Connect with us

Vermont

Final Reading: Lawmakers learn it’s expensive to be incarcerated in Vermont – VTDigger

Published

on

Final Reading: Lawmakers learn it’s expensive to be incarcerated in Vermont – VTDigger


A phone inmates use to communicate with attorneys inside the Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility in South Burlington on Monday, August 27, 2024. The handset is upside down in the cradle to show that it has been cleaned. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

The little costs in prison add up. Phone calls cost six cents per minute. Digital messages are a quarter each. Want to send a letter? Eighteen cents for an envelope. 

The House Corrections and Institutions Committee Thursday was reviewing many of the fees paid by incarcerated people and their families, like commissary, phone calls and digital communications. This year, a single for-profit contractor will take over the commissary and the digital tablets given to most incarcerated people, consolidating what were previously two contracts. 

In 2024 alone, Vermont Department of Corrections’ commissions on phone calls and commissary raised almost $650,000, according to records obtained by VTDigger. That money, the vast majority of which comes from the commissary, pays for prison recreation coordinators and a recreation fund.

The costs and options have incarcerated people fed up. According to a survey of 212 people held at the Springfield prison, 91% either disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement “the costs are reasonable” at the commissary. Similarly, 85% disagreed that there were enough items to buy, and 75% disagreed that the quality of items is “good.” 

Advertisement

“That’s a major area of improvement for the department,” Isaac Dayno, executive director of policy and strategic initiatives at DOC, told lawmakers at the hearing.

Rep. Joe Luneau, R-St. Albans City, called out a particularly strange commissary price disparity: the Bible costs $16, but the Quran costs $27. 

“Even though the Quran is a much shorter document,” Luneau noted.

“That is for sure on (a) very high part of the list for something we’re looking at,” Kristin Calver, DOC’s deputy commissioner, said. 

Thursday’s conversation was sparked by H.294, a bill sponsored by committee member Rep. Troy Headrick, I-Burlington. In part, the proposal would make communications services like phones and messaging free for incarcerated people. 

Advertisement

Only a handful of state have provided free communications in prison, and as DOC officials pointed out, some of those state have seen increased use — and costs. 

Calls more than doubled in Massachusetts during the first year of free service, and in Connecticut, the state governor was proposing nixing the program to fill a budget hole. 

For his part, Headrick said he sees increased usage not as something to condemn, but a worthy goal. 

The data suggests states aren’t providing a “basic human need.” he said. “That costs money.” 

— Ethan Weinstein

Advertisement

In the know

Why not just knock it down? That’s what first-term Vermont Representative Shawn Sweeney said was his first thought after hearing the staggering $40 million estimated price tag on the state’s proposal for restoring the Bennington Battle Monument. 

But, then he thought there must be other cheaper, creative and more sustainable ways to address the challenges facing the monument. Taking inspiration from another monument to liberty, a giant patina green copper one in New York Harbor, he tinkered with a miniature model of the battle monument and brought his big idea to the institutions committee last week.

The Bennington Battle Monument is composed of limestone, which is currently saturated by an estimated 66,000 gallons of water. The steep cost of its repair has sparked debate over whether the state should consider other innovative, even potentially holographic solutions for the memorial to the historic Battle of Bennington.

Sweeney, D-Shelburne, who sits on the committee, proposed enclosing the monument in a ventilated copper sheath, using heat pumps to initially dry the monument out and maintain a year-round air-conditioning system.  Sweeney estimates that his proposed plan would cost $5 million to $15 million, he said in an interview. 

Read more about the committee’s discussion of how to handle repairs on the Bennington Battle Monument here.

Advertisement

— Greta Solsaa


On the move

Paige Kaleita found a surprise in her mail last August: a letter from the Department of Environmental Conservation saying her Richmond neighborhood was out of compliance with stormwater regulations. 

Kaleita and some of her neighbors in the Southview development live on land regulated by what’s called the 3-acre rule. Put into effect after the passage of the state’s 2016 Clean Water Act, the rule requires any site with at least 3 acres of impervious surface, or those that water can’t pass through, to obtain a stormwater permit if they hadn’t done so since 2002. 

The letters sent to the Richmond residents stated that failure to comply may result in a title encumbrance being placed on the property, impacting the homeowners’ ability to sell. 

Only some residents of the development live on land that’s out of compliance. Neighbors just up the hill from Kaleita’s home, or even a few doors down, didn’t receive such letters from the department. 

Advertisement

“We’re expecting it to be around $20,000 per household,” said Kaleita. She’s frustrated that only the few homeowners who live on 3-acre sites need to foot the bill for upgrades when “we all contribute” to stormwater pollution.

Legislators in the House Committee on Environment and Energy put together a bill this year aimed at addressing concerns like those in Richmond. It recently passed the House and moved into the Senate. 

The bill, H.481, includes multiple provisions to quell people’s issues with the current stormwater permitting system, such allowing more time to comply with the 3-acre rule. In addition, it would set up a study to explore creating regional utility districts to take over responsibility for stormwater compliance.

Read more about the proposed changes to the 3-acre rule here. 

— Sam Hartnett, Community News Service

Advertisement

Visit our 2025 bill tracker for the latest updates on major legislation we are following. 





Source link

Vermont

OUTDOOR ACCESS FOR DISABLED IN VERMONT

Published

on

OUTDOOR ACCESS FOR DISABLED IN VERMONT


Louis Arevalo rides his adaptive mountain bike through the trails at Randolph Town Forest during an adaptive assessment on Thursday, June 25. Nick Bennette, with the Vermont Mountain Bike Association, rides behind.

Zoe McDonald/Vermont Public


hide caption

Advertisement



toggle caption

Zoe McDonald/Vermont Public

Mountain bike enthusiasts have been working for years on an ambitious 485-mile, multi-use trail called The Velomont that will span the length of the state.

When finished, the collaborative project will knit together existing trail networks, connect 27 communities and include huts and hostels for overnight stays.

Advertisement

New trail construction is finally ramping up after years spent on permits, plans and public input. And organizers say they want to make it as user-friendly as possible.

“For us, it’s not a huge lift to just be mindful when we’re trying to build trail or improve trail to think about the adaptive rider,” said Angus McCusker, the Velomont trail director with the nonprofit Vermont Huts and Trails.

McCusker is referring to the growing number of disabled athletes who mountain bike with specially designed equipment.

“The challenge,” said McCusker, “is we’re connecting to existing trail networks that were never intended for adaptive bikes. So, where we can, we’re trying to do adaptive assessments.”

Louis Arevalo, left, straps into his adaptive mountain bike and chats with Jeff Dickson of the Vermont Mountain Bike Association, Angus McCusker with Vermont Huts and Trails, and volunteer Thatcher Hinman (all from left) ahead of a trail accessibility assessment in Randolph, Vermont, on Thursday, June 25, 2026.

Louis Arevalo, left, straps into his adaptive mountain bike and chats with Jeff Dickson of the Vermont Mountain Bike Association, Angus McCusker with Vermont Huts and Trails, and volunteer Thatcher Hinman (all from left) ahead of a trail accessibility assessment in Randolph, Vermont, on Thursday, June 25, 2026.

Zoe McDonald/Vermont Public

Advertisement


hide caption



toggle caption

Zoe McDonald/Vermont Public

Advertisement

Louis Arevalo of Essex Junction is one of several adaptive athletes helping with that, most recently on some slightly overgrown single track trails in Randolph, a central Vermont town nestled along the eastern edge of the Green Mountains.

Arevalo pedals with his hands. He rides an electric powered recumbent-style three-wheeler that sits low to the ground. His service dog Azul chases along nearby.

“Once you realize what these bikes are capable (of) or this equipment actually opens up, it kind of blows your mind,” he said.

Arevalo was paralyzed in a skiing accident six years ago. Being able to get back on the trails has been a game changer, he said smiling.

“There’s a reason we live in the Green Mountain state. It’s because we like to get outside…you know, seeing the squirrels and chipmunks and birds… I mean, it’s life.”

Advertisement
Nick Bennette, of the Vermont Mountain Biking Association, guides an adaptive bike over a narrow bridge, pointing out that other adaptive riders may have trouble getting across.

Nick Bennette, of the Vermont Mountain Biking Association, guides an adaptive bike over a narrow bridge, pointing out that other adaptive riders may have trouble getting across.

Zoe McDonald/Vermont Public


hide caption



toggle caption

Zoe McDonald/Vermont Public

Advertisement

But adaptive rigs like Arevalo’s are wider and heavier than regular mountain bikes, and not all trails are user-friendly.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

VT Lottery Powerball, Gimme 5 results for July 8, 2026

Published

on


Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win

Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.

Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

The Vermont Lottery offers several draw games for those willing to make a bet to win big.

Advertisement

Those who want to play can enter the MegaBucks and Lucky for Life games as well as the national Powerball and Mega Millions games. Vermont also partners with New Hampshire and Maine for the Tri-State Lottery, which includes the Mega Bucks, Gimme 5 as well as the Pick 3 and Pick 4.

Drawings are held at regular days and times, check the end of this story to see the schedule.

Here’s a look at July 8, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from July 8 drawing

12-29-37-43-55, Powerball: 18, Power Play: 4

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Gimme 5 numbers from July 8 drawing

01-05-23-36-38

Check Gimme 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from July 8 drawing

Day: 0-1-3

Evening: 2-4-0

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 4 numbers from July 8 drawing

Day: 3-9-5-9

Evening: 9-2-0-9

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Megabucks Plus numbers from July 8 drawing

12-15-23-27-40, Megaball: 03

Check Megabucks Plus payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from July 8 drawing

16-18-43-48-50, Bonus: 01

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

For Vermont Lottery prizes up to $499, winners can claim their prize at any authorized Vermont Lottery retailer or at the Vermont Lottery Headquarters by presenting the signed winning ticket for validation. Prizes between $500 and $5,000 can be claimed at any M&T Bank location in Vermont during the Vermont Lottery Office’s business hours, which are 8a.m.-4p.m. Monday through Friday, except state holidays.

For prizes over $5,000, claims must be made in person at the Vermont Lottery headquarters. In addition to signing your ticket, you will need to bring a government-issued photo ID, and a completed claim form.

Advertisement

All prize claims must be submitted within one year of the drawing date. For more information on prize claims or to download a Vermont Lottery Claim Form, visit the Vermont Lottery’s FAQ page or contact their customer service line at (802) 479-5686.

Vermont Lottery Headquarters

1311 US Route 302, Suite 100

Barre, VT

05641

Advertisement

When are the Vermont Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Megabucks: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily

What is Vermont Lottery Second Chance?

Vermont’s 2nd Chance lottery lets players enter eligible non-winning instant scratch tickets into a drawing to win cash and/or other prizes. Players must register through the state’s official Lottery website or app. The drawings are held quarterly or are part of an additional promotion, and are done at Pollard Banknote Limited in Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Vermont editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Poll: Most young Vermonters say they’re likely to leave state amid affordability concerns – VTDigger

Published

on

Poll: Most young Vermonters say they’re likely to leave state amid affordability concerns – VTDigger


University of Vermont students gather at a protest on campus in Burlington in April 2022. File photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Theo Wells-Spackman is a Report for America corps member who reports for VTDigger.

Nearly two-thirds of Vermonters ages 18 to 34 say they’re likely to leave the state within five years in search of adventure or a cheaper place to live, according to a poll from the University of New Hampshire.  

Overall, the poll estimated that 86% of Vermonters find the state at least somewhat unaffordable.

“The issue of affordability has been a very important thing across New England,” said UNH political science professor Andrew Smith, who runs the institution’s survey center. The poll, released Tuesday, includes response data for five New England states, excluding Maine.

Advertisement

In general, the survey found, most residents say Vermont is a good place to live — or even a great one.

Nevertheless, about 40% of Vermonters of all ages want to leave the state, according to the report from Smith’s team. Housing prices and other cost-of-living concerns are the foremost drivers of the trend, researchers found, followed by tax rates. Connecticut and Rhode Island showed similar overall rates of desired departure.

Among young people, though, Vermont’s numbers stand out.

Smith’s research found that 63% percent of Vermonters between 18 and 34 say they’re somewhat or very likely to move out of the state in the next five years. That’s a much higher rate of planned departure than in any other state surveyed. Responses varied from 28% in New Hampshire to 44% in Connecticut. 

But according to Smith, New England often sees a beneficial “boomerang effect”: former residents eventually returning to their home states, often as higher earners.

Advertisement

In a Wednesday press conference, Gov. Phil Scott said that although he hadn’t seen the poll, he wasn’t surprised by reports that many Vermonters are considering a move.

“I think there’s a lot of frustration out there,” he said. “We have a lot of work to do to make Vermont the affordable state that these folks need.”

About half of young Vermonters who said they want to move away cited the cost of living as a primary reason, while roughly as many said they were looking for a “new adventure or more excitement.” By contrast, less than a quarter of those older than 64 foresee leaving, according to the poll. 

Outmigration of young people could worsen the state’s existing workforce shortage, according to Kevin Chu, who leads the research nonprofit the Vermont Futures Project. Scott’s administration has made workforce development a priority in light of what his office called a “growing demographic crisis.”

Chu added that by design, services such as public education and healthcare are supported disproportionately by working households that tend to pay higher taxes and insurance premiums. When the base of income earners shrinks, the problem can then intensify for those bearing the brunt of rising costs, he added.

Advertisement

“There’s a demographic reality in which the economic burden is being shouldered by a small and shrinking pool of young working-age people,” Chu said.

Tuesday’s poll also indicated that Vermonters who have completed more education say they’re less likely to leave the state. For Chu, that’s likely because such households tend to earn more — and also because they tend to be older.

Julie Lowell, deputy director of the Montpelier research nonprofit Public Assets Institute, offered a grain of salt in relation to Tuesday’s report. While migration is crucial to keep track of, Vermont’s overall population turnover tends to be about 5% or less each year, she said. And although the state does have an unusual number of young people intending to leave, that age group is always the most mobile in any study, she said.

In recent years, more of Vermont’s older population has possessed more wealth to contribute to public services, Lowell added. For example, she said, her organization has found that more Vermonters aging out of the workforce has not appeared to decrease state tax revenues in recent years. 

But it’s true that many Vermonters are struggling to make ends meet, she said. The state’s lowest earners have seen low wage growth in relation to other New England states, she said, and basic needs are getting harder to cover.

Advertisement

“We’re seeing prices, in large part driven by housing and healthcare, really outpacing our increases in household incomes,” Lowell said. “Many people are feeling insecure.”





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending