Connect with us

Rhode Island

Lamont won’t say if he’ll ease ‘debt diet’ to make Conn. budget fix work • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

Lamont won’t say if he’ll ease ‘debt diet’ to make Conn. budget fix work • Rhode Island Current


Since his first weeks on the job, Gov. Ned Lamont has urged his fellow Democrats to embrace a “debt diet” and curb borrowing where possible.

But the administration wouldn’t say this week whether it would back legislative leaders’ plans to borrow to effectively cover operating expenses in the next budget — creating a significant hole to be tackled one year from now.

“Gov. Lamont is committed to an honestly balanced budget in [fiscal year] ’25. Any adjustments that impact any level of funding must ensure the budget remains balanced,” Chris Collibee, the governor’s budget spokesman, told The Connecticut Mirror this week.

At first glance, this answer appears to close off options for Democratic legislators, who want to add $300 million to $400 million to a preliminary $26 billion budget for the next fiscal year that already exceeds the state’s spending cap by $30 million.

Advertisement

But borrowing happens outside of the budget. The same applies to spending federal pandemic relief grants. The majority Democrats’ latest plan to bolster the next state budget beyond what the spending cap allows centers on those two areas. It goes like this:

  • Step 1: Identify projects and programs currently paid for with the last vestiges of Connecticut’s $2.8 billion American Rescue Plan Act allocation from Congress.
  • Step 2: Replace those ARPA dollars with borrowed funds.
  • Step 3: Reassign ARPA dollars to higher education, social services and other core programs.

Emergency federal relief can be spent outside of the spending cap, which tries to keep most expenditure growth in line with changes in household income and inflation.

This approach effectively would circumvent the spending cap and other fiscal principles that Lamont frequently espouses.

But borrowing for ongoing expenses adds an interest cost normally reserved for capital projects.

The administration repeatedly chastised public colleges and university systems this past winter for using ARPA dollars for operating costs rather than for one-time purposes such as paying down debt. Yet this latest Democratic strategy would pump more temporary dollars into ongoing programs.

Lamont recently upgraded his estimate of ARPA dollars available for use next fiscal year from $56 million to $200 million — much closer to the $300 million minimum sought by Democratic legislators.

Advertisement

This week, House Speaker Matt Ritter told the CT Mirror that legislators hoped to replace $75 million in ARPA funds earmarked for municipal school HVAC-system upgrades with $75 million in borrowing.

Does Lamont’s upgraded $200 million ARPA tally reflect this proposed supplanting of pandemic grants with borrowing? Could available ARPA be expanded to $300 million or more by identifying more ARPA-funded projects and instead paying for them by borrowing the money?

“The administration will not comment on what is or is not included [in the ARPA tally] until we have had further conversations with the General Assembly,” Collibee said.

Democrats couldn’t pull off such a swap without the governor’s cooperation, given that any bonding bill would go to Lamont’s desk for a signature.

“I think [Lamont] will be fine,” with Democrats’ plans for the upcoming fiscal year, the speaker said earlier this week. “He may not agree with how we spend it, but I think he’ll agree [with] how we get it.”

Advertisement

When asked if Lamont would sign such a maneuver into law, Collibee wouldn’t say, though he acknowledged it would increase the problems state officials would have to solve next year.

“Minimizing structural holes is always a goal,” Collibee added. “Whatever is agreed to may have to be accounted for in future budgets.”

Lamont has been a vocal advocate for the spending cap and other budget controls that he and other supporters have dubbed the state’s “fiscal guardrails.” These controls have helped state government amass a record-setting $3.3 billion rainy day fund and use an extra $7.7 billion in surpluses to pay down pension debt.

But critics say these controls are forcing the state to save excessively and are dangerously shortchanging core programs.

The University of Connecticut and the Connecticut State Colleges and Universities system both have ordered significant tuition and fee hikes for the next academic year and are planning cutbacks to close deficits. Nonprofit agencies that deliver the bulk of state-sponsored social services say they lose $480 million annually because state payments haven’t kept pace with inflation, leaving them unable to meet demand.

Advertisement

When the CT Mirror published a series in late January demonstrating the impact of huge new state savings policies on core programs, Lamont insisted the guardrails were working fine and that legislators had to make tough-but-necessary spending choices.

Leaders of the Republican minorities in the House and Senate said Thursday that Lamont can’t have it both ways. He can’t be the public champion of the guardrails while facilitating a legislative end-run around the system.

Republicans already are frustrated that Democrats have said they won’t address hundreds of millions of dollars in projected holes in the next state budget, involving eroding sales tax receipts, cost overruns in Medicaid and other programs, and insufficient appropriations to cover required pension fund contributions.

If Lamont helps Democrats borrow for operating expenses, even as they ignore budget holes, the GOP said, it’s a big financial mistake.

“Right now, the governor is a bit of a deer in the headlights, and I think they’re trying to cover up that [ARPA] money,” said House Minority Leader Vincent J. Candelora of North Branford, who predicted state finances will be struggling 12 months from now when ARPA funds have been exhausted. “I don’t foresee a soft landing.”

Advertisement

“It’s bad fiscal policy, and it’s counter to what this governor ran for reelection on two years ago,” said Senate Minority Leader Stephen Harding of Brookfield.

Staff writer Mark Pazniokas contributed to this story.

Connecticut Mirror is a content partner of States Newsroom. Read the original version here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Rhode Island

Call center is now open to answer questions about RIBridges cyberattack. What to know.

Published

on

Call center is now open to answer questions about RIBridges cyberattack. What to know.


play

PROVIDENCE – Vendors working for the state have set up a call center to answer customer questions following the cyberattack earlier this month on Rhode Island’s public benefits computer system in which private information from hundreds of thousands of people was stolen. 

Deloitte, the information technology company that built and runs the system known as RIBridges and UHIP, contracted credit reporting agency Experian to run the multilingual call that opened Sunday morning. 

Advertisement

The toll-free hotline can be reached at 833-918-6603. It was set to remain open on Sunday until 8 p.m. and then continue operating from Mondays to Fridays between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. 

“Call center staff will be able to provide general information about the breach as well as steps customers can take now to protect their data,” a news release from the Gov. Dan McKee’s office said. “Unfortunately, as the analysis of the data involved is still happening, call center staff will not be able to confirm whether a particular individual’s data is or is not included in the breach at this time.”  

“Once the impacted individuals are identified, they will be mailed a letter with the information they need to secure free credit monitoring services,” the release continued. 

Advertisement

The RIBridges system was shut down on Friday after Deloitte discovered dangerous malware embedded in its computer code. On Saturday, McKee said that the cybercriminals had stolen the personal data belonging to hundreds of thousands of Rhode Islanders. A negotiator has been holding ransom talks with the criminals, and it’s believed the data could be exposed as early as this week, the governor said at a news conference. 

Individuals who have received or applied for health coverage or health and human services programs or benefits could be affected by the data breach. The programs managed by the RIBridges system include: 

  • Medicaid
  • Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
  • Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)  
  • Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP)  
  • Health coverage purchased through HealthSource RI
  • Rhode Island Works (RIW) 
  • Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS)  
  • General Public Assistance (GPA) Program  
  • At HOME Cost Share 

State officials have urged anyone who has applied for benefits through the system since 2016 to change passwords and monitor their bank accounts for suspicious charges. 

The state has set up a website to provide information about the attack and steps customers can take to protect their data. It’s located at cyberalert.ri.gov. 

Deloitte first alerted the state and police about a potential attack on Dec. 5. McKee said the state did not disclose that there could be a problem until the breach could be confirmed and to prevent triggering the release of personal data. 

Advertisement

He said he did not know how much money the hackers demanded, because Deloitte was communicating with them. However, he said he would have the final say on the decision to pay a ransom. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Dating stories from RI as a survey places one city among the worst for singles in US

Published

on

Dating stories from RI as a survey places one city among the worst for singles in US


I have bad news for single people in Warwick.

It’s supposedly one of the worst places for dating in America.

Out of 182 American cities surveyed by WalletHub, Warwick ranked in the bottom eight.

It’s below Grand Prairie, Texas – wherever that is – as well as Yonkers, New York, and Jackson, Mississippi.

Advertisement

Providence isn’t so great, either. It ranks 109th.

WalletHub based this on percentage of singles, the cost of a meal for two, online dating “opportunities” and a few other metrics.

It got me thinking about dating in Rhode Island in general.

Not long ago, I did a story about Mary Hardy, 66, an X-ray and ER assistant from Smithfield who told me she’d been in the dating wars here for years.

I asked how it was going.

Advertisement

“Oh gosh,” she said, “frustrating, time-consuming. Basically, a full-time job if you really want to find somebody. But usually a big waste of time.”

She’d been on tons of apps – Bumble, Zoosk, Silver Seniors.

“I’m pretty much breaking my wrist swiping left,” she said.

At her age, the “supply” in Rhode Island isn’t perfect.

“Now, I’m not all that and a bag of chips,” Mary said, “but I know what lane I’m in. I’m not in the high-speed lane. But some of these dudes are in the breakdown lane.”

Advertisement

I have experience in this area, having dated in Rhode Island for years before I got married in 1988, and years after I got divorced in 2010.

There was more pressure the first go-around, since I was approaching my mid-30s while still never married. My Jewish mother would start phone calls with the same question.

“Anything new to report?”

Since that was before dating apps, there were probably more office romances – always a dicey gambit in a fishbowl.

Advertisement

Then again, all of Rhode Island sometimes feels the same. I was once on Thayer Street with a woman and walked right by someone else I’d been taking out. This led to a call later from the someone else, asking how I could be such a cad. I pointed out that we’d never talked about being exclusive, but it turns out there’s often an assumption that if you’ve dated 3.2 times, or even 2.3 times, you’re an item.

My brother “The Douglas” was much better at dating than I, being quite the schemer. For example, he always sent flowers to a woman at her place of work. That way, he said, the other women in the office will rush over and ask, “Who’s the great guy?”

A few times, he even sent flowers to a woman’s mother for having such an amazing daughter. That’s playing dirty, but it worked.

Once, he almost got into trouble when he brought a date home and suddenly, someone called on his answering machine. He had no doubt it was one of the other women he was dating, her voice about to sound on the machine’s speaker.

I asked what he did.

Advertisement

“I bearhugged the girl I was with around the ears and loudly said I was sooo glad to be with her.” Crisis averted. “She thought I was being really affectionate.”

Douglas frequently visited Rhode Island from Chicago for business and took up with a side-woman here. One night, I got a call from his hometown girlfriend who’d found a letter from his Providence paramour. The Chicago girlfriend wanted me to explain what was going on.

I had to weasel out of it on Douglas’s behalf, explaining that the Providence woman was, um, let me think – projecting a relationship that didn’t exist? Amazingly, she bought it. Forty years later, Douglas still owes me for that one.

We should give poor Warwick a break, because unsuccessful dating can happen anywhere in the state.

After being divorced, I had a date at what you’d think would be the ultimate Rhode Island locale for things to go smoothly – the restaurant at the Ocean House in Watch Hill. It was roughly halfway for both myself and a woman who was an ad hotshot at ESPN outside Hartford.

Advertisement

I think I blew it when I saw CNN notable John King – a Rhode Island guy – at another table. I excused myself to go chat with him, for probably too long, and the temperature at my own table had cooled when I returned.

Afterward outside, as she climbed into her car, I was about to ask through the window if she wanted to get together again, but before I got the question out, she peeled away, spraying a bit of gravel at my shins. I took that as a maybe.

In closing, I’d love to hear from any Warwick folks about the dating scene there. Is it better than what WalletHub says?

Or are you breaking your wrists swiping left?

mpatinki@providencejournal.com  

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Rhode Island hit by data breach as hackers demand ransom

Published

on

Rhode Island hit by data breach as hackers demand ransom


By Rich McKay

(Reuters) – Hundreds of thousands of Rhode Island residents’ personal and bank information, including Social Security numbers, were very likely hacked by an international cybercriminal group asking for a ransom, state officials said on Saturday.

In what Rhode Island officials described as extortion, the hackers threatened to release the stolen information unless they were paid an undisclosed amount of money.

Trusted news and daily delights, right in your inbox

See for yourself — The Yodel is the go-to source for daily news, entertainment and feel-good stories.

Advertisement

The breached data affects people who use the state’s government assistance programs and includes the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and healthcare purchased through the state’s HealthSource RI, Governor Dan McKee announced on Friday.

Hackers gained access to RIBridges, the state’s online portal for obtaining social services earlier this month, the governor’s office said in a statement, but the breach was not confirmed by its vendor, Deloitte, until Friday.

“Deloitte confirmed that there is a high probability that a cybercriminal has obtained files with personally identifiable information from RIBridges,” the governor’s office said in a statement on Saturday.

A representative from McKee’s office was not immediately available to Reuters for comment.

Anyone who has applied for or received benefits through those programs since 2016 could be affected.

Advertisement

The state directed Deloitte to shut down RIBridges to remediate the threat, and for the time being, anyone applying for new benefits will have to do so on paper applications until the system is back up.

Households believed to have been affected will receive a letter from the state notifying them of the problem and explaining steps to be taken to help protect their data and bank accounts.

(Reporting by Rich McKay in Atlanta;; Editing by Sandra Maler)



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending