Connect with us

Vermont

‘Goldilocks’ trees face climate change threats; community conservation work key to protecting Vermont maple industry

Published

on

‘Goldilocks’ trees face climate change threats; community conservation work key to protecting Vermont maple industry


FRANKLIN COUNTY– As winters warm, Vermont’s maple trees are under threat from a revolving door of future concerns and dangerous invasive species. 

“If you’re in the business of having a forest, it’s tough,” said Jason Gagne, a Highgate sugarmaker and vice president of the Franklin County Sugarmakers’ Association. 

According to the Vermont Department of Health, the state has seen an increase in temperature of four degrees in the winter and two degrees in the summer since the 1960s. As the climate shifts, spring is beginning two weeks earlier while winter is starting one week later than it was previously. 

Advertisement

As the climate changes, species which prefer warmer areas may be drawn up into more northern, historically cooler areas as they expand their territory. Non-native species which prefer these warmer climates can move into an area, like Vermont, which does not have natural protection against these non-native species, and decimate the ecosystem. 

Invasive species can be brought by humans intentionally or unintentionally, or can be spread through migration during changing climate patterns. 

There are people monitoring the situation, however, powering through to help strengthen Vermont’s forest health. From state-level experts and specialists to conservation groups at a regional level and conservation commissions at the local level, people are working together to protect the forests.

Warming weather and maple 

Vermont has led the U.S. in maple syrup production since 1916 with only two years having been out-produced by other states. Maple production is huge economically for the state, but also culturally, as sugarmaking is often a family tradition, passed down generation to generation.  

Since the 1990s, maple syrup production has continually increased, while at the same time Vermont has become one of the fastest warming states in the U.S.

Advertisement

Warmer temperatures mean maple trees are beginning to have a shorter window to tap into. From 1965-2015, Vermont lost about 3.3 days of the sugar production season. This variability in winter climates and shorter sugaring seasons can cause periods of insufficient maple production and threats from invasive species. 

Mark Isselhardt, maple specialist for the University of Vermont Maple Extension, said the threats to the maple industry are multi-faceted. 

“Those conditions that encourage or discourage a good run of sap are not evenly distributed across the season,” he said. “It’s pretty random but can have a huge impact on the total yield. It can be the difference of a couple degrees that can make a big difference whether or not sap runs.”

Isselhardt said as the temperatures have warmed, he’s seen sugarmakers begin tapping trees in December and January – a month or two before the traditional sugaring season begins. 

Over the past few years, Vermont maple farmers have seen the difference between too warm a season and too cold a season. 2022, for example, was widely viewed as a strong production year, as temperatures were ideal, Isselhardt said. But in 2023, temperatures warmed up and were followed by a prolonged cold snap, which hurt the overall yield. 

Advertisement

Gagne and many other Franklin County sugarmakers have experienced first-hand warmer temperatures impacting local maple syrup production. 

“April can be very warm and it can produce a lot of syrup or zero,” Gagne said. “This year, we made very little syrup in April. It was just too warm in March and the trees kind of shut down for us.” 

Sugarmakers have to be prepared for a random change in temperature, or a  “mother nature curveball,” he added.

Warming during the sugaring season can cause a blockage tapping the trees. The taps inside the trees create a perfect mix for a microbial environment, Isselhardt said. This activity can create a blockage which cuts off the tap and completely stops production from the tap. 

Looking into the future, Isselhardt said the growth of new maple trees could be harmed by warming temperatures. 

Advertisement

“A sustained warmth period that promotes an early exit from dormancy and then late frosts can cause damage to young trees,” he said. “A late frost isn’t going to kill, but it will delay trees’ ability to photosynthesis and rebuild stores of energy.”

Longer-term threats are slower to play out. Vermont may have a good amount of trees that will not disappear right now, but Isselhardt said the concern is a generational shift down the line. 






Advertisement

Damage to an old sugar maple that had already developed some decay around a weak branch junction.




“Sugar maple tends to be categorized as a ‘Goldilocks’ tree,” he said. “It thrives in a specific type of soil. Some places where sugar maples are growing are not on the most ideal site, so if you combine that with some other threats you might see, over time, sugar maple struggling to thrive through individual tree growth or requirements for next-gen tree growth.”

Advertisement

Maple trees rely heavily on cold winters to have a competitive advantage over other species. Isselhardt said warmer temperatures could invite species both known and unknown to take advantage of the maple seeds waiting to start growing. 

Josh Halman, forest health program manager for the State of Vermont, said the warming temperatures can create a way for invasives to latch on to sugar maple trees. 

“There is a lengthening of the growing season we’ve seen in sugar maple,” he said. “Those conditions can increase success for those invasive species and further their presence in the state.”

The impact of invasive species 

Invasive species that directly attack maple trees and those which harm the forest around them are monitored closely by the UVM Maple Extension program. 

Jumping Worms, for example, while not a direct attack to maple trees, harm the ideal soil conditions the trees need to thrive and grow in. The worms, which have been seen in 12 of Vermont’s 14 counties – including Franklin County – consume organic material, like decaying leaves and twigs, making it difficult for maple seedlings to get established.”

Advertisement

“They change the environment in the soil to the point where sugar maple struggles to regenerate,” Isselhardt said. 

There are very few pesticide applications available for maple trees. When new invasive species show up, maple producers are going to have a difficult time controlling the fight. 

Gagne said he’s always worried about the next invasive. The elm tree has almost completely been wiped out, ash trees are falling, and Gagne said he’s worried maple is next on that list. 

“I’m very worried maple could be the next one,” he said. “There’s nothing on the radar right now, but that doesn’t mean in five years from now they couldn’t attack maple.” 

From an individual sugarmaker’s perspective, Gagne said warming temperatures and invasive species can compound stressors the trees already feel. 

Advertisement

“Not all will survive because they are so stressed out,” he said. “If it was a dryer year and you tap it, that’s another stress, if there’s more, then the tree won’t make it.”

Maple farmers are also keeping an eye out for two other invasives: the Spotted Lanternfly and the Asian Longhorned Beetle. Both insects are attracted to sweeter saps and warmer conditions, putting maple trees as a prime point of interest. 

The Spotted Lanternfly has made it as far north as Maine, with three making it to Vermont in 2021 before being killed and yet to return. ALB is currently in quarantine in central Massachusetts where it continues to be an invasive species to the area and is under constant watch by the USDA and Vermont officials.

This past January, maple producers were told to check their trees in case of ALB infestation, but no beetles were found in the state. 

Community efforts underway

While the future may look alarming, there are ways Vermonters and maple producers can work together to help safeguard the state’s forests. 

Advertisement

For maple producers, Isselhardt said the diversity of a forest could be important in defending sugarbushes from some impacts. 

“We know in general a more diverse forest can mitigate stressors and sugar producers can retain another 25% of non-sugar maple, which appears to be important in lessening the impacts,” Isselhardt said. “It’s not just species diversity, but also encouraging multi-age forests. Not all the same aged trees but actually encouraging complexity and so there’s a range of ages.”

A range of young, medium and old maple trees is protection in case of a disturbance. If a tree falls down or is removed for example, nothing else will be able to take advantage of an opening in the canopy if a different aged maple tree can take its place.  

With new technologies, Isselhardt said it’s important to look at the traditional sap collection methods and update them for the future. 

“That ideal sugarbush image in the past used to be really big, widely spaced trees with really nothing else around,” he said. “That made a lot of sense when you had buckets as your only means of collecting sap, but with tubing it really changes it and now you can focus more on having a more robust, resilient forest.” 

Advertisement

Understanding where the maple industry is heading remains hard work with complex systems and modelings. Doing good work now to promote forest health for the future is important and gives the trees the best position for resisting future damage.

The Franklin County Sugar Makers Association is always watching for threats, Gagne said. Members look after each other’s backs and monitor threats. He said they are happy to continue seeing Vermont’s success at the top of the maple-producing states. 

“We’re always very active at the association level getting ahead of everything, but overall, maple is very strong in Vermont right now,” he said. 

Community efforts also play an important role in keeping Vermont’s landscape as healthy as possible. 

In Franklin County, conservation commissions in Georgia and Richford as well as other towns make efforts to remove invasive species in their respective areas, though it can be challenging to do so. 

Advertisement

“It’s very easy to spot invasive plants once you know what they look like. In fact, once you learn about them you will see them everywhere,” Alysia Catalfamo, chair of the Georgia Conservation Commission, said. “Removing them is much harder.”

Catalfamo said the combination of physical labor and insecticide makes the removal a long process, and it makes it even harder to remove the species around town.

As a warming climate impacts Vermont, she said the foothold of invasive species in the lower parts of the state have begun moving up toward Georgia. Although they can find some nests or seed producing trees and get rid of them, the impact is already around. 

But individuals can make a difference by being vigilant and checking their properties for invasives and quickly removing them. 

The conservation commission also holds events to raise awareness and remove the invasives. As they battle an invasive plant, Buckthorn, the commission will have a Buckthorn “party” event in the fall where Catalfamo said the community is welcome to come and help pull out the plant. 

Advertisement

Richford Conservation Commission Chair Annette Goyne agrees. She said with support from the community and town, the fight against invasives can move quicker.   

Goyne said they have seen evidence of the Emerald Ash Borer spreading around Vermont and decided early on to make an action plan. She said meeting with the Town Road Crew and selectboard, the commission was able to make swift decisions in hopes of protecting their ecosystem. 







EAB Map

A map of the counties in Vermont affected by Emerald Ash Borer infestations.

Advertisement




Goyne said over the winter, the road crew took down some of the trees vulnerable to the Emerald Ash Borer, mostly in South Richford, but left some remaining. 

“There are still many private landowners with healthy ash trees and younger trees, and the hope is that some will out last this invasive species and replenish our ecosystem eventually, but in most of the country, this beetle has really wiped out the ash trees, so time will tell,” she said. 

Other efforts come from conservation groups like the Missisquoi River Basin Association, which works tirelessly in their efforts across the river to keep the landscape healthy. 

Advertisement

MRBA field coordinator Sarah Lunn said their project to fight invasive Japanese Knotweed began in 2020 and has continued since. The plant spreads so easily it is often easily seen across Route 7 in Franklin County. 

The most effective part of the removal project has been community outreach. Lunn said she works with landowners around the Missisquoi River who email her and help them learn removal and prevention methods.

“I think the number one thing about invasive work is making sure people are informed about it,” she said. “A lot of invasive work doesn’t get lots of funding for conservation so a lot of this work takes lots of volunteer work.”

Halman doubled down on that message and said one of the most important parts to creating a healthy forest is having an informed public. 

“The number one thing is education and making the public aware of the species that are out there, prevent the introduction and what to do if they find it,” he said. “It’s just as important to provide info on how to manage them when they do show up.”

Advertisement

Volunteer efforts do not just come from local towns and villages but also through a more statewide approach. The Forest Pest First Detectors program consists of community members around Vermont who are the first people to notice invasives and report them. 

Vermont relies on testing from inside and outside the state, while also looking towards Vermonters to help report and identify invasive species. 

The LIEP Invasive Species Program helps Vermonters locate, identify and prevent future invasive species and the public is encouraged to report an invasive species finding and location using the VT invasives reporting tool.





Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

Vermont’s oldest museum opened almost 150 years ago. How to visit

Published

on

Vermont’s oldest museum opened almost 150 years ago. How to visit


Colorblind museum helps visitors see color for first time

A North Carolina museum is offering special glasses so that colorblind visitors can see art in full color.

Fox – Seattle

Looking for a new museum to visit this winter?

Advertisement

As a historic state with European settlements going all the way back to the 1600s, Vermont is home to many historical museums dedicated to preserving the state’s foundational role in United States history.

In fact, the state’s oldest museum dates all the way back to 1884, making it almost 150 years old. Originally founded from a personal collection, Henry Sheldon Museum is not only the oldest museum in Vermont, but also the oldest community-based museum in the whole country.

Here’s a brief history of the oldest museum in Vermont, as well as how to visit.

History of Henry Sheldon Museum

According to the museum’s website, Henry Sheldon Museum was founded by its namesake, Henry Sheldon. A local businessman and avid collector, Sheldon turned his personal collection of furniture, paintings, documents, household objects and artifacts into a museum, which opened to the public in July of 1884, says the Vermont Historical Society.

Advertisement

The museum’s collection has expanded greatly since then and still continues to grow. Today, the Sheldon aims to help community members gain a deeper appreciation of Vermont’s local art and history through engaging art and history exhibits, programs, events and an extensive archival collection at the museum’s research center.

This spring’s upcoming feature exhibit will focus on the idea of time, displaying the museum’s collection of timepieces like clocks, watches, calendars, journals, time capsules and more.

How to visit Vermont’s oldest museum

Want to explore Vermont history and art at the oldest museum in the state? Henry Sheldon Museum is open from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Wednesday throguh Saturday.

Advertisement

Admission costs $10 for adults or $5 for seniors, with free admission for members, students and children ages 18 and under. Appointments to visit the museum’s research center must be made by emailing archives@henrysheldonmuseum.org.

Henry Sheldon Museum is located at 1 Park St. in Middlebury.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Spaulding wrestling dethrones Mount Anthony, ends 36-year title reign

Published

on

Spaulding wrestling dethrones Mount Anthony, ends 36-year title reign


Editor’s note: For the full championship story and photos, visit HERE.

HINESBURG — For the first time since 1988, there is a new Vermont high school wrestling state champion.

Spaulding dethroned Mount Anthony, ending the Patriots’ 36-year reign with an impressive team performance at the state championship at Champlain Valley Union High School on Feb, 28, 2026.

Advertisement

The Crimson Tide scored grapplers in 12 out of 14 weight classes and had seven of them competing in final matches.

Spaulding, which locked up the title before final matches commenced, finished with 236.5 points to MAU’s 195.

This is Spaulding’s first title since 1984. MAU’s unchallenged championship run was a national record for wrestling. It ranks sixth all-time for consecutive state titles among all high school sports in the country.

Check back later for an updated story and photo gallery at burlingtonfreepress.com.

Advertisement

Team scores (final)

1. Spaulding 236; 2. Mount Anthony 195; 3. Middlebury 134.5; 4. Vergennes 123; 5. Otter Valley 121; 6. Colchester 96; 7. Essex 86; 8. Mount Abraham 85.5; 9. Harwood 67; 10. Springfield 54; 11. Fair Haven 52; 12. Mount Mansfield 44; 13. Burr and Burton 43; 14. North Country 38.5; 15. Mill River 38; 16. St. Johnsbury 37.5; 17. Champlain Valley 36; 18. Lyndon 33; 19. South Burlington 29; 20. Randolph 28; 21. Rutland 26; 22. U-32 12; 23. Lamoille 11; 24. Lake Region 6; T25. BFA-Fairfax, Rice 3.

106-pound final: Wesley Churchill (Spa) def. Fernando Oyola (MAU) for 14-3 win (major decision)

Winner: Churchill caps the evening of finals with with a state title as the No. 3 seed, beating the top-ranked grappler in this division. Churchill was fifth a year ago at 106.

Other place finishers: 3. Tolkein Lawlor (MMU); 4. Brady Babcock (OV); 5. Mason Douglass (U-32); 6. Sam Dyer (Rut).

113-pound final: Sylas Race (MAU) def. Lucas Colby (Spa) for 8-7 win

Winner: In the first match of the finals, Race builds a 7-0 lead before Colby storms back in the final period. But Race holds on for the 8-7 victory. The match was stopped three times for what appeared to be a bloody nose.

Advertisement

Other place finishers: 3. Caleb Woodward (OV); 4. Addie Smith (Verg); 5. Colton Jones (MR); 6. Liem Moller (CVU).

120-pound final: Brayden Buchanan (Essex) def. Mason Sheltra (Col) for 16-1 win (tech fall)

Winner: The sophomore Buchanan polishes off his second straight title, securing a tech fall (margin of 15 or more points) in the final seconds of the match. Buchanan celebrates with a back flip. Sheltra was going for a third state title.

Other place finishers: 3. Miles Goetz (Midd); 4. Duncan Klinck (Har); 5. Vincent Deysenroth (MAU); 6. Darien Haselton (CVU).

126-pound final: Cahota LaFond (Col) def. Eion Comes (NC) for 17-0 win (tech fall)

Winner: LaFond completes a fourth straight state title with a tech fall in the final seconds of the first period. The senior, who surpassed 200 career wins last month, celebrates with a take down to the mat of his coach, Scott McPhearson.

Other place finishers: 3. Jackson Brown (MMU); 4. Adrien Provencher (Verg); 5. Grady Thurston (Spa); 6. Eric Whitten (Har).

Advertisement

132-pound final: Stephen Kittredge (Verg) def. Anthony Szabo (FH) for 7-4 overtime win

Winner: In the early moments of a 1-minute overtime period, Kittredge uncorks impressive takedown for the three points and state title, his first after finishing runner-up at 126 in 2025.

Other place finishers: 3. Dylan Jacobs (Col); 4. Landon Wilcox (OV); 5. Nate Sackett (Har); 6. Cole Brown (Lyn).

138-pound final: Asa Reis (MAU) def. Karter Morey (Lyn) for 17-4 win (major decision)

Winner: Reis seizes his second title in three years, taking early lead and cruising to the major decision. A year ago, Reis was runner-up in this weight class.

Other place finishers: 3. Colby Belden (FH); 4. Mo Hussein (SB); 5. Camden Ayer (CVU); 6. Gavin Winnie (Spa).

144-pound final: Duncan Harrington (MAU) def. Michael Grasso (Spa) for 10-3 win

Winner: Harrington gets his third straight state crown. Harrington scored a pair of takedowns in the first period to take control.

Advertisement

Other place finishers: 3. Jackson Scribner (Verg); 4. Anthony Abetti (BBA); 5. Carter Jones (Essex); 6. Wyatt Tarbell (MR).

150-pound final: Isayah Isham (MTA) pins Tyler Monick (MAU)

Winner: With 17 seconds left in the second period, Isham pins Monick for his state title. Isham, who took third a year ago, was up 10-1 prior to his pin.

Other place finishers: 3. James Marcellus (Spa); 4. Jackson Ladd (SJ); 5. Micah Perez (Rut); 6. Chase Tefts-Young (Col).

157-pound final: Nicky Service (Har) def. Mason Atkins (MTA) for 9-7 win

Winner: Service is the first Harwood wrestler to win a state title since Kyle Streeter in 2013.

Other place finishers: 3. Logan Slater (Spa); 4. Connor Decker (SJ); 5. Jason Sperry (Midd); 6. Jeremy Glodgett (NC).

Advertisement

165-pound final: Noah Dunster (Spa) def. Blake Allen (OV) for 4-3 win

Winner: Dunster scored all of his points (escape, takedown) in the first period, hanging on to beat the top seed for his first state title.

Other place finishers: 3. Dimitri Jasinski (Spring); 4. Lincoln Painter (MTA); 5. Quinn Veth-McGovern (BBA); 6. Henry Dodge (SB).

175-pound final: Payton Lavoie (Verg) pins Caleb Hoar (Spa)

Winner: Lavoie earns his second straight crown with a first-period pin with 22 seconds left. Last year, Lavoie won the 190-pound class.

Other place finishers: 3. Ethan Patch (MR); 4. Parker Carl (Midd); 5. Jonathan Lake (Spring); 6. Max Potter (OV).

190-pound final: Maxwell LaPerle (Spa) def. Wyatt Kennett (Midd) for 20-2 win (tech fall)

Winner: After a scoreless first period, LaPerle led 5-1 through two periods before piling up two near falls and two takedowns for the tech fall victory.

Advertisement

Other place finishers: 3. Zane Cooper (Rand); 4. Keegan Reid (OV); 5. Abraham Kreuger (Lam); 6. Jacob Jamieson (FH).

215-pound final: Tucker Wright (Midd) pins Charlie Berry (Spa) (5:49)

Winner: Wright separates with an eight-point second period and then secures second consecutive state title with a late third-period pin.

Other place finishers: 3. Drake Felkl (OV); 4. Ian Denue (MAU); 5. Rowan Danaher (Essex); 6. Dallas Sulton’El (Col).

285-pound final: Ryan Marsden (MAU) pins Steven Lackard (Midd) (4:37)

Winner: Marsden claims his third straight 285-pound championship with a third-period pin.

Other place finishers: 3. Joe Gershon (Essex); 4. Izaak Wolniewicz (Verg); 5. Tyler Scott (MMU); 6. Alex Poczobut (Spa).

Advertisement

Contact Alex Abrami at aabrami@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter: @aabrami5.





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Ugandan torture survivor and UVM Health Network nurse faces uncertain future in Vermont

Published

on

Ugandan torture survivor and UVM Health Network nurse faces uncertain future in Vermont


BURLINGTON, Vt. (WCAX) – We’re digging deeper into the story of Steven Tendo, an asylum seeker living in Vermont who was detained by ICE, but has been released. We spoke with his lawyer about his plan to stay in the states amidst the national immigration crackdown.

Stephen Tendo was a political activist in Uganda. He fled after he was tortured, shot in the leg, and lost two of his fingers. He sought asylum at a port of entry in Brownsville, Texas, in 2018.

In 2019, the Department of Homeland Security denied his application, and Tendo was detained for two and a half years.

The Department of Homeland Security says they denied his application for asylum because of inconsistencies.

Advertisement

“They had to do with his wife’s date of birth, as well as his prior visa application, which asked for all the countries that he traveled through,” said Christopher Worth, Tendo’s lawyer.

A non-profit research group found 69% of asylum applications were denied in 2019 during Trump’s first term. Tendo was released on an order of supervision in 2021, which means he could live and work in the U.S. while awaiting potential removal. Since then, he’s been a pastor and a nursing assistant in Vermont.

“Steven filed three applications for stays of removal, all of which were granted. He was scheduled for a check-in on Friday, February 6th. ICE had been notified that that’s when the stay application was being filed, but yet they took that day as the opportunity to arrest him two days before his check-in,” said Worth.

Tendo spoke with Senator Peter Welch about the conditions of the Dover detention center.

“The circumstances he described in Dover were really — very, very bad,” said Senator Welch.

Advertisement

A New Hampshire judge found ICE violated Tendo’s due process because the federal agency did not provide the required notice for revoking his supervised release. Tendo, who has no criminal record, walked free on February 20th.

“The pattern that we’re seeing is that ICE seems to have a quota for arrests. I’ve heard that they have to make 3,000 arrests every day, and that’s very hard to do. And so, ICE seems to be arresting everyone they possibly can, whether or not that person may be removed or not,” said Worth.

Tendo is expected to check in with ICE on March 20th at their St. Albans office. While his attorneys are hard at work trying to delay his potential removal, it’s unclear if he will be detained again before then.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending