New Hampshire
U.S. Senate GOP blocks bill proclaiming congressional support for abortion access • New Hampshire Bulletin
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Senate gridlocked over reproductive rights on Wednesday, when Republicans blocked Democrats from advancing a measure that would have expressed support for abortion access.
The failed 49-44 procedural vote was just one in a string of votes Senate Democrats are holding this summer to highlight the differences between the two political parties on contraception, in vitro fertilization, and abortion ahead of the November elections.
Maine Sen. Susan Collins and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski were the only Republicans to vote to move the bill toward final passage.
“This is a plain, up-or-down vote on whether you support women being able to make their own reproductive health care decisions,” Washington Democratic Sen. Patty Murray said during floor debate. “It doesn’t enforce anything. It doesn’t cost anything. It’s actually just a half-page bill, simply saying that women should have the basic freedom to make their own decisions about their health care.”
Minnesota Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar said that women and their doctors, not politicians, should make decisions about abortion and other reproductive health choices.
“This is our current reality, but it doesn’t have to be our future,” Klobuchar said. “This is a pivotal moment for America: Are we going to move forward and protect freedom, which has long been a hallmark of our nation, or are we going to go further backwards in history – not just to the 1950s but to the 1850s.”
Michigan Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow urged support for the legislation, saying women should be able to make decisions about their own health care, lives and futures.
“That’s what this vote is about and we’re not going to give up until we have those freedoms fully protected,” Stabenow said.
No Republican senators spoke during debate on the bill ahead of the vote.
The two-page bill would not have actually changed or provided any nationwide protections for abortion access.
The legislation, if enacted, would have expressed a “sense of Congress” that abortion rights “should be supported” and that the nationwide, constitutional protections for abortion established by Roe v. Wade “should be restored and built upon, moving towards a future where there is reproductive freedom for all.”
The Biden administration released a Statement of Administration Policy earlier in the week, backing the bill.
“Today, more than 20 states have dangerous and extreme abortion bans in effect, some without exceptions for rape or incest,” the statement said. “Women are being denied essential medical care, including during an emergency, or forced to travel thousands of miles out of state for care that would have been available if Roe were still the law of the land. Doctors and nurses are being threatened with jail time.”
Trio of bills offered, blocked
The blocked procedural vote on Wednesday came just one day after Democrats went to the floor in an attempt to pass three other bills on reproductive rights through the fast-track unanimous consent process.
That involves one senator asking “unanimous consent” to pass legislation. Any one senator can then object, blocking passage of the bill. If no one objects, the bill is passed.
The maneuver is typically used to approve broadly bipartisan measures or for lawmakers to bring attention to legislation without moving it through the time-consuming cloture process that can take weeks in the Senate.
Nevada Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto on Tuesday tried unsuccessfully to pass her bill, which would have barred the government from preventing travel “to another state to receive or provide reproductive health care that is legal in that state.”
Forty Democratic or independent senators co-sponsored the legislation.
During brief floor debate, Cortez Masto said the bill “reaffirms that women have a fundamental right to interstate travel and makes it crystal clear that states cannot prosecute women – or anyone who helps them – for going to another state to get the critical reproductive care that they need.”
“Elected officials in states like Tennessee and Texas and Alabama are trying to punish women for leaving their state for reproductive care, as well as anyone who helps them, including their doctors or even their employers,” Cortez Masto said. “Why? Because for these anti-choice politicians, this is about controlling women.”
Mississippi Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith objected to the unanimous consent request, saying that while members of the anti-abortion movement “most certainly do not oppose any individual’s freedom to travel across this great country,” they do have concerns the measure would hinder prosecution of crimes, like human trafficking.
Bill would ‘take us backward,’ Budd says
Republicans blocked a second bill, sponsored by Murray, that would have blocked state governments from preventing, restricting, impeding, or disadvantaging health care providers from providing “reproductive health care services lawful in the state in which the services are to be provided.”
The bill was co-sponsored by 30 Democratic or independent senators.
“When I talk to abortion providers in Spokane, where they see a lot of patients fleeing restrictive abortion bans from states like Idaho, they are terrified that they could face a lawsuit that will threaten their practice and their livelihood, just for doing their jobs, just for providing care their patients need – care that is, once again, completely legal in my state,” Murray said. “We are talking about people who are following the law and simply want to provide care to their patients. This should be cut-and-dried.”
North Carolina GOP Sen. Ted Budd objected to the request, arguing the bill “would make it easier for unborn life to be ended.”
“The Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision brought renewed hope to Americans who believe in the sanctity of each and every life, including life in the womb,” Budd said. “But this bill would take us backward.”
Following Budd’s objection to passing the bill, Murray said his actions “made clear” that GOP lawmakers “have no problem whatsoever with politicians targeting doctors in states like mine, where abortion is legal.”
“I think that pretty much gives the game away,” Murray added.
Grant program
Democrats also tried to pass legislation from Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin that would have established a federal grant program to bolster the number of health care providers who receive “comprehensive training in abortion care.”
That bill had seven Democratic or independent co-sponsors in the Senate.
“For our top-ranked medical schools, a post-Roe reality sowed chaos as students and their instructors wondered how future doctors in our state would have access to the full slate of training necessary to safely practice obstetrics and gynecology,” Baldwin said.
Kansas Republican Sen. Roger Marshall, an OB-GYN, blocked the request, saying that the federal government “should not be spending taxpayer dollars to encourage medical students and clinicians to take life when their principal duty, their sacred oath, is to protect life and to do no harm from conception to natural death.”
Repeated attempts throughout 2024
Democrats sought to advance legislation on access to contraception and in vitro fertilization despite the 60-vote legislative filibuster earlier this year, and failed to get the necessary Republican support each time.
In early June, Democrats tried to advance legislation that would have protected “an individual’s ability to access contraceptives” and “a health care provider’s ability to provide contraceptives, contraception, and information related to contraception.”
A week later, Democrats tried again, this time with legislation that would have provided a right for people to access IVF and for doctors to provide that health care without the state or federal government “enacting harmful or unwarranted limitations or requirements.”
Collins and Murkowski were the only Republicans to vote to move the bills toward a final passage vote.
Alabama GOP Sen. Katie Britt attempted to pass an IVF access bill through the unanimous consent process in mid-June, but was unsuccessful.
That measure, which she co-sponsored with Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, would have blocked a state from receiving Medicaid funding if it prevented IVF.
The legislation, which had three co-sponsors as of Wednesday, didn’t say what would happen to a state’s Medicaid funding if lawmakers or a state court defined life as starting at conception.
That’s what led IVF clinics in Alabama to temporarily shut down earlier this year after the state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos at IVF clinics constitute children under state law.
The Alabama state legislature has since provided civil and criminal protections for IVF clinics.
New Hampshire
City Of Concord Library: Christmas Eve Early Closure
The library will be closing early on Tuesday, December 24, at 12pm. We will be closed Wednesday, December 25th, and will resume of normal hours on Thursday, December 26th. The CPL wishes you a happy holiday!
This press release was produced by the City of Concord. The views expressed here are the author’s own.
New Hampshire
Hypothermic hiker rescued after stranded in waist-deep snow amid wind chills near zero
MOUNT LAFAYETTE, N.H. – A hiker was rescued on Thursday after becoming lost and suffering from hypothermia during a solo hike in central New Hampshire.
Patrick Bittman, 28, of Portland, Maine, had embarked on a hike to see the sunrise from Mount Lafayette on Wednesday night.
Officials said Bittman came upon deep blowing snow near the summit of Little Haystack on Franconia Ridge, forcing him to come back down the mountain.
On his return, however, he became lost and ended up moving into the Dry Brook drainage, where temperatures dropped to around 20 with wind chills near zero.
After spending the night lost on the mountain, Bittman called 911 on Thursday morning. He said that his limbs were frozen, he was experiencing hypothermia and that he was no longer able to move through the snow, which was several feet deep.
HOW TO WATCH FOX WEATHER
Ground crews with the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department and Pemi Valley Search and Rescue Team, along with an aerial crew with the Army National Guard, responded to his call.
However, they faced poor visibility from cloud cover and intermittent snow squalls over the steep terrain and thick vegetation, forcing them to adjust their approach to rescuing Bittman.
The first ground rescuers had to spend an hour bushwhacking 1,000 feet of vegetation off the trail to reach Bittman by early Thursday afternoon. By then, he was found suffering severe hypothermia and was placed in an emergency sleeping bag for shelter and given warm, dry clothes and warm fluids.
Two hours later, weather conditions allowed for the Army National Guard to reach Bittman with a medic. They hoisted the young man into the helicopter and then was flown to a local hospital for treatment.
“This aerial rescue saved a multi-hour carry out thru rugged terrain and is a testament as to how search and rescue works in New Hampshire with several different groups working together for a common goal,” New Hampshire Fish & Game officials said.
New Hampshire
Distant Dome: Christmas Comes for Some in New Hampshire
By GARRY RAYNO, Distant Dome
Christmas in New Hampshire is upside down if you are the Granite State’s government.
New Hampshire lawmakers have decreed that most of the “gifts” from the state do not go to the needy, but to those on the other end of the economic spectrum.
With Republicans again firmly in charge of the legislature and governor’s office, the “mandate” according to House Majority Leader Jason Osborne, R-Auburn, will focus on “lowering taxes, cutting wasteful spending, growing our economy, empowering parents with the Parents Bill of Rights and expanding the wildly successful Education Freedom Account program.”
The question is who benefits the most from “lowering taxes” and “cutting wasteful spending,” and what is “wasteful spending,” services for poor women who go to Planned Parenthood clinics because they cannot afford to go to a private practice physician?
For the better part of a decade now, Republicans have voted to cut the rates of the state’s two business taxes, the business profits tax and the business enterprise tax.
The larger collector, the business profits tax, receives the vast majority of its revenue from multinational corporations not based in New Hampshire, but who do business here.
The business enterprise tax is a value added tax on every business in New Hampshire although many very small businesses are exempt from paying.
Now you might think lowering the rate of the business enterprise tax would benefit local businesses more than cutting the rate of the business profits tax and that would be a no brainer for lawmakers, but no, they lowered the rate for the business profits tax more frequently and far greater than they did the tax rate of the business enterprise tax.
Who did that help more? Large multinational corporations received the bulk of that benefit not your local business owners who do not reach across continents and cultures to soften the blow of taxes.
And in a little over a week, the one state tax that actually taxes wealth will be eliminated although it produced $185 million in revenue last fiscal year. Can you imagine what $185 million would do spread across the university and community college systems to reduce tuition for New Hampshire students?
Who pays the interest and dividends tax? About 90 percent of the revenue comes from the top five percent of wealth holders in the state. That is not most of us or our neighbors.
Well you might say, what about property taxes which every home, building and land owner pays in the state, surely they too should have a lower tax rate.
Have you checked the tax bill you are about to pay in a little over a week? I don’t know about your tax bill, but mine had a hefty increase this year, and I suspect yours did too.
And with the state facing a budget crisis not seen in two decades, you are likely to see it go up even more after the lawmakers are finished crafting the next two-year budget this spring as more state costs are likely to be downshifted to local property tax payers as they were two decades ago when the state stopped paying its share of the retirement system costs for municipal, school and county workers as they had since the unified system was created during the last century.
That sifted tens of millions of costs to local property taxes that the state once paid.
There are two Christmas presents the majority of local property taxpayers sort of received in the last year, two superior court decisions declaring the state’s education funding system unconstitutional, inequitable and too meager to cover the cost of an adequate education, which is every child’s fundamental, constitutional right.
Those two decisions in the ConVal and Rand cases — if acted on by lawmakers — could have lowered the property taxes of the poorer communities hit hardest by the state’s education funding system like Claremont, Berlin, Franklin, Newport, Pittsfield and others.
But that change would increase the property taxes in communities with the lowest rates in the state with the greatest property wealth, so in New Hampshire’s upside down Christmas world, lawmakers did not take the bait and instead did nothing keeping the current system in place.
We don’t want the taxpayers in those property wealthy communities saying “Bah Humbug” this time of year lawmakers might as well have said.
Elementary and secondary education is not the only place New Hampshire lawmakers traditionally shortchange the poorer residents, they do so in post-secondary education as well with tuition costs that are second only to Vermont for in-state students in the country.
Is it any wonder New Hampshire students have the highest debt load of any in the country when they graduate from college?
While the university and community college systems have held tuition costs near steady for in-state students for the last few years, they cannot do that forever with shrinking enrollments, reduced programs and fewer full-time faculty members.
There is a Christmas flavored program that began four years ago, the Education Freedom Account program that was sold by Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut and others as an alternative for poor families whose children have trouble in the public school environment.
However 70 to 75 percent of the students were not in public schools when they joined the program, they were in private or religious schools or homeschooled.
In other words, parents already sending their children to private or religious schools or homeschooling have been able to gain a state taxpayer-funded subsidy to cover the costs the parents were paying.
The program is currently capped at 350 percent of poverty, which is a salary of $71,540 for a family of two and $109,200 for a family of four.
The legislature defeated an attempt to raise the rate higher last session to 425 percent of poverty level, or up to $133,600 annually for a family of four and $86,870 for a two-member family.
The federal government estimates the median income in New Hampshire for a family of four is $133,447.
One bill in the upcoming session would do away with any income cap which would allow anyone with school-age children to apply for a grant of about $5,200 per student, a provision that is bankrupting Arizona, North Carolina and several other states with no cap.
But the program has gifted many religious and small private schools struggling to survive with a great deal of state money, money that once was forbidden for religious schools.
And another beneficiary of the program, the single biggest vendor for the parents using state money, is Amazon.
Does Jeff Bozos really need any more of your state tax dollars? I doubt it, especially at Christmas time.
Merry Christmas and to all a good night.
Garry Rayno may be reached at garry.rayno@yahoo.com.
Distant Dome by veteran journalist Garry Rayno explores a broader perspective on the State House and state happenings for InDepthNH.org. Over his three-decade career, Rayno covered the NH State House for the New Hampshire Union Leader and Foster’s Daily Democrat. During his career, his coverage spanned the news spectrum, from local planning, school and select boards, to national issues such as electric industry deregulation and Presidential primaries. Rayno lives with his wife Carolyn in New London
-
Politics1 week ago
Canadian premier threatens to cut off energy imports to US if Trump imposes tariff on country
-
Technology1 week ago
OpenAI cofounder Ilya Sutskever says the way AI is built is about to change
-
Politics1 week ago
U.S. Supreme Court will decide if oil industry may sue to block California's zero-emissions goal
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta asks the US government to block OpenAI’s switch to a for-profit
-
Politics1 week ago
Conservative group debuts major ad buy in key senators' states as 'soft appeal' for Hegseth, Gabbard, Patel
-
Business7 days ago
Freddie Freeman's World Series walk-off grand slam baseball sells at auction for $1.56 million
-
Technology7 days ago
Meta’s Instagram boss: who posted something matters more in the AI age
-
News1 week ago
East’s wintry mix could make travel dicey. And yes, that was a tornado in Calif.