Connect with us

New Hampshire

Conflict for prosecutors in NH Justice Hantz Marconi’s case? Judge to decide

Published

on

Conflict for prosecutors in NH Justice Hantz Marconi’s case? Judge to decide


CONCORD — A judge is considering whether New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella and his staff should be blocked from prosecuting New Hampshire Supreme Court Associate Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi. Her attorneys allege a conflict of interest due to the attorney general serving Gov. Chris Sununu, a key witness in her case.

Hantz Marconi, 68, a Stratham resident, has been charged in a high-profile case for allegedly interfering in the state’s criminal investigation into her husband, Geno Marconi, 73, the longtime New Hampshire Ports and Harbors director. Hantz Marconi has pleaded not guilty to two Class B felonies and five misdemeanor counts.

Merrimack County Superior Court Judge Martin Honigberg, who heard arguments from both sides Monday, will decide whether state prosecutors can try Hantz Marconi’s case or whether they should be replaced by outside counsel, in accordance with the defense’s request. 

Hantz Marconi is accused of speaking with both Sununu and Pease Development Authority board of directors chairperson Stephen Duprey to influence the criminal investigation into her husband, actions her defense argues are protected by the First Amendment and through judicial immunity. 

Advertisement

Hantz Marconi’s attorney makes case in court

Richard Guerriero, a lawyer for Hantz Marconi, filed a joint motion on Oct. 31 to dismiss the seven charges against her and disqualify the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office from prosecuting the case. The attorney has claimed that Formella cannot be unbiased in the case as Sununu’s pick for state attorney general.

On Monday, Guerriero furthered the argument, saying in court the state should hire outside counsel to try Hantz Marconi’s case rather than existing state prosecutors. Guerriero said Formella previously served as legal counsel for Sununu, who he described as “the key witness in this case.”

“In the simplest terms, our position starts with the reality that every accused person is entitled to a prosecutor who is impartial, and that’s a constitutional right, as we’ve outlined in our proceedings and our pleadings,” Guerriero said.

The charges in Hantz Marconi’s indictment accuse her of telling Sununu the investigation into Geno Marconi was the result of “personal, petty and/or political biases.” The indictment further alleges she felt the investigation “needed to wrap up quickly because she was recused from important cases pending or imminently pending before the New Hampshire Supreme Court,” per the October charging documents. 

Advertisement

Past case filings from Guerriero state Hantz Marconi requested a meeting with Sununu through his staff, which was then allegedly held with the governor’s legal counsel present during regular business hours. Her attorney also states the meeting was approved by New Hampshire Supreme Court Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald.

“I don’t think we can ignore the fact that Attorney General Formella has a particularly close relationship … with this one very powerful public official,” Guerriero said. “His (Formella’s) personal interests are directly tied to this very powerful and important witness, and under that unique circumstance, not any other circumstance in this case, there is a limitation that’s not fair to the defense.”

Sununu appointed Formella to be the attorney general in 2021. Hantz Marconi was nominated to the New Hampshire Supreme Court by Sununu in 2017 and was sworn in by the governor in August the same year.

Honigberg, the presiding judge in Hantz Marconi’s case, took the matter under advisement and noted a decision on Guerriero’s motion to disqualify state prosecutors will be released at a future date.

Advertisement

Hantz Marconi and Guerriero both declined to speak to reporters after the Monday afternoon proceeding ended.

Attorney general’s prosecutors argue their side

Joe Fincham, assistant attorney general, and Dan Jimenez, senior assistant attorney general, are prosecuting Hantz Marconi’s case. They fought against Guerriero’s motion to disqualify their office from prosecution, stating their office is impartial in the case.

“At it’s heart, it was a motion that, in our estimation, basically demanded special treatment. Just like we would in any other case, we objected, because no one, justice or citizen, is entitled to special treatment in criminal prosecutions,” Fincham said after the motion hearing Monday.

Hantz Marconi remains free on bail

Hantz Marconi was charged with one count of attempting to commit improper influence and one count of criminal solicitation of improper influence, both felonies. She was also charged with two counts of criminal solicitation of misuse of position, one count of criminal solicitation of official oppression, one count of official oppression, and one count of obstructing government administration, all Class A misdemeanors.

Hantz Marconi is free on personal recognizance bail.

Advertisement

Guerriero previously requested prosecutors compile a bill of particulars of all her alleged criminal activity if all the charges against her are not dismissed. 

Hantz Marconi was charged before her husband, Geno Marconi

The New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office announced on Oct. 16 that a Merrimack County Superior Court grand jury indicted Hantz Marconi on the seven charges. A day later, a Rockingham County grand jury’s charges against Geno Marconi were released. 

Geno Marconi was charged with two Class B felony counts for allegedly tampering with witnesses and informants and falsifying physical evidence. He was also hit with four Class A misdemeanors – two counts of Driver Privacy Act violations and two counts of obstructing government administration.

Advertisement

The state’s port director appeared in Rockingham County Superior Court last week, pleading not guilty to six state charges. A county judge approved conditions calling for Geno Marconi to be free on personal recognizance bail and a no-contact order preventing him from discussing the facts of the case with all staff of the Pease Development Authority and the agency’s board of directors.

The criminal charges against the Stratham couple were preceded by both Marconis being placed on leave from their respective positions. 

Hantz Marconi, the third woman to sit on the state’s high court, has been on paid administrative leave from the state Supreme Court since July 25. The order regarding her leave was extended by the remaining Supreme Court justices in mid-October.

In April, Geno Marconi was placed on paid leave from his position, which is overseen by the Pease Development Authority. 



Source link

Advertisement

New Hampshire

CAUGHT ON CAMERA: Driver seen driving across Windham, NH lawn late at night – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News

Published

on

CAUGHT ON CAMERA: Driver seen driving across Windham, NH lawn late at night – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News


WINDHAM, N.H. (WHDH) – Police are searching for a person seen on camera driving across a lawn in Windham, New Hampshire.

Windham police say on April 25, around midnight, a driver plowed across a lawn on Trails Edge Road in Windham.

Police say the vehicle is believed to be a late 1990s-early 2000s Chevrolet Silverado, but the color in unknown due to the video being black and white.

A next-door neighbor says their driveway was just redone one day before the incident.

Advertisement

“The boys came in the other morning. I was surprised I didn’t hear anything,” she said. “That’s not that bad but kind of scary, though. I just hope it never happens again.”

The incident is still under investigation.

(Copyright (c) 2026 Sunbeam Television. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)

Join our Newsletter for the latest news right to your inbox



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Commission sets sights on UNESCO recognition for Mount Washington – NH Business Review

Published

on

Commission sets sights on UNESCO recognition for Mount Washington – NH Business Review


Ice coats instruments, buildings and rock fields atop Mount Washington. The peak’s extreme weather is one reason members of the Mount Washington Commission say they are seeking potential UNESCO World Heritage Site status for the peak. (Photo by Charlie Peachey, courtesy of the Mount Washington Observatory)

Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, Egypt’s Great Pyramids, Arizona’s Grand Canyon … and New Hampshire’s own Mount Washington?

At their April meeting, the group of institutions that steward the Northeast’s tallest mountain voted, 9-1, to take a preliminary step toward pursuing UNESCO World Heritage Site designation for the peak. The process may take years to decades, but if it is successful, Mount Washington could become the first site in New England to rank on the internationally recognized list.

Advertisement

The possibility requires unique considerations, commission members said, including the need it would create to manage increased visitation that is already straining the summit’s alpine ecosystem and infrastructure.

Mount Washington Commission Chair Rob Kirsch believes the designation would be a boon for the mountain, bringing in not only more visitors but also more funding to invest in making the peak more resilient to traffic. Kirsch said he sees the application as a chance to showcase the wonder of Mount Washington at a grander scale.

“It will lead to an improved experience for people, generally,” Kirsch said. “It will give the state something to really be proud of.”

A property must meet at least one of 10 criteria to be considered for World Heritage Site status, according to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Mount Washington could invoke several categories in its application, including one for sites that “contain superlative natural phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty and aesthetic importance.”

There are many steps before Mount Washington could potentially be added to that list. The motion approved at the April 17 meeting of the Mount Washington Commission was the first: At that meeting, the commission approved pursuing “Tentative List” status for the mountain. One site is selected from that national list each year for submission to the United Nations World Heritage Committee.

Advertisement

To move ahead, the application must receive support from the federal government. The commission has engaged with federal officials, and U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen has been supportive of the project, commission members said.

“Mount Washington’s unique natural environment, scientific significance and rich history deserve global recognition,” Shaheen said in a statement to the Bulletin. “I am proud to support the Commission as they work to have our region’s most iconic peak designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site.”

From here, Kirsch said, the process may take decades. UNESCO designation typically boosts visitorship to a site, and proponents generally point to the associated regional economic boost as a benefit of the status. But the list has also been criticized as contributing to overtourism that can degrade sites or harm the communities around them. While it can boost public awareness of a place, there is no funding attached to the status itself.

The Mount Washington Commission is guided by a 2022 master plan for the mountain’s stewardship and conservation. In November 2025, the commission reviewed preliminary results from an assessment conducted as part of that plan, showing that crowds and climate change were large factors in the strain on the summit’s delicate natural environment and aging infrastructure.

With significant investment, the summit could readily accommodate significant crowds, said Kirsch, who is also an environmental lawyer, former weather observer at the Mount Washington Observatory, and a member of the observatory’s board of trustees. It’s not clear yet where the money for those investments will come from, but Kirsch said he hoped the UNESCO designation would help.

Advertisement

“You can bring as many people as you want to Mount Washington as long as you make sufficient infrastructure investment to protect the environment,” he said.

The commission is still waiting for more results from the summit’s environmental assessment, but Kirsch said the boost to visitation would not affect the environment if the commission adheres to the guidelines laid out in the Master Plan. Rather, he said, the investments he hopes designation would help secure could help prevent any danger from overcrowding and ensure the mountain’s environment is protected.

He added that the benefit of a UNESCO designation would go beyond the businesses operating on the mountain — which include the Mount Washington Auto Road and the Mount Washington Cog Railway — to boost others throughout the North Country.


This story was originally produced by the New Hampshire Bulletin, an independent local newsroom that allows NH Business Review and other outlets to republish its reporting.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Investigation into woman’s 2007 death resolved, NH officials say

Published

on

Investigation into woman’s 2007 death resolved, NH officials say


New Hampshire authorities said Thursday that they have resolved their investigation into the death of a woman nearly 20 years ago.

On Feb. 24, 2007, 25-year-old Carrie Hicks was found dead from two gunshot wounds to the head at the Acworth home of Wayne Ring, who was found alive in the same room with a single gunshot wound to the head.

Ring died at the age of 57 on May 26, 2012.

Investigators officially determined Ring fatally shot Hicks before attempting to take his own life.

Advertisement

People who knew Hicks and Ring told authorities that they had formed a suicide “pact” and openly discussed suicide.

“Witness testimony revealed that Ms. Hicks had specifically instructed Mr. Ring to shoot her twice so she would not be left alive,” the office of Attorney General John Formella wrote in a press release.

A review of the autopsy report this year, along with a forensic reconstruction of bloodstain patterns, demonstrated that it was “medically and physically impossible” for Hicks to have fired the second shot she sustained, officials said. They added that, beyond a reasonable doubt, she could not have inflicted either injury on herself, and that Ring fatally shot Hicks before turning the gun on himself.

Formella said that if Ring were alive, there would be sufficient evidence to prosecute a first-degree murder case against him.

“We hope that the conclusion of this investigation brings a measure of clarity and peace to the loved ones of Carrie Hicks,” he said in a statement. “This resolution underscores the commitment of the New Hampshire Cold Case Unit. By thoroughly re-examining the forensic evidence, witness statements, and autopsy records, our investigators have finally established the truth behind this tragic loss of life.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending