Connect with us

Vermont

Sen. Peter Welch discusses the one-year anniversary of the flooding

Published

on

Sen. Peter Welch discusses the one-year anniversary of the flooding


A new report from the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee finds that flooding could cost the U.S. between $180 and $496 billion dollars annually in losses. Sen. Peter Welch cites that economic burden as one of the main reasons why he’s fighting for additional flood recovering and resiliency funding.

Welch joined Vermont Edition host Mikaela Lefrak to discuss the one year anniversary of the summer 2023 flooding, former President Donald Trump’s recent convictions, nonprofit theater funding and more

This segment of the conversation on flood resiliency has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Let’s start our conversation around flood resiliency, as the one year anniversary of the summer 2023 flooding is right around the corner. You are a member of the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee. Just this week, it shared a new report that shows that flooding could cause as much as $496 billion in losses each year in the United States. That is a massive number. Where did those losses come from?

Advertisement

We had our huge flood [in Vermont] just a year ago. Today, Florida is underwater in many, many places. What’s really, really tough is that this is going to keep flooding. And what we’re seeing in Vermont, of course, is the awareness that we have to build back in a more resilient fashion. So this is absolutely a product of climate change, and it just is a reminder of the urgency of addressing that issue.

In this report, it noted some of the the sources of those losses — the need for infrastructure upgrades for resiliency, commercial impacts, decreased tax revenue and more. I’m sure you’ve witnessed many of these here in Vermont in the past year. Can you tell us a little bit more about what you’ve seen on the ground?

The flood was a year ago and [we] immediately found, in the flood, it was all hands on deck, and neighbors helped neighbors dig out the mud and muck. Towns reacted and people did their best to get back on their feet. But now, a year later, I just recently went to Barre, I went to Johnson, I went to Hardwick. If it was your farm, if it was your business, if it was your home, you’re still suffering. And FEMA is tremendous in the immediate aftermath. They come in en force and really provide immediate emergency assistance. But a year down the road, there’s infrastructure problems — like in Johnson with their pump station, [or] like in Hardwick, where public resources were demolished along the bike path.

And this is where it gets tough with FEMA. Because at this point, you need folks who have flexibility, and you need FEMA officials who can make quick decisions, and also the money that is necessary. The best money is the one that goes through the disaster relief program through the CBDG program. But the bottom line is, it’s flexible. And you’ve got to have local leadership. So that’s what I’m working on with my colleagues, particularly [Sen.] Brian Schatz from Hawaii. And of course, they suffered that terrible fire around the time we had our terrible flood.

So that is going to be something that I think we’ve got to get to Vermont — the flexible funds in these towns that are going to help the farmers, that are going to help the town officials deal with infrastructure, and hopefully homeowners who are either going to get a buyout or hopefully get back in their home.

Advertisement

Have you been satisfied with FEMA’s flood response in Vermont over the past year?

I have been. They came in and I thought did a tremendous job. They were very responsive in their administration. But here’s what I’ve noticed: FEMA does not have the capacity for the long-term rebuilding of a community. They have the capacity for an immediate, short-term response to the disaster. And that’s where I think we’ve got to step back and reform the processes.

And what I’ve seen is that the leadership that is going to address what’s going on in Barre or in Johnson or in Ludlow — that has to be local, and they’ve got to be given flexibility. Because those folks are totally invested in the well-being of their community. And this is where FEMA needs some adjustment, because the FEMA folks now who are attending to these issues, they come and they go. There’s a lot of turnover, and they don’t have the flexibility. And that’s why these disaster relief funds, where there is flexibility, and where there can be local leadership, I think is so essential for the long-term recovery of communities.

Last week, you introduced the Rural Recovery Act, a bill that would essentially create a new program at the U.S. Department of Agriculture to provide rural development offices with more immediate funding for emergency recovery. This was co-sponsored by Sen. Bernie Sanders and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire. What exactly would a bill like this change for Vermonters if another flood were to hit?

Essentially, it would create that flexibility I’ve just been talking about and empower the local leaders to provide their response. You know what I’ve seen with the floods that we had last year in July, and what we had going back to [Tropical Storm] Irene [in 2011], was that it was local select boards that got out the Rolodex and started calling up people in the community to come out with their backhoes or their front end loaders or do whatever it was, and get whatever equipment was needed to respond. Well, that flexibility, you need to have down the road. The immediate response is absolutely urgent and essential. But there are things that require long term effort, because it’s rebuilding. And this legislation would essentially create the flexibility and the resources for those rural communities that don’t have that administrative infrastructure to deal with the massive impact of a big flood. Sen. Shaheen is a great ally on this, and Bernie [Sanders] and I will be working on this along with [Rep.] Becca [Balint].

Advertisement

Broadcast live on Thursday, June 13, 2024, at noon; rebroadcast at 7 p.m.

Have questions, comments, or tips? Send us a message or check us out on Instagram.





Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

All gifts matched to keep Vermonters warm and informed – VTDigger

Published

on

All gifts matched to keep Vermonters warm and informed – VTDigger


Dear Readers,

There are just days left in our Warmth Support Program partnership, and right now, your gift can do double duty for Vermont.

Until midnight on Dec. 25, every donation is matched dollar for dollar and helps provide two days of emergency heat to a Vermont household in need through the Warmth Support Program of Vermont’s Community Action Agencies.

Local news helps Vermonters understand what’s changing on the local, state and federal level — and how to respond. VTDigger delivers daily and investigative news that you can rely on year round. This work takes resources, and it’s powered directly by our readers.

Advertisement

At the same time, thousands of households in Vermont are struggling to afford basic heat right now. The community-funded Warmth Support Program of Vermont’s Community Action Agencies fills critical gaps when other fuel assistance isn’t available. Funds go directly to fuel suppliers to prevent shutoffs and keep families from running out of heat.

If you’re able, please make a gift that’s meaningful to you before midnight on Dec. 25 and it will be matched! Plus it will warm homes.

Thank you for helping connect Vermonters to the information and resources we need to look out for one another this season.

Sincerely,

Advertisement
” data-medium-file=”https://i0.wp.com/vtdigger.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Libbie-Sparadeo-Headshot.jpeg?ssl=1″ data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/vtdigger.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Libbie-Sparadeo-Headshot.jpeg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i0.wp.com/vtdigger.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Libbie-Sparadeo-Headshot.jpeg?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-540487″ style=”width:150px”/>

Libbie Sparadeo

Director of Membership and Engagement, VTDigger


P.S. If you or someone you know needs heat assistance, you can learn more about the Warmth Support Program and find contact information here.


The donation to the Warmth Support Program of Vermont’s Community Action Agencies is generously underwritten by our partnership sponsor, Vermont Gas, so that 100% of your gift to VTDiggers supports our newsroom.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Nine Vermont dams were removed in 2025. There are many more to go.  – VTDigger

Published

on

Nine Vermont dams were removed in 2025. There are many more to go.  – VTDigger


The landscape before and soon after the removal of Newport’s Sleeper Pond Dam in Oct. 2025. Photo courtesy of the Missisquoi River Basin Association

There are at least 140 dams in the Winooski River watershed, according to Michele Braun, executive director of the Friends of the Winooski River. Three of those dams help with flood control. Fifteen provide hydropower. A “handful” contribute to local recreation. 

But the rest? They “aren’t doing anything but causing trouble,” Braun said. 

“The great majority of those dams serve no purpose and are a public safety hazard, as well as bad for the river health and fish,” she said. 

Advertisement

Braun helped lead an effort to remove two dams in Barre City and Barre Town this year, part of a decades-long effort to get rid of derelict or harmful dams along Vermont’s waterways. According to the Vermont Natural Resources Council, local and regional organizations removed nine dams this year, the most in a single year, reconnecting 125 miles of river. 

More than 80 dams have been removed since the 1980s, some of which were more than a century old, said Karina Dailey, science and restoration director for the council, who also chairs the Vermont Dam Task Force. 

There are plenty more to go. Vermont’s dam safety program and local watershed partners have identified 47 dams that would be good candidates for removal, along with 27 active projects at different stages of preparation for removal and 12 projects that have stalled, according to a task force report. 

Dam removals have gained urgency in recent years as Vermont communities have been battered by repeat floods. An increasing body of research shows that some dams can worsen flooding. Five dams failed during flooding in 2023, sustaining heavy damage, according to state investigators. 

Advertisement

Removing dams can also benefit the local ecosystem, improve water quality and improve recreational opportunities for swimmers and boaters, according to the task force’s website. 

But dam removals can be a long and arduous process. The first challenge, Dailey said, is getting the dam owners on board. Many of the dams pegged for potential removal are privately owned, and the landowners have no obligation to participate in the process. 

Braun said that one of the dams her organization removed this year was owned by Trow and Holden Co. Initially, the owners expressed an emotional attachment to the dam, which was built in the 1800s and powered a factory that manufactured tools for the granite industry. Braun won them over by showing how getting rid of the dam would lower the flood elevation behind their building and make the river more predictable in the future. 

Dailey said the “silver lining” of the 2023 flood is that landowners are now “connecting the dots between the flood hazard in their yard of owning this dam, and not wanting to be liable for impacting downstream infrastructure or communities.” 

A historic photo of the Trow & Holden Brooklyn Street Dam. Photo courtesy of Friends of the Winooski River

She gave the example of a dam failure in Williamstown that caused “quite a lot of damage.”

Advertisement

 “The landowner had to do an emergency breach to stabilize the project because we couldn’t remove it fast enough to get all the funding and the permits,” she said. The task force is hoping to get the dam removed sometime next summer. 

Dam removals tend to be more complex than other infrastructure projects, requiring specialized construction companies and a variety of permits, Braun said. The state also sets a hard stop: All river projects have to be finished by October. 

Although removal projects can benefit the local flora and fauna, they can also cause short-term upheaval to animal habitats and vegetation. Lindsey Wight, executive director of the Missisquoi River Basin Association, said that the crew removing the Sleeper Pond Dam in Newport had to carefully relocate snapping turtles.

An excavator works to remove the Trow & Holden Dam in Sept. 2025. Photo courtesy of Friends of the Winooski River

“We got to dive into the muck and get a couple of turtles and bring them up Mud Creek a little bit farther to just sort of keep them out of the way,” she said. 

Greg Russ, restoration director of the White River Partnership, said the organization had to plan their use of heavy equipment around the local bat roosting season when they removed the Farnham Bros. dam in Tunbridge. The crew also had an archeologist on site throughout the project documenting any details uncovered about the roughly 100-year-old dam for future researchers. 

Advertisement

Dailey said she was glad to see so many projects move forward this year despite the chaotic situation at the federal level. The federal government froze funding specifically for dam removal that had already been committed in February, and for a while the task force thought those projects might not happen at all. 

Although the funding has since been restored, lining up grants and loans for new projects is an ongoing challenge, Dailey said. At the Army Corps of Engineers, one of the most important Vermont staffers took a federal buyout and hasn’t been replaced, she said. Cuts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency have left it short-staffed, slowing down approval for a dam removal in Northfield. 

“The money supposedly is still there and hasn’t gone away, and the project will still move forward,” Dailey said. “But there’s just not enough staff to review it to keep it moving along.” 

She said she expects the Trump administration’s actions will affect funding for years down the line, impacting the possibility of future projects. 

In the meantime, the waterways that had dams removed this year will slowly change as they adapt to the new shape of the landscape. 

Advertisement

“Really the first five years is where the river is sort of just creating its natural channel, and it meanders a lot,” Dailey said. 

“You watch a rain event, and the river just starts moving and meandering more and more,” she said. “And that’s really exciting, because that’s what rivers do, how rivers function.”

Braun noted one immediate benefit of the Trow & Holden dam removal. At the kickoff meeting for the removal, her team spotted a dozen trout swimming right up behind the dam. 

“We were all so excited to see them, because soon they would be able to be connected to the rest of the river system,” she said. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont congressional delegation nominates 23 students for military academies

Published

on

Vermont congressional delegation nominates 23 students for military academies


MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – Vermont’s congressional delegation nominated 23 students for military academy appointments Saturday, with the applicants speaking to lawmakers about their goals to serve the country.

Senators Peter Welch and Bernie Sanders, along with Representative Becca Balint, met with the nominees at the Statehouse to discuss their motivations for military service.

“You’ve made a decision that life is better when you’re helping others,” Welch said.

Balint told the students that regardless of whether they are accepted, being nominated is significant.

Advertisement

“Whatever happens whether you’re accepted or not being here, today is a really big deal,” Balint said.

Many nominees said they want to be part of something bigger than themselves and protect the ideals the country was built on, according to reporter observations from inside the event.

“That was a very interesting message that came from the young people,” Sanders said.

Welch said the students were motivated by teamwork, service and giving back.

One nominee said the reason that motivated them to serve is wanting to be a doctor.

Advertisement

Francis Robinson, a Merchant Marine applicant, said he wants to be the captain of a ship one day.

“All the books I’ve read since I was a kid have all been sea stories and I just want to be a part of that,” Robinson said.

Grady Gallagher, an Air Force applicant, said he wants to protect the people he loves and replicate the feeling of camaraderie he felt through football.

“I just want to be exceptional,” Gallagher said.

Many families attended the ceremony to support the nominees. Jamie and Sarah Gallagher, Grady’s parents, said they felt proud hearing their son’s answers.

Advertisement

“Seeing that he’s ready to take on the world and really be a leader of this next generation is really awesome,” Jamie Gallagher said.

Beck Welch, an Air Force applicant, called it a special moment.

“This is a very special moment for me and all of us and I think we’ve all worked very hard to be here,” Welch said.

Robinson said the experience was unique and one he will remember forever.

Sanders wished the nominees the best of luck and said Vermont has a long history of dedicated military service.

Advertisement

“I know they’re going to continue that tradition,” Sanders said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending