Connect with us

New Hampshire

NH lawmakers hope to save the 603: Area code nears its limit

Published

on

NH lawmakers hope to save the 603: Area code nears its limit


CONCORD — By the end of 2027, New Hampshire’s iconic 603 area code may reach its limit.

There are only so many seven-number combinations that can be put after the number 603, the state’s phone area code. In 2023, the North American Numbering Plan Administrator warned it hit the maximum as soon as 2027. That could mean New Hampshire will have to add a second area code in the near future.

To delay it, state lawmakers have introduced the aptly titled Senate Bill 603, which directs the New Hampshire Department of Energy and the Public Utilities Commission to do all it legally can to adopt telephone conservation measures and maximize the number of available numbers.

“We lost the Old Man of the Mountain nearly 21 years ago. Our first-in-the-nation primary is under attack, even Daniel Webster went to Massachusetts to run for Senate. But we still have three numbers that are unique to the Granite State: 603,” said Grant Bosley, the deputy chief of staff for the New Hampshire Senate, at a public hearing in front of the House Science, Technology, and Energy Committee in April. He introduced the bill on behalf of the prime sponsor, Senate President Jeb Bradley, R-Wolfeboro.

Advertisement

“603 is more than an area code. It’s an identity. We have songs and bumper stickers, and political slogans, and craft beers and T-shirts,” said Bosley. “603 is New Hampshire, and New Hampshire is 603.”

Transgender people a big focus of GOP: Why are there so many bills about gender identity in New Hampshire?

How could New Hampshire extend life of 603?

Some ways to preserve the code are reclaiming numbers that are no longer in use and requiring providers to return assigned blocks of numbers not being used. The bill comes with a one-time cost of $100,000 to $300,000 to hire a consultant to identify the measures New Hampshire could take.

Bradley introduced the bill in part at the request of New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu, who issued an executive order last year that established the “Don’t Overload the Code” initiative. To extend the life of the code, it directed the Department of Energy and the Bureau of Economic Affairs to reclaim unused telephone numbers.

Advertisement

The state is following the example of Maine, which also acted to preserve its code when told 207 would hit its limit by 2025. By limiting robocalls and changing forecasting and block requesting practices, the state was able to extend the life of the code until 2032, according to reporting by WMTW.

New Hampshire and Maine are two of just 11 states left with a single area code. However, according to Maine’s Public Utilities Commission, the whole country may run out of area codes by 2051.

Therefore, the efforts in New Hampshire won’t prevent the need for a second area code someday, but it would move the date down the line, said Bosley. The New Hampshire Department of Energy testified it’s optimistic it can extend the 603, perhaps even until the federal government determines how to number across the country when they run out.

But that inevitability is part of the reason Rep. Thomas Cormen, D-Lebanon, wrote the bill should be voted inexpedient to legislate in the committee’s minority report. 

“Whether or not we attempt to extend the life of the 603 area code, we will run out of phone numbers in the 603 area code sometime in the next few years,” wrote Cormen. “The bottom line is that this bill spends money just to kick the can down the road.”

Advertisement

The bill passed the Senate in March by a voice vote. The House Science, Technology and Energy Committee narrowly recommended it to pass by a vote of 10-9, and it was scheduled to go to the House for a full vote Thursday.



Source link

New Hampshire

Woman charged in death of baby found floating in New Hampshire pond

Published

on

Woman charged in death of baby found floating in New Hampshire pond


A woman has been arrested in connection with the death of her baby whose body was found in a pond in Manchester, New Hampshire last year. Hepay Juma, 26, of Manchester, is now charged with reckless second-degree murder.

The New Hampshire Attorney General said Juma was arrested for “causing the death of Baby Jane “Grace” Doe, her child, under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life.”

On March 27, 2025, the baby’s body was found floating in the water at Pine Island Park in Manchester. The baby’s death was treated as suspicious following an autopsy.

Advertisement

Investigators have not released any information about how they made the arrest or how the baby died.

Hepay Juma, 26, of Manchester, NH, is charged in connection with the death of her baby. 

Manchester, NH police


At the time, Manchester Police Chief Peter Marr said the baby’s death was “extremely tragic.”

Advertisement

Police asked the public for help after the baby’s body was discovered. They wanted to know if anyone saw someone discarding anything in the water in the previous 14 days, or if anyone knew a pregnant woman who gave birth during that time who needed medical help.

A funeral was held for baby Grace Doe last May, and the public was invited to pay their respects. “The way she was discarded is heartbreaking, and it is important that we give her a proper farewell,” Chief Marr said last year. 

The baby was named Grace by police “to celebrate the kindness extended to her by those who refuse to let her life go unrecognized.”

Juma is scheduled to be arraigned on Friday in Manchester District Court.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Man dead after Windsor, New Hampshire, house fire

Published

on

Man dead after Windsor, New Hampshire, house fire


A man was found dead after an early morning house fire in Windsor, New Hampshire, on Thursday.

The Hillsboro Fire Department was called to the home on Stone Circle by a neighbor just before 4 a.m., according to the State Fire Marshal’s Office. When crews arrived they found a single-family home nearly burned to the ground, and began searching for one person believed inside.

One person, an adult man, was found dead. He has not been publicly identified at this time.

The cause of the fire remains under investigation, though investigators do not think it is suspicious. Fire officials believe the fire had been burning for some time before first responders arrived.

Advertisement

Firefighters from Henniker, Deering, Antrim, and Washington assisted with the call.



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

How Much Income Is Needed To Be Considered ‘Rich’ In New Hampshire?

Published

on

How Much Income Is Needed To Be Considered ‘Rich’ In New Hampshire?


A report from Visual Capitalist indicates households typically need to be in the top 10 percent of earners to be labeled “rich.” The specific income required to reach this status varies significantly by location.

In New Hampshire, households must earn $302,500 per year to meet the criteria for being considered rich. This figure compares to $229,000 in Maine and $294,600 in Vermont. In the Bay State, the figure is $386,800. These regional differences highlight how the definition of wealth can shift even within the same geographic area.

Nationally, a household needed to earn approximately $210,000 annually to be considered wealthy in 2024, according to a separate report by Visa Business and Economic Insights. This national definition also includes a net worth of about $1.8 million. Based on this definition, about 12.2 million U.S. households met the criteria for being “rich” last year.

The Visual Capitalist report found that annual household income thresholds range from approximately $198,000 in West Virginia to more than $630,000 in Washington, D.C. States located in the Northeast and along the West Coast generally require higher incomes to achieve wealthy status. Conversely, many Southern and rural states have lower thresholds.

Advertisement

Income alone does not fully represent the economic picture. High living costs in expensive metropolitan areas can erode purchasing power, meaning that six-figure salaries may no longer provide the same financial comfort they once did. However, some remote workers who moved to more affordable regions during the pandemic may find their earnings extend further.

Other research also points to a widening income gap. A recent Oxfam study found that over the past 35 years, the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans accumulated nearly 1,000 times more wealth than the poorest 20 percent.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending