Connect with us

Northeast

Ranked choice voting and the love-hate relationship both Democrats and Republicans have with it

Published

on

Ranked choice voting and the love-hate relationship both Democrats and Republicans have with it

Depending on who you ask, ranked choice voting can either reward extreme and wealthy candidates in elections or lead to a more publicly-palatable electoral process and encourage voter engagement.

The practice has grown in prevalence in recent elections – particularly in Alaska and Maine, plus Virginia, to some extent – entailing a hierarchical approach to election tallies. Several rounds of tabulation occur after voters are asked at the polls to choose their candidates in order of preference.

In the first round, totals for each candidate are tabulated, and the candidate with the fewest “first votes” is eliminated, and the “second votes” of that candidate’s supporters are added to the totals of the remaining candidates until a winner is decided.

A Republican former Alaska U.S. Senate candidate fell on the side of RCV critics, while a Republican former state lawmaker in Virginia credited it with leading to a political shakeup in his state. Democrats appeared similarly divided.

Democrats in Maine and New York have praised the system, while one Democratic governor appeared to throw up a potential roadblock in the way of his state’s implementation. He later stated that he would support the will of the people in a forthcoming ballot measure.

Advertisement

ALASKA SUES FEDS OVER ‘KNOWINGLY’ POLLUTED NATIVE LANDS

A ballot drop box in Atlantic City (AP)

Ballot measures implementing or banning RCV will appear in Oregon, Alaska, Nevada, Missouri and Colorado. Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Kentucky also have pre-emptively banned RCV.

Former Virginia State Del. Chris Saxman, a Staunton Republican who is now executive director at the free-enterprise non-profit Virginia Free, told Fox News Digital that RCV worked in the selective way it was implemented in his state.

During the 2021 gubernatorial sweeps, Virginia Republicans utilized RCV in their primary candidate selection process, which led to Glenn Youngkin winning the nomination.

Advertisement

Virginia Republicans voted to hold a convention rather than a primary that year.

After Youngkin was selected, Saxman told Fox News Digital, a consultant approached him at the convention to complain that supporters of perceptibly more conservative candidates had been stymied from attacking the nominee.

GAS CRISIS: ALASKA GOVERNOR SAYS ‘BIDEN IS SEARCHING FOR OIL ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET EXCEPT AT HOME’

“If it wasn’t for this damned ranked choice voting, we could have gone after Youngkin harder, but we couldn’t afford to alienate his voters,” the consultant complained, according to Saxman.

“I was like, ‘So, it’s a problem not to attack a fellow Republican?’,” he said, citing former President Reagan’s noted rule.

Advertisement

Saxman said that situation showed there is value in nuanced reforms to elections like the way the party utilized RCV.

“Complex systems reward small change,” he said, going on to claim that because of the surgical way Virginia Republicans implemented RCV, it led to a political earthquake that November.

Saxman noted the GOP had been out of power in Richmond since the Bush era, but now, suddenly, Youngkin, Lt. Gov. Winsome Sears and Attorney General Jason Miyares supplanted the Democratic establishment.

Saxman said national fundraising groups had largely dismissed Virginia’s governor’s race as a lost cause, but in part thanks to RCV, funding poured in after the Youngkin-Sears-Miyares ticket was announced.

Separately, in New York City, then-Mayor Bill de Blasio celebrated 2021’s contest as the “biggest ranked choice voting election in America,” while many of the competitive races fell during the Democratic primary.

Advertisement

IN THE ONLY STATE BORDERING RUSSIA, ALASKA GOVERNOR SAYS DEFENSES ARE STRONG

On the other side of the country, however, Alaska Republicans appeared ready to dispense with the recently-implemented system, which many blamed for the election of Rep. Mary Peltola, D-Alaska, in a solidly red state as a replacement for the late five-decade GOP mainstay Don Young.

Proponents of RCV in Alaska said in multiple reports that the new system worked in the 2022 race there, in that Peltola – a liberal – Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, – a moderate – and Gov. Mike Dunleavy – a conservative, all won races in the same election.

But Kelly Tshibaka, a Republican who ran for Murkowski’s seat in the nonpartisan primary that year, told Fox News Digital that Alaskans were fooled by proponents of RCV who claimed it would take dark money and extremism out of elections.

She noted how Peltola had prevailed after facing Republicans Nick Begich III – scion of a famous Alaskan political family – and former Gov. Sarah Palin.

Advertisement

Tshibaka said she fully supports the effort to get rid of RCV in the Last Frontier, as its repeal is poised to be a statewide ballot initiative in November pending a legal challenge to the measure.

She pointed to the failed candidacy of Al Gross, a Democrat-turned-Independent who, at times, led in the primary but dropped out. Tshibaka claimed that Gross had been forced from the ballot to make way for Peltola, who was to his left – and therefore claims that RCV quells extremism are unfounded.

WHAT IS RANKED CHOICE VOTING, THE NEW ELECTION PROCESS USED IN ALASKA?

Gross said at the time it was “just too hard to run as a nonpartisan candidate in this race” and that the country was “broken.”

Tshibaka also argued that the system leads to a much smaller pool of voters ultimately electing a candidate as other votes are canceled out in tabulation rounds.

Advertisement

“So, it’s very deceptive on how they sell it to the public,” she said, adding that 2022 is largely seen as the most negative election in the state’s history despite RCV being sold to voters as a moderating force.

“We are baiting the water for negativity. You might have a one-off anecdote here or there. However, what we saw in Maine and Alaska … we’re seeing an increase in extreme negativity.”

Judy Eledge, a former schoolteacher in the Arctic oceanside community of Barrow – or Utqiagvik – who is active in Alaskan conservative circles, said the RCV system has shown to be very confusing to voters:

“You basically don’t get your first choice of who you want to win, and it enables people that otherwise would never win anything,” said Eledge. “It gives them enough to win and basically just destroys the party system within the state when it comes to elections.”

Eledge also claimed that it allows candidates who have substantial outside financial support a leg up, artificially influencing second and third choices.

Advertisement

Rep. Mary Peltola (D-AK) speaks to supporters at a watch party on November 8, 2022, in Anchorage, Alaska. (Getty Images )

In Maine, the implementation of RCV paved the way for Democrat Jared Golden’s surprise 2018 upset over incumbent GOP Rep. Bruce Poliquin, marking the first large-scale test of RCV statewide.

Golden’s campaign told Fox News Digital that RCV is a “nonfactor” in his current race. “Like 2020, this will be a head-to-head race,” a spokesperson for the campaign said.

In response to criticisms, Peltola said that while RCV gets a lot of attention in Alaska, the true denominator is the open-primary system.

Advertisement

“We need more people willing to work with the other party, and Alaska’s system gives those candidates a chance. For instance, I wouldn’t have won a Democratic primary – I’m too conservative, and I talk about things that don’t just appeal to the Democratic base,” Peltola said.

“Open primaries and ranked-choice voting give a voice to the 64% of Alaskans that aren’t Democrats or Republicans.”

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pittsburg, PA

Off-site parking remains a critical part of Pittsburgh International Airport’s operations

Published

on

Off-site parking remains a critical part of Pittsburgh International Airport’s operations






Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Fairfield police cancel Jennings Beach Carnival over public safety concerns

Published

on

Fairfield police cancel Jennings Beach Carnival over public safety concerns


Fairfield police announced that the Jennings Beach Carnival has been canceled for Saturday and Sunday.

The department made the announcement on their Facebook page and cited public safety concerns during Friday night’s event.

According to police, officers were called in large numbers, with help from the Bridgeport Police Department, to manage “unusually large and disorderly crowds.” Police said the crowd was made up mostly of unsupervised juveniles.

Police said that throughout Friday evening, there were multiple incidents where attendees believed shots had been fired or that fights had broken out, which led to “panic, chaos, and crowd surges.”

Advertisement

Officers who were at the scene already looked into the reports and found no evidence that shots had been fired.

According to police, the size and movement of the crowds caused some families to be separated and required officers to reconnect parents with their children. Police said they also got numerous reports of fights and disturbances in different areas of the Jennings Beach grounds and parking lots.

Large groups also began running in multiple directions, including some into surrounding neighborhoods, police said. Crowds numbering in the hundreds also gathered at the Chick-fil-A and surrounding businesses, where other fights broke out, and people illegally congregated, needing more police and help from the Connecticut State Police.

Police said the decision to cancel the carnival was made in the interest of public safety and supported by the McKindley PTA, which sponsored the carnival.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

How hedge fund fire trucks are affecting Maine towns

Published

on

How hedge fund fire trucks are affecting Maine towns


Calais has been seeking federal funds for a new ladder truck for years. It hasn’t worked out.

At 41 years old, the fire department’s current truck has been in service for about two decades longer than industry standards recommend. The department can no longer find parts for it but can’t replace it with town money alone. New ones run more than $1 million, and the budget for the entire city is roughly $6.5 million per year.

“We don’t want to burden the taxpayers with that, because I don’t think they can [afford] it, to be honest with you,” Fire Chief William Lee said.

Advertisement

Fire engine prices have skyrocketed since the pandemic, rising much faster than inflation. Maine towns struggling under heavy tax burdens are responding by holding onto aging trucks for longer and struggling to plan for new purchases that often take several years to process.

The price spike is the culmination of industry consolidation, ever-changing safety and emissions standards and President Donald Trump’s tariffs. One Maine city has even joined a national legal effort alleging a price-fixing scheme among a trio of dominant manufacturers.

Fire engines are typically made custom after departments outline their specific needs. In Maine, trucks need to fit in old stations and maneuver narrow, winding streets. The Hancock County town of Surry has put in an order for one on a standard chassis to save time.

The order cannot be placed until this summer. Fire Chief Bryan McLellan said he’s hoping to wait about 18 months for delivery. If material costs rise dramatically during that time, the final price could go up before the truck gets to the coastal town.

Surry’s effort was boosted by a $492,000 earmark sponsored by U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Democrat from Maine’s 2nd District, in this year’s round of federal funding bills. Even with that help and local matching funds, it’s not enough for a top-of-the-line engine.

Advertisement

Other towns are looking for 2027 earmarks from Maine’s delegation, which is helmed by Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican and top appropriator. Golden made a similar request for Orland. The nearby town of Penobscot is trying for Golden’s help. China, in Kennebec County, made a similar request to independent Sen. Angus King.

Many communities in Maine and across the country have voiced outrage over industry consolidation. Fire truck producers have been bought up repeatedly by private equity firms in recent years. Up to 80% of the U.S. fire truck supply now comes from three companies: Oshkosh Corp., REV Group, and Rosenbauer America.

Augusta sued them last year, alleging in a 66-page filing that they colluded to fix prices while raking in billions in profit. Executives have denied engaging in anti-competitive business practices. The federal lawsuit in Wisconsin, where two of the manufacturers are based, is still active.

Augusta’s complaint tells the story of market consolidation, including the Great Recession-era private equity takeover of distressed manufacturers that had once competed and were turned into REV Group. The city said it is operating two trucks that are more than 30 years old.

City officials declined to comment on the pending litigation, and the city’s fire chief could not be reached for comment.

Advertisement

Back in Surry, the town is aiming to keep its new truck compliant with the latest industry standards, which are frequently updated to include advanced safety features. The truck’s manufacturer will have to add many new safety tools, like seatbelt sensors. Those requirements add cost to replacing the department’s old truck, which lacks shoulder straps, anti-lock brakes, and airbags.

“When we’re having volunteers put their time and their lives on the line to protect their communities, it’s really important that we’re giving them a vehicle to operate that’s safe for them,” McClellan said.

The newest truck in Calais was made in 2005. It is also reaching the end of the industry standard 15 to 25 year service life and will soon need to be replaced. The city is planning to apply once again for fire truck funding through a federal program that has not come through in the past three years and is now stalled due to the partial government shutdown.

As costs continue to rise and backlog continues to plague truck manufacturers, it’s unlikely Calais will be able to replace a truck anytime soon.

“Communities just can only sustain so much, and these prices are just getting out of reach,” Lee said.

Advertisement

Daniel O’Connor is a Report for America corps member who covers rural government as part of the partnership between the Bangor Daily News and The Maine Monitor, with additional support from BDN and Monitor readers.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending