Connect with us

Vermont

This rare, tiny flower was thought to have been extinct in Vermont since WWI. Now it’s a symbol of hope | CNN

Published

on

This rare, tiny flower was thought to have been extinct in Vermont since WWI. Now it’s a symbol of hope | CNN




CNN
 — 

Molly Parren was tracking a wood turtle in Vermont when she smelled something surprising, yet familiar. The amphibian scientist for the state’s wildlife agency traced the smell to a rare wild garlic and snapped a photo.

What she didn’t realize at the time was she had found not one but two rare plants — one of which hadn’t been seen in the state since 1916.

Parren sent the photo to her colleague Grace Glynn, Vermont’s state botanist.

Advertisement

“I saw this other plant in the foreground, this tiny, little plant that had a much different color.” Glynn told CNN. “I immediately knew that it was floerkea. False mermaid-weed.”

Glynn has been searching for this plant “a little bit obsessively,” she said. Its ephemeral nature meant that it could easily go unspotted. Its short blooming window begins in April. To say its white flowers are small is an understatement — they are the size of a pin head. Then by June, the plant is withering away.

There are also only three historic sites for floerkea in the state, according to Glynn. “I’ve just dreamt of finding it because this is such an inconspicuous little plant with a limited window visibility and I knew that it could be lurking in plain sight. I’ve never seen it in person, but I had looked at photos so many times,” she said.

When she saw what Parren photographed, Glynn “jumped up and screamed.”

False mermaid-weed needs open floodplain soil in order to germinate — but this means these kinds of plants are susceptible to invasive species including garlic mustard, reed canary grass and Japanese knotweed, among others, Glynn explained. Invasive species “choke out” floodplain habitats, making it hard for native plants to compete.

Advertisement

Most of the invasive species come from gardens, Glynn said. But they aren’t the only threat to native plants.

The increase in flooding in New England is very “concerning because it may be altering these habitats in ways that floerkea and other river-shore species are not adapted to,” Glynn said. Most river shore plants have evolved to benefit from winter and spring flooding — not flooding in the summer.

During the summer, plants will begin to reproduce and flower. Flooding can damage the plant during that critical process, forcing it to start over again. Glynn said this is “really stressful,” and while some plants may be able to quickly resprout and send up new flowers, “after multiple seasons of this happening, you can imagine that it may be too stressful on the plants and they could die or be outfitted by invasives.“

The challenge for plants is that they can’t run away from bad conditions, said Tim Johnson, the CEO of the Native Plant Trust, an organization that — true to its name — works to restore native plants, educate property owners and implement native species into landscape design.

“Plant species and communities have evolved over millions of years, and they have been able to adapt to or migrate away from unfavorable climate conditions,” Johnson told CNN. “The species we have today are the survivors. They’re the ones that have been able to navigate this process over time.”

Advertisement

Johnson explained certain species of plants have wider distribution than others and that Vermont is on the edge of the range of distribution for the false mermaid-weed, which is why the population size isn’t as large as it is in other states, making it more rare.

“Plant species and communities have evolved over millions of years, and they have been able to adapt to or migrate away from unfavorable climate conditions,” Johnson said. “The species we have today are the survivors. They’re the ones that have been able to navigate this process over time. The challenge, or one of the major challenges, with plants, is that they can’t run away.”

Native plants have evolved in balance with the rest of the ecosystem. Local pollinators and wildlife rely on native species, and are just as threatened by invasive, non-local plants as the natives themselves.

“Some native insects rely on very specific host plants or host species to complete their life cycles,” Glynn said. “And then the birds rely on (the insects), and so on, throughout the food chain.”

Glynn said much of work relies on enthusiasts, volunteers and other professional botanists sending her photos and videos of their observations. Every species “has a right to be given a chance to persist on the landscape, and that’s really why we do what we do,” Glynn said.

Advertisement

The false mermaid-weed discovery shows there is reason to hope the world can undo the harmful effects of climate change, said Johnson.

“We might think that we are beyond it because we have supercomputers in our pocket and we have jets that’ll carry you across and around the world, but everything about our lives actually is facilitated by plants,” Johnson said. “They are the primary producers in our world. We eat them. We use them for building materials. They produce the oxygen we breathe. We literally couldn’t live without them.”

Vermont Fish & Wildlife tracks hundreds of plant species across the state and publishes findings on its website. You can report a sighting of a rare species in Vermont by submitting this form.



Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

Wrong-way driver stopped on I-89, charged with DUI

Published

on

Wrong-way driver stopped on I-89, charged with DUI


BOLTON, Vt. (WCAX) – A wrong-way driver was safely stopped on Interstate 89 overnight Sunday.

Vermont State Police say just before 12:30 a.m., they stopped the car near marker 77, near Bolton.

The driver, Denise Lear, 60, of Revere, was charged with driving under the influence and gross negligent operation.

Lear is expected in court Monday.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WCAX. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Women’s Lacrosse Bested in Burlington by Vermont – University at Albany Great Danes

Published

on

Women’s Lacrosse Bested in Burlington by Vermont – University at Albany Great Danes


Score: UAlbany 4, Vermont 14

Location: Virtue Field | Burlington, Vt.

Records: UAlbany (10-5, 5-1 America East) | Vermont (8-6, 4-1 America East)

Short Story: UAlbany women’s lacrosse fell to the Vermont Catamounts on Saturday afternoon.

Advertisement

Key Stats

  • Grace Cincebox recorded a total of 14 saves with 13 goals allowed for a .565 save percentage.
  • Ravan Marsell led the Great Danes with two points on one goal and one assist.
  • Four different UAlbany players scored in the contest.
  • Reggie Williams was the team’s leader with three ground balls.
  • Delilah Mile caused a team high three turnovers.

 
How It Happened

  • The Catamounts came out of the gates hard and heavy, scoring all three goals between both sides in the first quarter.
  • Vermont would take an 8-0 lead in the second quarter before Amanda Williamson found the back of the net on a women-down goal to put the Great Danes on the board and make it 8-1.
  • The Great Danes would allow one more goal in the first half to trail 9-1 after 30-minutes of play.
  • Grace Cincebox would enter the half with 10 saves.
  • Riley Forthofer started the Great Danes off in the second half to make it a 9-2 game, before Vermont put up three more goals to take a 12-2 lead entering the final quarter of play.
  • Mya Carroll and Ravan Marsell both scored on back-to-back free-position goals to make it a 12-4 game.
  • The Catamounts finished the game with two more goals to take the win 14-4.

 
Up Next
The Great Danes will next have a bye week and wait to see the outcome of next week’s Vermont vs UMass Lowell game to see who will host the America East Tournament.

Social Central: Stay up to date with UAlbany women’s lacrosse by following the team on Instagram (@UAlbanyWLax), Facebook (UAlbany Women’s Lacrosse),  and X (@UAlbanyWLax) for all of the latest news and highlights throughout the year.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont lands two cities in America’s top 15 happiest list

Published

on

Vermont lands two cities in America’s top 15 happiest list


Is creativity the missing key to better health?

Research suggests creative activities like art, music and crafts may benefit mental health as much as other key health habits.

Here’s another reason Vermont is the best New England state: It’s home to one of the top 5 happiest cities in the United States.

Plus, it has another within the top 15.

Advertisement

Massachusetts, on the other hand, doesn’t even break the top 50. Nor, does Connecticut or Rhode Island.

The personal finance website analyzed 182 of the largest cities in the country, and ranked Boston 63rd overall. Although the city is home to some of the nation’s top universities, high-ranking hospitals, and well-regarded companies, it didn’t break the top 50.

To get the rankings, WalletHub compared the cities using 29 metrics, including life-satisfaction index, depression rate, poverty rate, job security, and acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, and cities were assigned an overall happiness score.

Here’s a look at how the cities ranked.

South Burlington is No. 4 happiest city, Burlington is No. 11

South Burlington came on top for Vermont in WalletHub’s list of the happiest cities in the United States, ranking at No. 4. In scored very high for emotional and physical well-being coming in at the No. 4 spot, which made up for coming in No. 48 for community and environment. It was No. 9 for income and employment ranking. That gave it a total happiness of score of 70.15

Advertisement

Burlington wasn’t far behind at all, taking the No. 11 spot on the list and a happiness score of 67.54. It’s highest score was for income and employment ranking where it came second. It ranked No. 13 for community and environment and No. 21 for emotional and physical well-being.

Happiest cities in the US, per WalletHub

Here are the 25 happiest cities in the U.S., and their happiness scores, according to WalletHub’s 2026 list:

  1. Fremont, California – 74.09
  2. Bismarck, North Dakota – 73.11
  3. Scottsdale, Arizona – 71.36
  4. South Burlington, Vermont – 70.15
  5. Fargo, North Dakota – 69.36
  6. Overland Park, Kansas – 68.45
  7. Charleston, South Carolina – 68.44
  8. Irvine, California – 67.99
  9. Gilbert, Arizona – 67.96
  10. San Jose, California – 67.79
  11. Burlington, Vermont – 67.54
  12. Madison, Wisconsin – 66.35
  13. Columbia, Maryland – 66.28
  14. Chandler, Arizona – 65.69
  15. Seattle, Washington – 65.62
  16. Plano, Texas – 65.34
  17. San Francisco, California – 64.99
  18. Lincoln, Nebraska – 64.90
  19. Portland, Maine – 64.59
  20. Tempe, Arizona – 64.30
  21. San Diego, California – 64.30
  22. Raleigh, North Carolina – 63.47
  23. Peoria, Arizona – 63.38
  24. Durham, North Carolina – 62.84
  25. Huntington Beach, California – 62.80

Least happy cities in the US, per WalletHub

Here are the 25 least happy cities in the U.S., and their happiness scores, according to WalletHub’s 2026 list:

  1. Detroit, Michigan (#182 overall) – 29.55
  2. Memphis, Tennessee (#181 overall) – 34.39
  3. Shreveport, Louisiana (#180 overall) – 34.93
  4. Cleveland, Ohio (#179 overall) – 36.50
  5. Huntington, West Virginia (#178 overall) – 37.20
  6. Toledo, Ohio (#177 overall) – 37.21
  7. Augusta, Georgia (#176 overall) – 38.24
  8. Fort Smith, Arkansas (#175 overall) – 38.66
  9. Dover, Delaware (#174 overall) – 39.08
  10. Akron, Ohio (#173 overall) – 40.11
  11. Baltimore, Maryland (#172 overall) – 40.28
  12. Birmingham, Alabama (#171 overall) – 40.37
  13. Baton Rouge, Louisiana (#170 overall) – 40.47
  14. Columbus, Georgia (#169 overall) – 40.61
  15. Montgomery, Alabama (#168 overall) – 41.35
  16. Gulfport, Mississippi (#167 overall) – 41.65
  17. Charleston, West Virginia (#166 overall) – 42.18
  18. Jackson, Mississippi (#165 overall) – 42.60
  19. St. Louis, Missouri (#164 overall) – 43.53
  20. Knoxville, Tennessee (#163 overall) – 44.04
  21. Wilmington, Delaware (#162 overall) – 44.34
  22. Little Rock, Arkansas (#161 overall) – 44.48
  23. Mobile, Alabama (#160 overall) – 44.85
  24. New Orleans, Louisiana (#159 overall) – 45.19
  25. Tulsa, Oklahoma (#158 overall) – 45.33

Where New England cities ranked

Here are the 12 happiest cities in New England, and their happiness scores, according to WalletHub’s 2026 list:

  1. South Burlington, Vermont (#6 overall) – 70.15
  2. Burlington, Vermont (#11 overall) – 67.54
  3. Portland, Maine (#19 overall) – 64.59
  4. Nashua, New Hampshire (#27 overall) – 62.49
  5. Manchester, New Hampshire (#51 overall) – 59.10
  6. Boston, Massachusetts (#63 overall) – 56.88
  7. Warwick, Rhode Island (#66 overall) – 56.59
  8. New Haven, Connecticut (#95 overall) – 54.14
  9. Bridgeport, Connecticut (#96 overall) – 54.01
  10. Providence, Rhode Island (#98 overall) – 53.52
  11. Worcester, Massachusetts (#116 overall) – 50.12
  12. Lewiston, Maine (#145 overall) – 47.28



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending