Connect with us

Massachusetts

Massachusetts Senate strengthens protections for abortion care providers

Published

on

Massachusetts Senate strengthens protections for abortion care providers


With the Supreme Courtroom quickly poised to strike down Roe v. Wade, the Massachusetts Senate on Wednesday swiftly accredited a funds modification that might defend reproductive care suppliers within the commonwealth who ship companies to individuals from states with abortion bans.

Sen. Cindy Friedman’s modification shields suppliers of each reproductive and gender-affirming well being care companies which can be authorized in Massachusetts — even when they don’t seem to be permitted elsewhere, akin to in Texas or Oklahoma.

However her profitable proposal, which Friedman stated is a “very sturdy and constitutionally-based response” to extraterritorial legal guidelines, can not insulate well being care offers from legal or civil penalties outdoors of the commonwealth.

“We are actually confronted with a scenario the place one other state, by state legal guidelines enacted by their legislatures, is threatening the rights of law-abiding residents in our commonwealth for partaking in actions which can be authorized beneath our legal guidelines and have been enacted by our duly elected Legislature right here in Massachusetts,” Friedman stated on the Senate ground. “That is an egregious and direct assault on a state’s capacity to make their very own legal guidelines and defend their very own residents.”

Advertisement

Friedman, in an interview with MassLive earlier Wednesday, mirrored on her time spent marching within the Nineteen Seventies for abortion protections. The nationwide second now’s “deeply, deeply, deeply disheartening and really, very scary,” she stated.

“What’s most annoying to me is that we are actually in a spot the place states are taking their long-arm attain into my state and making it tough for my suppliers and my fellow residents to observe legally protected well being care,” Friedman informed MassLive.

The profitable modification — wrapped into a virtually $50 million funds that’s nonetheless being debated within the chamber, earlier than it heads to negotiations with Senate and Home members to reconcile diverging insurance policies — additionally protects doctor assistants, nurses, psychologists, social employees and different people linked to the supply of reproductive or gender-affirming care, in response to a doc shared by Senate President Karen Spilka’s workplace.

Senate funds writers have additionally carved out $2 million for abortion and reproductive well being care entry inside their preliminary fiscal 2023 funds proposal, in an allotment that’s $1.5 million greater than what the Home of Representatives accredited in its funds final month.

Spilka, in an announcement celebrating the modification’s passage, praised the Senate for taking “decisive motion.”

Advertisement

“Let me be clear: the Senate will at all times defend the rights of our residents to entry reproductive and gender-affirming well being care,” stated Spilka, who in latest days has hinted at pending laws to strengthen abortion protections already enshrined into Massachusetts state legislation.

Friedman, cautious of bounty-style provisions allowed elsewhere in america, stated her modification prevents Massachusetts state legislation enforcements companies from aiding out-of-state or federal companies looking for details about companies “constituting legally protected well being care actions in Massachusetts.”

Equally, the proposal restricts Massachusetts courts from ordering individuals to present testimony or produce paperwork about authorized well being care companies.

“Anybody who faces abusive litigation in one other state over legally protected well being reproductive and gender-affirming care companies can sue in Massachusetts courts to acquire a judgment, or amongst different issues, damages — together with precise damages, bills, prices and cheap lawyer charges in opposition to the one that sued them,” Friedman stated in her official remarks.

The modification additionally implements a statewide standing order that directs insurers to cowl emergency contraception prices, Senate Majority Chief Cindy Creem famous in her remarks. Making certain entry to reproductive and gender-affirming care is “core to our state insurance policies,” she stated.

Advertisement

“We have to do what we are able to to take away limitations to such entry and ensure girls within the commonwealth of Massachusetts keep company over their reproductive choices and have the alternatives they deserve,” Creem stated on the Senate ground.

Amid impassioned remarks over Roe v. Wade, Sen. Julian Cyr broadened the modification’s give attention to the “unprecedented assault” on the LGBTQ neighborhood, particularly transgender youth. Greater than 200 anti-LGBTQ payments have been filed in state legislatures this 12 months, with over half concentrating on transgender individuals, Cyr stated.

“This modification makes clear that actions and legal guidelines that impede entry to gender-affirming care companies are opposite to public coverage and demonstrates that we’ll do every little thing that’s throughout the commonwealth’s management to attempt to defend suppliers, helpers and sufferers from such interference on this time — as soon as unimaginable, the place the civil rights of girls and LGBTQ persons are on the cusp of systemic erosion in different states on this union,” Cyr stated on the Senate ground.

The Past Roe Coalition — together with Reproductive Fairness Now, the ACLU of Massachusetts and Deliberate Parenthood Advocacy Fund of Massachusetts — praised the Senate’s motion Wednesday.

“As our Commonwealth prepares for the autumn of federal constitutional abortion protections, sturdy state management on reproductive fairness points is essential to make sure each particular person has entry to the total spectrum of reproductive well being care,” Rebecca Hart Holder, government director of Reproductive Fairness Now, stated in an announcement. “I’m proud that the Massachusetts legislature is performing to fulfill this monumental problem and guarantee our Commonwealth stays a beacon for reproductive freedom.”

Advertisement

Associated Content material:



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Massachusetts military secrets leaker Jack Teixeira sentenced to 15 years in prison

Published

on

Massachusetts military secrets leaker Jack Teixeira sentenced to 15 years in prison


The Massachusetts Air National Guard tech support member responsible for “one of the most significant leaks of classified documents and information in United States history” will spend a decade and a half behind bars.

U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani sentenced Jack Teixeira to 180 months, which is 15 years, in federal prison at a sentencing hearing in federal court in Boston’s Seaport on Tuesday afternoon. She also ordered, among other conditions, that he enter a mental health treatment program and barred him from taking any jobs where he would have access to sensitive government materials. She did not impose a fine because he did not have the resources to pay a fine.

“I wanted to say I’m sorry for all the harm I’ve wrought and I’ve caused,” Teixeira, wearing an orange Plymouth County Correctional Facility jumpsuit, said before Talwani delivered her sentence.

“I can’t really sum up how contrite I am that my behavior has caused such a maelstrom,” the 22-year-old continued, “affecting my family and everyone overseas. I understand that all of the responsibility and consequences come on my shoulders alone and I accept whatever that will bring. I’m at your mercy, your honor.”

Advertisement

Teixeira, of Dighton, was arrested in April 2023 and pleaded guilty in March to six counts of willful retention and transmission of national defense information under the Espionage Act.

Teixeira, who served as a Cyber Defense Operations Journeyman at Otis Air National Guard Base on Cape Cod, leaked more than 40 highly classified military documents, including many regarding Russia’s war in Ukraine, to a cadre of fellow video game players on the social media platform Discord.

He was looking at a maximum of more than 16 years for his crimes, if Talwani had followed the plea agreement, which she wasn’t bound by in calculating sentencing. Teixeira entered the plea agreement in late February and finalized with his guilty pleas days later on March 4.

Boston FBI Special Agent in Charge Jodi Cohen called Teixeira “a textbook example of an insider threat.”

“His actions compromised military plans, sources and methods, and allowed our most significant adversaries access to some of our most closely guarded intelligence,” she continued in a press conference following sentencing.

Advertisement

Acting U.S. Attorney Joshua Levy at the same press conference said that the “heavy price” of the sentence “sends a powerful message to every individual who holds a top secret clearance.”

“I expect that starting tomorrow, Jack Teixeira’s name will be mentioned when people are trained about the gravity of a top secret clearance and the consequences if you leak information,” Levy said.

Sentencing arguments

The federal prosecutor, Jared Dolan, in arguing for a sentence of 200 months, called Teixeira’s crimes “exceptionally serious” and compared his actions to those of Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning. He said that the sentence should be large enough to be a huge deterrent to anyone else who is considering such disclosures.

“Our military is built on a backbone of people his age and younger,” Dolan said. “And we trust that the training for those individuals put them in a place to succeed and that’s what they do every single day.”

“The defendants job was to not tell anyone else, what he promised to not tell anyone else,” he continued. “Youthful brains make impulsive decisions, but this was not an impulsive decision and if it was then it was an impulsive decision that he made every day for more than a year.”

Advertisement

Talwani spoke at length about her thought process on sentencing a crime for which there was “very little case law.”

“It seems to me that this is not one harm, this is multiple harms,” Talwani said when arguing that she disagreed with the plea agreement’s argument that the crimes could be grouped. She compared it to rape or robbery, to where even if the victim remained the same each new offense was a different crime.

“Yes the victim is the same here, the victim is the United States,” she continued. “But I don’t know how you can say it’s the same if he did it for one month instead of 13 months. … Each time you are creating a new risk, each time is new information, new disclosure.”

In sentencing memos filed last month, the defense recommended a sentence of 11 years whereas the prosecution recommended a sentence of 16 years and eight months, citing not only the need for Teixeira’s adequate punishment but to deter anyone else from even considering similar actions.

Defense attorney Michael Bachrach argued that Teixeira had no intention whatsoever to harm the United States, and that “motive matters.”

Advertisement

Unlike Manning and Snowden, who each chose to disclose secrets with purpose, Bachrach argued that Teixeira’s “truly bad decision making” was built on both his youth and his autism and wanting to find a community.

“What he cared about was having a community to speak to because he didn’t have that community at Otis Air Base,” Bachrach said, adding that his recommended sentence of 11 years is “significant” and is more time than half of the defendant’s life at the time of the crimes.

Talwani took some exception with Bachrach’s argument but did agree that she was leaning toward a downward departure based on Teixeira’s age.

Margaret Small via AP, File

This artist depiction shows Massachusetts Air National Guardsman Jack Teixeira, right, appearing in U.S. District Court in Boston, April 14, 2023. (Margaret Small via AP, File)

Jack Teixeira of Dighton is taken into custody in April 2023. (AP photo)

AP photo

Jack Teixeira of Dighton is taken into custody in April 2023. (AP photo)

 

Advertisement

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Winning $50,000 Powerball ticket sold in Massachusetts

Published

on

Winning ,000 Powerball ticket sold in Massachusetts


A lottery player won $50,000 playing Powerball in Massachusetts on Monday.

The winning numbers for the Powerball drawing on Nov. 11 were 3, 21, 24, 34, 46 and Powerball: 9. The multiplier was a 3X.

The $50,000 ticket sold in Massachusetts matched four of the first five numbers, and the Powerball number. It was sold in Waltham at a 7-Eleven.

Overall, at least 200 prizes worth $600 or more were won or claimed in Massachusetts on Monday, including eight in Springfield, seven in Worcester and 20 in Boston.

Advertisement

The Massachusetts State Lottery releases a full list of winning tickets every day. The list only includes winning tickets worth more than $600.

So far, the largest lottery prize won in Massachusetts this year was worth $1 million a year for life.

The prize was from the lottery’s “Lifetime Millions” scratch ticket game. The winner claimed their prize through a trust on July 10, and opted to receive a one-time payment of $15.4 million.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Schools closed in 3 Massachusetts communities Tuesday as teacher strike continues

Published

on

Schools closed in 3 Massachusetts communities Tuesday as teacher strike continues


GLOUCESTER – Still at a deadlock, 10,000 students in three North Shore communities have classes canceled on Tuesday, as the teacher strike continues in Gloucester, Beverly, and Marblehead.

The three unions spoke together Monday night, accusing their school committees of digging in their heels at the bargaining table while school leaders accused the unions of colluding to drag negotiations.

All three teacher union contracts expired on August 31st, 2024.

“It is not a coincidence, it’s a message that these issues are felt widely and deeply across the North Shore,” said Andrea Sherman, co-president of the Beverly Teachers Association.

Advertisement

“It is the school committee and their attorneys for all three districts that are colluding together to draw this out,” said Jonathan Heller president of the Marblehead Education Association.

Teacher Strikes Massachusetts
Teachers and supporters display placards during a rally, Monday, Nov. 11, 2024, in Gloucester, Mass., held to call attention to pay, paid parental leave, and other issues.

Steven Senne / AP


In Gloucester, right now, school leaders say the town and teachers are $800,000 a year apart on salaries alone, plus school officials said under the union’s proposal 24 teachers would be laid off over three years.

“We are committed to mediating long into the night, but our teachers should be in the school during the day with their students,” said School Committee President Kathy Clancy. “That is unacceptable and most definitely not in the best interest of our students.”

Advertisement

“To meet their proposal would mean either a tax override resulting in a permanent increase to taxes or cuts to services to our taxpayers and residents,” said Gloucester Mayor Greg Verga.

Striking teachers rally together  

Monday afternoon, teachers on the picket line from each district rallied with their biggest goals in mind: better wages for underpaid paraprofessionals and safer schools.

“It feels amazing because we have seen so much community support and this is just really empowering us to continue to do right by our students,” said Beverly Teacher Lauren Lauranzano.

Since teacher strikes are illegal in Massachusetts, a judge had ordered the Gloucester and Beverly teachers to be back in the classroom on Tuesday, but now they’ll be headed to court.

Marblehead will start it’s strike which was announced on Friday after failed negotiations.

Advertisement

The president of the state teacher’s union is in solidarity with the teacher unions, saying these are issues educators face statewide.

“Our members are saying get to the bargaining table, let’s stay all night, lets resolve these issues. These are not new issues, all of these locals have been bargaining for months and months,” said Max Page, president of the Massachusetts Teachers Association. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending