Connect with us

New Hampshire

Former Ambassador to Denmark on where he sees a U.S. deal with Greenland going

Published

on

Former Ambassador to Denmark on where he sees a U.S. deal with Greenland going


President Trump said this week that the U.S. will have “total access” to Greenland and that he’s formed the framework of a future deal.

The details are still unclear, but Trump has backed off on threatening tariffs against Europe and said he doesn’t plan to take Greenland by force. This comes after Trump renewed his demand to acquire Greenland earlier this week.

Former Democratic Congressman Richard Swett served as an ambassador to Denmark under the Clinton administration. He spoke with NHPR’s All Things Considered host Julia Furukawa about the relationship between the U.S. and Denmark, and where he sees the Greenland deal going.

Transcript

The U.S. and Denmark already have a framework for U.S. military presence in Greenland. What does that look like?

Advertisement

It was established in 1951. It really gives the United States broad latitude for developing military bases on the island. We have one remaining base in Thule, which is now called Pituffik [Space Base]. But it’s right up on the Arctic Circle. It watches for incoming missiles from Russia. And that is the one base that I think Trump has sort of focused on. That would be expanded and created into a “Golden Dome,” as he calls it, over—not so much the island of Greenland, but to intercept any missiles that are coming in from Russia that would be aimed at the United States.

Courtesy of Richard Swett

Richard Swett also served as the U.S. representative for New Hampshire’s 2nd Congressional District from 1991 to 1995.

Can you explain the extent of the role Greenland has played in U.S.-Denmark relations?

Well, first of all, the U.S. and Denmark have been allies forever. Denmark was the second country to recognize the new country of the United States, and we have had a continuous relationship with them. Some would say it’s the longest. Some might argue that point. But the reality is that there has never been a breach in that relationship. It’s a very good one.

Greenland has been a part of Denmark forever. I visited Greenland twice. Once to see the space station. The other time was to see or celebrate with the Danes the thousand-year celebration of Christianity coming to the island. That was a thousand years ago, and that’s how long Greenland has been a part of either the Danes or the Scandinavian countries more broadly.

Advertisement

1951 was when an agreement was signed with Denmark for the use of Greenland. Since then, and even since I was ambassador to Denmark, Greenland has become more and more independent. At this point, my interest and concern would be to see that the Greenlanders are as much a part of this negotiation as the Danes are and the U.S. is.

The idea of the U.S. acquiring Greenland isn’t entirely new. Remind us why the U.S. has this interest.

Well, it has always been an interest of the United States. As far back as 1910, we made our first offer to purchase it. I think President Truman offered $100 million to purchase it in 194[6].

In 1917, we did purchase the Danish West Indies and that became the U.S. Virgin Islands. So we’ve done real estate deals with Danes, not maybe in the same fashion or form as President Trump, who is a real estate developer himself, but I do think this is not a new conversation topic. It’s not a new idea.

And what would you say, exactly, are the U.S. security needs in the Arctic region?

Advertisement

The resources that exist there — and I have no idea what exists under the mild deep ice that covers Greenland — but there are rare minerals that are important. There are shipping routes that, as they become more available, more open, could be utilized by Russia, by China. And it might be to our disadvantage that they have that availability. So I think those are the two primary things.

And then of course, we’ve talked about the “Golden Dome” that would stop the missiles from coming through. So we’re very interested in being able to work in Greenland to provide the kind of technology that will enable the U.S. to to stop this stuff from coming over the horizon. Some say that the 1951 agreement makes available all kinds of things that the U.S. could do that would satisfy those concerns. But we’ll see how the negotiation goes, whether there’s still more that the president is willing or wants to extract from the Greenlanders and the Danes in those discussions.

You served as an ambassador to Denmark under the Clinton administration, and you still have many ties to the country.

I do.

What have you been hearing from members of the Danish government or civil society there?

Advertisement

Well, I think the first thing is, many people in the political world tend to overreact to things that the president says. If you understand his mentality, if you read his book, it’s all very broadly and clearly explained that he will start with an extreme position and negotiate from there. Having said that, I mean, it is not a diplomatic way to begin a discussion. I think that it could do long-term damage only if those who were offended choose to remain so. But I think that when things get down to the short strokes, you begin to have more credible discussions.

I think part of what he wants to accomplish is that he controls the news cycle for whatever period of time people choose to react to what he’s saying. And so this is something that ultimately doesn’t have major implications or detrimental implications on the long [term] scale, but on the short term, it gets him a lot of attention.

Well, in the long term, where do you expect this deal to go?

It will probably stay within the 1951 agreement. It will follow the different articles that talk about the U.S. being able to build multiple bases on the island [and] multiple technologies for defense purposes.

I think the relationship with Denmark will — actually it can’t get much better, but it will be stronger and better because of all of the discussion that’s going on here and the value that this holds for both countries. What I know of the Danes is that they are serious and responsible allies. And they know that they benefit [from] a good relationship with the United States. And the United States understands that it needs to treat its allies with respect.

Advertisement





Source link

New Hampshire

Nashua, NH, woman jailed for falsifying marriage to claim late man’s estate

Published

on

Nashua, NH, woman jailed for falsifying marriage to claim late man’s estate


KEENE, N.H. — A Nashua woman who had a town clerk falsely certify a marriage that never happened so she could claim her late partner’s property has been sentenced to seven days in jail, placed on probation and ordered to repay thousands to his estate.

Attorney General John Formella said Wendy Leedberg‑Snow, 60, turned to Winchester Town Clerk Jim Tetreault after the death of her longtime partner, Eric Leedberg — who was born in Lowell — using the falsified license to pose as his spouse and lay claim to property from his estate, an effort prosecutors describe as an attempt to rewrite the couple’s history for financial gain.

“This case involved a deliberate effort to manipulate official government records and exploit the death of a loved one for personal financial gain,” Formella said in a press release announcing the sentencing. “Our vital records system depends on honesty and integrity, and those who seek to corrupt that system will be held accountable. I want to thank the investigators and prosecutors whose work ensured justice for the victim’s family.”

According to Leedberg’s obituary, he was 53 when he died on Oct. 12, 2023, following a two‑year battle with cancer.

Advertisement

In the obituary, Leedberg-Snow is described as his “significant other.”

Prosecutors said Leedberg‑Snow moved quickly after his death, relying on Tetreault’s signature to fabricate a marriage that never occurred and position herself as Leedberg’s surviving spouse.

Tetreault, who was a New Hampshire justice of the peace at the time, falsely signed the marriage license claiming he had officiated the couple’s wedding. He later admitted he never performed any ceremony for Leedberg‑Snow and Leedberg and had no personal knowledge of them ever being married.

Leedberg‑Snow used the fraudulent certificate to obtain property from Leedberg’s estate, including a pickup truck and trailer, and later attempted to influence a witness connected to the scheme.

Leedberg‑Snow pleaded guilty in Cheshire County Superior Court in Keene to felony counts of solicitation to commit vital records fraud, title fraud, theft by misapplication of property and witness tampering.

Advertisement

In addition to her seven‑day jail term, she must serve two years of probation, pay $4,600 in restitution, return the truck and trailer to Leedberg’s estate and comply with a suspended three‑and‑a‑half‑ to seven‑year prison sentence, which means the sentence only takes effect if she violates the conditions of her probation.

Tetreault, who continues to serve as Winchester’s town clerk and “fully cooperated with the State’s investigation,” according to prosecutors, pleaded guilty in April to notarial misconduct, a Class A misdemeanor. As part of a negotiated plea, prosecutors dropped a felony charge of vital records fraud. He was sentenced to 90 days in the house of corrections, all suspended for two years on good behavior, and ordered to pay a $1,000 fine plus a $240 penalty assessment.

He resigned his commissions as a justice of the peace and bail commissioner and agreed not to seek recommissioning as a justice of the peace or notary public during the two‑year suspension period.

Tetreault could not be reached for comment at his office number.

Follow Aaron Curtis on X @aselahcurtis, or on Bluesky @aaronscurtis.bsky.social.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Rescue Crews Help Injured Woman Off Mt. Washington

Published

on

Rescue Crews Help Injured Woman Off Mt. Washington


SARGENT’S PURCHASE – On Saturday, personnel from multiple rescue crews teamed up to help an injured woman get off of Mt. Washington to seek medical treatment.

At approximately 7:45 AM, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department Conservation Officers were notified that a staff member at the Appalachian Mountain Club (AMC) Lakes of the Clouds Hut had taken a serious fall at the hut and was left unable to walk.

Fish and Game subsequently mobilized search and rescue personnel to come and help evacuate the young woman from her remote location.

By 10:00 AM, members of the Androscoggin Valley Search and Rescue Team (AVSAR), Pemigewassett Valley Search and Rescue Team (Pemi), AMC and Fish and Game had gathered at the Base Station of the Cog Rail. The Cog Railway generously donated room on their trains, and rescuers and equipment were given rides up Mt. Washington to the West Side Trail, which allowed for a shorter and less strenuous 1.6 mile hike than other routes.

Advertisement

By 11:20 AM rescuers were at the hut with the patient. The patient was subsequently packaged in a litter and prepared for an overland carryout back to the Cog tracks.

Rescue personnel made steady progress, and by 2:15 PM had made it back across West Side Trail and to the train tracks. A Cog Railway train picked up the whole rescue party and brought everyone back down the mountain. Once roadside, the patient was evaluated by personnel from Twin Mountain Fire and Rescue.

She was ultimately driven from the scene by a friend and went to Memorial Hospital in North Conway for further evaluation
and treatment of multiple injuries related to her fall. The patient was identified as Cali Turner, 26, of Willimantic, Maine.

Fish and Game would like to thank all of the people and organizations involved in this rescue effort. Through the help of everyone, the rescue was a great success and got done in a timely manner.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Gilmanton Iron Works Man Accused Of Possessing Guns, Hundreds Of Grams Of Fentanyl In Hooksett, Manchester

Published

on

Gilmanton Iron Works Man Accused Of Possessing Guns, Hundreds Of Grams Of Fentanyl In Hooksett, Manchester


Editor’s note: This post was derived from information provided by the Hooksett and Manchester police departments and does not constitute a conviction. This link explains how to request the removal of a name from New Hampshire Patch police reports.

Stark was arrested later by police during a motor vehicle stop in Manchester and charged with drug sale, possession, driving after revocation or suspension, and armed career criminal. He was then turned over to Hooksett police on that department’s charges, processed, declined bail, and was held at the Merrimack County Jail for future arraignment.

Decades Of Priors

Stark, according to superior court records, has more than two decades of criminal history, mostly in the Lakes Region.

In Laconia in December 2005, when he was a teen, Stark was accused of second-degree assault and felony theft. He pleaded guilty to both charges in August 2006. Stark was given work release in January 2007 and about 11 months later, was accused of violating probation. After being sentenced, he was accused of violating probation again in August 2008. A bail forfeiture hearing was held in December 2008, and a probation violation hearing was held in March 2009.

Advertisement

Stark was accused of controlled drug act in Laconia in December 2009, but the charge was nolle prossed in August 2010. In June 2010, he was accused of controlled drug act in Laconia, but the charge was nolle prossed in November 2010. Stark was charged with bail jumping in May 2010 and pleaded guilty a year later to the charge and received a two-to-four-year prison sentence with 113 days time served credit.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending