Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania infrastructure receives a C- rating – The Brown and White

Published

on

Pennsylvania infrastructure receives a C- rating – The Brown and White


The American Society of Civil Engineers discloses the situation and efficiency of Pennsylvania’s infrastructure each 4 years. This yr, the state’s system obtained a cumulative grade of C-. The report card consists of 15 classes of infrastructure: aviation, bridges, dams, ingesting water, power, hazardous waste, levees, parks, ports, rail, roads, stable waste, stormwater, transit and wastewater.

Lehigh’s Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering collaborated with the Lehigh Valley part of the society to carry a information convention on Nov. 15 in Fritz Engineering Laboratory to announce and focus on the findings.

The American Society of Civil Engineers held an occasion for the Lehigh Valley the place they launched Pennsylvania’s infrastructure report card on Nov. 15. It was held at Fritz Laboratory on Lehigh College’s campus. (Jinshan Tu/B&W Workers)

On the convention, John Caperilla, former president of the society, introduced the efficiency outcomes and mentioned the areas of Pennsylvania’s infrastructure which might be in want of extra consideration and funding.

Advertisement

Caperilla stated Pennsylvania’s wastewater obtained the bottom grade within the report with a D-.

“The common age of most sewer techniques (in Pennsylvania) is approaching 75 years with many plates over 100 years previous,” Caperilla stated. “The town of Philadelphia is utilizing inexperienced and nice infrastructure to deal with this difficulty. Nevertheless, the whole state must do extra to remove this well being danger.” 

Caperilla raised issues through the convention in regards to the state’s situation, together with the presence of PFAs in Pennsylvania’s water. PFAs are a bunch of manufactured chemical compounds which might be substances in numerous on a regular basis merchandise which might trigger sure sorts of most cancers and different critical sicknesses.

“Roughly one-third of the ingesting water techniques in Pennsylvania have been examined for PFAs and so they had been discovered to have a quantity that’s above the EPA supervisor,” Caperilla stated.

Shamim Pakzad, chair of Lehigh’s civil and environmental engineering division, stated the primary factor Pennsylvania must do to enhance the infrastructure is put money into sources.

Advertisement

Pakzad stated an infrastructure invoice that was handed just a few months in the past gives cash for enchancment, nevertheless, the sources should be directed towards the locations that want essentially the most consideration.

“I feel it’s essential for these sources to be put in the precise locations and discover one of the simplest ways to make use of these sources,” Pakzad stated. “You’ll all the time be chasing the {dollars} as a result of we’ll by no means have sufficient {dollars} to do every part. The good strategy to do all of that is to determine the place the {dollars} would make the most important distinction.”

People collect in Fritz Laboratory on Nov. 15 for a gathering hosted by the PA Council of the American Society of Civil Engineers. The occasion launched a report card relating to 15 classes of the state’s infrastructure. (Jinshan Tu/B&W Workers)

The civil engineering division at Lehigh works on figuring out the primary areas of want and deciding a number of the greatest practices for restore and design to make sure resilience within the college’s infrastructure, Pakzad stated.

Farrah Moazeni, assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at Lehigh, addressed the interconnectedness of important infrastructure techniques and the influence of academic-industry-government partnerships.

Advertisement

Moazeni stated that her tutorial analysis suggests options to enhance the power effectivity of recent water techniques and explores totally different strategies to leverage the interdependencies with important infrastructure to boost the operation.

“Fortunately at Lehigh we have now a middle referred to as I-CPIE, Institute for Cyber Bodily Infrastructure and Vitality, the place greater than 90 college members are gathered to carry out multidisciplinary analysis,” Moazeni stated.

Moazeni stated important infrastructure techniques together with water, energy, pure gasoline and transportation present proof of being interconnected, which might each assist and harm our infrastructure.

Ralph Eberhardt, chairman of the Transportation Committee for the Lehigh Valley, spoke on the convention about The Higher Lehigh Valley of Commerce’s mission to enhance transportation infrastructure within the Lehigh Valley. He stated their mission features a better understanding of the problems and intensifying neighborhood understanding advocacy on the native, state and federal ranges.

“The committee acknowledges the financial vitality of regional companies and the mobility of Lehigh Valley residents rely on protected, equitable, sustainable and environment friendly transportation infrastructure,” Eberhardt stated.

Advertisement

In 2014 and 2018, the report card for Pennsylvania’s infrastructure mirrored the identical general grade, a C-.

Pakzad stated individuals are continuously surrounded by infrastructure and are reliant on it.

“There’s no strategy to overstate the influence of a well-functioning infrastructure on a citizen’s life,” Pakzad stated.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Judge Denies Centre County GOP Request To Disqualify Undated or Misdated Mail-In Ballots

Published

on

Pennsylvania Judge Denies Centre County GOP Request To Disqualify Undated or Misdated Mail-In Ballots


WASHINGTON D.C. — A Pennsylvania judge today rejected a request from Centre County GOP Chair Michelle Schellberg and local voters to disqualify nearly 100 mail-in ballots cast in the state’s April 23 primary election with misdated or undated outer envelopes. 

The ruling comes as part of a lawsuit filed earlier this month in which Schellberg and individual voters alleged that the Centre County Board of Elections wrongly decided to include 95 ballots in the county’s vote tally with dates that were imprecise or missing altogether. The lawsuit additionally sought to prevent the board from counting undated or misdated mail-in ballots in all future elections.

In today’s order, Judge Julia R. Rater dismissed the county GOP’s legal action on the grounds that Schellberg and the voters filed their petition too late after the board’s April 25 decision to count the 95 undated or misdated ballots. Without reaching the merits of the case, Rater concluded that under state law, the petitioners would have needed to file their appeal of the board’s decision by April 27 or May 2 at the very latest. 

“The Appeal was not filed until May 7, 2024. As such, it is untimely,” Rater’s order reads. 

Advertisement

 Although the 95 contested ballots did not stand to materially affect Centre County’s primary election outcomes, they nonetheless resulted in the county postponing certification of its results as the litigation played out. Following today’s ruling, Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt (D) is expected to certify the statewide primary election results — a process that was held up due to Centre County’s certification delay.  

According to the now-dismissed GOP lawsuit, a 2022 decision from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and 2023 decision from the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals preclude Pennsylvania counties from counting mail-in ballots with outer return envelopes that are undated or incorrectly dated. 

On the other hand, the Centre County Board of Elections argued that the “Pennsylvania Supreme Court left untouched the county boards of elections’ authority to determine whether a ballot’s outer envelope is correctly dated.” 

The board also maintained that Schellberg and her co-petitioners brought their legal action too late after its members decided to count the ballots, thereby foreclosing the challenge under state law. In addition to agreeing with this argument in today’s order, Rater maintained that “even if Petitioners’ Appeal could be construed as a petition for an election contest”— as opposed to an appeal of the board’s decision — “it would be fatally deficient leaving the Court without jurisdiction to decide the matter.”

Rater further acknowledged the urgency of finalizing the state’s certification of its primary election results, reasoning that she must dismiss the appeal so as to “avoid any confusion or potential further delays.” In an amicus brief in support of the Centre County Board of Elections, Schmidt and the Pennsylvania Department of State previously urged the court to dismiss the petition in order to allow the secretary to “perform his duty and finally certify the 2024 primary.” 

Advertisement

Centre County was not the only Pennsylvania County beset by legal challenges over mail-in ballots in the wake of the state’s April 23 primary. Litigation is ongoing in a case out of Butler County, where the board of elections refused to allow voters to cure mail-in ballots that were missing inner secrecy envelopes. 

Read the order here.

Learn more about the case here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania's top marksmen revealed during Governor's Twenty competition

Published

on

Pennsylvania's top marksmen revealed during Governor's Twenty competition


More than 100 soldiers and airmen with the Pennsylvania National Guard competed in the annual Governor’s Twenty marksmanship competition at Fort Indiantown Gap on May 9-11.

The competition, which is organized and run by the Pennsylvania National Guard’s Marksmanship Training Unit and this year featured the efforts of 107 service members, determines the top 20 marksmen in the state. The 20 top scorers earn the right to wear the coveted Governor’s Twenty tab on their uniform.

First-place finisher Major Ian Swisher pointed out that several first-time competitors made the top 20.

“Winning feels great, a validation of sorts, to the time and energy I’ve devoted to improving my marksmanship,” Swisher, an operations officer with the 56th Stryker Brigade Combat Team, said in a release. “However, the real winners are the dozens of new shooters we welcomed to the firing line. Everyone, regardless of rank or experience, learns something about themselves or marksmanship every time they compete. That’s how we should be measuring value in competition; it’s the knowledge and experience we take back to our formations that counts.”

Advertisement

The Governor’s Twenty tab, worn on the left shoulder, is a state-level National Guard award that is presented every year and is reflected on a service members’ official personnel record. It is recognized by both the Army and Air Force.

Another top three finisher, Capt. Phillip Wright, competed in 2020 with low expectations, but ended up earning the tab.

“I went in more open minded to learn. I was ecstatic to earn the tab,” said Wright. “This year, I went in with the expectation to finish within the top three because I have been shooting competitively since 2020.”

In order to be competitive, guardsmen need to be proficient with rifles and pistols. Each competitor fires an M17 pistol and M4 carbine. The contest also included an M17 pistol 30 yard slow fire match and a M4 carbine 400 yard slow fire match.

The competition gives an opportunity to guardsmen to apply marksmanship fundamentals. That was one of the motivators for Sgt. 1st Class Douglas Costello, who also finished in the top three, but he also described his participation in the competition as “an honor.”

Advertisement

“I would love to see this match continue to grow,” Costello said. “I get to see friends that I don’t often get to see, I have an opportunity to pass knowledge on to new shooters and I always learn something new myself.”

Here are the Top 20 results, in order from 1st to 20th:

  • Maj. Ian Swisher
  • Capt. Philip Wright
  • Sgt. 1st Class Douglas Costello
  • Chief Master Sgt. Edward Altmeyer
  • Sgt. Dylan Albert
  • Staff Sgt. Luke Heim
  • Master Sgt. Shawn McCreary
  • Staff Sgt. Robert Robbins
  • Staff Sgt. John Rebuck
  • Staff Sgt. Zachary Paff
  • Sgt. Brennan Koji
  • Sgt. Croft Howley
  • Sgt. Jack Banducci
  • Sgt. James Reddington
  • 2nd Lt. Edward Hay
  • Sgt. 1st Class Thomas Brick
  • Sgt. 1st Class Sean Whaley
  • Sgt. Terry Bennett
  • Sgt. Craig Buick
  • Staff Sgt. Jonathan DeLise
Questions about this story? Suggestions for a future LebTown article? Reach our newsroom using this contact form and we’ll do our best to get back to you.

Support local journalism.

Cancel anytime.

Already a member? Login here

Advertisement

Free news isn’t cheap. If you value the journalism LebTown provides to the community, then help us make it sustainable by becoming a champion of local news. You can unlock additional coverage for the community by supporting our work with a one-time contribution, or joining as a monthly or annual member. You can cancel anytime.





Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Man charged with murder in fatal shooting at Pennsylvania linen company

Published

on

Man charged with murder in fatal shooting at Pennsylvania linen company


A man has been charged with murder Thursday after a shooting left 2 dead and 3 others injured in what prosecutors described as a “cold-blooded” attack at a linen company near Philadelphia.

Wilbert Rosado-Ruiz, 61, has been charged with two counts of homicide, multiple counts of aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and a firearms charge, according to Delaware County District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer. He was scheduled to be arraigned Thursday afternoon, Stollsteimer said.

Rosado-Ruiz was charged in connection to a shooting that occurred Wednesday morning at Delaware County Linen in Chester, a city south of Philadelphia. The family-owned company was founded in 1988 and provides linen rental and laundering services to businesses in southeastern Pennsylvania and surrounding states, its website said.

Advertisement

Stollsteimer said the shooting appeared to stem from a dispute between Rosado-Ruiz and a female colleague. It was unclear what led to the dispute between the suspect and his co-worker, authorities said.

Two brothers, identified as Leovanny Pena Pena and Giguenson Pena Pena, were killed and three others — including the colleague involved in the dispute — were wounded, authorities said. As of Thursday afternoon, two of the surviving victims were listed in stable condition while one was in critical condition but stable.

“This is a horrible, horrible event (that) should never happen,” Stollsteimer said at a news conference Thursday. “As I said yesterday, (shootings happen) too often in America. It could have happened in any community but it happened, unfortunately, here in the city of Chester.”

Ohio shooting: 3 killed, 3 others wounded following ‘chaotic’ shooting in Ohio; suspect at large

Advertisement

Gunman ‘methodically’ walked around, shooting victims

The shooting happened at about 8:30 a.m. and Chester Police Commissioner Steven Gretsky said officers arrived at a “very chaotic scene.” They found one man dead outside the business entrance and another dead inside.

According to Stollsteimer, surveillance video showed Rosado-Ruiz arriving at the business and having a verbal altercation with a female employee. He then went outside to make a phone call, returned with a gun, and opened fire.

“He methodically walked around the floor of the business,” Stollsteimer said.

The female colleague was the first victim in the incident and left the building after she was shot, according to Stollsteimer. As Rosado-Ruiz was leaving the building, he noticed the woman and fired several more shots but either misfired or ran out of ammunition, Stollsteimer added.

Rosado-Ruiz then fled from the scene but was soon taken into custody after an officer from nearby Trainer, Pennsylvania, heard the vehicle description and stopped the car, Gretsky said.

Advertisement

Stollsteimer added that although Rosado-Ruiz legally owned the gun that was used in the shooting, he faced a weapons charge because he did not have a license to carry a concealed weapon.

Latest workplace shooting in U.S.

There have been at least 168 mass shootings in the country so far this year, according to the Gun Violence Archive, which tracks gun violence incidents. The organization defines mass shootings as shootings in which at least four people have been shot, not including the shooter, regardless of whether they die.

Mass killings, as defined by a tracker from USA TODAY, Northeastern University, and the Associated Press, include incidents in which four or more people, excluding the offender, are killed within a 24-hour time frame. There have been 15 such killings in 2024, according to the tracker.

The Chester, Pennsylvania, shooting is also the latest incident of workplace violence carried out by disgruntled workers or former employees. Assault is the fifth-leading cause of workplace deaths, according to the National Safety Council.

Between 2021 and 2022, the public service organization counted over 57,600 injuries. In 2022, there were 525 fatalities reported due to assault.

Advertisement

Last year, seven people were killed in two related shootings in Half Moon Bay, California, in what authorities described as an “instance of workplace violence.” In June 2022, three people were killed and three others injured — including the gunman — at a Maryland manufacturing facility.

About five months later, a gunman, who a witness said was targeting co-workers, killed six people at a Walmart in Virginia. In 2021, a former employee at a FedEx facility in Indiana killed eight people.

Though multiple workplace killings by employees have occurred in recent years, experts have said these incidents are comparatively rare when looking at all U.S. mass killings, USA TODAY reported in 2022.

“In terms of workplace homicides, most are actually committed not by employees,” James Alan Fox, a criminologist and professor at Northeastern University, previously told USA TODAY.

Contributing: Jeanine Santucci and Nada Hassanein, USA TODAY

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending