Connect with us

New Hampshire

NH Executive Council Republicans again reject family planning contracts

Published

on

NH Executive Council Republicans again reject family planning contracts


CONCORD — For the fifth time in three years, the four Republicans on the New Hampshire Executive Council voted Wednesday to reject contracts with three organizations that had provided the majority of the state’s low-cost basic reproductive health care, such as cancer screenings, STD treatment, and contraception.

Only Democrat Cinde Warmington voted to approve funding to Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Equality Health Center, and Lovering Health Center. In its request to the council, the Department of Health and Human Services estimated those three organizations would have served nearly 5,381 low-income individuals in fiscal years 2024 and 2025.

Advertisement

“The New Hampshire Executive Council’s repeated rejection of funding that the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services has set aside for vital reproductive health care providers is not only disheartening but dangerous,” said Kayla Montgomery, vice president of public affairs for Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, in a statement following the vote. “These facilities are lifelines for our communities, offering essential preventive care that impacts the health and well-being of thousands of Granite Staters.”

The council voted, 4-1, to continue family planning contracts with four other organizations the department estimates will provide reproductive health care to 4,131 individuals in the next two years: Amoskeag Health, Lamprey Health Care, Coos County Family Health Services in Berlin, and the Community Action Programs of Belknap and Merrimack counties.

The difference, councilors have said during prior votes, is that those four organizations do not perform abortions where Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Equality Health Center, and Lovering Health Center do. The council’s Republicans have said they don’t want taxpayer dollars paying for abortions.

They have not been persuaded by state audits that show the three do not use state or federal money to provide abortions. It is enough, the councilors have said, that the three are performing abortions in buildings where public funding helps pay for electricity and heat.

Advertisement

In a letter earlier this week seeking the council’s support, Montgomery said that 61 percent of its patients qualify as low-income under the federal poverty level, which would equal earnings of less than $29,160 a year for a household of one.

She said state funding for reproductive health care such as STI testing and treatment is more important than ever.

She noted that sexually transmitted infections are “skyrocketing” in New Hampshire. Montgomery cited a report from the Department of Health and Human Services that said New Hampshire is in “outbreak” status for gonorrhea and syphilis. Cases for both declined between 2019 and 2020, according to the report, but increased significantly in 2021.

Warmington issued a statement following the vote.

“It is simply outrageous how, time and time again, these Republican executive councilors will put their own radical ideologies over the health and well-being of Granite Staters,” she said. “Today, they voted to defund cancer screenings for low-income individuals. They voted to reject funding for birth control, for STD testing and treatment, and for health education materials to vulnerable populations in need. Their actions today will negatively impact New Hampshire’s reproductive health care system for years to come.”

Advertisement

Sandi Denoncour, executive director of Lovering Health Center, said in a statement that losing family planning contracts in 2021 forced it to make staffing decisions, limiting the availability of care.

Ahead of the vote, Reproductive Equality Now submitted a petition signed by 450 people urging the council to reinstate contracts with Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Equality Health Center, and Lovering Health Center.

In a statement following Wednesday’s vote, Rebecca Hart Holder, the group’s president, said: “Today, the Executive Council turned their backs on the most vulnerable patients and communities in the state, once again denying basic, essential family planning services to Granite Staters. The Executive Council is again caving to anti-abortion misinformation that falsely claims that family planning dollars would be used for abortion.”

This story was originally published by New Hampshire Bulletin.



Source link

Advertisement

New Hampshire

New Hampshire rehab center ex-CEO charged with harassment against journalist

Published

on

New Hampshire rehab center ex-CEO charged with harassment against journalist





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

State House Dome: Buckley gets key seat to defend NH primary

Published

on

State House Dome: Buckley gets key seat to defend NH primary


AFTER A TENSE, chaotic and demoralizing 2024 election cycle, New Hampshire Democratic leaders have landed key spots as they try to put the Granite State’s first-in-the-nation primary back in the national party’s good graces.






Advertisement

The Union Leader first confirmed that new Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin has returned New Hampshire party chairman Ray Buckley to the DNC’s Rules & Bylaws Committee.

Some in GOP still on U.S. Senate lookout

Ayotte picks new judicial panel members

Dropping in on the ‘other gov’

Signs SIG Sauer bill, fires off at trial lawyers

Let’s play ‘When is the election?’

Friend of Kelly headed to N.H.

First 2026 campaign reports to emerge

NH split on vehicle inspections



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Concerns about transparency swirl around Nashua performing arts center – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Concerns about transparency swirl around Nashua performing arts center – The Boston Globe


Thursday’s decision arises from one of more than a dozen lawsuits resident Laurie A. Ortolano has filed against Nashua in the past five years under the RTK law. It clarifies that a 2008 change to the law didn’t narrow the scope of entities bound by it. Legislators added language specifying that government-owned nonprofit corporations are public bodies subject to the RTK law, but that doesn’t mean all for-profit corporations are exempt, the court ruled.

To determine whether an entity constitutes a public body under the RTK law, judges still must conduct a “government function” test, just as they were required to do before the 2008 change to the law. The lower court failed to do that in this case.

Advertisement

In response to Thursday’s decision, Ortolano said it seems fairly clear that NPAC Corp. is using public money to perform a government function, especially considering how involved city officials have been in the entity’s financing and administration.

Ortolano said officials had long reassured the public that the performing arts center would be operated transparently, but then they established the for-profit entity.

“All of the records went dark, and you could not really track accountability of the money any longer,” she said.

Ortolano’s lawsuit alleges the city owns a nonprofit entity that owns the for-profit corporation, but city attorney Steven A. Bolton disputed that. Nashua doesn’t own any of the entities in question, he said. (That said, the city’s Board of Alderman approves mayoral appointees to lead the nonprofits.)

Bolton said he was pleased that the Supreme Court agreed with the trial court’s decision to dismiss the city as a defendant in this case, and he expressed confidence that the money raised for this project was spent appropriately on construction, furnishings, and perhaps initial operating costs.

Advertisement

Attorneys for the remaining defendant, NPAC Corp., didn’t respond Thursday to requests for comment. The corporation maintains it is a private entity exempt from the RTK law, even though its members are listed on the city’s website alongside other municipal boards and committees.

Gregory V. Sullivan, an attorney who practices in New Hampshire and Massachusetts and who serves as president of the New England First Amendment Coalition, said he suspects the superior court will conclude that NPAC Corp. is subject to the RTK law. He commended Ortolano as “a right-to-know warrior” and criticized leaders who resist transparency.

“The city of Nashua has historically, in my opinion, not been cooperative with requests to disclose the public’s records as opposed to other cities and towns in New Hampshire,” he said. “We the people are the government, own the government, and they’re our records.”


This article first appeared in Globe NH | Morning Report, our free newsletter focused on the news you need to know about New Hampshire, including great coverage from the Boston Globe and links to interesting articles from other places. If you’d like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday, you can sign up here.


Advertisement

Steven Porter can be reached at steven.porter@globe.com. Follow him @reporterporter.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending