Connect with us

New Jersey

Repeal the New Jersey inheritance tax

Published

on

Repeal the New Jersey inheritance tax


Susan M. Barbey

Die in New Jersey, rich or not, and Trenton will possible take your cash, utilizing a

dying tax residents don’t learn about.

It’s time to get loud and repeal it.

Advertisement

New Jersey has a hidden again door property tax aimed toward poor, middle-class and rich decedents in the event that they depart cash to non-lineal members of the family. The tax I confer with is the New Jersey Inheritance Tax of 1892.

Most individuals have heard the phrases property tax, a dying tax aimed on the wealthy. Merely put, if an property exceeds a particular financial worth, the decedent’s property should pay an property tax.

New Jersey had an property tax. It was repealed in 2018, benefitting New Jersey’s

wealthiest decedents. All impacted have been handled equally primarily based solely on the worth of

their property: greater than $2 million.

Advertisement

However New Jersey has one other dying tax with a unique title and it’s nonetheless on

the books. It’s known as the New Jersey Inheritance Tax of 1892. I guess you’ve by no means heard of it. And I guess you don’t know, that it’ll possible have an effect on you and your hard-earned cash, even if you’re not rich.

It’s a discriminatory tax, triggered solely primarily based on who you allow your cash to, regardless of your socioeconomic standing.

Who pays and who would not?

New Jersey decedents with lineal household heirs, (i.e. grandparents, dad and mom, youngsters,

Advertisement

grandchildren) are exempt from having to pay this tax. They’re the chosen ones.

New Jersey decedents who depart cash to non-lineal household heirs, (i.e. brother, sister, niece, nephew) voluntarily or as a result of these are their solely heirs, should pay this tax.

As talked about earlier, the repealed NJ Property Tax of 1934 had a $2 million submitting

threshold. The New Jersey Inheritance Tax is a regressive tax, triggered beginning as low

as $500 with tax charges starting from 11% – 16%.

Advertisement

How is it, that beneath this tax, New Jersey’s richest decedents can switch nice wealth tax-free to lineal household heirs, whereas somebody who doesn’t have lineal household heirs isn’t handled as an equal and might’t do the identical?

How is it {that a} New Jersey decedent, who leaves their final $1,000 to a niece, should pay 15% inheritance tax?

What a sham.

Discrimination is outlined because the unjust or prejudicial therapy of various classes of

individuals or issues. The inheritance tax pits resident in opposition to resident, treating

Advertisement

them unequally but in a ‘equally located place’: useless.

The New Jersey Inheritance tax was written in 1892. It’s a unique world now. The American household appears to be like completely completely different. The legislature and governor haven’t any enterprise telling residents what constitutes household.

New Jersey is already too costly. With many millennials deciding to not have youngsters, the inheritance tax is one other massive cause to not make roots right here as a result of New Jersey will suck them dry financially whereas alive, and once more with the NJ Inheritance Tax when they’re useless.

The U.S. has an extended historical past relating to inheritance taxes. These taxes preceded New Jersey’s earnings tax, the gross sales tax and others. Most states have repealed this inappropriate and Neopolionic tax relic besides New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Kentucky and Nebraska.

It’s time for the governor and lawmakers to take away the income generated from this sham of a tax from the upcoming 2023 fiscal state funds.

Advertisement

Cease the arbitrary cherry selecting of who pays this tax and who doesn’t. Cease pitting

New Jersey residents in opposition to New Jersey residents.

At our deaths, deal with all New Jersey decedents equally.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Jersey

New Jersey State Police Gave a ‘Free Pass’ to Motorists with Courtesy Cards or Ties to Police, Investigation Finds – Insider NJ

Published

on

New Jersey State Police Gave a ‘Free Pass’ to Motorists with Courtesy Cards or Ties to Police, Investigation Finds – Insider NJ


The Office of the State Comptroller found even motorists suspected of dangerous driving offenses were let go by New Jersey State Police.

TRENTON—An investigation finds that New Jersey State Police troopers routinely gave preferential treatment to certain motorists who presented a courtesy card or asserted a personal connection to law enforcement—even when motorists were suspected of dangerous offenses, like drunk driving, according to a new report by the New Jersey Office of the State Comptroller.

OSC’s Police Accountability Project reviewed body worn camera footage of 501 no-enforcement stops by New Jersey State Police–meaning stops where New Jersey State troopers did not issue tickets or make arrests. In 139 or 27 percent of these no-enforcement stops, motorists presented a courtesy card, claimed to have a friend or relative in law enforcement, or flashed a law enforcement badge and then were let go, OSC’s report said. In some cases, the trooper released the motorist immediately, offering some version of “you’re good.” The report found that courtesy cards are in wide usage and function as “accepted currency” by state troopers. (In all but one case, the troopers gave the courtesy card back to the motorist, enabling the card to be used again.)

Reviewing more than 50 hours of body worn camera footage of the stops, which took place over ten days in December 2022, OSC found that troopers regularly decided not to enforce motor vehicle laws after receiving a courtesy card or being told the driver has ties to law enforcement. For instance, one motorist, who was stopped for driving over 90 miles per hour, admitted to drinking alcohol but was let go without a sobriety test after he presented two courtesy cards. Another motorist was stopped for driving over 103 miles per hour and was released after she volunteered that her father was a lieutenant in a local police department. The most significant consequence the troopers imposed in these stops was advising the motorists that they had left a voicemail message for the law enforcement officer named on the courtesy card or invoked as a friend or relative. OSC has released video excerpts of the footage.

“Our investigation shows that some people are being given a free pass to violate serious traffic safety laws,” said Acting State Comptroller Kevin Walsh. “Law enforcement decisions should never depend on who you know, your family connections, or donations to police unions. Nepotism and favoritism undermine our laws and make our roads more dangerous.”

Advertisement

Overall, close to half of the 501 non-enforcement stops reviewed by OSC involved speeding, many for more than 20 miles per hour over the speed limit. In three stops, drivers stopped for reckless driving, careless driving, and/or speeding, also admitted to drinking alcohol, yet were released without being asked to step out of the car for a field sobriety test. Both drunk driving and speeding are major causes of traffic fatalities. According to data compiled by the New Jersey State Police Fatal Accident Investigation Unit, in 2022, New Jersey recorded 646 fatal collisions that resulted in 689 deaths or 1.89 fatalities per day. This was among the highest number of traffic-related deaths in New Jersey in the past 15 years.

OSC initiated this investigation in response to reports that law enforcement officers’ decisions not to enforce motor vehicle violations were influenced by improper factors, including courtesy cards. Courtesy cards, often referred to as PBA cards, FOP cards, or gold cards, are given out by police labor associations to law enforcement officers. They also can be purchased through “associate memberships” with police associations and are sold by private companies.

OSC’s investigation found that courtesy cards are widely used. In 87, or 17 percent, of the no-enforcement stops OSC reviewed, motorists presented courtesy cards that came from municipal police departments, county and state agencies, as well as inter-state and out-of-state law enforcement agencies. They all appeared to be equally effective at getting motorists released without enforcement.

Asserting a relationship with law enforcement appeared to carry equal weight, OSC found. In 52 or 10 percent of the no-enforcement stops reviewed, the driver or passengers did not present a courtesy card but claimed a connection to law enforcement, and the trooper decided to let them go. In 29 of those stops, the motorist or passenger identified themselves as current, retired, or in-training law enforcement officers. Other stops resulted in no enforcement when the drivers or passengers claimed a relative, friend, or neighbor worked in a law enforcement agency.

In one stop, a trooper said he stopped a motorist for driving 97 miles per hour. After an extended conversation about the “friends” they had in common, the trooper told the driver to “stay safe” and let him go. In another stop, a trooper performed a computerized look-up of the driver’s credentials and discovered the driver had an active warrant for his arrest. But when the driver’s friend introduced himself, letting the trooper know that he was also an off-duty trooper, the stopping trooper walked back to the motorist, apologized for stopping him, and let him go without even mentioning the warrant. OSC was unable to determine from the footage what the warrant was for.

Advertisement

Other findings include:

  • Providing preferential treatment to motorists who present courtesy cards or assert close personal relationships with law enforcement appears to have a discriminatory impact. Of the 87 courtesy cards observed in the sample, for instance, 69 were presented by White drivers.
  • Even when courtesy cards were not present, racial disparities were observed in the sample. New Jersey State Police policy requires troopers to request all three driving credentials (license, registration, proof of insurance) when making motor vehicle stops, but OSC found overall, White and Asian drivers were less likely to have all three of their credentials requested and verified when compared to Black and Hispanic/LatinX drivers. Additionally, troopers conducted computerized lookups of Hispanic/LatinX drivers 65 percent of the time, while looking up White drivers only 34 percent of the time.
  • In many stops, OSC was unable to ascertain why the troopers made the decision not to enforce motor vehicle violations because of the quality of the video footage or other factors. Still, OSC observed several of those stops involved dangerous offenses, underscoring the importance of reviewing no-enforcement motor vehicle stops, which are not routinely reviewed.

OSC made 11 recommendations, including that New Jersey State Police regularly review no-enforcement stops to better understand racial/ethnic trends in motor vehicle data and determine if additional training is needed. OSC also recommended that the Attorney General consider issuing a directive that would explicitly prohibit law enforcement officers from giving preferential treatment to motorists because of their ties to law enforcement or possession of courtesy cards.

Read the report. 

Watch excerpts of the body camera footage. 

Sign up now for OSC’s newsletter.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

Authorities Debunk Viral Explanation for NJ Drone Sightings

Published

on

Authorities Debunk Viral Explanation for NJ Drone Sightings


U.S. News

The drones spotted over the Garden State were probably not looking for a missing shipment of radioactive material.

Newsday LLC/Newsday via Getty Images
Zachary Folk

Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

N.J. weighs making underage gambling no longer a crime, but subject to a fine

Published

on

N.J. weighs making underage gambling no longer a crime, but subject to a fine


Should underage gambling no longer be a crime?

New Jersey lawmakers are considering changing the law to make gambling by people under the age of 21 no longer punishable under criminal law, making it subject to a fine.

It also would impose fines on anyone helping an underage person gamble in New Jersey.

The bill changes the penalties for underage gambling from that of a disorderly persons offense to a civil offense. Fines would be $500 for a first offense, $1,000 for a second offense, and $2,000 for any subsequent offenses.

Advertisement

The money would be used for prevention, education, and treatment programs for compulsive gambling, such as those provided by the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey.

“The concern I had initially was about reducing the severity of the punishment,” said Assemblyman Don Guardian, a Republican former mayor of Atlantic City. “But the fact that all the money will go to problem gambling treatment programs changed my mind.”

Figures on underage gambling cases were not immediately available Thursday. But numerous people involved in gambling treatment and recovery say a growing number of young people are becoming involved in gambling, particularly sports betting as the activity spreads around the country.

The bill was approved by an Assembly committee and now goes to the full Assembly for a vote. It must pass both houses of the Legislature before going to the desk of the state’s Democratic governor, Phil Murphy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending