Vermont
Vermont accused in lawsuit of tracking pregnant women considered unsuitable to be mothers
A lawsuit filed this week accuses Vermont’s child welfare agency of using baseless allegations about a pregnant woman’s mental health to secretly investigate her and win custody of her daughter before the baby’s birth.
The ACLU of Vermont and Pregnancy Justice, a national advocacy group, filed the lawsuit on Wednesday against the Vermont Department for Children and Families, a counseling center and the hospital where the woman gave birth in February 2022.
In the lawsuit, the state also faces accusations that it routinely tracks pregnant women deemed unsuitable to be mothers.
The lawsuit asks for unspecified monetary damages for the woman, who is identified only by her initials, A.V., and an end to what it describes as an illegal surveillance program.
PREGNANT WOMAN AND BABY SAVED AFTER DOCTORS FIND GRAPEFRUIT-SIZED TUMOR: ‘EXTREMELY RARE’
A copy of the lawsuit seen against the the Vermont Department for Children and Families. (Google Maps; Vermont Superior Court)
The director of a homeless shelter where A.V. stayed in January 2022 told the child welfare agency that she appeared to have untreated paranoia, dissociative behaviors and PTSD, according to the lawsuit. The state began investigating and eventually spoke to the woman’s counselor, midwife and a hospital social worker without her knowledge, even though it had no jurisdiction over fetuses.
The woman remained unaware of the probe until she gave birth and her daughter was immediately taken away, according to ACLU senior staff attorney Harrison Stark.
A.V. had no knowledge that hospital officials were giving updates to the state while she was in labor, including details of her cervix dilation, and that she had lost temporary custody of her baby. The state even sought a court order forcing the woman to undergo a cesarean section, although it was rendered moot because she agreed to the surgery.
The woman was not able to win full custody of her child until seven months later.
“It’s a horrific set of circumstances for our client,” Stark said. “It’s also clear from what has happened that this is not the first time the agency has done this. We have learned from several confidential sources that DCF has a pattern and practice of looking into folks like our client who are pregnant, who are of interest to the agency based on a set of unofficial criteria and who the agency is tracking on what is called a ‘high risk pregnancy docket’ or ‘high risk pregnancy calendar.’”
Department for Children and Families commissioner Chris Winter said the agency will not comment until officials have reviewed the lawsuit and investigated its accusations.
“We take our mission of protecting children and supporting families seriously and work hard to balance the safety and well-being of children with the rights of parents,” he said.
Officials at Lund counseling center, which was named as a defendant, said they learned of the allegations from news reports.
The ACLU of Vermont and Pregnancy Justice filed the lawsuit on Wednesday against the Vermont Department for Children and Families, a counseling center and the hospital where the woman gave birth. (Getty Images )
“We take these matters very seriously and we are actively working to gather more information to understand the situation fully,” interim CEO Ken Schatz said.
Copley Hospital has not commented on the lawsuit.
Several states across the country allow the civil commitment of pregnant women to take custody of a newborn, Pregnancy Justice senior staff attorney Kulsoom Ijaz said. However, it is unclear how common these situations are in the U.S.
Ijaz said what happened to A.V. shows how pregnancy is increasingly used as a justification to block people’s rights.
The organization released a report in September detailing an increase in women being charged with pregnancy-related crimes in the year after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, allowing states to make their own laws regarding abortion. Most of those cases, in which the baby was listed as the victim, included women charged with child abuse, neglect or endangerment over allegations of substance use during pregnancy.
SMOKING AND VAPING HAVE THESE DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS ON FERTILITY, DOCTORS WARN
This photograph shows the logo of the American Civil Liberties Union. (KAREN BLEIER/AFP via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“What DCF did here is incredibly cruel,” Ijaz said. “It’s discriminatory. Its state sanctioned surveillance and stalking, and it violates Vermont’s newly enshrined right to reproductive autonomy in its state constitution. This is an opportunity for Vermont to signal to other states, as a leader, and say that these rights don’t just exist on paper. They exist in practice, too.”
Stark said the allegations in Vermont are particularly troubling since the state has described itself as a haven for reproductive rights.
“To discover evidence that a state agency is essentially colluding with certain medical providers to collect information without folks’ knowledge or consent and expanding its jurisdiction unlawfully to investigate folks based on what are essentially decisions about their own reproductive health is incredibly alarming,” he said.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Vermont
Aly Richards announces run for Vt. governor
NEWBURY, Vt. (WCAX) – A new face joins the race for Vermont governor.
Aly Richards, the former CEO of Lets Grow Kids, will hold her campaign announcement on Monday morning.
Richards has spent the last decade advocating for affordable child care in Vermont, including pushing for the state’s landmark child care law.
Richards’ campaign announcement will take place in her hometown of Newbury at 11 a.m.
Copyright 2026 WCAX. All rights reserved.
Vermont
Vermont ends cold weather hotel assistance for 160 households
MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – About 160 households will no longer receive hotel rooms following the end of cold weather rules for the state’s General Assistance program this week.
Anti-homeless advocates said last year the federal government authorized Vermont to use state Medicaid funds for a program that could supplement rent for people at risk of homelessness.
State leaders this week said that is not an option as Vermont is still building the program.
Vermont Human Services Secretary Jenney Samuelson said at a press conference this week the waiver gives the authority, not the funding or infrastructure to build the program.
“The state would need to put up significant investments including enrolling housing providers, landlords, developing and building IT systems,” Samuelson said. “These steps require significant time and resources.”
The state legislature and Governor Scott’s administration have been trying to wind down the use of hotels and instead ramp up shelters to get people back on their feet.
Copyright 2026 WCAX. All rights reserved.
Vermont
Cock-a-doodle-don’t? Vermont towns can’t agree on roosters. – VTDigger
Amanda Rancourt was facing a predicament.
She had started raising chickens in response to rising egg prices. But last May, a clutch of baby chicks she was raising in her backyard had grown up. Unexpectedly, one of the supposedly all-female chickens had a surprise for Rancourt.
The chicken turned out to be a rooster.
Rancourt knew what that meant. She could keep the chickens. But she lives in Barre City.
The rooster would have to go.
“It’s unfortunate. I literally live on the Barre City, Barre Town line,” she said. “It just kind of stinks we weren’t able to keep him, legally.”
Over the past few years, complaints across Vermont municipalities regarding roosters and their chatter have spurred many towns to ban them within their borders. Ordinances banning roosters have been in place in Burlington, South Burlington, Williston and Essex Junction for years. Yet regulations are not consistent, even between neighboring communities. The town of Barre, where Rancourt lives, has rooster regulations, while just up the road, the city of Montpelier does not.
As winter finally lets up and backyard flocks begin stirring from their coops, Vermont municipalities are increasingly saying “no” to roosters, creating a patchwork of local regulations that routinely pit the state’s agricultural heritage against suburban quality of life.
More communities have begun considering new bans. Last fall, the St. Albans City Council unanimously voted to ban roosters, with the threat of daily fines and possible court-ordered removal if a rooster is not moved, according to officials. A series of noise complaints regarding roosters crowing around the city had pushed the government to look at restrictions, St. Albans Mayor Tim Smith said.
Urban density fueled the complaints, with most residents living just 30 feet apart. And perhaps a blind spot in the city’s animal control laws helped the backyard chickens proliferate, said Chip Sawyer, St. Albans’ planning director and author of the proposed ordinance.
“A barking dog, you can deal with,” Sawyer said. “You can order someone with a barking dog to keep their dog inside. You can’t really order a rooster to be kept inside the home.”
The new rule drew little resistance. Only one family with a pet rooster complained, Smith said.
“To have some one person feel that his activities, his hobbies, whatever you want to call it, take priority over his neighbors is, in my opinion, very selfish,” Smith said.
Meanwhile, a similar dispute between neighbors in Shelburne prompted the town to debate adopting its own restrictions on roosters.
“They start yodeling at dawn and go on until dark,” wrote Ruth Hagerman, a Shelburne resident, in an email to town government representatives that was shared with VTDigger.
“They are disturbing the peace of those around them and are providing a textbook example of how neighborly policing doesn’t work.”
Yet after debating a drafted law, which was based on ordinances in neighboring municipalities, the Shelburne selectboard decided during a meeting last year to keep things as they were.
Shelburne Town Manager Matt Lawless was wary of overregulating how residents raise animals and produce their own food.
“We need to be cautious, I think, in when we deal with nuisance or when we’re concerned about health and safety, that we also look at the positive value provided, and we not make it hard for people to do things that are good,” Lawless said.
A ban on roosters felt too controlling, according to Shelburne board member Andrew Everett. He felt that for Shelburne, a community that is a mix of suburban and rural, changing traditional Vermont ways should be resisted until absolutely necessary.
Meanwhile, Williston’s war over backyard chickens has now spanned nearly a decade, with residents on smaller properties twice rebuffed in their efforts to keep hens. The city still classifies chickens as livestock, prohibited on any lot under an acre. The most recent attempt to lift the ban died in September 2023. Selectboard members who had previously supported the ban again voted to peel the chicken provisions off a broader housing package, shelving them indefinitely.
 100vw, 1200px”/><figcaption class=)
The trend of banning roosters from Vermont municipalities has caused a somewhat unintended wrinkle: what happens to the roosters?
The growing number of roosters that need to be re-housed has become an issue, said Pattrice Jones, cofounder of VINE Sanctuary in Springfield, an animal sanctuary that assists in rescuing roosters.
Sanctuaries around the state have been overwhelmed with requests to take roosters, Jones said. Chicks from hatcheries and farm stores that unexpectedly turn out to be roosters — and misconceptions about roosters being inherently violent — add to the problem.
But the growing list of local ordinances banning roosters has resulted in even more requests to take them in, adding to VINE’s “perpetual” waiting list, Jones said.
For many, emotional attachment to their roosters complicates the decision of what to do with the feathered pets.
“We hand raised them from when they were chicks and my kids were attached to them,” said Rancourt, the Barre chickens owner.
After a few months of looking, she was able to find a more rural home for her rooster, away from the suburban neighborhoods and the rooster ban in Barre.
“We understand that if they ended up becoming a problem with people, that they may end up having to cull them and eat them,”.
“Personally I couldn’t do that.”
-
South-Carolina1 week agoSouth Carolina vs TCU predictions for Elite Eight game in March Madness
-
Atlanta, GA1 day ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
Vermont1 week ago
Skier dies after fall at Sugarbush Resort
-
Movie Reviews4 days agoVaazha 2 first half review: Hashir anchors a lively, chaos-filled teen tale
-
Politics1 week agoTrump’s Ballroom Design Has Barely Been Scrutinized
-
Entertainment4 days agoInside Ye’s first comeback show at SoFi Stadium
-
Atlanta, GA1 week agoFetishist ‘No Kings’ protester in mask drags ‘Trump’ and ‘JD Vance’ behind her wheelchair
-
Politics1 week agoJD Vance says he was ‘obsessed’ with UFOs, believes aliens are actually ‘demons’