Connect with us

Vermont

‘An unconscionable betrayal’: Vermont groups scramble in wake of Trump order to halt refugee resettlement – VTDigger

Published

on

‘An unconscionable betrayal’: Vermont groups scramble in wake of Trump order to halt refugee resettlement – VTDigger


President Donald Trump’s executive order to halt the country’s refugee resettlement program as of Jan. 27 has Vermont organizations ramping up efforts to support newcomers and those still expected to arrive in the state.

While the January arrivals are already here, the future is uncertain for 17 refugees — four from Afghanistan, five from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and eight from Sudan — who were scheduled to arrive in February, according to Sonali Samarasinghe, interim director of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants in Vermont.

Although her office has not received any notifications of the refugees’ travel plans yet, she said, “We expect cancellations for those booked to arrive after Jan. 27. We hope that’s not the case.”

Signed on Monday, Trump’s order puts a pause on the resettlement program, canceling travel for refugees already cleared for relocation to the U.S. Initially those with travel plans before the Jan. 27 deadline were expected to be able to make it in, but that deadline appears to have been moved up, the Associated Press reported Wednesday.

Advertisement

USCRI, a nongovernmental, nonprofit organization that has been working to resettle refugees in Vermont since 1980, is actively advocating for pending cases to be rebooked to arrive in the country before Jan. 27, Samarasinghe said in an interview Tuesday. 

Among them is a young Somali resident in Vermont who has been trying to bring his mother here for 13 years. She recently passed her final interview with USCRI and is waiting to leave the drought-plagued country that is fast becoming one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises.

Refugees like her are “thoroughly vetted, security-screened individuals,” said Samarasinghe, who was once a refugee fleeing persecution in Sri Lanka herself. “So it’s a very sad day for them and of course their family members here who are very concerned to see if they are joining them.”

Across the state, agencies that help refugees have adopted a wait-and-watch stance since Trump signed the order on Jan. 20.

“Over the last 4 years, the United States has been inundated with record levels of migration, including through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program,” the order states. The country, it adds, “lacks the ability to absorb large numbers of migrants, and in particular, refugees,” and that continuing to allow more of them to enter “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

Advertisement

Tracy Dolan, Vermont’s state refugee director, said high numbers of refugee arrivals indicate a high level of need. “We have more refugees worldwide than we’ve ever had escaping from persecution and war, and so there are a lot of people who need assistance, who very much would like to live and have prosperous lives in their own countries and who can’t.”

And new refugee residents have filled a key gap in Vermont, Dolan continued. 

“We know through studies that have been put out by the Office of Refugee Resettlement that we gain as a country and as a state in terms of economic benefits from refugees here,” she said. 

“The majority of employable adults find work relatively quickly and we have employers that are very much looking to hire refugees and find it to be a successful, positive relationship. And we have organizations that are working with folks to help them move up and move ahead and really live the American dream.”

State Refugee Coordinator Tracy Dolan speaks at a press conference focusing on the plight of Afghan refugees in Burlington on Monday, August 12, 2024. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Since October, Vermont has received about 160 refugees — about 25% of the number that had been expected to arrive in fiscal year 2025, according to Dolan. 

Advertisement

She estimated that about 3,800 refugees have settled in the Green Mountain State since 2012. The most recent arrivals have come from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Syria, Venezuela, Sudan and Afghanistan. They have primarily resettled in Chittenden County, Rutland, Brattleboro, Bennington, and more recently, in smaller numbers, in Manchester.

About 85% to 90% of all employable adult refugees in Vermont typically join the taxpayer pool within six to eight months of arrival — a remarkable statistic for any population, said Samarasinghe. 

“Refugees demonstrate a remarkable entrepreneurial spirit, they have high rates of business ownership, citizenship attainment, and homeownership. Nationwide refugees pay billions of dollars in taxes annually. Contrary to being a burden on taxpayers they are an integral part of the economy,” Samarasinghe wrote in a statement.

“Vermont relies on the New American community to address the issues of an aging population,” she said. By providing a robust young, hard working workforce, refugees “ensure a greater future for Vermont.”

Gov. Phil Scott’s press secretary, Amanda Wheeler, said in a statement that the administration “will continue to do our part to welcome refugees to Vermont, which is even more important as we face these demographic challenges.” Referencing Trump’s spree of executive orders, Wheeler continued, “we are working to review, assess, and understand what implications they may have on Vermont going forward.”

Advertisement

Since U.S. troops pulled out of Afghanistan and Kabul fell to the Taliban in August 2021, many persecuted Afghan allies have found a safe haven in Vermont. So the order is particularly devastating for Afghan refugees awaiting relocation in the U.S., the Vermont Afghan Alliance said in a statement Wednesday. 

The order means many Afghans on temporary visas in Pakistan could be deported and risk persecution by the Taliban, the alliance said. And it will affect refugees in Vermont who have been waiting to reunite with their family.

The decision “isn’t just cruel — it’s an unconscionable betrayal,” the alliance said in its statement. “It shatters a sacred promise to Afghan allies who risked everything to support U.S. military and diplomatic missions.”

The suspension of the refugee program deals a blow to the United States’ standing in the world, said Samarasinghe, noting that most of the Afghan refugees moving to the U.S. are people who have helped the U.S. military. “For America to now appear to have relinquished that role of welcoming the vulnerable, really I think it harms our nation’s standing abroad,” she said. 

“The most devastating impact of the suspension of refugee resettlement is that families will remain separated,” she said.

Advertisement

The Ethiopian Community Development Council, which has offices in Bennington and Brattleboro, works to support refugees in southern Vermont.

Joe Wiah, the organization’s executive director, said in a statement that the council will continue to provide support services to refugee families through these uncertain times.

“Their presence has strengthened our region culturally, economically, and socially,” he said, calling refugee resettlement “a powerful catalyst for positive change, economic growth, and cross-cultural understanding.”

Despite the uncertainty surrounding the fate of the program, Vermont’s refugee resettlement organizations plan to continue working to help recent arrivals find employment, secure housing and help their children get integrated in schools.

Some are holding out hope that the indefinite suspension will be short-lived. A line in the order that asks for a report within 90 days on whether the program is in the country’s best interests. 

Advertisement

“Everyone is going to continue to do the same hard work they’ve been doing. And we are hopeful that in three months, we will see the spigot turn on again,” Dolan said.





Source link

Vermont

Friends, family rally behind Vermont veteran charged with domestic terrorism

Published

on

Friends, family rally behind Vermont veteran charged with domestic terrorism


NEWPORT, Vt. (WCAX) – Friends and family of a Vermont veteran charged with domestic terrorism rallied in Newport Thursday, saying the charges stem from a mental health crisis and are unwarranted.

Vermont State Police say Joseph “J.J.” Millett, 38, of Newport, called a veterans crisis line in February, making suicidal statements and threatening a mass-casualty event.

Court records say Millett had guns and wrote what investigators call a manifesto. He turned himself in, and state police say they disarmed him at the barracks. He pleaded not guilty and was never formally arrested or placed in jail. He is currently in a treatment facility.

Supporters say the threats were the result of new medication and a mental health crisis. “But all the way to domestic terrorism for a man that fought overseas — he wasn’t a terrorist. He’s been fighting terrorists half his life,” said Chad Abbott, a friend who served with Millett overseas.

Advertisement

Abbott said he believes the charges could have unintended consequences for veterans seeking help. “These hotlines that they put out for us is to kind of get us the help we need. And now, none of us are going to want to call that,” he said.

Millett’s sister, Courtney Morin, said her brother served in the Vermont Guard for nearly 10 years and has struggled with mental health since returning home. “He suffers from depression, anxiety — he has PTSD. So, he’s actually been seeking help for his mental health for probably as long as he’s been home,” Morin said.

Orleans County State’s Attorney Farzana Leyva said the charge is warranted and that Millett was not calling for help when he contacted the crisis line. “He called the crisis helpline to make the threats. I think we have to be very clear about that. Those were threats. He did not call the crisis helpline for help. He called anonymously,” Leyva said.

She said the evidence — including repeated threats — Millett’s access to guns, and a manifesto justifies the charge and protects the public. “My priority is public safety, which is the highest priority that I have right now,” Leyva said.

Morin said she believes her brother was trying to get help. “I think he was seeking help. I mean, it’s all a trail of him seeking help, being on different meds. You know, we’re not in his head. We don’t know what he’s dealing with. And especially if you’re dealing with it alone,” Morin said.

Advertisement

Millett continues to receive treatment and is due back in court later this month.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont high school playoff scores, results, stats for Thursday, March 5

Published

on

Vermont high school playoff scores, results, stats for Thursday, March 5


The 2025-2026 Vermont high school winter season has begun. See below for scores, schedules and game details (statistical leaders, game notes) from basketball, hockey, gymnastics, wrestling, Nordic/Alpine skiing and other winter sports.

TO REPORT SCORES

Coaches or team representatives are asked to report results ASAP after games by emailing sports@burlingtonfreepress.com. Please submit with a name/contact number.

Contact Alex Abrami at aabrami@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter: @aabrami5.

Advertisement

Contact Judith Altneu at JAltneu@usatodayco.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter: @Judith_Altneu.

THURSDAY’S H.S. PLAYOFF GAMES

D-III GIRLS BASKETBALL SEMIFINALS

At Barre Auditorium

No. 5 Vergennes (17-4) vs. No. 1 Hazen (18-2), 5:30 p.m.

No. 3 Oxbow (16-6) vs. No. 2 Windsor (16-6), 7:30 p.m.

Watch Vermont high school sports on NFHS Network

Advertisement

D-I BOYS BASKETBALL QUARTERFINALS

Games at 7 p.m. unless noted

No. 8 Mount Mansfield (10-11) at No. 1 Rice Memorial (17-3)

No. 12 Essex (5-16) at No. 4 Rutland (15-6)

No. 7 Burr and Burton (13-8) at No. 2 South Burlington (15-5), 6 p.m.

No. 6 BFA-St. Albans (13-8) vs. No. 3 Burlington (15-5) at Colchester, 7:30 p.m.

Advertisement

D-II GIRLS HOCKEY QUARTERFINALS

No. 8 Stowe (5-16) vs. No. 1 U-32 (13-6-1) at Kreitzberg Arena, 5 p.m.

(Subject to change)





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

19 Vermont school budgets fail as education leaders debate need for reform

Published

on

19 Vermont school budgets fail as education leaders debate need for reform


MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – Most Vermont school budgets passed Tuesday, but 19 districts and supervisory unions saw their spending plans rejected — an uptick from the nine that failed in 2025, though well below the 29 that failed in 2024.

Some education leaders say the results show communities are largely supportive of their schools.

“We’re starting to kind of equalize out again towards the normal trend of passage of school budgets each year,” said Chelsea Meyers of the Vermont Superintendents Association.

Sue Ceglowski of the Vermont School Boards Association said the results send a clear message. “Vermont taxpayers support Vermont’s public schools,” she said.

Advertisement

Meyers said the results also raise questions about the scope of education reform being considered in Montpelier. “If we are going to reform the system, it might not require sweeping broad changes as are being considered right now, but a more concise approach to consider that inequity,” she said.

But in districts where budgets failed, officials say structural changes are still needed. In Barre, where the budget failed, Barre Unified Union School District Board Chair Michael Boutin said the Legislature must, at a minimum, create a new funding formula. “We have to have that in order to avoid the huge increases and decreases — the huge increases that we’ve seen in the last couple years,” Boutin said.

He said the rise in school budgets is separate from why property owners are seeing sharp tax increases. The average state increase in school budgets is 4%, but the average property tax increase is 10%, driven by cost factors including health care. “There’s a complete disconnect, and that’s a product of the terrible system that we have in Vermont with our funding formula,” Boutin said.

Ceglowski says the state should address health care costs before moving forward with rapid education policy changes. “Addressing the rapid rise in the cost of school employees’ health benefits by ensuring a fair and balanced statewide bargaining process for those benefits,” she said.

The 19 districts that did not pass their budgets will need to draft new spending plans to present to voters, which often requires cuts. Twelve school districts are scheduled to vote at a later date.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending