Hoffer said this does not necessarily mean that the owner of the establishment did not address the problem but that the inspectors did not visit the place again to check if they did.

“If you’re calling for a corrective action for a serious problem, you need to make sure that it’s been done and documented, and they were kind of short on that,” Hoffer said.

The audit also found that the Department of Health doesn’t measure the performance of the Food and Lodging program, which is a state requirement. The program is also missing specific policies and procedures for handling complaints.

Hoffer said the auditor’s office will follow up in one year and again in three years to see if the department has implemented their recommendations to improve the program.

Advertisement

The public complaint system evaluated in the audit is just one part of the work carried out by the program, according to Liz Wirsing, the senior program manager for Food and Lodging.

“The report evaluated a small sample of the hundreds of complaints that we receive and follow up on every year, so sometimes other priorities have to take precedence for protecting public health,” Wirsing said.

Still the recommendations are helpful, and the program is already working on implementing them, she said.  

“We appreciate the public reaching out to us and sharing their concern,” Wirsing said, adding that people should continue to file complaints. “It’s important information, and it does help alert us sometimes to things that need some follow-up.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont state employees’ union files labor complaint over Gov. Phil Scott’s return-to-office plan — and sues – VTDigger

Published

on

Vermont state employees’ union files labor complaint over Gov. Phil Scott’s return-to-office plan — and sues – VTDigger


State employees enter the state office complex in Waterbury as the Vermont State Employees Association opposes Gov. Phil Scott’s return to work mandate on Oct. 23, 2025. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

The union representing Vermont state employees is turning to two legal venues to challenge Gov. Phil Scott’s order that many of its members return to the office in person.

On Nov. 10, the Vermont State Employees’ Association filed a charge with the state’s Labor Relations Board alleging the Scott administration skirted a union demand to enter formal bargaining over the return-to-work plan, in violation of labor protection laws. The plan will require many employees to come into the office at least three days a week. 

The union also filed a separate grievance with the Labor Relations Board arguing that parts of the plan violated the collective bargaining agreement it has in place with the state. 

Vermont state employees show up in person to demonstrate constraints of Waterbury office complexAdvertisement

” data-medium-file=”https://vtdigger.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/vsea-8-20251023-300×200.jpg” data-large-file=”https://vtdigger.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/vsea-8-20251023-1200×798.jpg”/>


Advertisement

Then, on Nov. 12, the union filed a lawsuit in Washington County Superior civil court asking a judge to bar the Scott administration from implementing its workplace plan — set to take effect Dec. 1 — until the labor board adjudicates the union’s complaints. 

The union wrote in its lawsuit that “neither the unfair labor practice charge nor the grievance is capable of being decided” by the labor board before Dec. 1. The suit seeks a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction that allows state employees to continue working remotely.

Steve Howard, the union’s executive director, said in an interview Wednesday that he hoped the suit would at least slow the implementation of the governor’s directive. He said he thought a hearing could be held on the lawsuit as soon as next week. 

The legal challenges mark a significant escalation in the monthslong fight between the union and the administration over the plan to have state workers, with some exceptions, return to the office. The union contends that the hybrid work mandate will cause experienced employees to quit, decreasing the quality of state departments’ work. 

At the same time, administration officials say that the order will improve government services by boosting collaboration and helping to preserve institutional knowledge. They’ve argued Vermonters want government workers to be present in-person.

Advertisement

In a statement Thursday, Amanda Wheeler, a spokesperson for the governor’s office, said the union’s legal challenges had no impact on Scott’s support for the plan. 

“The Administration’s decision to implement this standard is well within our authority,” Wheeler wrote. “The Governor’s position on returning to a hybrid work standard has not changed, he continues to believe human connection is an important part of employee engagement, as well as team building and learning from each other.” 

According to court filings, after the administration formally announced its return-to-work plans in late August, it wrote to the union in September requesting a meeting to discuss the plans and hear the union’s concerns. In that letter, which is attached to the lawsuit, John Berard, the state’s director of labor relations, said the plan did not need to be the subject of formal bargaining. That’s because the planned hybrid work requirement was permissible under an existing teleworking policy for state employees, he said.

State leases more space in Waterbury as employees’ deadline nears for return to officeAdvertisement


But the union doesn’t see it that way. In court filings, the union contends state leaders agreed to remote working arrangements for their employees, starting at the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, that did not fall under the stipulations of the teleworking policy. Those arrangements “have become an established condition of employment which the State is not free to change” without entering formal bargaining, the union wrote in an Oct. 24 letter to the state. It demanded, in that letter, that bargaining take place. 

Berard then wrote the union back Nov. 10 saying the state’s position had remained unchanged, according to court filings. That’s the same day the union filed its challenges with the state Labor Relations Board.

Advertisement

The legal challenges are set to play out as the state has expanded its workspace ahead of the planned return to office for many employees. On Monday, it signed leases for three new office spaces in the privately owned Pilgrim Park complex in Waterbury, which records show would be used by workers at the state Agency of Human Services.

That agency has been facing a shortage of office space at the nearby Waterbury State Office Complex, where much of its operations are based. The shortage could delay the restart of in-person work for some employees past Dec. 1, officials said previously.

The state is set to pay about $2.3 million to lease the new office space over the next five years, according to the leases.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

This Vermont company was ranked 24th ‘most ethical’ in the US

Published

on

This Vermont company was ranked 24th ‘most ethical’ in the US


Job tips: How to prepare for a virtual job interview

From lighting to sound, here are 5 tips to prepare for a virtual job interview.

ProblemSolved, USA TODAY

One Vermont company was deemed among the “most ethical” in the United States by the financial media company MarketBeat.

Advertisement

MarketBeat said it surveyed more than 3,000 people from different demographics last month to determine which companies they feel best align with their personal ethics and values. The results were then adjusted to reflect national population benchmarks.

The survey found that people value businesses that remain close to their founding towns, prioritize employee ownership and focus on sustainability.

The financial media company pulled together a list of 118 businesses considered to be the “most ethical” across the nation.

See how the Vermont company ranks and how it stacks up against other New England businesses.

MarketBeat’s ‘most ethical’ Vermont company

Here is the Vermont company that made MarketBeat’s “most ethical” list:

Advertisement

King Arthur Baking Company in Norwich, which sells flours, mixes, and baking tools, was ranked #24 in the country.

The baking company lists four environmental commitments on its website – regenerative agriculture, emissions reduction, zero waste and sustainable packaging.

King Arthur is employee-owned and is focused on “fostering an inclusive and welcoming baking community, taking meaningful steps to ensure all bakers feel they belong,” it said.

Advertisement

How other New England companies stack up

Here are the New England companies that made MarketBeat’s top 118 list:

  1. Ocean Spray – Lakeville, Massachusetts (#4 nationally)
  2. CVS Health – Woonsocket, Rhode Island (#5 nationally)
  3. L.L. Bean – Freeport, Maine (#12 nationally)
  4. King Arthur Baking Company – Norwich, Vermont (#24 nationally)
  5. Timberland – Stratham, New Hampshire (#30 nationally)
  6. Stonyfield Organic – Londonderry, New Hampshire (#34 nationally)
  7. Taza Chocolate – Somerville, Massachusetts (#56 nationally)
  8. New Morning Market – Woodbury, Connecticut (#65 nationally)
  9. Narragansett Beer – Providence, Rhode Island (#86 nationally)
  10. ReVision Energy – South Portland, Maine (#89 nationally)
  11. Allagash Brewing Company – Portland, Maine (#109 nationally)
  12. Cape Air – Hyannis, Massachusetts (#110 nationally)

Top 20 ‘most ethical’ companies in the US

Here are the top 20 “most ethical” companies in the U.S., from a list of 118, according to MarketBeat:

  1. Hershey Company – Hershey, Pennsylvania
  2. The Campbell’s Company – Camden, New Jersey
  3. Burt’s Bees – Durham, North Carolina
  4. Ocean Spray – Lakeville, Massachusetts
  5. CVS Health – Woonsocket, Rhode Island
  6. Publix Super Markets – Lakeland, Florida
  7. McCormick & Company – Hunt Valley, Maryland
  8. Hallmark Cards – Kansas City, Kansas
  9. Tillamook Creamery – Tillamook, Oregon
  10. Buc-ee’s – Lake Jackson, Texas
  11. Jack Daniel’s Distillery – Lynchburg, Tennessee
  12. L.L. Bean – Freeport, Maine
  13. Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores – Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
  14. Community Coffee Company – Baton Rouge, Louisiana
  15. Zapp’s Potato Chips – Gramercy, Louisiana
  16. Ozark Natural Foods – Fayetteville, Arkansas
  17. Clif Bar Baking Company – Twin Falls, Idaho
  18. Peace Coffee – Minneapolis, Minnesota
  19. Honolulu Coffee Company – Honolulu, Hawaii
  20. Milo’s Tea Company – Bessemer, Alabama



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending