Follow us on social media:
Rhode Island
This historic East Providence house is older than the country – and it needs a new tenant
Providence Mayor Brett Smiley celebrates donation of vacant synagogue
Providence Mayor Brett Smiley urged community members to support the Center for Southeast Asians’ plans to transform the historic building
EAST PROVIDENCE – History lovers have a rare opportunity to live in one of Rhode Island’s oldest homes.
With an estimated construction date of 1724, the four-bedroom Philip Walker House in East Providence is available to rent for $2,900 a month.
The historic preservation society Preserve Rhode Island has owned the property at 432 Massasoit Ave. since 1984, and over the years it has poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into restoration, fortifying the house’s structural integrity and adding modern conveniences.
“It’s a unique opportunity, and it’s in the best condition now,” said Paul Trudeau, the nonprofit’s director of preservation. “It’s a pretty hefty investment to keep this building in its best shape, so we are focusing now on getting it to a state where it’s a nice place to live.”
Preserve Rhode Island plans to use the rental income to help recoup its investment in the property.
For additional preservation opportunities, the Newport Restoration Foundation and the Providence Preservation Society both have programs for community members to help steward historic properties.
What renovations have been done to the house?
The original house was a four-room building with a chimney jutting out of the center – an important feature for cooking and providing heat.
“That original square plan was a pretty straightforward floor plan at the time,” Trudeau said.
For years, under Preserve Rhode Island’s stewardship, the house was essentially a research site, where architectural historians and students studied its structure and materials, often opening up the walls to do so. It was only in 2003 through dendrochronology – a method of assessing age through tree rings – that a research team figured out that Walker House was constructed in the early 18th century, and that their previous estimates had been incorrect.
Although valued for its educational gains, the invasive nature of the research compromised the house’s livability. The preservation group first started renovations in 1990, mostly focusing on the building’s exterior. In 2008, they redid the house’s plumbing and HVAC systems, updating the kitchen and bathroom.
More recently, Preserve Rhode Island partnered with Shantia Anderheggen, who owns the firm Preservation Strategies, on a rehabilitation project that focused on the interior details. The work wrapped up last month and included cleaning, painting, treating floors, carpentry repairs, plaster and drywall repairs and installing a new custom mantle around the central fireplace that had previously been damaged.
What is the history of the Philip Walker House?
The Walker House was originally thought to have been constructed in 1679 on top of the foundation of a house that burned down during King Philip’s War. The property once encompassed 96 acres of farmland, but spans 1½ acres today. Details about its construction are limited, but the house is named after a prominent landowner from that era, Philip Walker.
“He had 10 children. He was a farmer. He worked as a weaver and a sawmill proprietor. He was the deacon of the church here. He had a lot of things going on,” said Trudeau. “By the late 17th century, he had a pretty sizeable estate.”
Walker House is considered a significant architectural heritage site in Rhode Island, as one of the few surviving houses from the period when classical forms of Georgian architecture were first introduced. The house still has many of its early Georgian facets, including the chimney breasts, paneled doors and door frames, mantelpieces and finishing materials, such as plasterwork and flooring.
The house was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1972. It was inhabited by descendants of Philip Walker until Faith Shedd Potter deeded the property to Preserve Rhode Island in the 1980s.
New East Bay Bike Path bridges are open and ready for bikes
What’s it like to ride over the new East Bay Bike Path bridges? We sent a reporter to try them out.
I’ve long thought bike paths are among Rhode Island’s premier attractions, up there with the beaches, the mansions and the bay.
We like to knock government, but credit where it’s due, the state has done an amazing job building out an incredible pedaling network.
It’s clearly a priority.
At least I thought it was.
But they’ve just dropped the ball on what should have been a beautiful new stretch.
The plan was to finish a mile-long connector from the East Providence end of the Henderson Bridge all the way to the East Bay Bike Path.
There was even $25 million set aside to get it done.
Except WPRI recently reported that it’s now been canceled.
The main fault lies with the Trump administration, which is no friend of bike paths, and moved to kill that $25 million.
But it gets complicated, as government funding always does.
To try to rescue that money, the state DOT reportedly worked with the administration to refunnel it into a road project. Specifically, the $25 million will now be spent helping upgrade the mile-long highway between the Henderson Bridge and North Broadway in East Providence, turning it into a more pleasant boulevard.
That totally sounds worthy.
But it’s insane to throw away the bike path plan.
Especially for a particular reason in this case.
They’d already put a ton of money into starting it.
When state planners designed the new Henderson Bridge between the East Side and East Providence, they included a bike path.
It’s a beauty – well protected from traffic by a barrier, a great asset for safely riding over the Seekonk River.
The plan was to continue it another mile or so along East Providence’s Waterfront Drive, ultimately connecting with the East Bay Bike Path, which runs all the way to Bristol. Which, by the way, is one of the nicest bike paths you’ll find anywhere.
But alas, that connector plan has been canceled.
So the expensive stretch over the Henderson Bridge to East Providence is now a bike path to nowhere. Once the bridge ends, the path on it continues a few hundred yards or so and then, just … ends.
Too bad.
We were so close.
Most of the stories on the issue have been about the complex negotiation to rescue the $25 million by rerouting it to that nearby highway-to-boulevard project. But I don’t want to get lost in the weeds of that bureaucratic process here because it loses sight of the heart of this story.
Which is that an amazing new addition to one of the nation’s best state bike path systems has just been scrapped.
You can knock the Rhode Island government for blowing a lot of things.
The PawSox.
The Washington Bridge.
But they’ve done great with bike paths.
And especially, linking many of them together.
Example: not too many years ago, Providence bikers had to risk dicey traffic on the East Side to get to the more pleasant paths in India Point Park and on the 195 bridge to the East Bay Path.
But the state fixed that by adding an amazing connector that starts behind the Salvation Army building and beautifully winds along the water of the Seekonk River for a mile or so.
That makes a huge difference – and no doubt has avoided some bike-car accidents.
We were close to a comparable stretch on the other side of the river – that’s what the $25 million would have done.
But it’s now apparently dead.
Online commenters aren’t happy about it.
On a Reddit string, “Toadscoper” accused the state of being “complicit” with the feds in rerouting the money from bikes to cars.
And there was this fascinating post from FineLobster 5322, who apparently is a disappointed planner who worked on the project: “Mind you money has already been spent on phase one so rejecting it at this point is wasting money and also against the public interest … but what do I know? I only worked on the project as an engineer … I didn’t get into this to build more highways. I do it … to give back to communities and give them more access to their environment.”
Wow. One can imagine the state planning team is devastated. That’s not a small consideration. Good people go into government to make life better in Rhode Island, and it’s a bad play to take the spirit out of the job by first assigning a great human-scale project and then, after a ton of work, trashing it.
A poster named Homosapiens simply said, “We just accept this?”
Hopefully not.
The first stretch of the path over the Henderson Bridge is done, money already sunk.
What a shame to leave that as a path to nowhere.
It doesn’t have to happen.
Between Governor McKee and our Washington delegation, there’s got to be a way to get this done.
There’s got to be.
mpatinki@providencejournal.com
WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.
Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.
According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.
The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.
The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.
A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.
State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.
The investigation remains ongoing.
Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.
Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.
A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.
Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.
McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.
“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.
Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”
“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”
The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.
The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.
The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.
At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.
The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
-
World7 minutes ago
Oil prices rise anew after a US-Iran standoff in the Strait of Hormuz strands tankers
-
News13 minutes agoVideo: 8 Children Killed in Louisiana Shooting, Police Say
-
Culture49 minutes agoPoetry Challenge: Memorize “The More Loving One” by W.H. Auden
-
Lifestyle55 minutes agoPhotos: How overfishing in Southeast Asia is an ecological and human crisis
-
Technology1 hour agoBlue Origin successfully reused its New Glenn rocket
-
World1 hour agoDistress call captures tanker under fire, Iran shuts Hormuz trapping thousands of sailors
-
Politics1 hour agoTrump ally diGenova tapped to lead DOJ probe into Brennan over Russia probe origins
-
Health1 hour agoExperts reveal why ‘nonnamaxxing’ trend may improve mental, physical health
