Connect with us

Massachusetts

Massachusetts court blocks ballot question affecting Uber, Lyft drivers

Published

on

Massachusetts court blocks ballot question affecting Uber, Lyft drivers


Massachusetts’ excessive courtroom has blocked a poll measure from shifting ahead that may have requested voters if app-based drivers for firms like Uber, Lyft and Instacart needs to be handled as impartial contractors relatively than workers with common shifts, advantages and hourly wages.

The Supreme Judicial courtroom dominated on Tuesday that poll questions supported by a coalition of drivers for the big-tech service suppliers overreached of their try to incorporate a proposal that may restrict the businesses’ legal responsibility in case of accidents on the street.

The bulk opinion penned by Justice Scott Kafker took no problem with a lot of the language included within the query, which is “dedicated to defining a brand new contract-based relationship between community firms and app-based drivers.” However the justices dominated “vaguely worded provisions… close to the top” are in violation as a result of they erroneously introduce a separate, unrelated coverage proposal.

“The petitions thus violate the associated topics requirement as a result of they current voters with two substantively distinct coverage selections: one confined for essentially the most half to the contract-based and voluntary relationship between app-based drivers and community firms; the opposite — couched in confusingly imprecise and open-ended provisions — apparently in search of to restrict the community firms’ legal responsibility to 3rd events injured by app-based drivers’ tortious conduct,” the justice wrote.

Advertisement

Legal professional Basic Maura Healey in September green-lit the ballot-measure, a transfer challenged by a gaggle of employee advocates and drivers, arguing that Healey shouldn’t have licensed the proposals as a result of they violate the state’s structure.

The legal professional basic defended the certification, as did a gaggle of app-based drivers who supported the initiative. The legal professional basic’s workplace didn’t instantly reply to questions on Tuesday.

It’s unclear at this level whether or not Healey’s workplace and the coalition of drivers who again the proposal — Flexibility & Advantages for Massachusetts Drivers — plan to attraction the courtroom opinion.

“A transparent majority of Massachusetts voters and rideshare and supply drivers each supported and would have handed this poll query into legislation. That’s precisely why opponents resorted to litigation to subvert the democratic course of and deny voters the proper to make their very own determination,” a spokesman for Flexibility & Advantages for Massachusetts Drivers mentioned in an announcement. “The way forward for these companies and the drivers who earn on them is now in jeopardy, and we hope the Legislature will stand with the 80% of drivers who need flexibility and to stay impartial contractors whereas getting access to new advantages.”

Critics of the poll proposal say the contract-based work leaves drivers idling of their automobiles for lengthy hours leading to low wages and permits big-moneyed tech giants to get out of paying for advantages together with sick time and paid go away. Supporters, together with many drivers, mentioned the set-up gives flexibility for drivers to earn on their very own time exterior of the constraints of normal shift work.

Advertisement

The query pitched by tech firms like Uber and DoorDash is a response to a lawsuit from Healey, now a candidate for governor, that final 12 months accused tech firms of violating Massachusetts wage legal guidelines by not classifying their employees as full workers.

The Massachusetts poll is seen because the battleground the place tech giants search to bypass laws that threatens their impartial contractor mannequin for gig drivers.

The poll effort following courtroom problem mirror the efforts of gig firms in California the place they bankrolled a $200 million marketing campaign to move Prop 22 in 2020. The measure handed however was dominated unconstitutional by a state trial courtroom. The case is now pending earlier than California’s intermediate-level courtroom of appeals.

Associated Content material:



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

This Bedroom Activity is Very Risky in Massachusetts

Published

on

This Bedroom Activity is Very Risky in Massachusetts


Massachusetts is home to some strange laws. Many of the laws were passed years, and years ago so they don’t hold up or are enforced today, yet they are still on the books.

There’s One Bedroom Activity That’s Technically Illegal in Massachusetts

One particular Massachusetts law I found interesting is something that people do every day in the privacy of theirhomes: snoring. Believe it or not, there’s a law in Massachusetts (according to multiple sources) that prohibits snoring in your home unless all bedroom windows are closed and securely locked.

Is There Any Logic Behind This Massachusetts Law? 

Okay, in one small way I get that you don’t want to disturb the peace hence, the closing of the windows, but does one snore so loudly that neighbors throughout the neighborhood are disturbed by it? I find that hard to believe but then again maybe it has happened. Laws are formed for a reason. Furthermore, is the locking of windows really going to make that big of a difference?

Another question I have about this is what if I fall asleep in my kitchen, living room and/or basement and those windows are open but the bedroom windows are closed and locked? Is the act of snoring still illegal? Technically the state of the bedroom windows would be following the law.

Advertisement

This is a lot of silliness but it is fun to examine these strange Massachusetts laws and poke holes in them. Residents of Boston, Worcester, the Berkshires, and everywhere in between better take note and keep the snoring to a low roar.

Could you imagine if this Massachusetts snoring law was strictly enforced? Oh, my word. Many of my family members would be paying a fine or spending a night in the big house. This includes me. I wonder if it would be illegal for them/us to snore in jail…lol.

LOOK: 15 formerly popular foods in America that are rarely eaten today

Stacker researched the history of popular foods, from Jell-O salads to Salisbury steak, and highlighted 15 that are no longer widely consumed.

Gallery Credit: Stacker

LOOKS: Things you’d likely see in an awesomely ’80s garage

From scandalous bikini calendars to your dad’s AMC Gremlin, ’80s garages were a treasure trove of adventure, good fun, and sometimes downright danger.

Gallery Credit: Stephen Lenz

Advertisement

LOOK: 35 Vintage Cereals That Perfectly Captured Pop Culture Moments

Movies and TV shows have always found ways to partner with cereal companies as part of their promotion strategy. While some may have come up with a giveaway in boxes, others went big by having their own cereal connected to the movie or TV show title. Here are vintage cereals that were used to promote some of pop culture’s biggest moments (and some you probably forgot about).

Gallery Credit: Rob Carroll





Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

California man charged with threatening to ‘shoot up’ Massachusetts businesses in explicit voicemails

Published

on

California man charged with threatening to ‘shoot up’ Massachusetts businesses in explicit voicemails


A California man is charged with threatening to shoot up Massachusetts companies over five extremely explicit phone calls.

Subscribe to continue reading this article.

Already subscribed? To login in, click here.

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Treasure mystery: Who found the gold statue in Mass. woods — and who gets the bounty?

Published

on

Treasure mystery: Who found the gold statue in Mass. woods — and who gets the bounty?


We now know the identity of the clever treasure hunter who tracked down a gold statue worth more than $25,000 — though whether he gets to keep tens of thousands more in bounty money apparently remains up in the air.

Dan Leonard, a meteorologist in Andover, Massachusetts, was identified as the winner, not by the founders of Project Skydrop, but by NBC affiliate News Center Maine, which actually introduced Leonard and the people whose puzzle he solved in the woods of Wendell State Forest.

Leonard described the moment to founders Jason Rohrer and Tom Bailey like this: “I’m kind of in disbelief that this is happening. I see the camera so expertly hidden in that stump, and I think, ‘Oh my god.’”

The digital treasure hunt for the gold statue whose value was appraised at $26,536.25 sparked widespread speculation from puzzle enthusiasts and more. The founders created clues to make the search hard, but not too hard, specifying an area where the 10-ounce, 24-karat gold statue could be that shrank every day. People could also pay $20 to receive a daily clue, which helped fund the bounty.

Advertisement

People are searching for a golden statue worth more than $25,000.

The circle was centered roughly on Greenfield, Massachusetts, north along the Connecticut River from Springfield.

The person who tracked the statue down was seen on cameras grabbing the puzzle off the floor, but the Skydrop organizers didn’t hear from him until News Center Maine reached out. Leonard explained that he narrowed down where the treasure could be based on the temperature recorded in the camera, plus the cloud cover and plant life seen in the stream.


Advertisement

Project Skydrop

The winner claiming the gold statue at the heart of Project Skydrop’s treasure hunt on Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2024, at 5:19 p.m.

When they did meet, Leonard learned there was a catch to claiming the bounty, as News Center Maine reported: the prize could only be accessed by solving clues written onto the trophy itself, which technically meant that anyone with access to the statue could crack the code and claim the money.

Leonard was surprised, but not particularly bothered, saying, “Let’s say I don’t get it: I still had a really good time and got a treasure out of it.”

Rohrer shared more about the circumstances around Leonard’s victory in a message to the game’s official Discord server, a social media chat site where players were able to get more information about what happened.

The winner’s name is Dan Leonard. A news channel up in Maine figured out who he was, based on their meteorologist connections. They connected us with him, and we got to talk to him on camera yesterday. That encounter should appear on the news soon.

Advertisement

Dan joined Project Skydrop for $20 on October 25. He explained how he solved it. Along with weather patterns, temperature data, and cloud cover stuff from the trail cameras, he also depended heavily on the aerial image clues. He said it would have been impossible to solve if:

  1. He had no aerial clues
    or
  2. We had cropped the temperature sensor data off the camera images.

The aerial clues helped him in two ways. First, they showed him that the treasure was in a large, deciduous beech grove, and there aren’t many large beech groves in the Erving area. Second, they showed him a “map” of what the scene looked like around the treasure (the logs, etc.)

He never had an exact GPS coordinate figured out. He was simply walking the (few) large beech groves in Wendell, looking for the distinctive logs that he saw in the clues.

The temperature sensor data and weather patterns just helped him narrow down the area.

Also, he actually stared right at the treasure and didn’t see it. He walked away, thinking he had found the wrong logs. He was about to leave (he walked off-camera for 1 min and 30 seconds), and then he came back to take one more look, because those logs looked like such a close match. Then, staring at the leaves in the spot he had already checked, he suddenly saw that the treasure was there after all. He said it was almost impossible to see.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending