Pennsylvania
With child abuse amendment stalled in Pa. House, Speaker Mark Rozzi seeks public input to overcome gridlock
The Pennsylvania Home of Representatives is at an deadlock, with lawmakers unable to ascertain guidelines for the brand new legislative session. The standoff has delayed the passage of a constitutional modification that will permit little one intercourse abuse victims to file lawsuits that in any other case can be prevented by the statute of limitations.
In an effort to unravel the partisan gridlock, Home Speaker Mark Rozzi is embarking on a statewide listening tour to achieve public suggestions on the perfect methods to beat it.
The listening tour kicks off Wednesday in Pittsburgh, with extra stops to be introduced over the subsequent few days. Rozzi, who represents Berks County, has requested a bipartisan group of six legislators to hitch him. They embrace Reps. Morgan Cephas, a Democrat from Philadelphia, and Tim Briggs, a Democrat from Montgomery County. The group has been assembly since Jan. 17 because the Democratic-controlled Home searches for tactics to finish its gridlock.
“As a rank-and-file member of the Home for 10 years, I used to be by no means concerned within the behind-the-scenes politics of the Common Meeting,” Rozzi mentioned Friday. “Now, having been thrust into it during the last two weeks, I can inform you one factor: Harrisburg is damaged.”
Rozzi was elected because the state’s first unbiased Home Speaker on Jan. 3 after being nominated by Rep. Jim Gregory, a Republican from Blair County. The longtime Democrat appeared poised to vary his celebration affiliation and has repeatedly mentioned he is not going to caucus with both celebration.
Nonetheless, Gregory has known as on Rozzi to resign, claiming that he is privately walked again his determination to change his celebration affiliation. Some Republicans even have made requires Rozzi’s resignation.
The primary few weeks of a brand new legislative session sometimes consist of creating guidelines and assigning members to chair legislative committees. Nonetheless, former Gov. Tom Wolf known as for a particular session of the state Home and Senate on Jan. 9 as a way to go the constitutional modification, which might set up a two-year window for abuse victims to sue abusers in any other case protected by the statute of limitations.
The modification must be authorised by each legislative chambers and signed by Gov. Josh Shapiro earlier than it will probably seem as a poll referendum. Lawmakers from each events had pledged to approve it initially of this session.
The Republican-controlled Senate handed it as a part of a bundle of constitutional amendments, together with some that lack bipartisan help. They included measures that will require voters to indicate identification on the polls, mandate post-election audits and provides lawmakers larger energy to disapprove of laws applied by the governor,
The Senate since has recessed till Feb. 27.
“Throughout my quick tenure as speaker, I’ve seen the highs of former Gov. Tom Wolf name the Common Meeting into particular session to go a constitutional modification that would supply reduction to survivors of childhood sexual assault,” Rozzi mentioned. “I’ve additionally seen the lows of lawmakers utilizing survivors of sexual assault as pawns to attempt to drive the passage of one other constitutional modification that will make it tougher for everybody to vote.”
The Home Republican Coverage Committee is set to fulfill Monday to debate the significance of returning to the chamber to go the bundle of amendments. If the amendments are authorised by the Home earlier than Jan. 27, they would seem on the poll throughout Could’s main election.
It’s unclear whether or not the state Home will reconvene earlier than three particular elections scheduled for Feb. 7. The elections, which all happen in Allegheny County, will fill vacancies left by the demise of former Rep. Anthony DeLuca and vacancies created by Lt. Gov. Austin Davis and Congresswoman Summer time Lee taking up their new roles.
Pennsylvania
Josh Shapiro wasn’t on the ballot this year, but still spent millions campaigning. Here’s where the money went.
HARRISBURG — His name wasn’t on the ballot in 2024, but Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro still spent more than $5.5 million campaigning this year. Much of that money, however, didn’t go directly to the Democrats up for election in the commonwealth.
A review of Shapiro’s campaign finance reports for the year shows that he spent almost $1.3 million on pricey consultants, and almost $1 million on a combination of private airfare, hotels, and event planning in 13 states, including Pennsylvania, alongside smaller expenditures on new cameras and online clothing retailers.
Shapiro’s spokesperson, Manuel Bonder, said these expenses were all for the good of Democrats inside and outside Pennsylvania.
“Throughout the 2024 election cycle, Governor Shapiro was a top surrogate for candidates up and down the ballot and campaigned tirelessly across the Commonwealth and in key swing states — working to defend every single seat of the State House Democratic majority and elect pro-freedom candidates at every level,” Bonder said in a statement.
Shapiro raked a lot of donations into his already strong campaign account during and after his time as a vice presidential contender this summer. Newly filed reports show that he ended November with more than $10.6 million on hand.
Recent big donors included former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, California developer and stem cell research advocate Robert Klein, and Los Angeles-based talent manager Scooter Braun.
The cash puts Shapiro in a strong financial position heading into what could be a competitive 2026 reelection race while allowing him to continue to build a national brand.
Where exactly did Shapiro’s money go?
Shapiro spent more than $5.5 million out of his campaign account this year.
Of that, about $1.7 million went to Pennsylvania candidates. The rest went toward consultants, private flights, hotels, events and meals for his campaign in 13 states including Pennsylvania, among other expenses.
Of the $1.3 million the campaign put toward consulting, the biggest chunks went to Denver-based political advertising firm Ascend Digital Strategies and to California fundraising advisor Cooper Teboe. Each received $570,000 in fees.
Teboe, who connects major Silicon Valley donors to Democratic candidates, has worked with Shapiro previously. The governor’s financial reports routinely show millions of dollars from tech moguls like Reid Hoffman, who co-founded LinkedIn. He also receives donations from Hollywood producers and celebrities, and other West Coast megadonors like Karla Jurvetson and Jennifer Duda, who are both physicians.
Of the almost $1 million Shapiro spent on travel and accommodations, the majority — $641,000 — went toward private flights. He also spent at least $121,000 on hotels and $27,000 on meals.
Some of those expenses, such as $180 at an Michigan gastropub and $725 at Atlanta’s Ritz-Carlton, illustrate his frequent stops in other swing states in the lead-up to the presidential election.
Shapiro also spent at least $185,000 to attend the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Nearly 80% of that tab went toward renting an event space at a renovated church where he hosted attendees during the four-day affair.
Shapiro also spent $18,000 on hotels in California and $14,000 on lodging in Florida. Most of the latter paid for time at the five-star Eau Palm Beach Resort & Spa, which advertises that “guests are welcomed with champagne, breathtaking ocean views and cooling tropical breezes.”
His campaign also spent more than $34,000 on hotels in Philadelphia — though he lives just outside of the city — including $13,000 at the swanky Four Seasons, where guests can “revel in breathtaking, unobstructed views” of the city from the 60th floor of the Comcast Center.
Bonder told Spotlight PA that the Four Seasons expense was related to Shapiro hosting an annual policy conference for the Democratic Governors Association.
How did Shapiro help Pa. Dems?
Many of the candidates down the ballot foundered in the commonwealth this year.
While Democrats narrowly kept their majority in the state House and didn’t lose ground in the GOP-controlled state Senate, Republicans easily won races for Pennsylvania’s three row offices — attorney general, auditor general and treasurer.
Democrats told Spotlight PA that they don’t blame Shapiro, or any other single person, for those losses. However, several operatives for the party said they wished the governor had used some of the millions he still has on hand to boost state candidates a little more.
Most spoke on condition of anonymity because of Shapiro’s power within the party.
The money Shapiro donated to state-level Democrats on the ballot in 2024 amounted to about 30% of his total campaign spending for the year.
He gave $1.25 million and $350,000 to the state House and Senate campaign committees, respectively. He also gave $100,000 to attorney general candidate Eugene DePasquale and $25,000 to auditor general candidate Malcolm Kenyatta.
Shapiro’s predecessor, Democrat Tom Wolf, spent just $210,000 on down-ballot Pennsylvania races in 2016, though he ended the year with much less on hand than Shapiro — $1.7 million.
But in 2020, without a reelection race to run, Wolf poured $2.6 million into lower-level Democratic general election campaigns, particularly for legislative seats in the then GOP-controlled General Assembly.
Chuck Pascal, who chaired the campaign of Democratic treasurer candidate Erin McClelland and runs the Armstrong County Democratic Committee, told Spotlight PA that additional money from Shapiro likely would have made little difference given the party’s weak performance across the board.
Shapiro gave no money to McClelland, a political outsider. She raised far less than Kenyatta, for instance, but ultimately got only 20,000 fewer votes than he did.
But Pascal, who noted he was speaking for himself and not McClelland, does think there’s at least one area where Shapiro could have done more.
“The one glaring thing in the results was that turnout was down in the Southeast, and particularly in Philadelphia and Montgomery Counties,” he said.
Shapiro is from Montgomery County. He previously represented a state House district there and served as county commissioner.
“Given the governor’s political strength in the southeast,” Pascal added, more spending there to increase voter engagement “could have been a place where he could at least have saved Bob Casey.”
Casey, Pennsylvania’s senior Democratic U.S. Senator, lost his race by just more than 15,000 votes.
According to Shapiro’s campaign, the governor appeared at 25 public events in Southeast Pennsylvania between late July — when President Joe Biden dropped his reelection bid — and Election Day.
The extent of the work that a governor, or any other political figure, does for their party during an election doesn’t all show up in public reports. A governor can join fundraising calls to help persuade donors, appear at national events to talk about important races in their state, or share intelligence about likely donors with various campaign committees — among other intangibles.
Bonder, Shapiro’s spokesperson, said that’s what Shapiro was doing. “His work to make key endorsements, stump at events, raise money, film digital and TV ads, and more was unmatched in Pennsylvania,” he said.
For instance, the Saturday before the election, Shapiro appeared at two canvass kickoffs for swing district Democratic candidates — one in Bucks County and one in Northampton County.
At the former, Shapiro warmed up the dozens-deep crowd gathered in a suburban park for state Rep. Brian Munroe, D-Bucks, extolling them that “you have the power in your hand” to ensure that Democrats win up and down the ballot before introducing Munroe to cheers.
Munroe would go on to win by 1,100 votes, one of the key wins that preserved House Democrats’ majority. He told Spotlight PA he thinks there were a number of reasons he came out on top — but having Shapiro in his corner definitely didn’t hurt.
When Munroe was knocking doors in the weeks leading up to the election, he got a strong sense of the governor’s broad appeal.
“I met a significant number of Republicans who said when (Shapiro) was in the running for vice president, they would have loved to see him in the role,” Munroe said.
Of complaints that Shapiro could have done more, Bonder said, “While I understand that some people in politics level bad faith criticisms in order to see their names in the paper, the reality is no one in this commonwealth worked harder than Gov. Josh Shapiro this fall to show up, raise money, film ads, and support and elect candidates who will protect real freedom and get stuff done.”
Jeff Coleman, a Republican operative, argued that Shapiro’s national visibility gave his donors exactly what they wanted: They wrote checks because they believe in his long-term political prospects.
“When you are writing a check to Gov. Shapiro, you are writing it to whatever the next chapter looks like,” Coleman said. “You are writing a check with the hope you are going to be part of history. That’s the type of brand his team built.”
Consultants also noted that the big cash reserve Shapiro has could allow him to put dollars into next year’s judicial retention elections, during which three justices elected as Democrats will run for new 10-year terms.
Kate Huangpu of Spotlight PA contributed reporting for this story.
Spotlight PA is an independent, nonpartisan, and nonprofit newsroom producing investigative and public-service journalism that holds power to account and drives positive change in Pennsylvania. Sign up for our newsletters at spotlightpa.org/newsletters.
Before you go, if you learned something from this article, pay it forward and contribute to Spotlight PA at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.
Originally Published:
Pennsylvania
Manhunt for attempted murder suspect ends in Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
The Welcoming Center receives $1M to expand its work throughout Pa.
From Delco to Chesco and Montco to Bucks, what about life in Philly’s suburbs do you want WHYY News to cover? Let us know!
The Welcoming Center will use a $1 million grant from the Pennsylvania Legislature to expand its work throughout the commonwealth.
The Philly-based nonprofit promotes economic growth through immigrant integration, offering a number of programs supporting immigrants in entrepreneurship and professional development.
Anuj Gupta, president and CEO of the center, said the state grant — supported by state Sens. Nikil Saval, Sharif Street and Anthony Williams, along with state Rep. Joe Hohenstein — will help the organization work with immigrant communities in Philadelphia’s collar counties and beyond.
“We’re excited to bring our workforce development models, our entrepreneurship models, our leadership development models, to more communities across Pennsylvania that see immigrant integration as part of their future,” Gupta said.
The grant, administered through the state Department of Community and Economic Development, will fund the organization’s work over a two-year period. Gupta said that though the funds and programming are focused on immigrants, the benefits of the center’s work are felt by all residents.
“The focus of our model has always been that by helping immigrants realize their full economic potential, we’re helping our entire community realize more economic opportunity,” he said. “The support that the legislature has demonstrated, I think it exhibits a trust in this model that we’re not looking to only serve one community as opposed to another. We’re trying to help a community uncap or leverage its full economic potential in a way that benefits everyone else.”
-
Technology1 week ago
Struggling to hear TV dialogue? Try these simple fixes
-
Business7 days ago
OpenAI's controversial Sora is finally launching today. Will it truly disrupt Hollywood?
-
Politics3 days ago
Canadian premier threatens to cut off energy imports to US if Trump imposes tariff on country
-
Technology4 days ago
Inside the launch — and future — of ChatGPT
-
Technology2 days ago
OpenAI cofounder Ilya Sutskever says the way AI is built is about to change
-
Politics2 days ago
U.S. Supreme Court will decide if oil industry may sue to block California's zero-emissions goal
-
Technology2 days ago
Meta asks the US government to block OpenAI’s switch to a for-profit
-
Politics4 days ago
Conservative group debuts major ad buy in key senators' states as 'soft appeal' for Hegseth, Gabbard, Patel