Connect with us

Rhode Island

Strange Things That Are Actually Illegal in Rhode Island

Published

on

Strange Things That Are Actually Illegal in Rhode Island


Every state in America has their owns general laws. Those rules and regulations residents must follow or face legal actions.

But not every law on the books still makes sense. Some might have you wondering if they ever made sense.

In Rhode Island, there are about a dozen laws left on the books that make you wonder how they became a law in the first place. Or why such a law was ever actually needed.

With New England being some of the oldest states in the nation, it’s no surprise that their list of strange laws is kind of long – and some are extremely specific to the coastal area.

Advertisement

In Massachusetts, for example, it’s illegal to use tomatoes in the production of clam chowder. (Keep it classic apparently.)

In Connecticut it’s against the law to go clamming at night.

New Hampshire has laws against raking a beach without a permit and picking up seaweed from a beach.

In Vermont there is no whistling underwater allowed and in Maine, one cannot have Christmas decorations up past January 14th.

While these laws may make total sense to the residents of the specific town they were passed for or at one time seemed like the right thing to prevent, today they just sound a little weird.

Advertisement

But several Rhode Island laws really take the cake when it comes to strange.

Some of these laws stem from the strict blue laws the Ocean State has had in place since colonial days, while others seem newer, though just as odd.

Here are the weirdest laws still on the books in Rhode Island.

15 of the Weirdest Laws in Rhode Island

The world has changed and yet some laws have stayed the same.

These are some of the strangest laws still on the books in Rhode Island.

Advertisement

Gallery Credit: Nancy Hall

Massachusetts Laws You Don’t Even Know You’re Breaking

There are a lot of strange laws still on the books in Massachusetts, many that also carry actual punishments and fines. Though we’re pretty sure no one has been arrested for the crimes we’re about to list, we’re also pretty sure you have violated at least one of these laws in the last month or so.

Gallery Credit: Nancy Hall

These Common Plants Are Illegal in Massachusetts

Massachusetts plant lovers, beware! Many of our most recognizable flora are actually common because they are super successful invaders, and are taking out our native plants.

The state has made it illegal to sell, grow, spread or propagate them — trust us, they don’t need any help. Here’s a list of some of the most widely known plants that actually don’t belong here.

Advertisement

Gallery Credit: Kate Robinson





Source link

Rhode Island

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick

Published

on

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick


WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.

Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.

According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.

The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.

Advertisement

The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.

A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.

State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.

The investigation remains ongoing.

Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.

Advertisement

Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.

Follow us on social media:

 

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information

Published

on

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information


A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.

Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.

Advertisement

McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.

“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.

Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”

“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”

The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.

Advertisement

The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.

The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.

At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.

The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Single Dad Says Grandparents’ Rights Trial Has Cost Him More Than $500K, but He'll Do ‘Whatever It Takes’ to Keep Daughter Safe

Published

on

Single Dad Says Grandparents’ Rights Trial Has Cost Him More Than 0K, but He'll Do ‘Whatever It Takes’ to Keep Daughter Safe


As the two-year anniversary of his wife’s death approaches, widowed single father Scott Naso is sounding an alarm to fellow parents across the country — and especially in Rhode Island, where he lives with his now 4-year-old daughter, Laila.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending