New Hampshire
One person dead after house fire in New Hampshire, state fire marshal says
One person has died in a house fire in New Hampshire, the state fire marshal said late Monday night.
The fatal fire happened at 203 Pease Road in Meredith at approximately 4 p.m. Monday, State Fire Marshal Sean Toomey said in a statement.
Late Monday afternoon, the fire department received reports that there were two people trapped inside the home.
When firefighters arrived, they found “significant fire and smoke” coming from the second story of the single-family home, Toomey said.
Once inside, firefighters found a person dead in the home, he said. The person was not immediately identified pending an autopsy on Tuesday to determine cause and manner of death.
Two other residents were able to evacuate from the home safely.
Several other area fire departments assisted from communities including Laconia, Gilford, Moultonborough, Holderness, Bristol, Center Harbor, New Hampton and Ashland. Police from Meredith and Laconia also responded.
An investigation into the cause of the fire is active and ongoing by the State Fire Marshal’s Office and Meredith Police and Fire.
Anyone with information about the deadly fire is encouraged to contact the State Fire Marshal’s Office at 603-223-4289 or by email at fmo@dos.nh.gov.
Toomey reminds everyone of the importance of having working smoke alarms in their homes.
In the event of an alarm activation or visible smoke or fire, residents should immediately get out of their home and call 911.
“Keep exits clear and accessible at all times and have a home fire escape plan,” Toomey said.
Anyone with questions about home fire safety should contact their local fire department or the NH State Fire Marshal’s Office, he said.
Meredith is a small town in the Lakes Region, north of Weirs Beach. The town’s population was 6,662 at the 2020 census.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
New Hampshire energy regulators have rejected a proposal from Unitil to charge all customers in their area for the additional costs incurred by their own electricity supply programs, instead of just the customers enrolled in those programs.
State officials, community power advocates, and commercial suppliers had opposed that plan, saying it would harm competition in the energy industry and could violate state law.
The Community Power Coalition of New Hampshire called the rejection a “significant victory for consumers, municipalities, and the competitive energy market.” The change could have raised prices for their customers, who rely on utility companies to deliver power but get their actual supply of electricity through their town or county.
Unitil, one of the state’s three main utility companies, made the proposal after the Public Utilities Commission directed the company to submit a filing with a position on how reconciliation charges should be managed.
But what is a reconciliation charge? And why does it matter? Let’s break it down.
When you get an electricity bill, you’re paying a rate that your utility company estimates will cover their costs for buying you that electricity.
But in New Hampshire, rates are set twice a year, and in that time period things can change. So rates also include reconciliations from the previous time period – added charges if the company underestimated costs, or reimbursements if the company overestimated.
Those reconciliation charges show up on the bills of people who use that electricity: utility “default supply” customers. That doesn’t include those enrolled in community power, who are charged for their electricity supply through their town or county’s program. And it also doesn’t include anyone using a competitive energy supplier.
Two changes have shifted the dynamics of utility rates in recent months and put reconciliation charges front and center.
First, more and more customers are moving to community power programs, leaving utilities with fewer people using their default service. Sixty-four municipalities and four counties are enrolled in community power programs with the Community Power Coalition of New Hampshire, with other communities using contractors like Standard Power.
And second, New Hampshire state regulators have directed the state’s investor-owned utilities – Unitil, Eversource and Liberty – to use a new process for buying power. Instead of locking in prices for six months, they’re now expected to buy some power from a shorter-term “spot market.”
That introduces more uncertainty to utility costs, said New Hampshire’s consumer advocate Don Kreis, and exposes customers to more risk.
That makes the question of reconciliation charges more pressing. Who should foot the bill if a heat wave or a cold snap makes prices skyrocket in the middle of a rate period, and the cost of electricity is much higher than what a utility predicted?
That’s where this decision comes in. Unitil asked regulators to approve a plan to collect those costs from everybody they deliver power to, even people buying their electricity from other suppliers. The company argued that was an equitable solution. Their default service is considered a last resort for customers who may not wish to join an alternative supplier – a “safety net” of sorts.
Additionally, Unitil said, the increasing popularity of community power programs has caused their own programs to take a major hit. That means, the company says, that customers using the “safety net” electricity supply are paying higher rates to reconcile underestimated costs.
Unitil proposed adding reconciliation costs to a part of the electric bill everyone pays, including people who have their power delivered by Unitil but provided through a different supplier.
In the order regulators issued this week, the Public Utilities Commission directs Unitil to keep collecting reconciliation costs only from customers signed up for their utility’s default energy supply.
But, the commission left the question somewhat open, saying they may explore changes to reconciliations in the future. Other utilities have similar questions still pending with the commission.
New Hampshire
NH News Recap: Top corrections official resigns; State expects dip in Canadian tourism
NHPR is nonprofit and independent. We rely on readers like you to support the local, national, and international coverage on this website. Your support makes this news available to everyone.
Give today. A monthly donation of $5 makes a real difference.
Memorial Day Weeknd: Hitmaker thrills Ford Field at first of two concerts
San Francisco’s Chinatown hosts first in-person Pride celebration
Gray, Griner pair up to help Atlanta Dream past Dallas Wings
Miami shows ‘soul,’ ‘fight’ in Messi-inspired rally
Boston police seek man who disabled traffic lights downtown
-
Technology1 week agoLove, Death, and Robots keeps a good thing going in volume 4
-
Technology1 week agoMeta asks judge to throw out antitrust case mid-trial
-
Movie Reviews1 week agoClassic Film Review: ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ is a Lesson in Redemption | InSession Film
-
World1 week agoCommissioner Hansen presents plan to cut farming bureaucracy in EU
-
News1 week agoVideo: Doctors Heal Infant Using First Customized-Gene Editing Treatment
-
Politics1 week agoDem senator says 'no doubt' Biden declined cognitively during presidency
-
News1 week agoNew Orleans jailbreak: 10 inmates dug a hole, wrote ‘to easy’ before fleeing; escape plan found
-
World1 week agoLeak: Commission to launch PFAS clean-ups in water resilience strategy