Connect with us

Massachusetts

Mass. top court rejects bid to legalize physician-assisted suicide

Published

on

Mass. top court rejects bid to legalize physician-assisted suicide


  • Mass. highest courtroom finds no proper to medical support in dying
  • Follow is authorized in 10 states and the District of Columbia

(Reuters) – Massachusetts’ high courtroom on Monday dominated the state’s structure doesn’t shield the precise to physician-assisted suicide, dealing a loss to advocates for terminally sick sufferers wanting to regulate when and the way they die.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court docket’s ruling got here in a lawsuit by a retired doctor affected by prostate most cancers and a health care provider who was keen to prescribe deadly drugs for his sufferers however feared prosecution for manslaughter.

Roger Kligler, the most cancers affected person, and Alan Steinbach, the physician, had argued that making use of manslaughter legal guidelines to medical support in dying interfered with their equal safety and due course of rights beneath the Massachusetts Structure.

However Justice Frank Gaziano, writing for the 4-2 courtroom, mentioned that whereas the courtroom acknowledged the “paramount significance and profound significance of all end-of-life choices,” the state’s structure doesn’t shield physician-assisted suicide.

He mentioned physician-assisted suicide raises philosophical and regulatory questions “greatest left to the democratic course of, the place their decision may be knowledgeable by strong public debate and considerate analysis by consultants within the area.”

Advertisement

Ten different states plus the District of Columbia enable for medical support in dying, although normally it grew to become authorized due to laws or poll measures.

Massachusetts Legal professional Normal Maura Healey, the state’s incoming Democratic governor, argued in opposition to recognizing a constitutional proper. A spokesperson had no speedy remark.

John Kappos, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at O’Melveny & Myers, didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

Kligler and Steinbach first sued in 2016 and had been interesting a choose’s 2019 ruling rejecting their claims. Their case was backed by Compassion & Selections, a bunch that advocates for medical support in dying.

In Monday’s ruling, Gaziano mentioned Kligler’s claims ought to be tossed as a result of, whereas he had argued sufferers with a six-month window to reside are entitled to medical aid-in-dying, he doesn’t have himself have that prognosis as his most cancers is beneath management.

Advertisement

Whereas Steinbach did have standing to sue, Gaziano mentioned an absence of authorized precedent undercut arguments that medical support in dying was a elementary proper.

He mentioned making use of the legislation of manslaughter to physician-assisted suicide was constitutional given the state’s “reputable” pursuits in preserving life, stopping suicide, and defending the medical career and weak sufferers.

However Justice Dalila Argaez Wendlandt, in partial dissent joined by Chief Justice Kimberly Budd, mentioned that whereas they agreed physician-assisted suicide was not a elementary proper, they might have acknowledged it as a non-fundamental one.

Wendlandt mentioned that was as a result of when a “terminally sick, mentally competent affected person approaches the ultimate stage of the dying course of, the Commonwealth’s curiosity in criminalizing physician-assisted suicide reduces to a nullity.”

Learn extra:

Advertisement

Massachusetts high courtroom seems open to legalizing medically assisted suicide

Massachusetts choose permits right-to-die lawsuit to maneuver ahead

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.

Nate Raymond

Thomson Reuters

Advertisement

Nate Raymond studies on the federal judiciary and litigation. He may be reached at nate.raymond@thomsonreuters.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Massachusetts may help homeowners whose foundations are crumbling

Published

on

Massachusetts may help homeowners whose foundations are crumbling


BOSTON – Homeowners across the state who rallied on Beacon Hill asking for help to pay for their crumbling foundations may soon see some relief.

Why are foundations crumbling?

Thursday night, state senators approved an amendment to the Affordable Housing Act that will create a fund for Massachusetts residents whose foundations are failing. The problem is a natural mineral called pyrrhotite, which eventually causes concrete foundations to crumble – and insurance doesn’t cover the costs. The state now mandates quarries to test their product for pyrrhotite.

“The next step is finding the best methods for funding this effort,” State Sen. Peter Durant, R-Spencer, said. “This is a long-term problem that will require us to be creative so as not to place a large burden on taxpayers while also helping residents to repair their homes which, in turn, helps their local economy.”    

Members of Massachusetts Residents Against Crumbling Concrete gathered outside the Statehouse again on Thursday to call for help fixing their foundations.

Advertisement
crumbling-foundations-5p-vo-transfer-frame-802.jpg
Massachusetts Residents Against Crumbling Concrete are asking the state to help fix their crumbling foundations.

CBS Boston


Homeowners face financial hardship

“This slow-moving mineral has created a financial hardship for thousands of families in my district and across our state, is not covered by homeowners’ insurance and costs hundreds of thousands of dollars out of pocket to fix,” said State Sen. Ryan Fattman, R-Sutton.  

The problem is expected to hit more than 40 cities and towns, which have identified homeowners with crumbling foundations due to pyrrhorite. Replacing the foundation in a home can cause a homeowner as much as $250,000.  

“Faulty foundations are putting the homes and life savings of thousands of Massachusetts families across the Commonwealth at risk, through no fault of their own,” said Sen. Michael Moore, D-Millbury.  

Advertisement

The amendment is now before a conference committee. 

“This is essentially a natural disaster,” Durant said. “It is caused by the failing of a natural element and it was unforeseen by the concrete industry, builders and homeowners.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Marion Police Department Earns Re-Accreditation from Massachusetts Police Accreditation Commission

Published

on

Marion Police Department Earns Re-Accreditation from Massachusetts Police Accreditation Commission


For immediate release

MARION — Police Chief Richard Nighelli is proud to report that the Marion Police Department earned re-accreditation from the Massachusetts Police Accreditation Commission (MPAC). 

On Wednesday, June 26, MPAC unanimously re-accredited the Marion Police Department.

“I am honored our department has once again earned re-accreditation from MPAC,” said Chief Nighelli. “As we celebrate this achievement, I would like to recognize all of our department members for their dedication and commitment to upholding the values of this department. I would also like to thank our community for their ongoing support and partnership.”

The department received State Certification in June 2014, full State Accreditation in June 2015 and re-accreditation in 2018 and 2021. Accreditation must be renewed every three years and, following this year’s renewal, the department will be up for re-accreditation again in 2027. 

Advertisement

Accreditation is a self-initiated, lengthy and comprehensive evaluation process. Participating departments complete an internal self-review and an external assessment by MPAC experts. The process is a voluntary evaluation by which police departments strive to meet and maintain the top standards of law enforcement. It is considered the best measure for a police department to compare itself against the established best practices around the country and region.

The Massachusetts Police Accreditation Program consists of 257 mandatory standards as well as 125 optional standards. In order to achieve accreditation status, the department was required to meet all applicable mandatory standards as well as 55% of the optional standards. 

These carefully selected standards reflect critical areas of police management, operations and technical support activities. They cover areas such as policy development, emergency response planning, training, communications, property and evidence handling, use of force, vehicular pursuit, prisoner transportation and holding facilities.

The Commission offers two program awards: certification and accreditation, with the latter being the higher of the two.

###

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Man saved by Massachusetts’ first ever whole blood transfusion from car crash site

Published

on

Man saved by Massachusetts’ first ever whole blood transfusion from car crash site


It took 45 minutes for firefighters to get a 35-year-old man out of a “heavily damaged” car following a car crash on Saturday, officials said. The man’s injuries were extensive, with low blood pressure, shock and internal bleeding.

Quickly, firefighters and paramedics decided to try a new lifesaving method starting at the crash site: whole blood transfusion.

The method had never been done in Massachusetts before, according to the Canton Fire Department. However, in March, the Canton Fire Department and 25 other cities and towns in Massachusetts worked with Boston Medical Center to launch the first pilot program in Massachusetts history for administering whole blood before a patient reaches the hospital, the press release stated.

On Saturday, the fire department put it into action.

Advertisement

The crash happened in Braintree during the early morning hours, officials said. The Braintree Fire Department and Brewster Ambulance paramedics “swiftly” put in a request to the Canton Fire Department for the whole blood transfusion.

Paramedics put the 35-year-old in the ambulance where Canton Fire Field Transfusion Paramedic Michael White and EMT Jonathan Buckley started the transfusion. On his way to Boston Medical Center, the man’s vital signs improved, according to officials. Once at the hospital, he was taken to surgery.

“This groundbreaking program represents a significant advancement in prehospital care and has already proven its worth in it first use,” said Fire Chief Wendell Robery. “The successful administration of whole blood in the field is a testament to our paramedics’ and EMTs’ training, preparedness and dedication. We are grateful for the collaboration with Boston Medical Center and the support of our neighboring communities.”

Transfusions with specific blood components are common in hospital settings and are often used for trauma but whole blood might be becoming more common.

The leading cause of preventable deaths in the U.S. is massive bleeding caused by a traumatic injury, U.S. News and World Report wrote. Most of the deaths occur within six hours.

Advertisement

In an article by the Boston University School of Medicine, it pointed to a new study that suggested a person who receives whole blood transfusion for severe traumatic bleeding earlier has a greater chance of survival.

“However, if this transfusion is delayed by as little as 14 minutes after arriving at the hospital, the survival benefit is significantly reduced,” the university wrote.

Crisanto Torres, assistant professor of surgery at the school, said in the article that there was a “decrease in survival probability for each minute delay in whole blood transfusion.”

She said she hopes this encourages more hospitals to use whole blood as a standard emergency transfusion product and more consideration for it to be used at the scene of an injury or during transport to the hospital.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending