Connect with us

New Hampshire

Conflict for prosecutors in NH Justice Hantz Marconi’s case? Judge to decide

Published

on

Conflict for prosecutors in NH Justice Hantz Marconi’s case? Judge to decide


CONCORD — A judge is considering whether New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella and his staff should be blocked from prosecuting New Hampshire Supreme Court Associate Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi. Her attorneys allege a conflict of interest due to the attorney general serving Gov. Chris Sununu, a key witness in her case.

Hantz Marconi, 68, a Stratham resident, has been charged in a high-profile case for allegedly interfering in the state’s criminal investigation into her husband, Geno Marconi, 73, the longtime New Hampshire Ports and Harbors director. Hantz Marconi has pleaded not guilty to two Class B felonies and five misdemeanor counts.

Merrimack County Superior Court Judge Martin Honigberg, who heard arguments from both sides Monday, will decide whether state prosecutors can try Hantz Marconi’s case or whether they should be replaced by outside counsel, in accordance with the defense’s request. 

Hantz Marconi is accused of speaking with both Sununu and Pease Development Authority board of directors chairperson Stephen Duprey to influence the criminal investigation into her husband, actions her defense argues are protected by the First Amendment and through judicial immunity. 

Advertisement

Hantz Marconi’s attorney makes case in court

Richard Guerriero, a lawyer for Hantz Marconi, filed a joint motion on Oct. 31 to dismiss the seven charges against her and disqualify the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office from prosecuting the case. The attorney has claimed that Formella cannot be unbiased in the case as Sununu’s pick for state attorney general.

On Monday, Guerriero furthered the argument, saying in court the state should hire outside counsel to try Hantz Marconi’s case rather than existing state prosecutors. Guerriero said Formella previously served as legal counsel for Sununu, who he described as “the key witness in this case.”

“In the simplest terms, our position starts with the reality that every accused person is entitled to a prosecutor who is impartial, and that’s a constitutional right, as we’ve outlined in our proceedings and our pleadings,” Guerriero said.

The charges in Hantz Marconi’s indictment accuse her of telling Sununu the investigation into Geno Marconi was the result of “personal, petty and/or political biases.” The indictment further alleges she felt the investigation “needed to wrap up quickly because she was recused from important cases pending or imminently pending before the New Hampshire Supreme Court,” per the October charging documents. 

Advertisement

Past case filings from Guerriero state Hantz Marconi requested a meeting with Sununu through his staff, which was then allegedly held with the governor’s legal counsel present during regular business hours. Her attorney also states the meeting was approved by New Hampshire Supreme Court Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald.

“I don’t think we can ignore the fact that Attorney General Formella has a particularly close relationship … with this one very powerful public official,” Guerriero said. “His (Formella’s) personal interests are directly tied to this very powerful and important witness, and under that unique circumstance, not any other circumstance in this case, there is a limitation that’s not fair to the defense.”

Sununu appointed Formella to be the attorney general in 2021. Hantz Marconi was nominated to the New Hampshire Supreme Court by Sununu in 2017 and was sworn in by the governor in August the same year.

Honigberg, the presiding judge in Hantz Marconi’s case, took the matter under advisement and noted a decision on Guerriero’s motion to disqualify state prosecutors will be released at a future date.

Advertisement

Hantz Marconi and Guerriero both declined to speak to reporters after the Monday afternoon proceeding ended.

Attorney general’s prosecutors argue their side

Joe Fincham, assistant attorney general, and Dan Jimenez, senior assistant attorney general, are prosecuting Hantz Marconi’s case. They fought against Guerriero’s motion to disqualify their office from prosecution, stating their office is impartial in the case.

“At it’s heart, it was a motion that, in our estimation, basically demanded special treatment. Just like we would in any other case, we objected, because no one, justice or citizen, is entitled to special treatment in criminal prosecutions,” Fincham said after the motion hearing Monday.

Hantz Marconi remains free on bail

Hantz Marconi was charged with one count of attempting to commit improper influence and one count of criminal solicitation of improper influence, both felonies. She was also charged with two counts of criminal solicitation of misuse of position, one count of criminal solicitation of official oppression, one count of official oppression, and one count of obstructing government administration, all Class A misdemeanors.

Hantz Marconi is free on personal recognizance bail.

Advertisement

Guerriero previously requested prosecutors compile a bill of particulars of all her alleged criminal activity if all the charges against her are not dismissed. 

Hantz Marconi was charged before her husband, Geno Marconi

The New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office announced on Oct. 16 that a Merrimack County Superior Court grand jury indicted Hantz Marconi on the seven charges. A day later, a Rockingham County grand jury’s charges against Geno Marconi were released. 

Geno Marconi was charged with two Class B felony counts for allegedly tampering with witnesses and informants and falsifying physical evidence. He was also hit with four Class A misdemeanors – two counts of Driver Privacy Act violations and two counts of obstructing government administration.

Advertisement

The state’s port director appeared in Rockingham County Superior Court last week, pleading not guilty to six state charges. A county judge approved conditions calling for Geno Marconi to be free on personal recognizance bail and a no-contact order preventing him from discussing the facts of the case with all staff of the Pease Development Authority and the agency’s board of directors.

The criminal charges against the Stratham couple were preceded by both Marconis being placed on leave from their respective positions. 

Hantz Marconi, the third woman to sit on the state’s high court, has been on paid administrative leave from the state Supreme Court since July 25. The order regarding her leave was extended by the remaining Supreme Court justices in mid-October.

In April, Geno Marconi was placed on paid leave from his position, which is overseen by the Pease Development Authority. 



Source link

Advertisement

New Hampshire

Townsend man arrested in connection with two armed robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey, authorities say – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Townsend man arrested in connection with two armed robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey, authorities say – The Boston Globe


Authorities allege Joseph Sawyer brandished what appeared to be a handgun during a robbery at St. Mary’s Bank in Nashua, N.H., on June 12.Boston FBI

A Townsend man was arrested Wednesday night in connection with two armed bank robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey last month, federal authorities said.

Joseph Sawyer, 52, was arrested by FBI Albany’s SWAT team after the bureau’s Boston office and Nashua, N.H., police learned he might be in upstate New York, FBI Boston said in a statement Thursday.

Investigators said the alleged robberies happened at St. Mary’s Bank on Northwest Boulevard in Nashua on June 12 and at a Chase Bank in Boonton, N.J., on June 27.

During both robberies, prosecutors allege Sawyer brandished what appeared to be a black semiautomatic handgun, ordered everyone inside the banks to get on the ground, and demanded their cell phones before stealing cash, according to a criminal complaint filed in New Hampshire federal court.

Advertisement

The complaint alleges Sawyer stole $6,000 from the Nashua bank before fleeing in a Honda minivan. Investigators say he discarded a shopping bag containing the bank manager’s cell phone in a nearby parking lot before driving away.

Investigators linked the two robberies through surveillance footage and license plate reader data, according to court filings. Authorities allege the minivan was driven with stolen New Jersey plates during the Boonton robbery that were later replaced with Massachusetts plates registered to Sawyer’s late father.

Sawyer was charged with one count of bank robbery in New Hampshire, court records show. It was not immediately clear Thursday night if he is being represented by an attorney.

The case is being prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s office for the District of New Hampshire, the FBI said.


Breanne Kovatch can be reached at breanne.kovatch@globe.com. Follow her @breannekovatch.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Trans athletes drop lawsuit to gain access to girls’ sports in New Hampshire after SCOTUS ruling

Published

on

Trans athletes drop lawsuit to gain access to girls’ sports in New Hampshire after SCOTUS ruling


A pair of trans athletes in New Hampshire have dismissed their lawsuit to challenge the state law that protects girls’ sports after the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Title IX ruling on June 30.

Advertisement

The trans teenage plaintiffs, Parker Tirrell and Iris Turmelle, originally filed the lawsuit in 2024 to challenge a current New Hampshire state law prohibiting trans athletes from participating in girls’ sports. The lawsuit later expanded to add President Donald Trump’s administration to the defendants after Trump signed the “No Men in Women’s Sports” executive order on Feb. 5, 2025.

The lawyers for the trans athletes claimed Trump’s executive order, along with parts of a Jan. 20 executive order that forbids federal money from being used to “promote gender ideology,” subjects the teens and all transgender girls to discrimination in violation of federal equal protection guarantees and their rights under Title IX.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

A transgender athlete and the Supreme Court (Getty Images)

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire then ruled last year that female athletes represented by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorneys were permitted to intervene in the case to defend the state’s women’s sports law and the administration’s executive orders.

Advertisement

Now, after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling, which protects state laws that ensure only females compete in girls’ sports, there is no room for the trans teens to fight the law in New Hampshire.

“Women and girls deserve privacy, safety, and equal opportunities. That can’t happen when males are competing in women’s sports, taking spots on women’s athletic teams, and winning women’s championships,” ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of Litigation Strategy Jonathan Scruggs said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital.

USA POWERLIFTING, ONCE IN TRANS ATHLETE LAWSUIT, SUPPORTS SCOTUS RULING: ‘LAW HAS CAUGHT UP WITH THE SCIENCE’

“President Trump’s executive orders and New Hampshire’s law recognize common sense and track Title IX, the federal law that ensures equal opportunities for women in athletics. We are grateful this case is coming to an end and that New Hampshire is free to protect its female athletes.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to Tirrell and Turmelle’s attorneys at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) for a response.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

A protester waves a transgender pride flag outside of the U.S. Supreme Court Building on June 18, 2025 in Washington, DC. Advocates organized a rally in response the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in US v. Skrmetti, in which the justices ruled to uphold state bans on gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The SCOTUS rulings in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, the high court upheld state laws requiring student-athletes to compete on sports teams that correspond with their biological sex at birth rather than their gender identity, in a 6-3 decision.

However, there are still 23 states, including California, New York and Massachusetts, that don’t have any such laws, and some of those have laws to protect trans athletes in girls’ sports.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

New Hampshire Gov. signs law requiring schools to out trans kids

Published

on

New Hampshire Gov. signs law requiring schools to out trans kids


New Hampshire Gov. Kelly Ayotte has signed legislation requiring public school employees to disclose information about transgender students to their parents or legal guardians, reversing a 2024 state Supreme Court ruling that upheld students’ privacy rights in certain circumstances.

Advertisement

Ayotte’s office announced on 2 July that the legislation had been signed into law. Under SB 430, educators must respond to written requests from parents for “material information” about their child, even if a student has asked that the information be kept confidential or fears negative consequences at home.

Supporters of the legislation, such as Republican state Senator Tim Lang, argue the measure strengthens parental rights and enables families to better support children who may be struggling. “If you don’t tell the parent, the parent can’t watch for the signs of self-harm,” Lang told New Hampshire Public Radio.

Educators and LGBTQ+ advocates, however, say the law places teachers in an impossible position by forcing them to choose between complying with the law and protecting vulnerable students. Megan Tuttle, president of NEA-New Hampshire, the state’s largest teachers’ union, said in a statement that the legislation is “vaguely written and risks putting educators in a position of outing a student.” She added that schools should remain places where every student feels “safe, seen, and free to be themselves.”

Aimee Terravechia, executive director of LGBTQ+ advocacy group 603 Equality, warned the law could erode trust between students and educators while speaking with New Hampshire Public Radio. “Schools should be a place of learning… and a place of critical self-examination,” she said. “Placing educators into a role of monitoring and reporting removes the trust necessary for a thriving academic environment.”

Advertisement

The legislation also effectively overturns a 2024 New Hampshire Supreme Court decision, in which justices ruled that keeping a student’s gender identity confidential did not unlawfully interfere with parents’ rights, noting that parents still retained numerous ways to support and communicate with their children outside the classroom.

Share your thoughts! Let us know in the comments below, and remember to keep the conversation respectful.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending