Connect with us

Rhode Island

The state will ultimately pay $132m to build a soccer stadium in Pawtucket. How did it get so expensive?

Published

on

The state will ultimately pay 2m to build a soccer stadium in Pawtucket. How did it get so expensive?


play

The Tidewater Landing stadium in Pawtucket is on track to open early next year and, when it does, the 10,500-seat building is expected to be the most expensive minor league soccer stadium in the country.

Advertisement

That’s not a shock given the rising cost of construction, but even the state economic development officials who signed off on the project didn’t know just how steep the price of publicly financing the stadium would climb.

To channel $27 million to stadium developer Fortuitous Partners, Pawtucket earlier this month sold a $54.3 million tax-free bond. Under the terms of the bond, the state is projected to pay $132 million in total debt service over the next 30 years.

Those borrowing costs – which Bloomberg’s municipal bond reporter compared to the price of government debt in Pakistan – have triggered sticker shock in some quarters.

“My concern is how this got to be so expensive and such an enormous waste of taxpayer money,” said Michael McNally, a former member of the state Commerce Corporation Board who voted against the project in 2022.

But Rhode Island Commerce Secretary Liz Tanner, who has overseen the deal for the state for the last two years, on Monday defended the deal over the long term.

Advertisement

“Stadiums are expensive. We know that they’re expensive, and these dollars that we’re putting into it are going to have a nice infrastructure project for us when we’re done,” Tanner told The Journal Monday. “We know we’re going to have a stadium when we’re finished with a soccer team, and that’s good for Rhode Island.”

How did we get here? Shrinking project but expanding cost

The Tidewater Landing stadium plan first launched in December 2019, with the city still stinging from the loss of the Pawtucket Red Sox baseball team.

Initially the stadium was supposed to anchor a $400-million development spanning the Seekonk River and Interstate 95, containing hundreds of apartments plus shops, offices, a hotel and an event center.

Advertisement

The state first approved a $50-million public subsidy package for the development in February 2021 after the segment north of I-95 had been eliminated, slimming the project down to 25 acres.

But before work could begin, inflation spiked and the Federal Reserve hiked interest rates, sending the cost to complete the project soaring. The stadium is now expected to cost $137 million.

In the summer of 2022, Fortuitous shrank the project again, this time asking for the same public investment, but it would go to the stadium alone. On July 25, 2022, Gov. Dan McKee broke a tie on the Commerce Corporation Board to give almost all of the subsidy package to the stadium.

Public funds going to Fortuitous, once they finish the stadium, are made up of:

Advertisement
  • $27 million from the bond
  • $10 million in Pawtucket’s federal pandemic aid
  • $10 million from state tax credits. (The state is issuing $14 million in Rebuild RI tax credits to net $10 million.)

But the cost of the borrowing keeps going up. When the deal was approved, the state planned to provide Fortuitous $27 million for the stadium from a $37-million bond. By October, with higher interest rates prompting investors to demand ever higher yield, the principal on the bond grew to $54 million, including reserves and administrative costs.

The deal allows the state to make interest-only payments on the bonds for the first 10 years. There’s a $5-million reserve in place to make payments in any year the General Assembly were to decide not to appropriate the required funding. And there is an $11-million “capitalized interest fund” that will fund payments in the early years.

Of the $54-million principal borrowed, $6 million is set aside to pay middlemen, lawyers and other administrative expenses, according to a breakdown from Commerce RI.

Why didn’t the state just pay less two years ago?

Why didn’t the state just appropriate $27 million for the stadium two years ago and save the tens of millions required by this exotic financing?

“When this project started a couple of years ago, this was the deal that was made, as far as how it was going to unfold, and all of those conversations were based on far lower interest rates,” Tanner said. “The $27 million, if it had been done upfront, would have to had been General Assembly approved.”

More: Soccer stadium bond adviser cited ‘concerns’ about project before quitting. What we know.

Advertisement

Since authorizing this type of state financing for a proposed new PawSox ballpark, legislative leaders have been cool to the idea of a direct investment into the soccer stadium.

Why not change the deal as economic conditions changed over the years?

“So we had committed to a deal at that point and we were in a contractual relationship to commit to following through with what we had done,” Tanner said. “And if you had changed the course of the transaction, there would’ve been a level of uncertainty without knowing whether the legislature was going to pass those dollars or not. So we continued on the path that we had set up originally.”

Although the Pawtucket Redevelopment Agency issued the stadium bonds, they are to be repaid with state tax revenue generated in Pawtucket, supplemented if need be by appropriations from the Assembly.

Advertisement

Because of the money set aside, state lawmakers won’t have to appropriate any money for the stadium until 2027.

Tanner said if interest rates rise again, the 8.24% rate the state is paying will end up looking like a bargain. If they fall, it is likely the state will be able refinancing after 10 years at a lower rate.

Is this 38 Studios all over again?

The complicated financing structure of the stadium bonds recall the $75-million 38 Studios deal.

Unlike the 38 Studios bonds, which were supposed to “pay for themselves” through revenue from the company that ended up folding, the stadium bonds are intended to be repaid by state tax dollars.

The risk to the state lies in what would happen if Rhode Island FC, the team slated to play in the stadium, folds, something not uncommon in professional soccer.

Advertisement

As it awaits the construction of the soccer stadium, Pawtucket is planning to tear down McCoy Stadium, which assumed negative value once the PawSox left.

More: Pawtucket soccer stadium’s financing is complete. Here’s what’s behind the $137M project

“[Rhode Island FC] did commit to a 30-year relationship with us,” Tanner said. “If they don’t, there’s liquidated damages that they would have to pay.”

Asked what those damages would be worth if the team goes bankrupt, Tanner said the state would get the stadium as an asset.

What would the empty stadium be worth?

Advertisement

“Again, we’re doing speculation on so many ifs,” she said.

To encourage Fortuitous to finish the residential and commercial development that initially attracted the state to the project, Commerce RI is providing the developer $1.5 million to start working on that next phase.

There is still no timeline on when any plans for stadium-adjacent development will be drawn up or cost estimates formulated.

Tanner said, if anything, she is “far more optimistic” about the residential/commercial development happening “because they have their investors all gathered to work on the stadium project and so we know there’s more people who have already committed the stadium that could be potentially partnering with them.”



Source link

Advertisement

Rhode Island

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick

Published

on

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick


WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.

Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.

According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.

The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.

Advertisement

The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.

A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.

State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.

The investigation remains ongoing.

Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.

Advertisement

Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.

Follow us on social media:

 

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information

Published

on

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information


A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.

Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.

Advertisement

McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.

“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.

Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”

“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”

The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.

Advertisement

The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.

The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.

At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.

The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Single Dad Says Grandparents’ Rights Trial Has Cost Him More Than $500K, but He'll Do ‘Whatever It Takes’ to Keep Daughter Safe

Published

on

Single Dad Says Grandparents’ Rights Trial Has Cost Him More Than 0K, but He'll Do ‘Whatever It Takes’ to Keep Daughter Safe


As the two-year anniversary of his wife’s death approaches, widowed single father Scott Naso is sounding an alarm to fellow parents across the country — and especially in Rhode Island, where he lives with his now 4-year-old daughter, Laila.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending