Connect with us

New York

$87.50 for 3 Minutes: Inside the Hot Market for Videos of Idling Trucks

Published

on

A white-paneled truck sat immobile and idling in Midtown on a latest morning, its driver wrapped up in his telephone and oblivious to what was occurring exterior.

There on the street, Paul Slapikas was stalking his prey. Wire-thin and 81 years outdated, Mr. Slapikas stood in entrance of the truck like a misplaced vacationer, a digital camera dangling round his neck and a map protruding of his jacket pocket. He seemed to be deep in dialog on an outdated flip-phone — massive hand gestures, a peek at a watch, a crane of the neck like he’s searching for a buddy.

After precisely three minutes and 10 seconds, Mr. Slapikas — a lifelong New Yorker who lives just a few miles away in Queens — snapped the telephone shut, tapped the display of his watch and walked away. If the whole lot goes because it ought to, he simply earned $87.50, and possibly extra, for these couple of minutes of time, and the corporate that owns the truck will obtain a fantastic of a minimum of $350 that it by no means noticed coming. However for now, Mr. Slapikas is off down the block, a bounty hunter jauntily searching for his subsequent goal.

“Straightforward pickings,” mentioned the previous marine and retired pc specialist from Woodside.

It is a scene from town’s benign-sounding however typically raucous Residents Air Grievance Program, a public well being marketing campaign that invitations — and pays — folks to report vehicles which can be parked and idling for greater than three minutes, or one minute if exterior a college. Those that report gather 25 % of any fantastic in opposition to a truck by submitting a video simply over 3 minutes in size that reveals the engine is working and the title of the corporate on the door.

Advertisement

This system has vastly elevated the variety of complaints of idling vehicles despatched to town, from only a handful earlier than its creation in 2018 to greater than 12,000 final yr. A few of these complaints flip menacing when truck drivers react.

“I am going out considering I’m going to get assaulted,” mentioned Ernest Welde, 47, an environmental lawyer. “I’ve had my luggage stolen by truck drivers. I’ve been bodily assaulted. I’ve needed to name the police a few instances.”

One other man, Eric Eisenberg, had an identical expertise throughout city final yr. An Amazon driver and two colleagues seen Mr. Eisenberg pointing his telephone’s digital camera at their idling truck, knocked him to the bottom and held him down, based on a lawsuit Mr. Eisenberg filed in January.

“Yeah, it’s like that, papa,” one of many males mentioned, based on the lawsuit.

Idling autos in the US are believed to collectively expel hundreds of thousands of tons of carbon dioxide a yr, and researchers have estimated that eliminating extreme idling from private autos alone would have an identical impression to taking 5 million of the nation’s 250 million vehicles off the streets.

Advertisement

A number of states have legal guidelines in opposition to extreme idling, however few have citizen-outsourcing packages like New York Metropolis.

This system and the elevated curiosity in submitting complaints have introduced a brand new sport of cat and mouse to town’s streets, as citizen reporters prowl searching for idling vehicles and drivers, maybe stung by previous fines, are more and more cautious of individuals with cameras. New ranges of stealth have come into play, like Mr. Slapikas’ vacationer disguise.

The digital camera round his neck has no movie. The flip telephone doesn’t work. They’re distractions from what is basically happening, which he requested not be defined intimately and thus revealed to the truck drivers — suffice it to say it includes an iPhone that he’s not holding in his palms whereas it information. And many fake calls on the flip telephone.

If this all appears like numerous bother for 1 / 4 minimize of a $350 fantastic, contemplate this: Mr. Slapikas mentioned he pulled in $64,000 in rewards in 2021 for merely paying consideration on his each day walks for train: “I’d count on to get three a day with out even trying.”

He’s one in all about 20 or so busy citizen reporters who collectively submit some 85 % of the complaints to town, a knowledge evaluation discovered final yr. They rely of their quantity a pediatrician, a number of attorneys and a retired police detective. The free group trades ideas and tales, calls itself Idling Warriors and recordsdata lots of of complaints monthly. The pandemic, and town’s elevated reliance on deliveries, has solely introduced extra work.

Advertisement

The town paid greater than $724,000 in bounties final yr alone, and $1.1 million since 2019. For its share, town collected $2.4 million in fines final yr, up 24 % from when this system started in earnest three years in the past.

And but, a number of citizen reporters mentioned in interviews that creaking forms, loopholes, waivers and a seeming disinterest in issuing growing numbers of fines has left untold penalties uncollected.

For each fantastic it points, town’s Division of Environmental Safety, which runs this system, appears to wave away others for causes that, to the reporters, appear arbitrary: The title of the corporate just isn’t legible on the truck door, regardless that the license plate would reveal the proprietor. The truck’s engine isn’t clearly audible on the video, even when smoke may be seen popping out of the exhaust pipe.

Mr. Welde, the lawyer, mentioned he filed some 2,000 complaints final yr and that almost all have but to be processed.

“I’ve made town most likely near $800,000 in income they usually’re simply leaving it on the desk in the event that they don’t get workers to get in there and get experiences finished,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

A deputy commissioner with the division, Angela Licata, mentioned the system remains to be evolving and hopefully bettering, however that the strict necessities for submitting a criticism are essential to efficiently prosecute that declare in court docket later.

“We can also respect that these people are spending numerous time and power on this,” she mentioned. “We don’t need them to turn out to be annoyed.”

She mentioned a workers of 14 handles the regular tide of complaints the place, earlier than this system, it was one particular person’s occasional process.

Extreme idling has been unlawful because the Seventies, and town unveiled a renewed anti-idling program in 2020 with the kitschy endorsement of, sure, Billy Idol, the spiky-haired rock star of “Insurgent Yell” and “White Wedding ceremony” fame. “Billy By no means Idles,” went the tagline.

By then, the citizen reporting program had been quietly up and working for over a yr. Mr. Welde, the environmental lawyer, remembers one dramatic confrontation earlier in his reporting. He was filming a truck — “United Refrigeration,” he mentioned — and the driving force seen and shut it off, however when Mr. Welde started to stroll away, he turned it again on. Mr. Welde resumed filming.

Advertisement

“He went from zero to 100 and began taking his shirt off and his watch and began chasing me,” he mentioned. “I ran.”

Mr. Welde mentioned he was keen about bettering the air high quality earlier than the reward program, however referred to as it an incredible incentive. “The cash, it’s superior,” he mentioned. If his unprocessed complaints from final yr result in fines, he expects to earn $200,000 to $225,000, he mentioned.

Making the video is the straightforward a part of the criticism. “Now the work begins,” Mr. Slapikas mentioned. Movies and pictures should be compressed and time-stamped and accompanied by display pictures of the figuring out data. Initially, a notary’s signature was required, however as we speak, a sworn assertion from the reporter is enough.

There’s extra work: It’s the accountability of the citizen reporters, after submitting their complaints, to trace them via the system of summonses and court docket hearings. Many are shocked to study that it’s also their accountability to find out whether or not a truck is a repeat offender, and due to this fact liable for a bigger fantastic — and the reporter a bigger bounty. The reporters mentioned they spend hours combing via open knowledge information to see if vehicles have been cited earlier than — and marvel why town doesn’t do that within the first place.

Ms. Licata mentioned the division is trying into figuring out repeat offenders itself, and presumably elevating their fines.

Advertisement

The reporters are additionally answerable for requesting their rewards months later, as soon as they’ve realized {that a} fantastic was paid. The town doesn’t pay the reporters routinely.

The assorted hurdles are maybe why the quantity of people that often take care of them is barely about 20. One Manhattan lawyer who has filed many complaints mentioned he believes most individuals who file only one quit.

The fun of the hunt stays. “Your adrenaline will get so pumped up since you may anytime get assaulted by this particular person,” Mr. Welde mentioned. “I’ve a file with simply assaults on my pc.”

Nonetheless, he tells his pals about this system. “Everybody I say this to is like, ‘That’s superior, I need to do it,’ and nobody does it,” he mentioned. Likewise, Mr. Slapikas mentioned his circle confirmed little curiosity: “They don’t have the motivation to do it themselves — it’s a full-time job.”

In Midtown, Mr. Slapikas approached an idling truck as if it had been a skittish animal, bending to position his palm to the exhaust pipe and ensure its engine was working.

Advertisement

“They are saying the streets are paved with gold,” he mentioned. He began his video, capturing the license plate, and slowly made his option to the entrance so he may document the engine noise. He started talking into his prop telephone; had somebody handed by, they may have heard him reciting Shakespeare: “Now’s the winter of our discontent …”

In a single truck that Mr. Slapikas recorded sat a driver named Jason Rodriguez. Had he seen? “By no means,” he mentioned moments later, after Mr. Slapikas had left. He turned off his engine. “Thanks for the heads up,” he mentioned, including that his boss has warned concerning the criticism program prior to now. “He mentioned it ain’t honest.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New York

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Published

on

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Violent confrontations at a pro-Palestinian rally in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, on Saturday reflected what some local officials and protest organizers called an unexpectedly aggressive Police Department response, with officers flooding the neighborhood and using force against protesters.

At the rally, which drew hundreds of demonstrators, at least two officers wearing the white shirts of commanders were filmed punching three protesters who were prone in the middle of a crosswalk. One officer had pinned a man to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the ribs, a 50-second video clip shows. Another officer punched the left side of a man’s face as he held his head to the asphalt.

The police arrested around 40 people who were “unlawfully blocking roadways,” Kaz Daughtry, the department’s deputy commissioner of operations, said on social media on Sunday.

Mr. Daughtry shared drone footage of one person who climbed on a city bus, “putting himself and others in danger.” The Police Department, he wrote, “proudly protects everyone’s right to protest, but lawlessness will never be tolerated.”

Neither Mr. Daughtry nor the police commented on the use of force by officers. A spokeswoman for Mayor Eric Adams did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the police response. The Police Department’s patrol guide states that officers must use “only the reasonable force necessary to gain control or custody of a subject.”

Advertisement

Bay Ridge has a significant Arab American population and hosts demonstrations in mid-May every year to commemorate what Palestinians call the Nakba, or “catastrophe” — when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were forced from their homes during the war that led to Israel’s founding in 1948.

Andrew Gounardes, a state senator and a Democrat who represents the area, said local politicians had been in touch with the commanding officer of the 68th police precinct before the preplanned protest and said there had been no indication that there would be such a heavy police response. He called the videos he saw of the events “deeply concerning.”

“It certainly seems like the police came ready for a much more aggressive and a much more confrontational demonstration than perhaps they had gotten,” he added.

Justin Brannan, a Democrat who is the city councilman for the area, said the protest was smaller than last year’s but that officers had come from all over the city to police it. He said their approach appeared to be directed by 1 Police Plaza, the department headquarters in Manhattan.

“These were not our local cops. Clearly, there was a zero-tolerance edict sent down from 1PP, which escalated everything and made it worse,” Mr. Brannan said.

Advertisement

“I’m still waiting on information and details about the arrests that were made,” he added, “but from my vantage point, the response appeared pre-emptive, retaliatory and cumulatively aggressive.”

The Republican state assemblyman whose district includes parts of Bay Ridge, Alec Brook-Krasny, had a different perspective. He said an investigation would determine whether the officers’ actions were warranted, but he said some protesters were “breaking the law” by refusing to clear the street.

“I think that those bad apples are really hurting the ability of the other people to express their opinions,” Mr. Brook-Krasny said.

Some local residents supported the police and said they were tired of the protests’ disruptive impact. “Enough is enough,” said Peter Cheris, 52, a 40-year resident of Bay Ridge, who said he had viewed the videos of the protest. “If you’re going to break the law, you deserve it,” he said.

Donna Lieberman, the executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, singled out the presence of the Police Department’s Strategic Response Group, a unit that is sometimes deployed to protests and has been the subject of several lawsuits brought by the civil liberties union and other groups.

Advertisement

The police unit’s handling of the demonstration “was a violation of New Yorkers’ right to speak out and risks chilling political expression,” Ms. Lieberman said in a statement. “N.Y.C.L.U. protest monitors witnessed violent arrests, protester injuries, and even arrests of credentialed members of the press.”

She added: “The continual pattern of N.Y.P.D. aggression against pro-Palestine demonstrators raises important questions about the city’s disparate treatment of speakers based on their message.”

Abdullah Akl, an organizer with Within Our Lifetime, the pro-Palestinian group that organized the protests, said the response took organizers aback, particularly for a demonstration that occurs every year in Bay Ridge and is known to be frequented by families with children.

“It was really an unusual and unprecedented response,” Mr. Akl said.

He said he witnessed two men being pushed to the ground. One of them can be seen in a video with blood streaming down the side of his face. Nerdeen Kiswani, chair of Within Our Lifetime, said three protesters — including the two who can be seen being punched — were treated for their injuries at hospitals.

Advertisement

The Police Department has arrested hundreds of demonstrators since street protests began shortly after the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7 and Israel’s subsequent invasion of Gaza. The protests have been largely peaceful, with few injuries or violent clashes.

In a turning point, on April 30 officers cleared Hamilton Hall at Columbia University, which had been occupied by protesters for 17 hours. Many officers showed restraint during the arrests, though a handful were filmed pushing and dragging students as they removed them from the building.

On Sunday, Ms. Lieberman said police response to the protests in Bay Ridge underscored the importance of implementing the terms of a $512,000 settlement the civil liberties union and the Legal Aid Society reached with the city this month. The settlement set new terms for how the Police Department manages protests, creating a tiered system that dictates how many officers can be sent to demonstrations and limits the use of the Strategic Response Group. It will take years to put into practice.

The settlement is one of several that stemmed from the George Floyd racial justice protests in 2020. Last year, the city agreed to pay $13.7 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that claimed unlawful police tactics had violated the rights of demonstrators in Manhattan and Brooklyn. In March, the city agreed to pay $21,500 to each of roughly 300 people who attended another Black Lives Matter protest in 2020 in the Bronx. Those people were penned in by the police, then charged at or beaten with batons, according to a legal settlement.

Andy Newman and Camille Baker contributed reporting.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 14, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 14, 2024

Proceedings
SUPREME COURT
CRIMINAL TERM
NEW YORK COUNTY
PART 59
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-against
DONALD J. TRUMP,
Defendant.
:
3503
INDICTMENT #
71543/2023
Falsifying Business
Records First Degree
BEFORE:
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 14, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN,
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN L. BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
New York County District Attorney
BY: JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.,
MATTHEW COLANGELO, ESQ.,
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.,
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.,
REBECCA MANGOLD,
ESQ.,
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.,
Assistant District Attorneys
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
BLANCHE LAW
BY: TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
STEPHEN WEISS, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA STERN, ESQ.
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Lisa Kramsky,
Senior Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 13, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 13, 2024

M. Cohen Direct/Hoffinger
3277
1
was there at The Trump Organization about executives coming in
2
to meet with Mr. Trump?
3
A
Mr.
Trump had an open-door policy, which, if there was
4
5
6
somebody in there, you waited; and if not, you knocked on the
door, and I would say, “Boss, do you have a second?”, and I
would walk right in.
7
Q
And others did the same, to your knowledge?
8
A
9
To my knowledge, yes.
Now, when you met with Mr. Trump at The Trump
Organization, in his office, did you, generally, need
10

I’m
11
sorry.
12
Did you, generally, record those meetings in your calendar?
13
A
No, ma’am.
14
15
16
As part of your work at The Trump Organization, did
you feel that it was part of your job to keep him updated on
matters that you were handling for him?
17
A
Yes.
It was actually required.
18
19
20
21
22
23
A
Tell us what you mean by that.
When he would task you with something, he would then
say, “Keep me informed. Let me know what’s going on.”
And what he was saying, what everybody did is, as soon as
you had a result, an answer, you would go straight back and
tell him. Especially if it was a matter that was troubling to
24
him.
25
So, two things, just to break that down.
Laurie Eisenberg, CSR, RPR
Senior Court Reporter

Continue Reading

Trending