Connect with us

New Hampshire

NH residents who paid TurboTax for free services to get settlement money

Published

on

NH residents who paid TurboTax for free services to get settlement money


CONCORD, N.H. (WCAX) – New Hampshire prospects who paid TurboTax free of charge tax companies can count on a test within the mail.

It’s a part of a multistate $141 million settlement.

New Hampshire Legal professional Basic John Formella says the Granite State will get $728,000 to distribute amongst greater than 23,000 prospects.

These eligible for the settlement paid TurboTax to file their federal tax returns in 2016, 2017 and 2018, though they certified for the IRS Free File program.

Advertisement

If that’s you, you’re going to get an e mail from Rust Consulting notifying you. You don’t have to file a declare. It is best to get a test within the mail this month, in all probability for round $30.

Click on right here for extra data on the settlement.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Hampshire

New Hampshire rehab center ex-CEO charged with harassment against journalist

Published

on

New Hampshire rehab center ex-CEO charged with harassment against journalist





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

State House Dome: Buckley gets key seat to defend NH primary

Published

on

State House Dome: Buckley gets key seat to defend NH primary


AFTER A TENSE, chaotic and demoralizing 2024 election cycle, New Hampshire Democratic leaders have landed key spots as they try to put the Granite State’s first-in-the-nation primary back in the national party’s good graces.






Advertisement

The Union Leader first confirmed that new Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin has returned New Hampshire party chairman Ray Buckley to the DNC’s Rules & Bylaws Committee.

Some in GOP still on U.S. Senate lookout

Ayotte picks new judicial panel members

Dropping in on the ‘other gov’

Signs SIG Sauer bill, fires off at trial lawyers

Let’s play ‘When is the election?’

Friend of Kelly headed to N.H.

First 2026 campaign reports to emerge

NH split on vehicle inspections



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Concerns about transparency swirl around Nashua performing arts center – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Concerns about transparency swirl around Nashua performing arts center – The Boston Globe


Thursday’s decision arises from one of more than a dozen lawsuits resident Laurie A. Ortolano has filed against Nashua in the past five years under the RTK law. It clarifies that a 2008 change to the law didn’t narrow the scope of entities bound by it. Legislators added language specifying that government-owned nonprofit corporations are public bodies subject to the RTK law, but that doesn’t mean all for-profit corporations are exempt, the court ruled.

To determine whether an entity constitutes a public body under the RTK law, judges still must conduct a “government function” test, just as they were required to do before the 2008 change to the law. The lower court failed to do that in this case.

Advertisement

In response to Thursday’s decision, Ortolano said it seems fairly clear that NPAC Corp. is using public money to perform a government function, especially considering how involved city officials have been in the entity’s financing and administration.

Ortolano said officials had long reassured the public that the performing arts center would be operated transparently, but then they established the for-profit entity.

“All of the records went dark, and you could not really track accountability of the money any longer,” she said.

Ortolano’s lawsuit alleges the city owns a nonprofit entity that owns the for-profit corporation, but city attorney Steven A. Bolton disputed that. Nashua doesn’t own any of the entities in question, he said. (That said, the city’s Board of Alderman approves mayoral appointees to lead the nonprofits.)

Bolton said he was pleased that the Supreme Court agreed with the trial court’s decision to dismiss the city as a defendant in this case, and he expressed confidence that the money raised for this project was spent appropriately on construction, furnishings, and perhaps initial operating costs.

Advertisement

Attorneys for the remaining defendant, NPAC Corp., didn’t respond Thursday to requests for comment. The corporation maintains it is a private entity exempt from the RTK law, even though its members are listed on the city’s website alongside other municipal boards and committees.

Gregory V. Sullivan, an attorney who practices in New Hampshire and Massachusetts and who serves as president of the New England First Amendment Coalition, said he suspects the superior court will conclude that NPAC Corp. is subject to the RTK law. He commended Ortolano as “a right-to-know warrior” and criticized leaders who resist transparency.

“The city of Nashua has historically, in my opinion, not been cooperative with requests to disclose the public’s records as opposed to other cities and towns in New Hampshire,” he said. “We the people are the government, own the government, and they’re our records.”


This article first appeared in Globe NH | Morning Report, our free newsletter focused on the news you need to know about New Hampshire, including great coverage from the Boston Globe and links to interesting articles from other places. If you’d like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday, you can sign up here.


Advertisement

Steven Porter can be reached at steven.porter@globe.com. Follow him @reporterporter.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending