Connect with us

Vermont

Vermont legislation banning neonics worries farmers, industry

Published

on

Vermont legislation banning neonics worries farmers, industry


The seed industry and growers are closely watching legislation in Vermont that would ban corn and soybean seeds treated with neonicotinoids. Critics say it would make it more difficult for growers to control pest pressure and use conservation practices such as no-till and cover crops.

More than that, adoption of the Vermont legislation a year after New York passed a bill on which it is based, has sparked concern that other states will follow suit.

Brad Mitchell, Syngenta

“I think it’s more than likely we’re going to see a bill in Vermont,” said Brad Mitchell, leader of Northeast affairs for neonic manufacturer Syngenta. “And that I think will probably trigger more bills, particularly in the Northeast.”

The debate centers on the impacts of neonics, which are used to coat virtually all corn and most soybean seeds sold nationwide. Supporters of the legislation say research has shown that the insecticides harm bees, both commercial and wild, and birds, leading to declining populations.

Advertisement

“Tiny amounts of neonicotinoid insecticides – 5 to 10 parts per billion – have sublethal effects that doom a colony to death during the coming winter,” the Vermont Beekeepers Association said in a statement arguing for the legislation.

Bill proponents, including environmental groups, point to studies showing little to no economic benefit from neonics. They cite a Cornell University report in 2020 that found “seed treatments benefit farmers when there is high early-season pest pressure, [but] these benefits are limited to a small proportion of fields.”

Testifying on the Vermont bill, Scott McArt, Cornell assistant professor of pollinator health, a co-author of the study, pointed to research showing corn and soybean yields in Canada’s Ontario province, have increased since neonic-treated seeds were banned in 2017. The law nonetheless allows growers to use them when there is a “demonstrated risk of a pest problem,” he said.

Similarly, New York’s law, slated to go into effect in 2029, would allow the state to grant waivers to growers who can show they would face pest threats without neonic-treated seeds. The law also would require growers to complete training in integrated pest management.

Vermont’s bill is modeled on New York’s, and even includes a provision that says the treated seed restrictions won’t go into effect until New York’s law does. 

Advertisement

Vermont’s House and Senate have both passed the bill overwhelmingly, suggesting that lawmakers could override a veto if Republican Gov. Phil Scott were to veto it the bill.

In the state House, Rep. Heather Surprenant, a farmer, explained her vote in favor of the legislation by saying that opponents were underestimating farmers’ ability to adapt.

“I voted yes to ensure my future in this industry,” she said.

The American Seed Trade Association cites research by AgInfomatics that found, without seed treatment, “U.S. cropped land would need to increase between 340,000 and 410,000 acres to offset losses in yield and quality, much of which would come from the Conservation Reserve Program, environmentally sensitive land established to preserve water, soil and wildlife.”

Others in the industry also are worried about the impacts on agriculture. Addressing the “pest pressure” issue, Syngenta’s Mitchell said many farmers use the seeds “prophylactically.”

Advertisement

Steve Dwinell, director of public health and the agricultural resource management division in the Vermont Department of Agriculture, said he is concerned about whether there will be enough non-treated seed for growers and about how growers will control pests without them.

“The pest problems have not gone away,” he said. “So if the pests can’t be controlled with the insecticide that’s on the seed, then there’s the possibility that the growers are going to have to use other pesticides to control the pests, which may have a bigger impact on the bees.”

He also points to the Vermont’s continuing loss of farmland. The 1974 Census of Agriculture showed about 1.67 million acres of farmland; the 2022 census shows 1.17 million acres.

“My concern about the restrictions on the use of the seed is that they may increase the production costs, or reduce the ability to produce enough crop,” he says. “And these farms will be under more economic pressure, and then we’ll lose more farms, and then we’ll have fewer resources for pollinators.” 

David Degolyer, an agronomist in upstate New York, said the way neonic-treated seeds are applied –  in minimal amounts, with precision and at the right time – helps ensure that there is minimal impact to the environment.

Advertisement

He also said that technology such as deflectors is highly effective at preventing dust from being kicked up into the air and spreading beyond the fields.

Degolyer says there is a “legitimate concern” about off-site movement of dust during planting, but that “most of the new planters have that taken care of.” For older planters, he advises, “Just purchase the deflectors. That solves the issue.”

He adds that he’s worried farmers will have to use tillage to bury eggs of seed corn maggots, which are especially fond of organic material such as compost as well as manure, a commodity in ample supply in dairy-rich Vermont.

“The seed corn maggot could be a really huge problem,” he says. “They fly in, they look for cover crops, they look for winter annuals like chickweed” to lay their eggs and start feeding on seeds, he said.

Elson Shields, a retired Cornell entomology professor, has written that “the frequent use of animal manures and cover crops known as green manure crops increases the attractiveness of the fields” to seed corn maggots.

Advertisement

Richard Nelson, a Vermont dairy farmer and corn grower who opposes the bill, says without neonic seeds, farmers would have to turn to older chemistries.

“We can use other stuff in-furrow,” he says. However, he adds, “It’s nasty, and it’s going to have the same effects.” 

He and Syngenta’s Mitchell also warn that laws restricting neonic-coated seeds would result in a lack of available seeds.

“The supply chain is pretty complicated.” Mitchell said, making it difficult to start creating specialized seed for different markets.

Mitchell also points to recent recommendations from the state’s Agricultural Innovation Board that focused on research and education on neonics.

Advertisement

“The board recommends actions to further understand the issues within Vermont, help educate growers about practices to limit pest pressure or reduce non-target exposure, and promote ongoing or planned research,” the AIB’s January report on neonics said.

Dwinell says farmers and beekeepers need to communicate to ensure pesticides are not harming bees. “The folks who grow apples or blueberries or vegetables are very careful about when and where they apply pesticides to avoid harming bees,” he said.

Nelson says he believes it’s unlikely that seed companies will adjust to demand just because of laws in New York and Vermont. Together the two states make up a fraction of the corn acres in the U.S. – about 1 million out of about 90 million. 

“I’m starting to feel like Davy Crockett in in the Alamo,” said Nelson, who added that he plans to run for the legislature. 

“I’m filling out the paperwork right now,” he said May 6.

Advertisement

For more news, go to www.Agri-Pulse.com.

 



Source link

Vermont

White out: Vermont’s tallest peak buried under record-breaking powder – VTDigger

Published

on

White out: Vermont’s tallest peak buried under record-breaking powder – VTDigger


A snowy scene on Mt. Mansfield, the state’s highest peak. Photo by Molly Walsh/CNS

More than 5 feet of snow currently blanket Vermont’s tallest peak — the deepest powder in recorded history for Mount Mansfield on this date.

The Mount Mansfield snow stake hit 63 inches Thursday, said Burlington-based National Weather Service meteorologist Adrianna Kremer, more than 3 feet deeper than the average 22-inch depth expected this time of year. As of Tuesday, the snow depth at the stake was 61 inches, falling 2 inches due to compaction, Kremer added. 

“We do have such a good snow pack early in the season,” Kremer said. “But, as always, there’s a lot of variability as the season goes on.”

Vermont has seen significant snowfall so far this winter, with over 3 feet recorded in November in some areas of the northern Green Mountains, Kremer said. 

Advertisement

With 192 inches of overall snowfall Tuesday, Jay Peak has been graced with the most snow of any ski mountain in the U.S. so far this season, surpassing West Coast ski resorts in powder.

Northern Vermont ski resorts Smuggler’s Notch and Stowe are also keeping pace, with overall snowfall hitting 116 inches and 108 inches, respectively, as of Tuesday.

But warmer temperatures this Thursday will spur some snow melt. While that may bring modest river rise, Kremer said the service does not expect flooding, as the increase in temperature is predicted to be short-lived and this year’s powdery snow is less dense with liquid. 

Hazardous travel conditions could arrive Friday, though, Kremer warned, as the snap back to colder temperatures brings the potential for a flash freeze and bursts of snow. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Visitors spent over $1B in Chittenden County in record VT tourism year

Published

on

Visitors spent over B in Chittenden County in record VT tourism year


Vermont’s tourism industry set new records in 2024, with 16 million visitors spending $4.2 billion, according to a community announcement.

The increase in both visitation and spending marks a modest rise from 2023, according to a study by Tourism Economics.

Visitor spending accounted for 9% of Vermont’s gross domestic product, significantly higher than the 2023 national state average of 3%. The tourism sector directly supports 31,780 jobs, or 10% of the state’s workforce, compared to the national average of 4.6%.

Advertisement

Direct spending by visitors in 2024 included $1.5 billion for lodging, $876 million for food and beverages, $680 million in retail, $678 million for transportation and $462 million for recreation and entertainment. The spending generated $293.5 million in state and local taxes, equivalent to $1,089 per Vermont household.

“As we think about economic impact, it is important to recognize that visitors to Vermont are essentially temporary taxpayers, bringing in outside money that helps to make Vermont more affordable for all of us,” said Department of Tourism and Marketing Commissioner Heather Pelham. “Every guest who buys a meal, stays the night, or heads to the mountain is supporting our businesses, sustaining jobs for Vermonters and funding the essential services that keep our communities strong.”

When considering the broader economic impact, including supply chain purchases and employee spending, the ripple effects of visitor spending amounted to $7 billion in economic activity in 2024.

The report also provided county-specific data, showing increased spending in every county. Chittenden County accounted for the highest share of visitor spending at 24.5%, at well over $1 billion. Lamoille, Rutland and Windsor counties each represented more than 10% of statewide visitor spending.

Advertisement

In Caledonia County, direct spending from visitors reached $109 million, a 7.7% increase from 2023.

“During the 2024 total solar eclipse, the positive impact of tourism on a rural community like St. Johnsbury was clear,” said Gillian Sewake, director of Discover St. Johnsbury. “An estimated 23,000 people came to our town alone. It was wonderful to feel that vibrancy in our downtown, with visitors filling sidewalks, enjoying the attractions that we know and love, and helping businesses break revenue records.”

In Bennington County, tourism generated almost $300 million in direct spending in 2024.

“Tourism is one of our region’s most powerful economic drivers, supporting nearly 13% of our workforce,” said John Burnham, executive director of the Manchester Business Association. “But its value reaches far beyond jobs. Visitor spending strengthens our economy, sustains small businesses, and helps fund the local services and amenities we all rely on, from restaurants and trails to cultural attractions and community events. Tourism also inspires us to preserve our historic character and adds a vibrancy that enriches everyday life. Simply put, the visitor economy helps keep our region the welcoming, thriving place we’re proud to call home.”

The 2024 economic impact report comes at a time when resident support of tourism is strong. In the University of Vermont Center for Rural Studies 2025 Vermonter Poll, 85% of residents agreed with the statement “Tourism is important to my local economy,” and 78% agreed with the statement “Increased tourism would have a beneficial impact on my local community.”

Advertisement

To read “Economic Impact of Visitors in Vermont 2024,” learn more about the report’s methodology, and the additional indirect and induced effects of visitor spending, visit the Vermont Department of Tourism and Marketing Tourism Research webpage, accd.vermont.gov/tourism/research.

This story was created by reporter Beth McDermott, bmcdermott1@usatodayco.com, with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at cm.usatoday.com/ethical-conduct.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Obstacles for Vermont refugees is focus at roundtable

Published

on

Obstacles for Vermont refugees is focus at roundtable


BENNINGTON — Sitting in a circle at the Bennington County Multicultural Community Center, Jack Rossiter-Munley shared the story of two families with whom he had worked.

The families had immigrated from South Sudan to Bennington, which was designated as a refugee site in October 2022. Since then, about 205 refugees have immigrated to the town. But the lives that they had hoped for in the United States haven’t necessarily come to fruition.

“These are folks who needed more orientation to work in the United States, but also the line is moving, and so you’re no longer on the line,” said Rossiter-Munley, the director of the Bennington County Multicultural Community Center. “Because their actual work here was unstable, they decided, ‘we’re just going to try to find work somewhere else.’”

Advertisement

Some of the family members moved to the Midwest, where they hoped to find a larger South Sudanese community and more support from their relatives. Those still in Bennington are looking to follow, he said.

Rossiter-Munley and about a dozen other people were gathered on Dec. 5 at BCMCC for a roundtable on Employment Support for New Americans, part of Gov. Phil Scott’s “Capital for a Day” initiative. That day, Scott and several of his cabinet members stationed themselves around Bennington County, holding meetings and hosting conversations with local leaders as they heard how to better support Bennington County.

The roundtable came at an especially pressing time for local immigrants. On Dec. 2, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration services under President Trump announced that it would pause its review of applications for green cards, asylum and citizenship following the shooting of two National Guard officers deployed in Washington, D.C. The pause applies to 19 countries — including Afghanistan and the Republic of Congo — from where many new Americans in Bennington emigrate.

People also come to Bennington from Venezuela, South Sudan and Iraq as part of the resettlement programs, Rossiter-Munley said. At the following Monday’s Select Board meeting, he read a statement on behalf of Afghan women in Bennington, condemning the violence in Washington, D.C. and asking for the community’s understanding. And at the roundtable, he was clear about the legal implications for those already living in Bennington: “nothing has changed.”

Kendal Smith, commissioner of the Department of Labor, was in attendance at the Dec. 5 meeting and represented Vermont. She sought to understand how the state could better support immigrants and refugees in Bennington County.

Advertisement

The biggest challenges Smith identified were language access support, transportation and licensing attainment, she said.

Translation is an area that gets highlighted the most in Bennington because the town is “uniquely deficient” in providing such community support, Rossiter-Munley said. Bennington county was almost 95 percent white, according to the latest census data.

Smith said that the Department of Labor is exploring funding the purchase of more translation devices to help overcome language barriers at work. The state currently contracts with Propio, an AI-based interpretation service. BCMCC uses Boostlingo to translate their speech into languages like Swahili and Dinka.

Another difficulty in Bennington is access to transportation to work. Wendy Morris, the Department of Labor’s regional manager, said that even commutes between Bennington and Manchester can pose serious challenges for new Americans.

“We help them get a job — let’s say we could do that, and we get them to Manchester,” she said. “We do the interview with them. How do we get them there every single day?”

Advertisement

The Department of Labor will explore “creative ways” to fund and provide driver’s licenses to immigrants and refugees, said Rowan Hawthorne, the policy and legislative affairs director at the Commissioner’s office. The Department will also work with the Office of Professional Regulation to “overcome licensing transfer barriers.”

Nearly every member of the roundtable stressed that immigrants and refugees in Bennington faced difficulties finding jobs that suited their training — for example, as pharmacists or engineers — and often were met with employers who were skeptical about hiring them.

All of it means that volunteers and leaders working with refugees are stretched thin.

“I can’t say enough how everybody in this room is doing more than their job,” said Sean-Marie Oller, director of the Tutorial Center, a Bennington nonprofit that provides adult education and literacy classes.

Still, Rossiter-Munley tries to be optimistic. He cited a study that showed refugee resettlement provided a net benefit of $123.8 billion to local, state and federal economies. And he’s encouraged by the state Department of Labor’s openness to growth.

Advertisement

“When we are sitting down to meet with employers, or offering support or working alongside the Department of Labor, the more of that knowledge can become just part of the day-to-day work of a how a local department … functions,” he said.

“This is part of how we work, and it’s not a special one-time project.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending