Vermont ski areas saw just a slight decrease in total visitors this past winter, a surprise after a challenging first half to the season. 

Statewide industry association Ski Vermont announced last week that alpine ski areas reported 4.1 million skier and rider visits, down 0.5% from the prior year, a smaller dip than the rest of the Northeast region and the country.

But inconsistencies in the November and December weather contributed to significant differences in snow conditions among mountains. For example, one got enough snow to open early — and another was delayed when the same storm fell as rain. 

Cross-country ski areas struggled nearly across the board, disadvantaged by the lack of snowmaking as a stopgap measure.

Nonetheless, Ski Vermont president Molly Mahar considered the season to be successful, all things considered, with a late-season boost aided by Vermont’s total solar eclipse in April.

She said in an interview that she was glad the decrease wasn’t worse, given the chaotic weather and the more than 6% drops in visits experienced across the region and country.

In roller-coaster winter, latitude made the difference

While statewide numbers reflected a relative success, many remember last season far from fondly.

“Why do you have to bring me back to last year? God…,” said Geoff Hatheway, president of Magic Mountain in Londonderry, when asked about the challenges of the winter.

Magic Mountain was hit harder than many resorts further north by early-season hiccups — namely, it kept getting too warm. Its staff updated skiers frequently on Facebook throughout November and December, reporting temperatures too high for most of the day to make enough snow. 

Several rainstorms, including one just before Christmas, set back the mountain’s snowmaking progress and delayed its opening date, but Hatheway said staff were able to open some trails between Christmas and New Year’s Day. Still, effectively missing out on the December crowds and seeing low snowfall through Martin Luther King Jr. Day weekend meant that Magic Mountain underperformed on two of the three biggest ski weekends of the year.

Elsewhere in Vermont, the story was completely different: Further north, Bolton Valley president Lindsay DesLauriers said Bolton was able to hit its opening day target of Thanksgiving weekend with some help from the very same weather that was hurting Magic Mountain.

“A lot of the rain was snow for us,” she said, thanks in part to Bolton Valley’s elevation.

She added that snowmaking upgrades also helped — so despite perception of a bad winter, Bolton Valley’s metrics were strong this year. In terms of total operating days, in fact, it had its best year in the last six. 

Mad River Glen marketing/events manager Ry Young said the mountain actually opened its lifts earlier than initially planned because of the heavy snowfall because people had started hiking up the mountain to ski its trails.

“We couldn’t stop people from skinning, so we decided just to open and make some money,” Young said.

An April eclipse assist

At Magic Mountain, snowfall woes continued until the start of March, when it had seen only half its forecasted total, according to Hatheway. Fortunately, he said, with two big snowstorms in March and early April, it was able to finish the season on a high note, closing April 7 with 100% of its trails open.

“If we can just move that back a few months next year, that would be great,” Hatheway said, laughing.

A similar pattern held across Vermont, as storms in March and April brought in large late-season crowds and buoyed a season that started off slow.

“I honestly thought we were going to be off by more than this,” Mahar said of how the statewide numbers looked mid-spring.

The second of the two auspicious late snowstorms was followed a week later by an even rarer event: the total solar eclipse that cast northern Vermont in darkness and brought crowds from all over on Monday, April 8.

According to Mahar, many of those eclipse tourists got some skiing in while they were here, making a long weekend out of the spectacle.

“That supercharged the early April business,” Mahar said.

At Bolton Valley, in the path of totality, DesLauriers said many skiers set up lawn chairs for the three minutes of darkness, during which time Bolton had to close the lifts to ensure safety.

She said that Bolton Valley restricted the number of lift tickets sold for that day, thinking many of its season pass holders would visit and wanting to leave enough room for everyone. Though that didn’t occur as much as executives were expecting — DesLauriers theorized that pass holders, more likely to be local, largely watched the eclipse from home — she said it was still a busy day, the cherry on top of a strong end to the season.

“It was a really fun scene,” DesLauriers said. “And great for business, it’s typically slow on Mondays, but it was like a regular weekend day.”

Again, though, not everybody reaped the same benefits from the eclipse: Magic Mountain, in Windham County well south of the path of totality, had shut down its lifts for the season the day before.

Mahar said it was hard to quantify exactly how much the eclipse helped the season’s strong finish overall, but ski areas in the path of totality reported full occupancy that day, according to Ski Vermont.

At cross-country ski areas, Mother Nature wins

Mahar credited improved snowmaking technology as one big reason for the relatively strong season. But she said that the challenging weather had a particularly damaging impact on ski areas that do not make artificial snow — notably, almost all of Vermont’s cross-country skiing areas.

Cross-country skiing visits were down 49.6% from last year, according to Ski Vermont.

“We can’t control the weather, and it’s a very weather-dependent business,” said George Robinson, owner of Blueberry Lake Cross Country Center in Warren.

Robinson said business was down around 30% from last year at Blueberry Lake. The biggest hit was when rain came through in mid-December and the ski center didn’t have any skiable snow on the ground all the way until mid January, forcing it to miss the big holidays entirely.

Most downhill areas, and recently some cross-country areas, make their own snow to have more of a safeguard against fluctuations in weather patterns. But Robinson said he is not considering doing so at Blueberry Lake.

“I’m completely against it,” Robinson said, citing concerns about climate change. “I do not think it’s right for us to be putting energy into making snow when that energy is what created the problem for us in the first place.”

Snowmaking has gotten more energy-efficient with recent technology, Mahar said, but it remains rare in cross-country areas because of the practicality of making enough snow to cover a more sprawling area. 

Craftsbury Outdoor Center, which does make snow, uses it only on a couple of the smaller, central trails in its network. But communications director Sheldon Miller said it helped the organization to perform fairly well this winter — specifically because of the unique way in which it uses the technology.

Faculty and students from UVM help Craftsbury do what they call “snow storage” over the summer months, a practice Miller said isn’t entirely new but much more common in Europe. Storing snow entails making a large pile of artificial snow in January, when it’s most efficient to make snow and they often already have enough for the trails, Miller said. That pile then gets covered with several feet of wood chips to stay cold through the summer. Then right around Thanksgiving, the snow is extracted and blown out onto a short loop.

Craftsbury is the only cross-country area to practice snow storage not only in Vermont, but in the contiguous 48 states, according to UVM.

“Two kilometers isn’t the zenith of everybody’s nordic skiing experience,” Miller said. “But it’s nice just to get back on the snow.”

It’s also a nice buffer for their early season, Miller said, especially in a year like this where heavy snow only came on the later side. Unfortunately, he added, Craftsbury closed for the season before the two big storms in March and April came through, so it missed the late boom.

It hasn’t gone completely perfectly, though. Miller said that the season before last, after staff laid out all the stored snow and two days later the weather warmed back up, Craftsbury somewhat bitterly named the early season route “Mother Nature Always Wins.”

Though all of Vermont’s ski areas are looking to adapt in one way or another, they tend to agree on this fact. DesLauriers was careful to admit Bolton Valley’s limitations in its own efforts to weatherproof the ski season.

“I won’t say regardless of what Mother Nature throws at us, because she’s more powerful than anything,” she said. “But we’re definitely putting safeguards in place.”

CHESTER, Vt. – The Chester Selectboard held their second monthly meeting on Wednesday, June 19, once again discussing two pending ordinances, and eventually enacting their long-discussed short-term rental (STR) ordinance.

The STR ordinance has been through multiple rounds of revision and comment by both the board and Chester’s attorney, Jim Caroll. Prior to the enactment of the ordinance, Chester resident Ian Montgomery, who owns an STR, rose to address the board, telling them he believed the ordinance should provide further clarity on several issues. Montgomery was particularly concerned with the definition of “dwelling unit capacity,” and whether, for instance, a renter inviting over relatives who live nearby in excess of the unit’s capacity as stated on the STR registration for a visit, and not to sleep, would be grounds for a complaint or violation.

The board was reluctant to change any language pertaining to occupancy in the ordinance, as it had been reviewed by Caroll, and was in compliance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes, with which the State of Vermont fire codes also comply. Currently, the ordinance sets the dwelling unit capacity for STRs which host fewer than eight people at two per bedroom, plus two extra people. STRs which intend to host more than eight people must be inspected by the state fire marshal, who will make a final determination about occupancy limits.

Ultimately, because occupancy limits are calculated by number of bedrooms, the board expressed that their understanding was that they applied to those sleeping in an STR unit, and not to temporary visitors.

After some back and forth, Board Chair Arne Jonynas told the board that he believed the ordinance should be put to a vote, saying “I think we’ve overanalyzed this…it’s time to put this to bed.” The STR ordinance passed unanimously.

The board also made minor adjustments to the proposed nuisance ordinance, though no action was taken. An updated draft of the ordinance will be presented to the board at their next meeting.

Finally, the board set the tax rate for the upcoming fiscal year at $0.9870 per $100 of assessed value.

The Chester Selectboard’s next regular meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 3, at 6:30 p.m., at the Chester Town Hall.

Vermont will be the first state in the US to hold “Big Oil” accountable with a law requiring payment for damages from the effects of climate change, per a report by CBS News.

Taking on Big Oil 

The state’s Republican governor, Phil Scott, sent a letter to Vermont’s General Assembly clearing the way for the Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program law (S.259) to pass without his signature. 

While he says he believes in the cause, Gov. Scott shared his reservations in the letter. He indicated that Vermont could have benefited from collaborating with other major players like New York and California instead of risking a stand on its own.

“Having said that,” Gov. Scott continued, “I understand the desire to seek funding to mitigate the effects of climate change that has hurt our state in so many ways.”

One Vermont state Representative, Martin LaLonde, released a reassuring statement of his own, clarifying that legal scholars vetted the bill and that they have a solid legal case. 

“The stakes are too high — and the costs too steep for Vermonters — to release corporations that caused the mess from their obligation to help clean it up,” he said, per CBS News.

Major polluters should pay

The bill would require entities found to have spewed more than 2.2 trillion pounds of planet-warming gases between 1995 and 2024 to pay up, according to CBS News. Vermont would use that money to deal with the disastrous effects of an overheating planet. 

And the industry certainly has the money to pay. In 2022, the U.S. oil and gas industry’s total revenue was $332.9 billion, as Statista reported. While that’s staggering enough, it’s a massive uptick from the $211.2 billion it earned the previous year.  

The damage

The rise in global temperatures has led to various severe climate impacts, including more flooding, fires, droughts, and increasingly powerful storm systems. 

Big Oil is to blame for much of the damage, with the United Nations stating that the use of dirty fuels accounts for more than 75% of polluting gases. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has estimated that in 2023 alone, climate-related disasters caused $92.9 billion in damage across the U.S., and Vermont was not immune to this damage. 

Looking forward

While federal efforts like the Inflation Reduction Act have created green incentives to help address the changing climate, the states must do their part. 

The Vermont Natural Resources Council expressed support for the Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program, stating, “[It] represents a major step forward in ensuring that responsible parties, like Big Oil — companies like ExxonMobil and Shell that have known for decades that their products are disrupting the climate — be required to also pay a fair share of the cleanup costs.” 

Lawsuits are also underway, seeking to hold the dirty energy industry accountable for its actions. More are likely to follow. 

Join our free newsletter for cool news and actionable info that makes it easy to help yourself while helping the planet.