Connect with us

Rhode Island

Parents tote toddlers to D.C. to press for expanded child tax credit, child care funds • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

Parents tote toddlers to D.C. to press for expanded child tax credit, child care funds • Rhode Island Current


WASHINGTON — Families gathered outside the U.S. Capitol Tuesday to “make a fuss for babies,” who they believe are being left behind by lawmakers who direct only a fraction of U.S. resources to young children.

Parents and kids representing 50 states and the District of Columbia convened for the eighth annual “Strolling Thunder.” Moms and dads pushing strollers decked out in state license plates rallied on the Capitol’s East Lawn to lobby lawmakers to fund child care, establish national paid family leave, and permanently expand the child tax credit.

Matthew Melmed, executive director of ZERO TO THREE, the organization behind the event, rallied parents to tell their representatives that the 11 million babies in the U.S. “make up 3.4% of our population, but 100% of our future.”

“You’re here with the pork producers and the insurance lobby and the pharmaceutical industry. Members of Congress don’t normally see real people, and they rarely see babies and toddlers, particularly babies and toddlers who need to have their diapers changed on their desks. And that’s what I encourage you to do if you need to have that happen,” Melmed told the crowd.

Advertisement

The nonprofit ZERO TO THREE bases its advocacy on health and developmental research findings in infants up to age 3, the years the group describes as “the most important for lifelong mental health and well-being.”

Melmed praised top Democratic appropriators Sen. Patty Murray of Washington and Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut for achieving a $1 billion increase for child care block grants and Head Start in this year’s government funding bills.

DeLauro, who spoke to the crowd, said “families deserve better.”

“The cost of living has increased year after year, and more and more Americans simply do not get paid enough to live on, let alone to raise a family,” the Connecticut lawmaker said, promising to advocate for the reinstatement of a fully refundable child tax credit.

‘Diapers, child care, formula’

Candace Winkler, a former Alaska resident and current ZERO TO THREE leader, sat on the Capitol lawn next to Sabrina Donnellan who traveled to D.C. from Girdwood, Alaska, with her 13-month-old Blakely to advocate for lower child care costs and paid family leave.

Advertisement

Winkler, the organization’s chief development and strategy officer, said the group of families would divide up in the halls of Congress Tuesday to meet with their representatives about six key policy issues, including permanently expanding the child tax credit to pandemic levels.

“We’ve seen that time and time again that families are using those resources for diapers, child care, formula and things their babies and their family needs. And it’s really critical for their success,” WInkler said.

The current child tax credit is $2,000 a year after tax liability, but the amount a parent could receive per child under 17 in a refund check is capped at $1,600 in 2023. The credit phases in at 15% on every dollar after earnings of $2,500.

As the U.S. was digging out from under the COVID-19 economic crisis, Congress approved a one-year expansion of the tax credit to $3,000 per child under age 18, and $3,600 for those under age 6 — including for families who made $0 in income. Lawmakers made the entire amount refundable, and a portion of it was sent to families in monthly installments.

Advocates hailed the research findings that showed the temporary move was a game changer for lifting children from poverty in the U.S.

Advertisement

A current bipartisan proposal, widely supported by U.S. House lawmakers, to temporarily expand the child tax credit until 2025 — though not to pandemic levels — is currently stalled by U.S. Senate Republicans who liken aspects of the bill to a welfare program.

The proposal, as passed by the House, would increase the credit’s refundable portion to $1,800 in 2023, $1,900 in 2024 and $2,000 in 2025. The legislation would also increase the phase-in rate to 15% per child, simultaneously — in other words, 30% for a family with two children, 45% for a family with three, and so on.

Credit card debt for child care

Cruz Bueno, a parent from Warwick, Rhode Island, shared her story of racking up credit card debt to enroll her 11-month-old Rosie in child care, along with her 2-year-old sister Amalia.

“Putting Rosie into daycare means that we must put a halt to our dream of buying a home,” said Bueno, an economist who lives in Warwick with her husband, Xhuljan Meta.

“One of the stipulations of our mortgage pre-approval was to keep our credit card balances low. Even so, we remain hopeful that one day in the not-so-distant future we will be able to buy a home to raise our girls and pass on wealth to them,” she said.

Advertisement

When asked about the Strolling Thunder event at Tuesday morning’s regularly scheduled House Republican press conference, House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana said, “There’s lots of ideas out there. What we stand for, what our party stands for, is support of families. We support infants and children, and there’s an appropriate role to play in that.”

“The devil’s always in the details on legislation, so I’m not sure exactly what they’re proposing, but all of us are looking at those avenues. We want to support families. That’s good public policy,” Johnson said. “In our view, the best way often for the government to do that is to step back and allow the local and state officials to handle their business at that local level.”

Rep. Elise Stefanik, House Republican Conference Chair, said the GOP is “proud to be a pro-family conference.”

“There are many of our members who have proposed innovative solutions — one is rural child care. Home-based child care, that’s an issue I’ve worked with many of my colleagues on the Education and Workforce Committee,” Stefanik, of New York, said. “But the economy, the border, crime, these issues, these crises caused by Joe Biden, they impact every family.”

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Rhode Island

Social Security Cost Of Living Adjustment 2025: What Rhode Island Residents Can Expect

Published

on

Social Security Cost Of Living Adjustment 2025: What Rhode Island Residents Can Expect


RHODE ISLAND — A predicted 3.2 percent 2025 cost-of-living increase for about 71 million Social Security recipients, including about 30,575 people in Rhode Island, may not be enough to keep pace with inflation, according to advocates.

The federal government won’t make a decision on the COLA, as the cost-of-living adjustment is known, until October. Under current government estimates, the COLA would be about 2.6 percent, as it had been for about 20 years before last year’s 3.2 percent increase. The final amount hinges on inflation.

Mary Johnson, an independent Social Security and Medicare analyst who formerly worked for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, believes the COLA will fall around 3.2 percent. She revised the prediction after April inflation data showed consumer prices were 3.4 percent higher than a year earlier, but down slightly from March’s 3.5 percent inflation rate.

Johnson told MarketWatch that even as inflation cools from two-decade highs, all consumers are still feeling less buying power. But increases in some sectors — including housing, up 5.5 percent, electricity, up 5.1 percent and medical care, up 2.7 percent — hit older adults harder, Johnson said.

Advertisement

Even with the increase in 2024 benefits, older Americans’ buying power increased only marginally.

In a statement, Senior Action League executive director Shannon Benton said the 2024 increase only marginally increased older Americans’ buying power. The average benefit increased by about $50, “and after subtracting $9.80 to cover Medicare Part B premium increases, the total change in benefits came to just $40.20 a month.”

Unless the adjustment is increased, “it appears seniors will continue to suffer financial insecurity as much next year as they have this year,” Benton said.

“While COLA payments will increase to offset the effects of inflation, the problem many have with the potential percentage jump is it won’t get far enough to meet most of the financial needs of seniors,” Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor at the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek.

“Obviously,” he said, “daily expenses for this age group continue to rise, but the uptick in health care costs are putting an additional strain on them, and COLA payments may not be enough to match that uptick.”

Advertisement

About 71 percent of older Americans who responded to a 2024 survey by The Senior Action League said household costs have exceeded the 3.2 percent increase in benefits.

“The majority of seniors still feel like their costs are rising faster than those annual adjustments,” Michael Ryan, a finance expert and founder and CEO of michaelryanmoney.com, told Newsweek. “So while the COLA certainly helps, it often still doesn’t fully cover the real inflation draining seniors’ buying power.”

According to AARP, 40 percent of Americans 65 and older rely on Social Security for half of their income, and about 14 percent of them rely on benefits for 90 percent of their income.

Have a news tip? Email jimmy.bentley@patch.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Let’s change the way we look at our food scraps in Rhode Island – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Let’s change the way we look at our food scraps in Rhode Island – The Boston Globe


When you eat an apple, you can do one of two things with the core. You can put it in your garbage can and it will likely end up in Johnston, at Rhode Island’s Central Landfill. There, it will be buried among tons of other organic and non-organic waste. It will break down in the absence of oxygen to release methane, a greenhouse gas that is 28 times as damaging to the climate as carbon dioxide.

Or, you can compost that apple core. Instead of filling up the landfill, it will be converted into a nutrient-rich and valuable product. Instead of contributing to climate change, it can be used to enrich your local soils.

Every day we are mostly choosing that first option here in Rhode Island. And it’s not just an apple core — we are paying millions to haul and dump thousands of pounds of food scraps in our quickly filling landfill.

Compostable material including food scraps accounts for 33 percent of the waste we dump in the landfill. If we keep doing what we’re doing, our landfill will reach capacity and be forced to close by 2046. When that happens, the price we all pay to throw out our trash will increase exponentially as we are forced to ship our waste out of state.

Our neighbors in Massachusetts have already had to go this route, at significant taxpayer cost. Rhode Islanders enjoy the lowest costs in New England to throw out our trash and we want to keep it that way. Extending the life of the landfill is the best way to keep our costs down – and investing in composting is an essential part of that.

That’s why we recently proposed new legislation that aims to fund composting and organic waste diversion programs with just a $2 per ton surcharge on the trash we send to the landfill, a strategy that is already working in 12 other states. The money generated from that small fee will go right back into our cities and towns through a grant program, funding things like compost facility builds, curbside service for residents, and organic waste diversion education.

Reducing food waste dumped in the landfill will bring down waste hauling costs on our cities and towns, and that small surcharge will quickly result in savings. Composting is an affordable, scalable solution to our waste crisis that we should be implementing in every community, and this program will put us on the right track.

Advertisement

In 2023, municipalities in Rhode Island spent over $23 million to landfill over 350,000 tons of waste. Imagine if we removed a third of those totals from the equation!

Cutting down on waste not only extends the life of our only landfill, it’s also good climate and economic policy. Let’s change the way we look at our food scraps. Instead of turning them into polluting garbage, let’s give them a second life enriching our soils. Let’s provide our communities with common-sense, long-term solutions that are cost effective and sustainable in every sense of the word. The action we take now will pay dividends for decades to come.

Senator Bridget Valverde, a Democrat representing parts of East Greenwich, North Kingstown and South Kingstown, and Representative Terri Cortvriend, a Democrat representing parts of Portsmouth and Middletown, are the sponsors of the Composting and Organic Waste Diversion Act (S 2753 / H 7856).






Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Rhode Island Demands Kei-Truck Owners Turn In Registrations Yet Legalizes Street Golf Carts! | Carscoops

Published

on

Rhode Island Demands Kei-Truck Owners Turn In Registrations Yet Legalizes Street Golf Carts! | Carscoops


The state says that the classic Japanese automobiles are unsafe for public roads but that golf carts are A-OK

 Rhode Island Demands Kei-Truck Owners Turn In Registrations Yet Legalizes Street Golf Carts!
  • Rhode Island wants Kei-car, truck and minivan owners to return their registrations to the DMV.
  • The department claims that these vehicles aren’t safe for the road.
  • At the same time, the state is about to make it legal for golf carts to drive on public roads.

Rhode Island is reportedly asking kei-vehicle owners, which include cars, trucks and minivans, to relinquish their registrations. This move is a direct challenge to federal laws that grant 25-year-old vehicles the freedom to remain in the country. It’s also puzzling, as the state claims its reasoning is safety-based, but at the same time, it wants to enable golf carts to wander the streets.

The DMV, which defines Kei Vehicles as “Primarily mini-trucks manufactured for the Japanese market designated as ‘kejidosha’ lightweight vehicles,” evidently canceled kei truck and car registrations over a year ago, according to a report from The Drive.

Advertisement

Review: The Honda S660 Is The Miniature NSX The World Was Deprived Of

Now, a new report suggests that the state is taking further steps. It’s asking owners to return their registrations, which were once legally issued. In fact, it might be denying registrations for normal vehicles to those who own kei cars and trucks. Almost any vehicle over 25 years old is legal to import to the USA under federal law, and this includes kei cars, like the ones that Rhode Island is targeting.

According to WPRI, “the DMV has made efforts over the last several years to prevent any additional registration of these vehicles… there are, however, a handful that still remain registered, and the proposed bill would restrain the DMV’s ability to further eliminate unsafe vehicles from the public roadways of the state.”

What it’s referring to is a bill proposed by State Senator Lou DiPalma who is fighting to keep the kei-vehicles legal. “What the bill seeks to do is grandfather everybody who has [a Kei vehicle (car or truck)] and has it registered. It would allow you to re-register if you had it prior to 2021,” DiPalma explained. The Providence Journal reports that the bill would “Apply only to kei cars, trucks, and microvans that were registered in Rhode Island as of August 1, 2021.” (At the time, there were at least 30 in the state, DiPalma said).”

 Rhode Island Demands Kei-Truck Owners Turn In Registrations Yet Legalizes Street Golf Carts!
Photos Stephen Rivers

It’s also worth noting that the state seems to be completely hypocritical when it comes to laws regarding vehicles on public roads. In July, it’ll become legal to drive “Low-Speed Vehicles” like golf carts on streets. Specifically, these vehicles must have a top speed above 20 mph (32 km/h) but no higher than 25 mph (40 km/h) and can only go on streets with speed limits up to 35 mph (56 km/h).

Notably, the street-legal golf carts in question aren’t just any old course-covering vehicle. They have to be all-electric, must have wipers, a license plate, be insured, and meet some other qualifications.

Advertisement

The point remains, though. To claim that they’re safe while Kei cars and trucks aren’t appears to be a case of one hand not knowing what the other is doing. Oh, and all of this appears to be over approximately 30 kei vehicles in total.

 Rhode Island Demands Kei-Truck Owners Turn In Registrations Yet Legalizes Street Golf Carts!
Photos Stephen Rivers



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending