New Hampshire

Distant Dome: A Dark Time For the State

Published

2 hours ago

March 14, 2026

By GARRY RAYNO, Distant Dome

The political climate in New Hampshire took a dark turn this month as lawmakers were in the middle of the last year of the current two-year term.

The second year of any term is always more contentious and antagonistic as the parties ramp up the rhetoric heading into the general election in November.

Each side wants to put the other on record for the perceived hot button issues their polling tells them will drive voter turnout.

But since the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling allowing billions of dollars of dark money to flow into elections nationally, and here, the stakes are higher because the donors want a return on their investment and decidedly more partisan.

Immigration and how the Trump administration is handling it through its ICE officers who often act more like street thugs than law enforcement, as well as the Iran war have heightened the partisan divide to the point of creating two realities.

And politically driven violence is on the upswing with no reason to think New Hampshire would escape.

Long gone are the days of the old New Hampshire Hotel where many lawmakers stayed rather than trek home through the notches in bad weather or to the geographically isolated Monadnock region or to the Seacoast with a few too many manhattans under your belt.

As the old timers used to say, they could fight like hell on the House floor and then share dinner, a cigar and drinks in the dining room of the hotel making lifelong friends on both sides of the aisle.

Now there are death threats over tax policy.

Attorney and longtime education funding reform advocate, Andru Volinsky and others proposed the 3 3 program to reduce property taxes for 80 percent of the state’s property owners by instituting a 3 percent income tax and $3 per $1,000 of valuation statewide property tax.

The plan also came with a handy feature that calculates how you would fare under the proposal instead of paying 70 percent of the cost of education with your property taxes.

It did not take long before Gov. Kelly Ayotte chimed in with “No income tax, no sales tax. Not now, not EVER,” followed by the House Minority Leader Alexis Simpson’s press release saying House Democrats do not support an income tax, which is not true for all of them.

And then an X post showed up under Libertarian Party NH which is still controlled by the Free State Project’s former executive director Jeremy Kauffman saying an income tax equated to forced labor and “under libertarian ethical theory, it is perfectly permissible to kill him.”

The Tweet has since been taken down.

But the threats didn’t stop there. In the comments Volinsky’s friend and 1st District Congressional candidate Christian Urrutia defended Volinsky on the string and the reply to him was “leave New Hampshire while it’s safe for you to do so.”
The threats were reported to police and the Attorney General’s Office acknowledged it is aware of them.

While later Simpson put out a press release saying, “This kind of rhetoric is dangerous and unacceptable. Calling for the murder because of political disagreement crosses a clear line. The Libertarian Party of New Hampshire should be ashamed to promote language that encourages violence against elected officials and others in public life,” but never mentioned Volinsky’s name which she did in a press release objecting to his proposal.

Two days later when House Majority Leader Jason Osborne offered a constitutional amendment to outlaw an income tax, she did mention the threats, but again but did not say Volinsky’s name.

Ayotte has yet to say anything about the threats to Volinsky or other threatening social media posts from a Republican representative targeting two female Democratic representatives one Jewish and the other a naturalized citizen from the Philippines.

State Rep. Travis Corcoran, R-Weare, known for his racist and bigoted commentary, wrote the posts.

After Rep. Jessica Grill, D-Manchester, promoted a bipartisan Karaoke Caucus meeting on X, Corcoran posed on X “We need a final solution for theater kids in politics,” referring to the Nazi’s plan to kill all the Jews in Germany.

The week before on social media he urged the Trump administration official behind the sometimes violent and often illegal arrests and detentions of immigrants, Stephen Miller, to have Rep. Luz Bay, D-Dover, deported.

Those remarks were contested by Simpson who released a statement saying “Posting antisemitic language and references to the Holocaust is reprehensible. Rep. Corcoran’s conduct is unacceptable for anyone, and even more so for a member of the legislature. I condemn this rhetoric. I expect the Speaker to stand against it and take action to address the hate speech coming from his caucus. For far too long, Rep. Corcoran has used antisemitic and racist rhetoric without consequence. The Speaker has allowed this behavior to continue, and addressing Rep. Corcoran’s pattern of hateful comments is long overdue.”

House Speaker Sherman Packard, R-Londonderry, did release a statement responding to Corcoran’s tweets.

“The recent rhetoric shared by Rep. Corcoran is deeply inappropriate and has no place in the New Hampshire House. Any language that invokes violence, hate, or intolerance is unacceptable by any member. Our institution is built on respect and the responsibility to serve all Granite Staters with dignity and professionalism. Conduct that undermines that mission does not reflect our values. Members of the House are expected to uphold the standards of the body and honor the trust placed in them by their constituents.”

Missing along with the governor is the Republican Party of NH and the Democrats’ response was to release a one line statement from party head Ray Buckley to a Boston public radio station.

“We strongly condemn political violence and remain committed to treating everyone with dignity and respect.”

Lot of profiles in courage from the political hierarchy on both sides of the aisle.

Corcoran has a long history of racist, hateful, intolerant and violent spots and comments.

Last year when the state budget went down in the House at the end of the session, Corcoran took credit for its defeat posting on social media his “No” vote and saying it killed the budget, noting he had been fighting for five months to have the state defund the Department of Health and Human Services Refugee Resettlement Program.

“No more using tax dollars to import third worlders to NH, then giving them money and free housing,” he wrote.

Corcoran was the prime sponsor of House Bill 635, which would tax non-profit entities who settle illegal immigrants as for-profit entities and have the Revenue Administration award bounties to anyone who report non-profits settling illegal immigrants.

The refugee resettlement program is run in conjunction with International Institute of New England and Ascentria Care Alliance, both non-profits.

Later on X he wrote he would be switching his vote because “I have been told that there will be MASSIVE leadership support to defund NH Office of Refugee Resettlement if I change my vote. I trust leadership.”
After the vote, Corcoran posted “we’ve got leadership saying they’re all going to cosponsor a bill to defund NH DHHS Refugee Resettlement in November.”

That bill, House Bill 1706, “Repealing the refugee resettlement program in the department of health and human services and prohibiting expenditure of state funds on refugee resettlement,” was sponsored by Corcoran and co-sponsors include Osborne and committee chairs Joe Alexander of Goffstown, Ross Berry of Weare, Kristin Noble of Bedford and James Spillaine of Deerfield.

It came out of committee with a 10-8 vote down party lines for passage and passed the House last week on a 170-164 vote and is now in the Senate.

At one time, government’s job was to help the most vulnerable among us, but that is not the case any more as you look at the bills that passed the House in just two days last week to undermine public education, education in general and local government, harm workers and transgender individuals, end the refugee resettlement program, and allow greater use of deadly force.

And there are death threats and forced deportation in the mix in a very troubling time in this country and particularly in New Hampshire where the vision of the elected leaders follow the tenets of the Free State/Libertarians who are controlling the agenda.

At an after conference party for the Free State’s Liberty Forum last weekend Kauffman announced a new club with the backing of a very wealthy individual is being formed to promote the ideas and tenets of the group and among those he announced were already on board were Osborne and Corcoran.

That is not reassuring.

Garry Rayno may be reached at garry.rayno@yahoo.com.

Distant Dome by veteran journalist Garry Rayno explores a broader perspective on the State House and state happenings for InDepthNH.org. Over his three-decade career, Rayno covered the NH State House for the New Hampshire Union Leader and Foster’s Daily Democrat. During his career, his coverage spanned the news spectrum, from local planning, school and select boards, to national issues such as electric industry deregulation and Presidential primaries. Rayno lives with his wife Carolyn in New London.

Source link

New Hampshire

After political debacle, 84 bills die in House without a vote

Published

14 hours ago

March 14, 2026

Press Room

After political debacle, 84 bills die in House without a vote

It’s a cherished State House maxim in New Hampshire: Every bill gets a public hearing, and every bill gets a vote on the House or Senate floor. But this week, a series of scheduling woes, time constraints, and partisan machinations upended that tradition.

Source link

New Hampshire

New Hampshire House Lets Marijuana Legalization And Psilocybin Therapy Bills Die Without A Vote – Marijuana Moment

Published

1 day ago

March 13, 2026

Press Room

New Hampshire House Lets Marijuana Legalization And Psilocybin Therapy Bills Die Without A Vote – Marijuana Moment

The New Hampshire House of Representatives has effectively killed bills to legalize marijuana and allow the therapeutic use of psilocybin by not bringing them up for floor votes ahead of a key deadline. Meanwhile, separate legislation on those topics has already advanced.

As legislators continue to push for a variety of drug policy reform proposals, with mixed results so far this session, the House on Thursday adjourned without bringing up scheduled measures to let voters decide on adult-use marijuana legalization as well as separate bills to end prohibition of low-level cannabis possession and give adults access to psilocybin as a novel treatment alternative.

Here’s an overview of the cannabis and psychedelics bills that were not considered by the House:

CACR 19

The House failed to consider a bill from Rep. Jonah Wheeler (D) that would have put a constitutional amendment on the state ballot to let voters decide if they want to legalize marijuana for adults 21 and older, allowing them to “possess a modest amount of cannabis for their personal use.”

If enacted, the constitutional amendment would have appeared on the November state ballot.

The the text of what would have gone before voters on the November ballot under CACR 19 reads:

“Are you in favor of amending the first part of the constitution by inserting after article 2-b a new article to read as follows:

[Art.] 2-c. [Adult possession of cannabis.] All adults who are 21 years of age or older shall have the right to possess a modest amount of cannabis intended for their personal consumption.”

Members of the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee took up that legislation in January. It was ultimately deemed inexpedient to legislate by a majority of the panel, but in New Hampshire all bills still have the opportunity to advance to the floor even with negative committee recommendations.

A motion from Rep. Alissandra Murray (D) to special order the legislation for consideration by the body before its adjournment on Thursday failed by a vote of 115-220.

In a minority report, Murray, clerk of the committee, wrote that the legislation “returns the question of cannabis legalization to the people of New Hampshire, where it belongs. It does not itself legalize cannabis; rather, it allows voters to decide whether adults age 21 and over may legally possess a modest amount.”

“The amendment intentionally avoids specifying possession limits, recognizing that such details are better addressed in statute than embedded in the constitution, where they are more difficult to amend,” she said, adding that polling shows overwhelming public support for legalization in New Hampshire. “It is high time we respect the will of the people and end the continued criminalization of adults for conduct that a strong majority no longer believes should be a crime.”

Rep. Terry Roy (R), chair of the panel, wrote in the majority report that the panel “recommends CACR 19 as inexpedient to legislate because embedding a federal crime into the New Hampshire Constitution is a reckless act of legal entrapment that endangers the very liberties we are sworn to protect. While some frame this as ‘respecting the will of the people,’ they are actually inviting Granite Staters into a ‘federal trap’ where exercising a state-granted ‘right’ results in the automatic and permanent forfeiture of their Second Amendment rights.”

“Beyond the constitutional risk, we must consider the professional doors this closes: any use authorized by this amendment remains an automatic disqualifier for federal security clearances in New Hampshire’s high-paying defense sector, as well as for military service and law enforcement,” he said. “A truly pro-liberty stance requires protecting our citizens from federal overreach, not baiting them into a conflict that strips them of their right to bear arms and their economic future.”

HB 1235-FN

Another cannabis legalization bill that didn’t get a floor vote in the House on Thursday is HB 1235-FN from Rep. Jared Sullivan (D) and five bipartisan cosponsors. The measure was also designated as inexpedient to legislate by the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee.

Under the legislation, HB 1235, adults 21 and older would have been allowed to possess up to 2.5 ounces of cannabis flower and up to 10 grams of marijuana concentrates. The proposal would not have created a system of regulated commercial sales, however.

In the majority report from the committee, the chairman reiterated his belief that legalization supporters are mischaracterizing the reform as a personal liberties issue.

“The promise of ‘personal freedom’ is a hollow one when it results in the systematic closing of doors for New Hampshire’s young people and the erosion of our fundamental constitutional rights,” Roy said. “We must look at actual outcomes: since legalization, neighboring states have seen a 15 percent increase in workers’ compensation claims and a 55 percent higher rate of industrial accidents among users, a trend that would cripple New Hampshire’s productivity and drive up insurance costs for small businesses.”

“Most critically, this bill creates a devastating ‘federal trap’ for the thousands of Granite Staters employed by our state’s thriving defense sector, which remains a primary economic driver with average annual wages exceeding $111,000,” he said. “We refuse to trade New Hampshire’s safety, economic future, and the Second Amendment rights of our citizens for a policy that offers only the illusion of liberty while stripping away the keys to a successful future and increasing road fatalities by 17.3 percent as seen in our neighboring states.”

Rep. Buzz Scherr (D) said in the committee’s minority report that the proposed legislation “recognizes that New Hampshire residents are notably in favor of such an approach and that all of New Hampshire’s surrounding states have taken some version of this approach.”

Sullivan, the bill sponsor, also filed separate legislation this session that would have legalized adult-use cannabis through a regulated sales model, with additional provisions to provide relief for those who’ve previously been criminalized over marijuana. That bill already passed the House this year, but it was then promptly killed in the Senate.

HB 1796-FN

The House on Thursday also did not take up a Republican-led bill from Rep. Michael Moffett (R) that would have permitted the regulated use of psilocybin in a medically supervised setting.

To qualify for psilocybin treatment, a patient 21 or older would have needed to be diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression, PTSD, substance misuse disorder, a terminal illness requiring end-of-life care or any other condition authorized by the state Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

There would have been specific guidelines for facilities where the psychedelic could be administered, including security requirements and other safety protocols such as ensuring there are rescue medications on site if a patient experiences an adverse event.

The legislation, HB 1796, would have also established a Therapeutic Psilocybin Treatment Fund, which would have been funded by revenue from licensing taxes and fees. The fund would have gone toward studies into the possibility of expanding the program to include additional psychedelics in the program.

Rep. Tim Hartnett (D)—on behalf of the majority of the House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs Committee that deemed the psilocybin bill inexpedient to legislate—said in a report that the measure contains “several insurmountable challenges,” including “significant financial challenges in staffing and related costs” for DHHS.

“Second, the bill presupposes existing expertise and related capacities already exist within the NH government,” the report says. “Third, psilocybin has great promise and even though significant anecdotal evidence exists on its therapeutic benefit, compelling confirmatory scientific evidence remains early in its development.”

“Further, beyond scientific studies, the experience of actual day-to-day-mainstream clinic operations are even less well understood—the ‘how do we run a clinic’ questions of staff recruitment and training, program admissions, management of patient emergencies etc.—are in their infancy. News reports from other jurisdictions suggest there is much to be learned about running and regulating clinics providing treatments using this medication.”

A minority report from Rep. Yury Polozov (R) says the legislation “provides an evidence-based treatment option for patients who have not responded to conventional therapies.”

“Emerging research supports psilocybin’s potential benefits for mental health conditions when used in controlled therapeutic settings. The bill promotes public health and harm reduction,” the said. “It offers renewed hope for life to those in crisis, as suicide remains a major cause of death, particularly among veterans who often suffer from treatment-resistant depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.”

Last month, the House approved a separate bipartisan bill to legalize the regulated use of psilocybin for medical purposes. It is now scheduled to be considered by the House Finance Committee on Tuesday before a final floor vote later this month that could move it to the Senate.

The legislation from Scherr would create a regulatory pathway for patients with certain conditions to access the psychedelic for therapeutic use through a program overseen by DHHS.

—
Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.
—

Meanwhile, Gov. Kelly Ayotte (R) has already threatened to veto any marijuana legalization bill that reaches her desk, though the constitutional amendment proposal would not require gubernatorial action.

The governor said in August that her position on the reform would not change even if the federal government moved forward with rescheduling the plant. Since then, President Donald Trump has directed the attorney general to finalize the process of moving cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

At a committee meeting last year, Sullivan ultimately made a persuasive argument for advancing his legalization bill, pointing out that the House has repeatedly passed similar legislation and that the chamber should stand its ground, forcing the Senate and governor to again go on record with their opposition to a policy popular among voters.

“We know where it’s going to go. Let’s send a virtue signal,” Sullivan said. “Let them be the ones that are pissing off voters who care about this.”

In the Senate, the Judiciary Committee in January also took up a bill from Sen. Donovan Fenton (D) that would allow adults over the age of 21 to legally possess up to four ounces of cannabis in plant form and 20 grams of concentrated cannabis products, as well as other products containing no more than 2,000 milligrams of THC.

Last June, the New Hampshire Senate voted to scrap compromise legislation that would have lowered the state’s criminal penalty for first-time psilocybin possession while also creating mandatory minimum sentences around fentanyl.

As originally introduced, the legislation would have completely removed penalties around obtaining, purchasing, transporting, possessing or using psilocybin, effectively legalizing it on a noncommercial basis. However a House committee amended the bill before unanimously advancing it last March.

Image element courtesy of Kristie Gianopulos.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron at Patreon!

Source link