Connect with us

Vermont

Judge greenlights demolition of Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Burlington

Published

on

Judge greenlights demolition of Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Burlington


A judge in the environmental division of Vermont Superior Court gave the go-ahead Tuesday for demolition of the former Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in downtown Burlington, considered by some to be a masterpiece of modernist architecture.

The cathedral was designed by Edward Larrabee Barnes and the property was landscaped by Dan Kiley, whom the state architectural historian called “two of the foremost designers of the 20th century.” It closed in December 2018 after dwindling to fewer than 100 parishioners.

Judge Thomas Durkin ruled against a group of 10 Burlington residents who appealed the decision in January 2023 by the city’s Development Review Board to allow the demolition. Durkin rejected the residents’ argument that because it has been sold, and closed for four years, the cathedral is no longer a church and shouldn’t be given the “preferential treatment” a church is given. Ron Wanamaker, one of the 10 residents, said Wednesday his group will decide by the end of the week, or early next week, whether to appeal the decision to the Vermont Supreme Court.

Advertisement

“Our hopes and plans for the property were to save it,” Wanamaker said. “Judge Durkin disagreed with us. We’re disappointed.”

The group filed a similar argument against demolishing the cathedral in federal court, but lost that case in a decision in August 2023.

Neither state nor local governments can interfere with religious decisions

Attorney John Franco, who represented the Cathedral of the Immaculate Parish Charitable Trust, said the judge agreed with his argument that the demolition to deconsecrate the church was a religious decision by the Catholic Church, not subject to local or state jurisdiction.

“There’s been a doctrine for a long time called the church autonomy doctrine that is part of the First Amendment,” Franco said. “What it says is secular courts cannot second guess or interfere with matters of religious doctrine.”

Advertisement

The decision to deconsecrate a cathedral by demolishing it is a religious exercise, Franco explained.

Approval for the demolition ultimately came from the Vatican in a “very involved” process that started locally and took two years to complete, according to Franco. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops required the Trust to have a purchase and sale agreement on the property before agreeing to demolition.

More: What will we be losing if the Immaculate Conception cathedral is demolished?

Judge Durkin wrote in his decision that the Trust “underwent an ecclesiastical decision-making process that led it to ultimately deconsecrate the Property via demolition.”

Advertisement

“The Court is without authority to question this ecclesiastical process or decision,” Durkin concluded.

Attorney is unable to say who the buyer is or how much the buyer paid

Franco said he was not at liberty to disclose the buyer, or the purchase price for the cathedral. He said the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops requires church properties selling for $3.5 million and above to be under contract, to protect against ill-considered decisions.

Several of the Burlington residents who appealed against the demolition, including Wanamaker, are members of Preservation Burlington, but Wanamaker said Preservation Burlington is not involved in the legal proceedings.

“Preservation Burlington has been helping with outreach and fundraising,” Wanamaker said. “We’re seeing a lot of community support, including ex-parishioners. We’re getting donations and a lot of comments from people who would love to see the building continue on as a community benefit.”

Advertisement

More: Former Cathedral of Immaculate Conception to be demolished

If the group of Burlington residents does decide to appeal, a decision from the Supreme Court likely wouldn’t come until March 2025, according to Franco.

“We would like to persuade (them) not to go forward with an appeal,” Franco said.

Contact Dan D’Ambrosio at 660-1841 or ddambrosi@gannett.com. Follow him on X @DanDambrosioVT.



Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

VT Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 30, 2026

Published

on


Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win

Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.

Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

The Vermont Lottery offers several draw games for those willing to make a bet to win big.

Advertisement

Those who want to play can enter the MegaBucks and Lucky for Life games as well as the national Powerball and Mega Millions games. Vermont also partners with New Hampshire and Maine for the Tri-State Lottery, which includes the Mega Bucks, Gimme 5 as well as the Pick 3 and Pick 4.

Drawings are held at regular days and times, check the end of this story to see the schedule.

Here’s a look at May 30, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from May 30 drawing

01-27-35-44-52, Powerball: 12, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 30 drawing

Day: 5-7-9

Evening: 6-8-2

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 30 drawing

Day: 6-0-9-9

Evening: 8-8-9-3

Advertisement

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Megabucks Plus numbers from May 30 drawing

05-16-22-27-37, Megaball: 06

Check Megabucks Plus payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 30 drawing

05-14-22-28-30, Bonus: 01

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

For Vermont Lottery prizes up to $499, winners can claim their prize at any authorized Vermont Lottery retailer or at the Vermont Lottery Headquarters by presenting the signed winning ticket for validation. Prizes between $500 and $5,000 can be claimed at any M&T Bank location in Vermont during the Vermont Lottery Office’s business hours, which are 8a.m.-4p.m. Monday through Friday, except state holidays.

For prizes over $5,000, claims must be made in person at the Vermont Lottery headquarters. In addition to signing your ticket, you will need to bring a government-issued photo ID, and a completed claim form.

All prize claims must be submitted within one year of the drawing date. For more information on prize claims or to download a Vermont Lottery Claim Form, visit the Vermont Lottery’s FAQ page or contact their customer service line at (802) 479-5686.

Vermont Lottery Headquarters

Advertisement

1311 US Route 302, Suite 100

Barre, VT

05641

When are the Vermont Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Megabucks: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily

What is Vermont Lottery Second Chance?

Vermont’s 2nd Chance lottery lets players enter eligible non-winning instant scratch tickets into a drawing to win cash and/or other prizes. Players must register through the state’s official Lottery website or app. The drawings are held quarterly or are part of an additional promotion, and are done at Pollard Banknote Limited in Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Vermont editor. You can send feedback using this form.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Fallen solar panels in Vermont prompt environmental concerns – Valley News

Published

on

Fallen solar panels in Vermont prompt environmental concerns – Valley News


High winds in October and March blew down many solar panels in a field in Shaftsbury, Vt., and regulators are now looking into the potential environmental impact of the damaged panels.

This is one of the first times in Vermont that large swaths of damaged panels containing lead and silver have raised the specter of environmental contamination and prompted the state to examine the issue. In this case, concerns grew partly because the fallen panels weren’t immediately cleaned up, state officials said in a recent filing, causing regulators to investigate potential environmental impacts.

In a recent filing to the Public Utility Commission, an Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets staff attorney wrote that the agency is looking into options for testing the soil to determine if contamination is a concern.

Advertisement

“In general, it is important to protect agricultural soils,” an agency spokesman, Trevor Audet, wrote in a statement. “We are not aware of broken solar panels being a common issue in Vermont, but our knowledge is imperfect under the current reporting framework and we are working to learn more about any potential impacts.”

The damaged panels have caught the attention of environmentalists in the area. Among what they are seeking is pre-testing of soil near solar developments, so there will be a baseline to measure against for possible contamination.

Shaftsbury resident and farmer Jesse McDougall wrote to the Public Utility Commission expressing concern about whether Vermont’s acidic, low pH rain, winter snowmelt and spring showers could compound environmental contamination onsite. McDougall also alleged there were two fires after the October blowdown event.

“I want to see the right steps taken,” McDougall said in an interview. “There were hundreds of panels down, many of them smashed and broken, and on the ground for six months through a Vermont winter and two giant wind events and two fires.”

The solar array is near another controversial planned solar site in Shaftsbury approved by the commission last October, though neighbors to the project appealed the decision to the Vermont Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Approved by the Public Utility Commission in 2022, the broken solar array, called ER Waite Cemetery Solar LLC, is licensed for 2.2 megawatts, the largest energy development allowed under a state program that facilitates long-term contracts and sets rates for renewable energy developments in Vermont.

Encore Renewable Energy planned and received a permit for the solar project, which Fusion Renewable then purchased. Fusion Renewable is now responsible for remediation at the site, wrote Jeffrey Polubinski, attorney for ER Waite Cemetery Solar.

The owner said the delay in site cleanup was due to the lag time in insurance approval. Then Fusion Renewable needed to pause any project work until April due to a deer wintering area near the site, according to a May 8 filing by the Department of Public Service.

The regulatory filing raised questions about work on the site, and the Department of Public Service filing included requests for information about the damage and remediation to see if there is more work to be done, if the owner violated terms of the contract or if there were impacts to rate payers.

An Agency of Natural Resources filing to the commission stated that the owner must dispose of panels as hazardous materials, given the silver and lead inside them.

Advertisement

In addition, the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets said it is investigating options for agricultural soil testing in areas the state has designated as important farmland, according to a recent filing to the commission. In his statement, Audet wrote that the remediation method will depend on the scope and type of potential contamination found.

Meanwhile, some research on the environmental impact of damaged solar panels says that the impacts are likely to be minimal, but stronger standards and practices for solar developments may be necessary.

Annick Anctil, a Michigan State University civil and environmental engineering professor, said in an interview that pre-testing soil before construction can help determine whether broken solar panels have caused increased levels of heavy metals in the soil.

Annette Smith, executive director of Vermonters for a Clean Environment, said that, in addition to pre-testing soil, she wants more state-level tracking of solar array failures to prevent this type of situation from happening in the future.

“We could have all of the solar projects in Vermont fail, and I don’t know that there would be any ramifications,” Smith said.

Advertisement

For the solar owner’s part, Polubinski wrote that the owner is working with the state to dispose of the solar panels, and they plan to detail the damage, the current and future remediation of impacts from the wind damage and subsequent fires.

Peter Sterling, executive director of the trade association Renewable Energy Vermont, maintains that the state has more than 100 solar arrays and that solar array failures are rare. Still, Sterling said the state’s examination of the issue shows “the process is working, which is good.”

This story was republished with permission from VtDigger, which offers its reporting at no cost to local news organizations through its Community News Sharing Project. To learn more, visit vtdigger.org/community-news-sharing-project.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont’s only theme park opened in the 50s. How Santa’s Land got its start

Published

on

Vermont’s only theme park opened in the 50s. How Santa’s Land got its start


Theme parks: Plus-size visitors worry about this ‘walk of shame’

While theme parks across the country post height requirements, plus-size customers are often left to figure out if they will physically fit in.

Staff video, USA TODAY

As the weather gets warmer, it’s almost time to return outdoors to some of your favorite summer attractions, including beaches, festivals and theme parks.

Advertisement

While a summer day at the amusement park is typically associated with fireworks and kettle corn, Vermont’s one true theme park, Santa’s Land USA, celebrates the season with visits to Santa and dancing elves. While the park is known for its holiday cheer, it also has a storied history, dating back to 1957.

Here’s the story of how the oldest theme park in Vermont came to be, as well as how to visit this summer.

History of Santa’s Land USA

According to Santa’s Land’s website, the park was founded in 1957 by Jack Poppele, a New York City radio pioneer who dreamed of building a roadside attraction in Putney after vacationing in Vermont.

On August 10, 1957, Santa’s Land USA officially opened, featuring attractions like the original Santa’s Sweetheart Bridge. Both locals and travelers celebrated Poppele’s idea for Christmas in July, and the park became a success for many decades.

However, in 2014, the park fell into disrepair, ultimately closing and sitting abandoned for multiple years. In 2017, Santa’s Land was saved by David Haversat, who dreamed of owning the park since he was a child. After lots of hard work painting, polishing and building, Haversat reopened the park, with much of the original 1950s architecture and artifacts restored to their original beauty.

Advertisement

Since its reopening, Santa’s Land has served as a favorite New England family tradition. One of the last standing roadside attractions in the region, the park stands today with attractions like antique car rides, a carousel, mini golf, Christmas displays and visits with Santa and his elves.

How to visit Santa’s Land USA

Santa’s Land USA is not yet open for the season and hasn’t yet posted an opening date. In 2025, the theme park was open for the holiday season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending