Pennsylvania
Exclusive | Pennsylvania teacher running for Congress slams district’s response to middle schoolers’ TikTok abuse: ‘They chose to hide’
MALVERN, Pa. — Pennsylvania middle-school teacher-turned-GOP congressional candidate Neil Young has been at the forefront of a social-media scandal that enveloped his Chester County middle school, making national headlines this month.
An hour outside of Philly, at the end of the city’s wealthy Main Line, is the suburb of Malvern, Pa., where Great Valley Middle School students carried out an online harassment campaign against their teachers via TikTok.
The New York Times first reported on July 6 that a quarter of the school’s faculty members were victims of this abuse, in which “fake teacher accounts rife with pedophilia innuendo, racist memes, homophobia and made-up sexual hookups among teachers” circulated fraudulent content to TikTok pages hundreds of students follow.
Young, a veteran social studies teacher on sabbatical while running for Congress, is among the victims.
“I’m the guy who was in bed with another teacher,” Young told The Post, describing the fraudulent picture students circulated of him on TikTok. “What was done with me is not acceptable.”
Young — who is challenging incumbent Democratic Rep. Chrissy Houlahan in Pennsylvania’s 6th Congressional District, which covers Chester County and part of Berks County — is hoping to shine a spotlight on his colleagues who have shared their stories.
“The stuff that was said about some of these other teachers — just an unbelievable lack of empathy from the kids,” Young said, alluding to stories of fellow teachers defamed with insinuations of pedophilia or depicted in “cheapfake” images in sexual situations.
Houlahan — who briefly taught high school chemistry early in her career — addressed the scandal on the House floor last Thursday, calling students’ actions “inappropriate” regardless of circumstance.
“This wasn’t a prank, it was a blatant misuse of social media violating basic rules of human decency.” Houlahan said. “And it’s inappropriate, regardless of a child’s age or whether the school is public, charter or private.”
Houlahan did not acknowledge that her GOP opponent was one of the teachers victimized by fraudulent TikTok posts — something Young was quick to capitalize on.
“She doesn’t acknowledge that her opponent was one of the victims,” Young said.
“Instead she starts with, ‘As a former chemistry teacher,’ Young added. “She quit after one year and didn’t follow through on her Teach for America contract.”
Young’s gripes aren’t only with Houlahan’s handling of the scandal, but the Great Valley School District also.
“Every step of the way, with the opportunity to bring in parents and support teachers, they chose to hide,” he said. “They refused to communicate to the whole district. They tried to do it [in] just isolated groups.”
And Young isn’t the only one who feels this way – just ask the 200+ people who showed up to the Great Valley school board meeting on Monday night demanding answers.
Teacher’s union president Nikki Salvatico was also there to make their position clear: the students’ actions should not be dismissed as protected speech under the First Amendment.
Young said that the district may have been acting on advice from its solicitors that taking serious action against student perpetrators of the social media posts could lead to lawsuits regarding conduct outside the classroom. Still, he feels they missed the mark.
“The opportunity to set a strong precedent that we’re not going to accept this type of behavior, we’re not going to allow it to fall under the umbrella of free speech — that was their opportunity that they lost,” he said.
Courts have traditionally upheld students’ right to protected speech after school hours, such as in the Supreme Court’s “cursing cheerleader” decision back in 2021 — another case involving Pennsylvania teenagers and social media. But in that case, the student in question was posting on her own behalf and not attempting to falsely impersonate others.
Young thinks a handful of students were briefly suspended because teachers remained persistent with both the district and their union — despite both wanting to avoid escalating the situation.
It may be too little too late, per Young, who says the district soured its relationship with faculty and families as a result of poor communication.
“The community feels like they were in the dark. The parents feel like they were in the dark,” Young said. “Teachers feel unsupported.”
As for action to prevent similar abuse in the future, Young says teachers and parents need a seat at the table. He expressed concerns about government-mandated social-media restrictions for children — like Pennsylvania GOP Senate candidate Dave McCormick’s calls to ban children under 16 from socials — arguing enforcement would be challenging.
But at the top of this teacher’s mind is getting educators involved in the process rather than leaving it to the politicians.
“If legislation’s going to exist, it certainly should have input from teachers,” Young said.
Pennsylvania
A Pa. utility shutoff law is expiring. Here’s what you need to know
Have a question about Philly’s neighborhoods or the systems that shape them? PlanPhilly reporters want to hear from you! Ask us a question or send us a story idea you think we should cover.
A Pennsylvania law that lays out how and when utility companies can shut off customers’ electricity, gas or water expires Dec. 31.
But the state’s ban on shutoffs for low-income customers during the winter months and other protections will continue uninterrupted.
“The message that we’ve been hoping that people really hear is not to panic,” said Elizabeth Marx, executive director of the Pennsylvania Utility Law Project.
Utility shutoffs are an experience many Pennsylvania households deal with. In the first 10 months of 2024, utilities in the state disconnected more than 300,000 households and reconnected fewer than three-quarters of them.
In Philadelphia, one in four low-income households spends at least 16% of its income on energy bills — an energy burden that’s considered severe. Black and Hispanic households in Philadelphia spend more of their income on energy than households overall, and national surveys have shown non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic households are disconnected from utility service at higher rates than non-Hispanic white households.
Here’s what you need to know about the sunsetting statute.
Pa.’s ban on shutoffs for low-income customers during the winter continues
Pennsylvania’s winter shutoff moratorium will continue even after the law expires, because this and other protections are duplicated in another part of state code.
Between the frigid months of December through March, public utilities in Pennsylvania are restricted from terminating low-income customers’ service for nonpayment without permission from the Public Utility Commission.
Water utilities cannot terminate heat-related service during this time period.
Gas and electric utilities cannot terminate service for households earning below $3,137 monthly for an individual or $6,500 for a family of four, based on the 2024 federal poverty guidelines.
“We understand the importance of these protections to Pennsylvanians and remain committed to balancing the needs of consumers and utilities,” said Stephen DeFrank, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission chairman, in a statement.
There is a partial exception for city gas utilities, which can terminate service for households earning $1,882 to $3,137 monthly for an individual or $3,900 to $6,500 for a family of four, during part of the winter under certain circumstances.
If you can’t pay your utility bills in full, Marx recommends making at least some payment, because utilities consider a positive payment history when setting up payment plans.
“Paying what you can, when you can, is very important, especially even through the winter, when the winter moratorium is in place,” she said.
Pennsylvania
Ice-cold temperatures overnight, Impact Day Sunday
Pennsylvania
$1M winning Mega Millions ticket sold in Pennsylvania
Check your tickets! Someone in Pennsylvania won big in Friday’s Mega Millions drawing.
While the jackpot is still rolling, someone in Pennsylvania matched all five winning numbers drawn Friday night— 2-20-51-56-67, but not the Mega Ball, 19, to win $1 million. The Megaplier was 2X.
Three other Pennsylvania Mega Millions players matched four of five numbers drawn, winning $10,000.
Click here for more information from the Pennsylvania Lottery and to check if your ticket won anything.
The Mega Millions jackpot is estimated to be worth $944 million for the next drawing on Christmas Eve.
The Mega Millions odds are 1 in 302.6 million. Winners can choose an annuity with annual payments over 29 years, but most almost always take the cash option.
Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
-
Politics1 week ago
Canadian premier threatens to cut off energy imports to US if Trump imposes tariff on country
-
Technology1 week ago
OpenAI cofounder Ilya Sutskever says the way AI is built is about to change
-
Politics1 week ago
U.S. Supreme Court will decide if oil industry may sue to block California's zero-emissions goal
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta asks the US government to block OpenAI’s switch to a for-profit
-
Politics1 week ago
Conservative group debuts major ad buy in key senators' states as 'soft appeal' for Hegseth, Gabbard, Patel
-
Business7 days ago
Freddie Freeman's World Series walk-off grand slam baseball sells at auction for $1.56 million
-
Technology7 days ago
Meta’s Instagram boss: who posted something matters more in the AI age
-
News1 week ago
East’s wintry mix could make travel dicey. And yes, that was a tornado in Calif.