Connect with us

Vermont

Final Reading: Vermont’s ‘climate superfund’ comes with complications – VTDigger

Published

on

Final Reading: Vermont’s ‘climate superfund’ comes with complications – VTDigger


Extensive damage to Red Village Road in Lyndon, seen on Wednesday, July 31, 2024. Photo by Jeb Wallace-Brodeur/VTDigger

Last year, the Vermont Legislature made history by passing the nation’s first “climate superfund” law. This year is about figuring out all of the follow up questions that come with setting precedent. 

One piece of that is how much money and time state agencies will actually need to carry out the research the law tasks them with.

Act 122 takes the polluters-pay framework from the federal hazardous waste Superfund and applies it to the costs of climate damages, like flood recovery or harm from extreme heat. Essentially, the law rests on the idea that Vermonters should not be the ones left with the bill for messes caused by climate change. Instead, the multinational oil companies responsible for extracting the fossil fuels driving climate change should be.

But figuring out what those companies are liable for and how much climate damages actually cost is no small order. It relies on the rather-nascent field of climate attribution science, which essentially uses modeling to figure out how likely a weather event would be if greenhouse gas emissions were at pre-industrial levels. 

Advertisement

Scientists have gotten really good at doing this for heatwaves, but when it comes to flooding, especially in the unique mountain-valley topography of Vermont, a lot of the research simply doesn’t exist yet, Deputy Treasurer Gavin Boyles told the House Committee on Energy and Digital Infrastructure Friday afternoon.

That’s why the Office of the State Treasurer and the Agency of Natural Resources are asking the Legislature for an extra year to do these assessments and for an additional $825,000 and $675,000, respectively, in order to hire people who can help them assess climate damage costs to Vermont. ANR is also hoping to put a portion of those funds toward hiring an additional attorney to navigate incoming lawsuits.

That brings us to the second piece of this: in December, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Petroleum Institute filed a legal challenge.  

Among its claims, the lawsuit hinges upon an argument that the federal Clean Air Act preempts Vermont’s law. It cites existing legal precedent that says the Clean Air Act allows the federal Environmental Protection Agency the power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, not just air pollution. 

The fact that this comes as the EPA is acting to dismantle the powers included in the Clean Air Act, leads to “complete cognitive dissonance,” Anthony Iarrapino, an attorney who lobbied for the law’s passage, said in an interview.

Advertisement

Changes at the EPA would not affect the ability of Vermont’s climate superfund to go into effect.

However, those changes might muddle the fossil fuel industry’s argument in the lawsuit “What the Trump administration is doing to weaken the Clean Air Act only strengthens our argument that states have a right to act and fill in where the federal government has retreated,” Iarrapino added.

The lawsuit itself appears to be moving slowly; “I totally thought I’d be subject to depositions and records requests, but I’ve heard nothing,” Legislative Council Michael O’Grady told the House Committee on Energy and Digital Infrastructure. “It’s curious that it’s been pretty silent.”

— Olivia Gieger


In the know

The Vermont Agency of Transportation expects that it will pave about 220 miles of state-owned roads over a yearlong period that ends in June. In the year after that, though, it’s set to pave only about 125 miles, according to the agency’s latest spending plans — a nearly 45% reduction.

Advertisement

That drop has raised concerns among the leaders of the Legislature’s committees on transportation in recent weeks, who said that while the amount the state paves varies each year, the projected change from the 2025 to 2026 fiscal years stands out. 

Miles paved over the 2026 fiscal year, which starts this July, would be the lowest since 2020, agency data shows, when the state paved 157 miles of roads it owns and operates. 

“We’re in a bad place,” said Sen. Richard Westman, R-Lamoille, who chairs the Senate Transportation Committee.

Read more about the state of the transportation fund here. 

— Shaun Robinson

Advertisement

The Green Mountain Care Board unanimously approved a settlement with the University of Vermont Health Network Friday, paving the way for a deal in which the hospital network will pay millions to primary care practices and the state’s largest private insurer, and will fund an outside observer to oversee the hospitals’ spending and operations.

It’s not yet clear who that observer — officially called a “liaison” — will be.

But Mike Smith, a former Secretary of the Agency of Human Services and the Agency of Administration, said in a brief interview Friday that he had had conversations with the board and the health network about the role.

“There’s a process, and let me just say that I’ll let the process play out and see where it leads,” he said. But, he added, “I mean, obviously, if I’m talking to people, I’m interested.”

Read more about the Green Mountain Care Board’s vote here.

Advertisement

— Peter D’Auria

For the second time this legislative session, Gov. Phil Scott vetoed a mid-year spending package Friday over disagreements with lawmakers about Vermont’s motel voucher program. 

In his veto letter, the five-term Republican governor rebuked lawmakers for continuing to use the mid-year budget adjustment bill to seek an extension of the voucher program’s winter rules, which ended earlier this week, forcing out hundreds of Vermonters who have been staying in motels. 

Read about the veto and the response here. 

— Habib Sabet

Advertisement

Visit our 2025 bill tracker for the latest updates on major legislation we are following. 





Source link

Vermont

Vermont Yankee will be ’99 percent demolished’ by the end of the year

Published

on

Vermont Yankee will be ’99 percent demolished’ by the end of the year


VERNON — The demolition of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant will be “99 percent complete” by the end of the year, according to a recent estimate from the chief executive officer of Yankee’s owner, NorthStar Group Services.

Scott State, in a telephone interview from his home in Arizona, said that crews have been making good progress in this fall’s good weather, and the reactor building’s wall and interior would be down to the ground by Thanksgiving.

According to recent photographs of the reactor building, there are still concrete walls standing. At one point this fall, two large excavators, which had to be hoisted to the top of the reactor building by a super-large crane, were tearing the building apart, from the top down.

Advertisement

“We plan to have it down to ground level within the next four weeks,” he said.

According to the memorandum of understanding NorthStar has with the state of Vermont, it must remove all structures that are within four feet of ground level, and that will take until Christmas, State said.

The concrete is very thick in the foundation, about two to three feet thick. He estimated the foundation goes 40 to 50 feet into the ground, but the vast majority of it would be left in place.

The company has until 2030 to complete the decommissioning of the Yankee site, and has long said the job would be complete by the end of 2026, but that most work would be done by 2025.

State said all the concrete rubble from the reactor building is being stored on site, but will eventually be shipped to west Texas, at the low-level radioactive waste facility run by NorthStar’s partner, Waste Services.

Advertisement

After the reactor building’s demolition is complete, the concrete will be shipped over a six-month period, State said. He said there is only room for two rail cars at a time to be loaded at the Yankee site.

“Mid-summer, next fall, all that stuff will be gone,” he said.

NorthStar, which bought the Vermont Yankee plant from former owner Entergy Nuclear in January 2019, actually started decommissioning several months before the sale was completed and approved by state and federal regulators.

NorthStar’s plans called for immediately demolition, rather than putting the plant into what essentially is cold storage, the plan adopted by Entergy. Under that plan, no work would have been done at Yankee for decades.

State said that additional field work, site assessments, sampling, studies and reports will take up the rest of 2026, when the company will seek final approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Advertisement

With the government shut down and continued understaffing at the NRC, State said that approval could take longer than originally expected.

Recent soil testing near the reactor building revealed contamination of PFAS or “forever chemicals,” at significantly above Vermont standards. That contamination is believed to have come from a fire at the plant’s electrical transformer in 2004, on the non-nuclear side of the plant.

The reactor building, which is the last major building left at the 140-acre site, was almost as big underground as it was above ground, State said. The reactor building, which housed the reactor core plus the spent fuel pool, was about five stories high.

The reactor building is located next to the storage site of the radioactive spent fuel from the 42 years the plant operated. The spent fuel is stored in giant concrete and steel casks, and it will remain after decommissioning is completed.

According to the state memorandum, the deep foundation may be left in place after testing shows it is clear of any radioactivity.

Advertisement

NorthStar agreed that the reactor foundation hole would not be filled with the rubbleized concrete from the demolition, but “clean fill,” State said, which will be trucked in to the Vernon site.

He said the other nuclear decommissioning project NorthStar is doing, Crystal River 3 in Florida, will use its rubble-ized concrete for fill, which State said is standard practice – but not in Vermont.

“We will not backfill until the NRC releases the site,” he said.

There are two large trust funds paying for the demolition and clean up work. The second, smaller fund will pay for site restoration. The larger $600 million fund was paid for by the utility customers of the original owner of Vermont Yankee, the Vermont Nuclear Power Corp.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Daylight saving time ends 2 AM Sunday. Turn your clocks back 1 hour before bedtime tonight.

Published

on

Daylight saving time ends 2 AM Sunday.  Turn your clocks back 1 hour before bedtime tonight.


BURLINGTON, Vt. (WCAX) – It’s that time of year again. We go back to standard time 2 AM Sunday, so before bedtime tonight, turn your clocks back 1 hour. After a blustery and chilly Saturday, Sunday will be relatively pleasant with partly sunny skies and highs in the 40s. It won’t be as breezy as the past couple of days.

Monday will start off with some sunshine, then clouds will quickly increase as a cold front approaches the area. Showers are likely around mid-afternoon, first in New York, then spreading eastward. Showers will continue overnight, possibly ending as some mountain snow showers early Tuesday morning. Little to no accumulation is expected. Highs on Monday will be warmer, in the 50s. The remainder of Tuesday will be partly sunny with highs in the upper 40s to low 50s. Lows will be mainly in the 30s.

A clipper will bring light rain on Wednesday, especially south. We’ll be on the backside of that on Thursday, which will feature mostly cloudy skies with showers and mountain snow showers. Highs by Thursday will be in the upper 30s to mid-40s.

Clouds will thicken up on Friday, with another cold front expected to bring showers late in the day, continuing overnight. As with the case Monday night, it may end as some mountain snow showers early Saturday morning. Highs on Friday will be in the 50s. The rest of Saturday will be partly sunny but quite chilly. Most spots may not get out of the 30s for highs.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Head Start programs in two Vermont regions may face temporary closure amid federal shutdown – VTDigger

Published

on

Head Start programs in two Vermont regions may face temporary closure amid federal shutdown – VTDigger


Playtime sponsored by the Rutland County Head Start at Wonderfeet Kids’ Museum on Dec. 11, 2024. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

A version of this story by Adora Brown was published on Oct. 29, 2025 by NOTUS. Theo Wells-Spackman is a Report for America corps member who reports for VTDigger.

In Washington, Democrats and national advocates are warning about the growing consequences that the government shutdown will have on Head Start programs across the country.

On Saturday, another wave of funding lapses is set to affect nearly 60,000 more children across 41 states, according to the National Head Start Association.

In Vermont, none of the state’s seven Head Start programs will need to shutter in November, according to Christy Swenson, the Head Start Director at Capstone Community Action and board chair of the Vermont Head Start Association. 

Advertisement

However, several will face temporary closure in early December if the shutdown wears on, Swenson said. Leaders of programs serving two Vermont regions — the Champlain Valley and the Northeast Kingdom — anticipate running out of federal funds by then, they said. 

The federal Head Start program, which provides child care and nutritious meals to more than 700,000 children across the country, and around 1,250 in Vermont, has already faced funding lapses that forced some locations in other states to close completely and others to look for interim funding elsewhere. 

Head Start, together with Early Head Start, aims to serve children from birth to age 5 living in foster care or households with incomes below the federal poverty line, or who are experiencing homelessness. In Vermont, almost one-fifth of children enrolled are unhoused or experiencing housing insecurity, according to an analysis of federal data by a national advocacy group.

“It’s an absolute tragedy,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who caucuses with Democrats, said about the upcoming lapses. “And it is beyond comprehension that you have a Republican House, which is now in its fifth week of vacation. Maybe they want to come to work and help us resolve this crisis.”

Head Start is funded on annual cycles, which have starting dates that vary from program to program, Swenson said. Once the commitment is renewed, the process of “drawing down” federal funding as it becomes necessary is not affected by the shutdown, she added.

Advertisement

Champlain Valley Head Start in Burlington is only guaranteed funding through Nov. 1, which means their grant ends on Saturday, Sandra Graves, the program’s director, said on Friday. Her program would be able to stay open through November under a continued shutdown, although only by exhausting its financial reserves, she said.

The program, which is operated by the Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity, serves Chittenden, Addison, Franklin, and Grand Isle counties. Graves’ staff of 63 provides care and programs to 233 enrolled children and their families, she said.

On Dec. 5, in the absence of federal funding or other support, all of the program’s offerings will need to pause, and all staff will be furloughed, Graves said. The annual grant from the federal Office of Head Start is roughly $7.2 million, she said, which represents the program’s entire operating budget save two small state-level grants.

The Head Start program run by Northeast Kingdom Community Action, or NEKCA, has a Dec. 1 funding cycle, but does not possess the financial cushion that Champlain Valley has available, said NEKCA Executive Director Jenna O’Farrell. The program may be able to keep running for a short time after Dec. 1 with a fraction of its previous capacity, but O’Farrell said that isn’t guaranteed.

That program operates eight physical locations across the rural Northeast Kingdom. It serves 160 children and their families, and employs 78 staff members.

Advertisement

Champlain Valley Head Start filed its annual federal funding application on time in August, Graves said. Ordinarily, the request should have been approved in September. But the Office of Head Start has seen cuts to staffing under the Trump administration, and every aspect of Graves’ interaction with federal officials has slowed, she said.

Even once the government opens, Graves has been told her organization’s funding approval might take several weeks. It may be hard to avoid the Dec. 5 deadline even if the shutdown ends in mid-November, she said.

Graves has not heard from the federal Office of Head Start since the shutdown began. Even though reimbursement for stopgap measures would be customary, she said recent federal actions toward other service programs have made her nervous.

The program’s closure would be a “huge, huge loss for our children and families,” Graves said. Apart from being a source of food and services for kids, Champlain Valley Head Start provides child care that allows parents to stay in the workforce, Graves added.

Graves has applied for temporary state funding from the Vermont Emergency Board, which on Wednesday approved a state-funded stopgap for lost federal food assistance. Champlain Valley Head Start will need about $1 million to remain stable over the next two months, Graves said.

Advertisement

O’Farrell said she too plans to apply for funding from the state’s Emergency Board. NEKCA’s Head Start program’s monthly expenses total roughly $450,000.

A closure would cause an “immediate, severe impact on low-income families across our service area,” O’Farrell said. 

Federal finger pointing

Outside of Congress, pressure from nonprofit groups is starting to pick up as Head Start programs look for solutions elsewhere.

“They are working with their states, working with their counties, working with their school districts, looking within their agencies, talking to philanthropic partners, just really trying to do everything that they can to avoid children and families being the collateral damage of the political fights in Washington,” said Tommy Sheridan, the deputy director of the National Head Start Association, a nonprofit that represents Head Start organizations and programs in Washington, D.C.

“They’re not gonna be able to hold that back forever,” Sheridan added.

Advertisement

Across the country, some Head Start programs already lost funding on Oct. 1 when their fiscal year ended, but the Saturday Nov. 1 deadline will have an even bigger effect because programs in the vast majority of states will lose their federal funding.

More than 100 organizations signed a letter released Tuesday, led by the First Five Years Fund, a nonprofit that supports child care and early education programs. In it, they asked Congress to end the shutdown.

“We cannot allow political gridlock to take away opportunities from our youngest learners and their families,” the letter reads.

But the pressure appears to have little effect on Republicans on Capitol Hill, even though lawmakers are aware that programs in their states could close. The Florida Head Start Association wrote in a press release that seven grantees won’t get a federal check on Saturday, bringing the total number of affected children in the state to almost 9,000.

“Isn’t it awful that the Democrats are doing this?” Sen. Ashley Moody, R-Fla., told NOTUS. Her comment is in line with Republicans’ messaging strategy of placing blame on Democrats for the shutdown as they withhold votes due to expiring health care subsidies.

Advertisement

In a statement to NOTUS, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services also tried to place the blame on Democrats.

“More than 58,000 children are on course to lose access to Head Start funding and programs on November 1 due solely to the Democrat-led government shutdown,” a spokesperson for the federal department said in a statement to NOTUS.

Despite the fact that many programs for low-income families are barrelling toward losing federal funding, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and WIC, senators seem no closer to ending the shutdown stalemate.

The home state of Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., would be one of the most affected by Head Start funding lapses. 

When asked what people in Florida are saying about losing programs that help low-income families, Scott said, “They’re fed up with the Democrats shutting down the government.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending