Follow us on social media:
It won’t take long for the University of Rhode Island women to face some difficult tests in their Atlantic 10 basketball schedule.
The Rams play four of last year’s top five finishers in the league standings in their first 10 games, including a Feb. 2 conference tournament title game rematch at Richmond. URI’s road back to that final league contest of 2024-25 begins with a Dec. 29 home date against Saint Louis at the Ryan Center.
More: Rhode Island women’s basketball announces non-conference schedule; who the Rams will play
George Mason visits on Jan. 12 to kick off what could be a tough opening stretch for the Rams. URI plays at VCU and at Duquesne within the next week — the games against the Patriots and Dukes will be broadcast on CBS Sports Network. The Rams will play in two of the league’s 40 contests that will be shown on national cable networks.
URI’s showdown with the Spiders comes against a team that swept regular-season and tournament crowns in 2023-24. Richmond finished 29-6 overall and controlled the first three quarters of the conference championship game against the Rams, easing to a 65-51 win. URI upset Saint Joseph’s and took care of the Billikens during a three-game winning streak at Henrico Sports & Events Center.
More: Rhode Island women’s basketball in line for ‘complete reset’ next season
The Rams play three of their next five games against last season’s contenders after taking on the Spiders. Duquesne at home on Feb. 5, George Mason on the road on Feb. 12 and the Hawks at home on Feb. 19 offer a difficult entry into the regular season’s last full month. Saint Joseph’s finished tied with VCU a game behind Richmond in 2023-24, coming up just shy of sharing a piece of the crown.
URI closes with a March 1 home game against George Washington at the Ryan Center. The Rams will be looking to improve upon a 21-14 overall mark last year, one that included just a 10-8 finish in league play. That’s the fewest conference wins in the last four seasons under head coach Tammi Reiss, who has lifted program standards considerably since her hiring ahead of the 2019-20 season.
Game times and other broadcast information will be made available at a later date. Visit gorhody.com for more.
bkoch@providencejournal.com
On X: @BillKoch25
Dec. 29 – Saint LouisJan. 2 – at St. BonaventureJan. 8 – at DavidsonJan. 12 – George Mason, CBS Sports NetworkJan. 15 – at VCUJan. 19 – at Duquesne, CBS Sports NetworkJan. 22 – MassachusettsJan. 26 – Loyola ChicagoJan. 29 – at FordhamFeb. 2 – at RichmondFeb. 5 – DuquesneFeb. 8 – DaytonFeb. 12 – at George MasonFeb. 16 – La SalleFeb. 19 – Saint Joseph’sFeb. 23 – at MassachusettsFeb. 26 – at Saint LouisMarch 1 – George Washington
WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.
Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.
According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.
The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.
The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.
A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.
State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.
The investigation remains ongoing.
Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.
Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.
Follow us on social media:
A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.
Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.
McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.
“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.
Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”
“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”
The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.
The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.
The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.
At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.
The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Ordered free, still locked up: Judges fume as Trump administration holds ICE detainees
A renewed threat to JPL as the Trump administration tries again to cut NASA
After 55 years as a broadcaster in L.A., Randy Rosenbloom is leaving town
Bulgaria votes in eighth election in five years
Real estate investors are buying up long-term care facilities. Residents can suffer
Former Piston shows Detroit what they’re missing as he dominates next to LeBron
Eastbound I-80 closure in San Francisco snarls traffic, slows business
Can Keir Starmer survive the latest Mandelson revelations? | BBC News