Vermont
Vermont becomes 2nd state to allow non-residents to use assisted suicide law
Vermont turned the second state within the nation Tuesday to permit terminally in poor health individuals from different states to journey there to die by suicide whereas underneath medical care.
The medically assisted suicide regulation that’s been round for many years within the state dropped its residency requirement after Republican Gov. Phil Scott signed the invoice Tuesday.
Supporters of the regulation hailed the change although critics warned it may lead Vermont to change into a “demise tourism” spot.
Kim Callinan, president and CEO of Compassion & Selections, mentioned in an announcement that the non-profit was grateful Vermont lawmakers realized that “a state border shouldn’t decide should you die peacefully or in agony.”
“Sufferers routinely journey to different states to make the most of the very best healthcare choices,” she added. “There is no such thing as a rational cause they shouldn’t be capable of journey to a different state to entry medical assist in dying if the state they dwell in doesn’t supply it.”
Opponents of the suicide regulation slammed it.
“To be clear, Vermont Proper to Life opposed the underlying idea behind assisted suicide and opposes the transfer to take away the residency requirement as there are nonetheless no safeguards that defend weak sufferers from coercion,” mentioned Mary Hahn Beerworth, the chief director of the Vermont Proper to Life Committee.
College of Massachusetts regulation professor Dwight Duncan informed Nationwide Catholic Register in February dropping the residency rule might make Vermont a vacation spot for demise.
“And it opens up this concept of ‘demise tourism’ — that you just journey there as a spot to be killed,” the regulation’s critic mentioned. “It’s one factor to journey to Vermont as a result of they’ve nice ski slopes. It’s one other factor to journey there as a result of they’ve nice undertakers.”
Whereas Vermont is the primary state to really change the regulation to permit non-residents to finish their life, Oregon beforehand agreed to cease implementing the residency requirement that allowed terminally in poor health individuals to obtain deadly remedy as a part of a court docket settlement. It additionally agreed to ask lawmakers to scrap it from the regulation.
Vermont is one in all ten states to permit medically assisted suicide.
Earlier than the invoice’s passage, the state had reached a settlement with a Connecticut lady who has terminal most cancers that allowed her to benefit from the regulation.
The girl, Lynda Bluestein, of Connecticut, and her physician sued Vermont final summer season, claiming the residency mandate violated the regulation.
She mentioned Tuesday the change permits scores of different terminally in poor health individuals to die by suicide in the event that they select that path.
“I’m pondering much more importantly that that is going to trigger different states, the opposite jurisdictions which have medical assist in dying, to take a look at their residency requirement, too,” Bluestein mentioned.
With Submit wires
Vermont
US Chamber of Commerce, oil group sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group have filed a lawsuit against Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay for damage the state attributes to climate change.
The federal lawsuit, which was filed Monday, urges a state court to block the state from enforcing the law, which was passed by lawmakers last year, according to The Associated Press. The state said it is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to 1995.
Vermont became the first state in the country to enact a law of its kind after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather, the outlet noted.
The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue in the lawsuit that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act, The Associated Press reported. The lawsuit also says that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating against the “important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
APPLE TO PAY $95 MILLION IN SIRI SPYING LAWSUIT
The plaintiffs say that the federal government is already addressing climate change, according to the report. The plaintiffs add that since greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over multiple decades.
“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center, said, according to the report. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”
The law requires the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to the state and its residents from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The review would examine the effects of greenhouse gasses on various areas, including public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development and housing.
The state would use federal data to determine whether the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions can be traced to a fossil fuel company.
The share of funds collected from the companies could be used by the state for things like improving stormwater drainage systems, upgrading roads and bridges, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants and making energy-efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings.
SUPREME COURT TO TAKE UP CHALLENGE TO TIKTOK BAN
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
The law in Vermont captured interest from other states, including New York, where a similar bill was signed into law last month.
The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects to repair or prevent future damage from climate change, and the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would face fines.
Vermont
Vermont state police seek help locating 60-year-old Enosburg man – Newport Dispatch
ENOSBURG — Vermont State Police are seeking assistance in locating John Reynolds, 60, who has not been seen since Nov. 13.
Reynolds is believed to be in the Enosburg/Berkshire area.
While there are no signs that he is in immediate danger or that his absence is under suspicious circumstances, concerns have been raised regarding his welfare.
Authorities are urging anyone who might have information about Reynolds’ whereabouts to reach out to the VSP St. Albans at (802) 524-5993.
Vermont
US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.
The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.
The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.
“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”
A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.
Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”
“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.
Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.
It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.
The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.
The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.
-
Health7 days ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology7 days ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
Business4 days ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Politics1 week ago
'Politics is bad for business.' Why Disney's Bob Iger is trying to avoid hot buttons
-
Culture4 days ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports3 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics2 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics2 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country