Connect with us

Massachusetts

Trump’s pick for top federal prosecutor in Massachusetts will crackdown on illegal immigration – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Trump’s pick for top federal prosecutor in Massachusetts will crackdown on illegal immigration – The Boston Globe


The country’s 94 US attorneys are political appointees who historically step down following a change in administration from one political party to another. That usually leaves the first assistant US attorney to lead the office until the president’s nominee passes an intensive background check and is confirmed by the Senate. Local observers say Trump appears to be moving faster.

“I’d expect a short window of time for the Trump administration to act on these positions,” said Boston attorney Brian T. Kelly, a partner at Nixon Peabody LLP and former federal prosecutor who headed the public corruption unit. “It’s different this time because he is focusing on appointments across the board because his victory was so clear cut. … He also now has experience with the federal bureaucracy and realizes that these things take time to get approved so he’s got to act quickly.”

The US attorney for Massachusetts oversees about 200 attorneys, paralegals, and other staff in offices in Boston, Springfield, and Worcester.

Kelly, a Republican, has been mentioned in legal and political circles as a contender for the US attorney job under Trump, but declined to say if he is vying for it other than to say, “Anyone would be honored to be considered.”

Advertisement

Kelly represented Trump in a civil case brought earlier this year by a group that unsuccessfully tried to remove him from the Republican presidential primary ballot in Massachusetts. The case was part of a national effort to remove Trump from ballots, claiming he was ineligible to serve because of his alleged role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, an argument that was unanimously rejected by the US Supreme Court.

Others being touted as possible nominees are Andrew Lelling, who served as US attorney for Massachusetts during Trump’s first term and is a partner at Jones Day; Assistant US Attorney Leah B. Foley, who was a finalist for the job when it went to Lelling and is deputy chief of the narcotics and money laundering unit; Robert Fisher, a partner at Nixon Peabody LLP and former federal prosecutor; and Nathaniel Mendell, a partner at Morrison Foerster who was Lelling’s first assistant and led the office for 10 months before Rachael Rollins was sworn in in January 2022 following a contentious, partisan battle for confirmation.

They all declined to comment on whether they are seeking the job.

Fisher did say he thinks Trump will tap “someone known to one of the advisers who has his ear” or has ties to his transition team.

“What he’s looking for is obviously a conservative who is aggressive on the type of crime they’re looking to target: guns, drugs, and illegal immigration,” Fisher said.

Advertisement

Trump has specifically vowed to make a crackdown on illegal immigration a top priority.

Carmen Ortiz, who served as US attorney for Massachusetts from 2009 to 2017 during the Obama administration and resigned a week before Trump’s first inauguration, predicted the president-elect’s administration will aggressively crack down on all types of immigration cases in Massachusetts because it is home to a number of sanctuary cities. Moreover, some local political leaders, including Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, have said they won’t assist federal law enforcement in any mass deportation efforts, leading to early public verbal exchanges with Trump’s advisers.

“I think they are planning to do as much as they can to send a message on day one,” Ortiz said. “They want to send a message with very aggressive enforcement initiatives.”

Ortiz said that would likely include prosecuting people who are in the country illegally, even if they have not committed crimes; prioritizing immigration fraud, and possibly conducting raids on work sites. As a result, she predicted the US attorney’s office will be tasked with pursuing more criminal cases connected to illegal immigrants, and also with defending the Trump administration in civil cases if it pursues its pledge to conduct mass deportations.

Mendell, who led the US attorney’s office before Rollins took over, agreed that immigration would be a core issue during Trump’s second term, but said, “The emphasis will be people who are here illegally who also have serious criminal records and have been previously deported.”

Advertisement

He also predicted Trump’s attorney general will direct prosecutors to seek harsher penalties for defendants in some cases than those recommended under the Biden administration.

“Violent crimes will be approached differently, more aggressively,” Mendell said.

B. Stephanie Siegmann, a partner at Hinckley Allen and former federal prosecutor who served as chief of the national security unit in the Massachusetts US attorney’s office until 2022, predicted the Trump administration will make national security threats from China, Russia, and Iran a higher priority.

“There has been a coordination in alliances between China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea that are of grave concern,” Siegmann said. “We face unprecedented national security threats from those countries.”

Siegmann said a national strike force launched by law enforcement and intelligence agencies in February 2023 to prevent China and other nationstate adversaries from stealing advanced technology from the United States will likely be expanded upon under Trump.

Advertisement

The next US attorney for Massachusetts will inherit an office that was thrown into tumult during the Biden administration while Rollins, the progressive former Suffolk district attorney, was at the helm. She resigned in May 2023 amid two blistering reports by the Justice Department’s Inspector General and the US Office of Special Counsel, which found she committed a series of flagrant ethics violations, including engaging in partisan political activity while on duty.

Joshua S. Levy, who was Rollins’s second-in-command, has been running the office as acting US attorney since May 2023. Biden nominated him for US attorney in October 2023, but a confirmation vote was blocked in the Senate by Vice President-elect JD Vance. On Monday, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Levy to the position of US attorney, but he will be required to step down in mid-January when his interim appointment expires.

Just over a week after winning the election, Trump announced he would nominate Jay Clayton, the former chairman of the Securities and Exchange commission to serve as US attorney for the Southern District of New York, which oversees Manhattan. He has also nominated former Florida attorney general Pam Bondi to lead the Department of Justice.


Shelley Murphy can be reached at shelley.murphy@globe.com. Follow her @shelleymurph.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Armed man barricades himself inside home in Dover, police say

Published

on

Armed man barricades himself inside home in Dover, police say


A police standoff is underway in Dover, Massachusetts, after an armed man allegedly barricaded himself inside a home Friday morning.

Dover police said they were first called to Claybrook Road around 11 a.m. for a report of an “unwanted person.” When they arrived they found a man armed with a knife. According to police, the man has barricaded himself inside a home.

It was not immediately clear if anyone else was inside the home.

Mutual aid has been called in. The situation is ongoing.

Advertisement

No other details were immediately available.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts lawmakers push for an effort to ban all tobacco sales over time

Published

on

Massachusetts lawmakers push for an effort to ban all tobacco sales over time


Health

If the bill is approved, young people not old enough to legally purchase nicotine and tobacco would never be lawfully able to purchase them in Massachusetts, thereby creating no more new users.

AP Photo/Jenny Kane, File

  • Medford and Lexington are weighing a ‘generational ban’ on tobacco sales this week, and retailers aren’t happy


  • SJC upholds Brookline’s ban on tobacco sales to people born this century

BOSTON (AP) — A handful of Massachusetts lawmakers are hoping to persuade their colleagues to support a proposal that would make the state the first to adopt a ban meant to eliminate the use of tobacco products over time.

Other locations have weighed similar “generational tobacco bans,” which phase out the use of tobacco products based not just on a person’s age but on birth year.

Under a Massachusetts law signed in 2018, the age to buy any tobacco product — including cigarettes, cigars and e-cigarettes — was raised to 21. Massachusetts also has banned the sale of all flavored tobacco products in an effort to reduce youth interest in nicotine.

The new proposal, which lawmakers plan to file next year, would expand the effort to curb smoking by gradually ending all sales of nicotine and tobacco products. If the bill is approved, young people not old enough to legally purchase nicotine and tobacco would never be lawfully able to purchase them in Massachusetts, thereby creating no more new users.

It would not apply to marijuana, and the cutoff date would be adjusted when passed to ensure everyone age 21 and above at that time would not be affected.

Advertisement

First town to adopt a generational smoking ban

Brookline, a town of about 63,000 neighboring Boston, was the first municipality in the country to adopt such a ban in 2020. Instead of raising the age for purchasing cigarettes, the bylaw blocks the sale of tobacco to anyone born on or after Jan. 1, 2000. The rule went into effect in 2021.

That would mean at some point in the future no one would be allowed to buy any tobacco products in the town. The measure was challenged, but the state’s highest court weighed in earlier this year, upholding the ban.

Other Massachusetts cities and towns already have approved similar tobacco bans, including Malden, Melrose, Reading, Stoneham, Wakefield, and Winchester.

Unclear levels of support

Democratic state Sen. Jason Lewis, one of the backers of the statewide proposal, said the bill would “save countless lives and create a healthier world for the next generation.”

“We all know the devastating health effects of nicotine and tobacco products, especially on our youth,” he said.

Advertisement

Nicotine and tobacco products are addictive and can increase the risk of lung cancer, heart disease, stroke and other illnesses.

Nearly 9 out of 10 adults who smoke cigarettes daily first tried smoking by age 18, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which also found that in 2024 about 2 in 5 students who had ever used a tobacco product currently used them.

Peter Brennan, executive director of the New England Convenience Store and Energy Marketers Association, said the proposal would undercut small mom and pop shops that rely on cigarettes for a significant portion of their sales.

It also would put stores located near neighboring states that allow the sale of cigarettes to all adults at a competitive disadvantage.

“It’s a terrible idea,” he said. “You’re really just taking away adults’ right to purchase a legal, age-restricted product.”

Advertisement

Taking certain rights away from some adults and not others is likely unconstitutional, he said, adding that other prohibition efforts haven’t worked, like past bans on alcohol, marijuana and gambling.

It’s unclear how much support the proposal has in the Legislature.

Massachusetts has taken other steps in recent decades to curb smoking, including raising taxes on cigarettes. Those taxes would presumably be reduced and ultimately eliminated by an incremental statewide smoking ban.

Any reduction in cigarette tax revenue would be more than offset by reduced healthcare costs and other savings, Lewis said.

In 2022, 10.4% of adults in Massachusetts reported smoking cigarettes, according to the state Department of Public Health.

Advertisement

Other places weighing similar bans

Some California lawmakers have pushed to ban all tobacco sales, filing legislation last year to make it illegal to sell cigarettes and other products to anyone born after Jan. 1, 2007.

In 2022, New Zealand became the first nation to pass a law intended to impose a lifetime ban on young people buying cigarettes by mandating that tobacco can’t ever be sold to anybody born on or after Jan. 1, 2009. The law was later axed.

In the U.K., Prime Minister Rishi Sunak proposed raising the legal age that people in England can buy cigarettes by one year, every year until it is eventually illegal for the whole population. The proposal failed to win approval earlier this year.





Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Some Massachusetts Lawmakers Push ‘Generational Tobacco Ban’

Published

on

Some Massachusetts Lawmakers Push ‘Generational Tobacco Ban’


BOSTON — A handful of Massachusetts lawmakers are hoping to persuade their colleagues to support a proposal that would make the state the first to adopt a ban meant to eliminate the use of tobacco products over time.

Other locations have weighed similar “generational tobacco bans,” which phase out the use of tobacco products based not just on a person’s age but on birth year.

Under a Massachusetts law signed in 2018, the age to buy any tobacco product—including cigarettes, cigars and e-cigarettes—was raised to 21. Massachusetts also has banned the sale of all flavored tobacco products in an effort to reduce youth interest in nicotine.

Read More: How to Get 4.5 Million Americans to Quit Smoking

Advertisement

The new proposal, which lawmakers plan to file next year, would expand the effort to curb smoking by gradually ending all sales of nicotine and tobacco products. If the bill is approved, young people not old enough to legally purchase nicotine and tobacco would never be lawfully able to purchase them in Massachusetts, thereby creating no more new users.

It would not apply to marijuana, and the cutoff date would be adjusted when passed to ensure everyone age 21 and above at that time would not be affected.

First town to adopt a generational smoking ban

Brookline, a town of about 63,000 neighboring Boston, was the first municipality in the country to adopt such a ban in 2020. Instead of raising the age for purchasing cigarettes, the bylaw blocks the sale of tobacco to anyone born on or after Jan. 1, 2000. The rule went into effect in 2021.

That would mean at some point in the future no one would be allowed to buy any tobacco products in the town. The measure was challenged, but the state’s highest court weighed in earlier this year, upholding the ban.

Other Massachusetts cities and towns already have approved similar tobacco bans, including Malden, Melrose, Reading, Stoneham, Wakefield, and Winchester.

Advertisement

Unclear levels of support

Democratic state Sen. Jason Lewis, one of the backers of the statewide proposal, said the bill would “save countless lives and create a healthier world for the next generation.”

“We all know the devastating health effects of nicotine and tobacco products, especially on our youth,” he said.

Nicotine and tobacco products are addictive and can increase the risk of lung cancer, heart disease, stroke and other illnesses.

Nearly 9 out of 10 adults who smoke cigarettes daily first tried smoking by age 18, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which also found that in 2024 about 2 in 5 students who had ever used a tobacco product currently used them.

Peter Brennan, executive director of the New England Convenience Store and Energy Marketers Association, said the proposal would undercut small mom and pop shops that rely on cigarettes for a significant portion of their sales.

Advertisement

It also would put stores located near neighboring states that allow the sale of cigarettes to all adults at a competitive disadvantage.

“It’s a terrible idea,” he said. “You’re really just taking away adults’ right to purchase a legal, age-restricted product.”

Taking certain rights away from some adults and not others is likely unconstitutional, he said, adding that other prohibition efforts haven’t worked, like past bans on alcohol, marijuana and gambling.

It’s unclear how much support the proposal has in the Legislature.

Massachusetts has taken other steps in recent decades to curb smoking, including raising taxes on cigarettes. Those taxes would presumably be reduced and ultimately eliminated by an incremental statewide smoking ban.

Advertisement

Any reduction in cigarette tax revenue would be more than offset by reduced healthcare costs and other savings, Lewis said.

In 2022, 10.4% of adults in Massachusetts reported smoking cigarettes, according to the state Department of Public Health.

Other places weighing similar bans

Some California lawmakers have pushed to ban all tobacco sales, filing legislation last year to make it illegal to sell cigarettes and other products to anyone born after Jan. 1, 2007.

In 2022, New Zealand became the first nation to pass a law intended to impose a lifetime ban on young people buying cigarettes by mandating that tobacco can’t ever be sold to anybody born on or after Jan. 1, 2009. The law was later axed.

In the U.K., Prime Minister Rishi Sunak proposed raising the legal age that people in England can buy cigarettes by one year, every year until it is eventually illegal for the whole population. The proposal failed to win approval earlier this year.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending