Connect with us

Vermont

Vermont becomes 2nd state to allow non-residents to use assisted suicide law

Published

on

Vermont becomes 2nd state to allow non-residents to use assisted suicide law


Vermont turned the second state within the nation Tuesday to permit terminally in poor health individuals from different states to journey there to die by suicide whereas underneath medical care.

The medically assisted suicide regulation that’s been round for many years within the state dropped its residency requirement after Republican Gov. Phil Scott signed the invoice Tuesday.

Supporters of the regulation hailed the change although critics warned it may lead Vermont to change into a “demise tourism” spot.

Kim Callinan, president and CEO of Compassion & Selections, mentioned in an announcement that the non-profit was grateful Vermont lawmakers realized that “a state border shouldn’t decide should you die peacefully or in agony.”

Advertisement

“Sufferers routinely journey to different states to make the most of the very best healthcare choices,” she added. “There is no such thing as a rational cause they shouldn’t be capable of journey to a different state to entry medical assist in dying if the state they dwell in doesn’t supply it.”

Opponents of the suicide regulation slammed it.

“To be clear, Vermont Proper to Life opposed the underlying idea behind assisted suicide and opposes the transfer to take away the residency requirement as there are nonetheless no safeguards that defend weak sufferers from coercion,” mentioned Mary Hahn Beerworth, the chief director of the Vermont Proper to Life Committee.

Vermont made historical past Tuesday when it modified its assisted suicide regulation.
AP

College of Massachusetts regulation professor Dwight Duncan informed Nationwide Catholic Register in February dropping the residency rule might make Vermont a vacation spot for demise.

“And it opens up this concept of ‘demise tourism’ — that you just journey there as a spot to be killed,” the regulation’s critic mentioned. “It’s one factor to journey to Vermont as a result of they’ve nice ski slopes. It’s one other factor to journey there as a result of they’ve nice undertakers.”

Advertisement

Vermont Governor Phil Scott
Vermont Governor Phil Scott signed the invoice Tuesday dropping the residency requirement for the medically assisted suicide regulation that’s been round for many years.
Phil Scott / Fb

Whereas Vermont is the primary state to really change the regulation to permit non-residents to finish their life, Oregon beforehand agreed to cease implementing the residency requirement that allowed terminally in poor health individuals to obtain deadly remedy as a part of a court docket settlement. It additionally agreed to ask lawmakers to scrap it from the regulation.

Vermont is one in all ten states to permit medically assisted suicide.

Earlier than the invoice’s passage, the state had reached a settlement with a Connecticut lady who has terminal most cancers that allowed her to benefit from the regulation.


Lynda Shannon Bluestein, smiles during an interview in the living room of her home, Feb. 28, 2023, in Bridgeport, Conn
Lynda Shannon Bluestein smiles throughout an interview in the lounge of her residence, Feb. 28, 2023, in Bridgeport, Conn
AP

The girl, Lynda Bluestein, of Connecticut, and her physician sued Vermont final summer season, claiming the residency mandate violated the regulation.

She mentioned Tuesday the change permits scores of different terminally in poor health individuals to die by suicide in the event that they select that path.

“I’m pondering much more importantly that that is going to trigger different states, the opposite jurisdictions which have medical assist in dying, to take a look at their residency requirement, too,” Bluestein mentioned.

With Submit wires

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

US Chamber of Commerce, oil group sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage

Published

on

US Chamber of Commerce, oil group sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group have filed a lawsuit against Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay for damage the state attributes to climate change.

The federal lawsuit, which was filed Monday, urges a state court to block the state from enforcing the law, which was passed by lawmakers last year, according to The Associated Press. The state said it is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to 1995.

Advertisement

Vermont became the first state in the country to enact a law of its kind after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather, the outlet noted.

The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue in the lawsuit that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act, The Associated Press reported. The lawsuit also says that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating against the “important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

APPLE TO PAY $95 MILLION IN SIRI SPYING LAWSUIT

Flooding in downtown Montpelier, Vermont on Tuesday, July 11, 2023. (Getty Images)

The plaintiffs say that the federal government is already addressing climate change, according to the report. The plaintiffs add that since greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over multiple decades.

Advertisement

“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center, said, according to the report. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”

A man watches flooding in Vermont

A man watches as heavy rain sends mud and debris down the Ottauquechee River in Vermont. (Getty Images)

The law requires the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to the state and its residents from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The review would examine the effects of greenhouse gasses on various areas, including public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development and housing.

The state would use federal data to determine whether the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions can be traced to a fossil fuel company.

The share of funds collected from the companies could be used by the state for things like improving stormwater drainage systems, upgrading roads and bridges, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants and making energy-efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings.

SUPREME COURT TO TAKE UP CHALLENGE TO TIKTOK BAN

Advertisement
Flooding in Vermont

Aftermath of flash flooding on Red Village Road in Vermont. (Getty Images)

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The law in Vermont captured interest from other states, including New York, where a similar bill was signed into law last month.

The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects to repair or prevent future damage from climate change, and the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would face fines.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont state police seek help locating 60-year-old Enosburg man – Newport Dispatch

Published

on

Vermont state police seek help locating 60-year-old Enosburg man – Newport Dispatch


ENOSBURG — Vermont State Police are seeking assistance in locating John Reynolds, 60, who has not been seen since Nov. 13.

Reynolds is believed to be in the Enosburg/Berkshire area.

While there are no signs that he is in immediate danger or that his absence is under suspicious circumstances, concerns have been raised regarding his welfare.

Advertisement

Authorities are urging anyone who might have information about Reynolds’ whereabouts to reach out to the VSP St. Albans at (802) 524-5993.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage

Published

on

US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.

The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.

The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.

Advertisement

“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”

A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.

Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”

“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.

Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.

Advertisement

It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.

The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.

The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending