Connect with us

Massachusetts

Mass. residents are clamoring for more beach access. The state says it’s listening.

Published

on

Mass. residents are clamoring for more beach access. The state says it’s listening.


The state’s recreational and environmental agency says it has a new top objective: Expand access to coastal and inland beaches.

It comes in the wake of a recently released government survey that shows Massachusetts residents are clamoring for more water access.

“We heard from people loud and clear that having that connection to water is so important,” Stephanie Cooper, undersecretary of environment with the Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs, told GBH News earlier this month. “With climate change where we’re having hotter temperatures, it becomes that much more important to have a place to cool off.”

Massachusetts’ new statewide outdoor recreation plan, released in March, included a survey of more than 5,000 residents and a roadmap for the commonwealth’s priorities. Beaches topped the list of outdoor recreational areas residents want more of across most racial groups, beating out nature preserves and hiking trails.

Advertisement

But the state’s objective could be difficult, given that a small fraction of Massachusetts’ coastline is currently accessible to the public and municipalities often limit access for those who don’t live in shore communities.

Cooper and some lawmakers are not yet specifying a plan to hit their new objective. And any expansions could be costly.

Cooper pointed to about $6 million annually in federal grants for land and water conservation acquisitions, money that can also be distributed to local communities for expanding recreational properties. The state’s new recreation plan is required by the U.S. National Park Service every five years for Massachusetts to be eligible for federal conservation funding.

That funding climbed significantly since 2021 under the Biden administration, up more than 73% over the previous three years’ average annual funding. There could be more state money coming, too, from a new environmental bond bill. And Cooper says she hoping for new federal grants and opportunities to team up with land trust nonprofits in the next year to acquire more coastal properties.

But restrictive laws have long made Massachusetts beaches some of the country’s most inaccessible. Geordie Vining, for one, welcomes the state’s new priority: he was the director of coastal access planning for the state between 1994 and 2000.

Advertisement

He’s still skeptical about the commonwealth making any real headway.

“Public coastal access is really important,” said Vining, now a planner for the coastal city of Newburyport. But, he said, “Challenges basically remain the same: The incredibly high cost of coastal property — eye-popping costs — and resistance from private property owners who own that expensive coastal property.”

The last time the state conducted an inventory of coastal access was more than 30 years ago. That report estimated that just 12% of the state’s roughly 1,400-mile coastline is open to all members of the public.

That low figure is due to a centuries-old law that dictates homeowners own the beach down to the low-tide line, along with a longstanding system of coastal towns barring or limiting nonresidents through strict parking regulations and fines. Racist housing practices also played a role as historic deeds in some beach communities expressly banned selling homes to anyone but white Christians.

The GBH News Center for Investigative Reporting covered those issues in a 2022 series, “Barriers at the Beach.”

Advertisement

The state currently owns and manages 15 saltwater ocean beaches and 31 fresh water inland beaches, according to the recreational study. Massachusetts also hosts several federally owned coastal properties, including The Cape Cod National Seashore and Parker River National Wildlife Refuge on the North Shore.

Adding to those holdings would require a lot of spending, given the value of waterfront real estate.

That would be on top of millions of dollars the state now spends every year on coastal resilience to protect existing sandy beaches at risk of disappearing under high tides, money that goes toward seawalls or re-nourishing the sand. Severe storm surges and erosion caused by climate change, Vining and Cooper agreed, have upended coastal policies and budgets.

And even public access doesn’t necessarily mean access for all. Some of the state’s coastal resiliency funding goes to coastal towns that also sharply restrict nonresidents access or charge high fees for parking.

Advertisement
Crews in Marshfield worked this winter to renourish more than 700 feet of critically eroded shoreline along Bay Avenue Beach after receiving a $1.2 million grant for coastal resiliency from the state. The town allots a small number of parking spaces for nonresidents at its beaches. Jan. 17, 2024.


Courtesy of the town of Marshfield’s Planning Department

Marshfield, for example, received $1.2 million from the state last fall to help renourish critically eroded shoreline along Bay Avenue Beach but allots a small number of parking spaces for nonresidents at its beaches.

Scituate won a nearly $2 million grant last fall to replenish 26,000 cubic yards of sand and gravel at North Scituate Beach. But the coastal town sells just a few hundred beach stickers to nonresidents for $350 each — passes that are not valid on weekends or on holidays.

In Ipswich, Select Board members two weeks ago tightened beach access in their North Shore coastal town, voting to ban nonresidents from beach parking through the summer season and increase parking fines around that beach from $30 to $50.

Advertisement

“This will prevent non-residents from parking in the neighborhoods and walking down to beach,” Ipswich Police Chief Paul Nikas wrote in an April memo to the Select Board.

But such restrictions are frustrating for lawmakers who want to see beaches more accessible to all of the commonwealth’s residents.

“Massachusetts has the most restrictive ocean-access laws in the country,” said state Rep. Dylan Fernandes, a Woods Hole Democrat, who has filed several bills to reform beach ownership statutes and local regulations that exclude nonresidents.

He has pushed back against these local practices, proposing legislation to tie public spending on coastal projects to fully open beaches. His bill would ban communities that get public funds for their beaches from charging excessive parking fees or allowing access only to residents or renters in that community.

At a hearing on the bill last fall, beachgoers shared their frustration with legislators about their feelings of injustice at the expense of getting onto coastal beaches in Massachusetts. Alex Vai of Sudbury, who volunteers with the beach access nonprofit Surfrider, was among them.

Advertisement

“Parking, congestion, crowding — all of these are issues that arise because people are being funneled into the 12% of Massachusetts coastline that is public,” he said.

What residents get out of beach access is “completely undervalued,” said Setha Low, a psychology and anthropology professor at the City University of New York who is editing a new book about environmental injustice at beaches.

“I don’t think that there is any public space that brings as much joy and pleasure and a sense of belonging as beaches,” said Low. “We need to be looking to our states and our cities and the federal government to try to get us more beach access.”

While officials duke it out over access, some organizations on the ground are doing what they can to give residents the benefits beaches can provide.

One grassroots project is helping dozens of neurodivergent and medically fragile youth in the state access two state-owned beaches on the weekends. The state awarded a $10,000 grant to the project run by a Rhode Island–based nonprofit called Gnome Surf.

Advertisement

Lynn Beach Follow

Lynn teenagers Alex Gomez, left, and Cole Kiiza, right, put finishing touches on a skiff they helped build with local boatbuilder Bob McCarty, center, as part of Kayak and Sail Lynn on May 4, 2024.


Christopher Burrell


GBH News

Another project, Kayak and Sail Lynn, teaches local high schoolers to build boats and paddle kayaks. Run by a teacher at Lynn English High School, the program connects teenagers with a local coastline many have hardly touched.

Cole Kiiza, a 17-year-old junior at the high school, said that before joining this club last year, he rarely went to the beach.

Advertisement

“I’ve been to the beach maybe twice, but we had to drive all the way to Rockport and Gloucester, and it’s really far away,” he said. “After this, I got on the water a lot. We had multiple kayak expeditions. I got to take a dip in the water after we landed on Point of Pines. Peaceful, serene. It was honestly so beautiful.”





Source link

Massachusetts

Deaton: D.C. is breaking great states like Massachusetts

Published

on

Deaton: D.C. is breaking great states like Massachusetts


For the city kids who didn’t get to play soccer, tennis, basketball, or track and field at the Melnea Cass Recreational Complex in Roxbury all spring, it’s probably tough to understand that the reason is because a bunch of adults almost 500 miles away can’t get their act together. They’d likely be similarly confused to learn that their fieldhouse became a shelter for dozens of vulnerable kids who came to America because adults in their native countries couldn’t get it right there either.

When I lived in Roxbury while attending law school, after becoming the first in my family to graduate high school and college, I played ball at Washington Park (also known as Malcom X Park), usually the only white guy, and probably with the dads of some of the kids barred from the Cass complex the last few months, before it finally reopened last week.

Before that, I was an inner-city kid myself with limited access to sports facilities, and even fewer avenues out of what was then, and remains, one of the most impoverished and dangerous neighborhoods in America.

So the Cass complex’s conversion to a migrant shelter really hit home.

Advertisement

I recently visited Yuma, Arizona, where I was stationed during my time as a U.S. Marine Judge Advocate, to witness the problem firsthand. The crisis I saw there, which is hurting working families here in Massachusetts, is two-fold: national security and humanitarian.

As much as 50% of the fentanyl tearing apart our communities comes through Yuma, Arizona. Not only is Washington’s inability to solve this crisis hurting those who already live in America, but the migrants being trafficked alongside it are also at risk. Asylum seekers hoping for a better life in the U.S. face a treacherous journey at the hands of the cartels. Women and children are raped or abused by traffickers who don’t care if they survive.

Congressional inability to address the serious problems facing this country is no longer a theoretical exercise or a punchline; it’s harming our kids’ development and quality of life. In Massachusetts, we see other tangible impacts. Governor Maura Healey has projected the emergency shelter program will cost nearly $1 billion next fiscal year, in addition to $700 million already spent this year, while our state’s one-party leaders have implored their counterparts in Washington – like Senator Elizabeth Warren – to address this exploding crisis.

What else could that $1.7 billion be doing in Massachusetts? How about repairing our roads and transit system, in such dangerous disrepair? Or ameliorating the educational crisis? In Boston, our kids aren’t just losing access to the Cass complex; the school district itself is teetering on receivership.

Do you think the rest of the state might benefit from $1.7 billion to help combat an upswing in violent crime? In 2022, the most recent year for which federal data is available, violent crime in Massachusetts rose, while dropping nationwide. Some of the alleged perpetrators made their way into Massachusetts by claiming to be refugees before committing violent crimes. Police departments, diversion programs, substance abuse and recovery efforts – all of these could benefit from precious state funds now being funneled into a problem that Washington created and refuses to fix.

Advertisement

Working families are suffering because of Washington dysfunction, and no amount of press releases, viral videos, or soundbites will fix that. Nor will new taxes from cannabis, gambling, or millionaires.

That’s a big reason I’m running against Senator Warren this year; it’s not just that Washington is broken, it’s that Washington is breaking great states like Massachusetts. Senator Warren voted against the bipartisan border legislation, voting with MAGA Republicans to sink the bill at the cost of her own constituents. Even worse, Senator Warren is talking out of both sides of her mouth on the issue.

This is the problem with Washington politicians – on both sides of the aisle. They become beholden to the special interest groups who exact outlandish policy promises to help them win primaries while red and blue states become even more polarized. It’s a cynical way to run a country, and those who have become a part of it should examine whether they’ve stayed true to their promise to voters.

I am running to be your senator to stand up for the poor and middle class. I have fought for the underdog my entire life, and I’ll do the same in the Senate. This era of gridlock and cynicism has to end.

The kids who run and play ball at the Cass complex don’t deserve to lose another season.

Advertisement

John Deaton is a Republican candidate for U.S. Senate and an attorney specializing in representing asbestos victims suffering from mesothelioma.

 

Migrants wait along a border wall in August 2022, after crossing from Mexico near Yuma, Ariz.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Uber, Lyft drivers in Massachusetts reach $32.50 minimum wage settlement – ABC Columbia

Published

on

Uber, Lyft drivers in Massachusetts reach $32.50 minimum wage settlement – ABC Columbia


 

(CNN)– Uber and Lyft are hailing a settlement they reached in a lawsuit against them by the state of Massachusetts.

They’re agreeing to pay their drivers a minimum wage of $32.50 an hour.

Rideshare drivers will also be provided with benefits under the agreement.

Advertisement

Those include paid sick leave based on the number of hours worked, healthcare stipends, and occupational accident insurance.

The companies will also pay a combines total of $175 million to the state.

The money resolves claims Uber and Lyft violated the state’s labor laws.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

This town’s name isn’t a punch line. Or is it? Exploring Athol’s surprisingly posh, somewhat scandalous Scottish roots. – The Boston Globe

Published

on

This town’s name isn’t a punch line. Or is it? Exploring Athol’s surprisingly posh, somewhat scandalous Scottish roots. – The Boston Globe


Yes, I know that joke. I know them all. Athol makes people giggle like schoolchildren who think they’ve heard a naughty word. After Belchertown, Athol probably ranks as one of Massachusetts’s most unpleasantly named towns. If you’re still not hearing it, touch your tongue to the palate of your mouth and say, “Athol.”

I knew my hometown was named after a village in Scotland called Blair Atholl (two lls is Scottish Atholl, and one l is the Massachusetts Athol). But until this year, I had no idea how beautiful Blair Atholl is or that it has a 700-year-old castle. There is even a Duke of Atholl who commands Europe’s only officially sanctioned private army. Who’s laughing now, Wellesley? Anything to say for yourself, Dover, or Newton? Sure, Athol may be one of the poorest towns in Massachusetts, and our high school ranks 239th out of the state’s 351 public high schools (I am a somewhat proud and semi-literate graduate of Athol Regional High School). But we’re named after a village with Britain’s second tallest tree. So take that, Brookline!

My visit to Blair Atholl was a happy accident. I was on vacation in April, beginning with a few days in Glasgow. I drove north to Inverness to explore the Highlands and then southwest to Edinburgh. Halfway between Inverness and Edinburgh, I spotted a sign for Atholl on the highway. My husband, Alex, turned to me and said, “We’re stopping, right?” It was a rhetorical question.

The exterior of Blair Castle & Gardens in Blair Atholl, Scotland.Christopher Muther/Globe Staff

Cut to 30 minutes later, and we’re pulling into the parking area of Blair Castle & Estates. We were surrounded by sheep-dotted hills and acres of manicured gardens. I was beginning to think that this Atholl contained an extra “l” to denote that it’s lovelier than Athol, Mass. Because it was April, every inch of grass was over-saturated Technicolor green, and the sheep seemed extra plump. The setting was heavenly.

Before exploring the castle, I headed to the Hercules Garden, which dates back to the 18th century and was carefully restored in the 1980s. Even though few flowers were blooming, and the fruit trees were just beginning to bud, the gardens, sculptures, and duck-filled ponds were charming. In an alternate universe, this is the Atholl where I would have grown up, not the Athol with a lake my sister and I lovingly referred to as Dead Man’s Pond.

Advertisement
A statue in the Hercules Garden at Blair Castle & Gardens in Blair Atholl, Scotland. The 9-acre walled garden has been restored to its original Georgian design.Christopher Muther/Globe Staff

After an hour, the stop in Blair Atholl became much more than a novelty. It was a place I would enjoy visiting no matter what the village was called. Had I not grown up in Athol, there’s a good chance I wouldn’t have stopped here and experienced Blair Castle.

I later discovered that the 9-acre Hercules Garden that I was smitten with was being laid out at the same time that Athol, Mass., was being named. Before British settlers arrived in North America, the Nipmuc Nation Tribe already had a name for the region: Pequoiag. However, when the town was incorporated in 1762, John Murray, a politician and native of Blair Atholl, chose the name Athol because the rolling hills reminded him of his Scottish hometown. Murray was reported to be a distant cousin of the Duke of Atholl. So, a cousin of royalty bestowed Athol with its name. Very classy.

Or so I thought.

As it turns out, Murray was neither noble nor royal. He was given the paperwork to register the town’s name as Paxton, not Athol. He took it upon himself to change it. Why? Because he was a slippery, duplicitous miscreant. Another town in Worcester County got the name Paxton. We got stuck with Athol.

“He was a scoundrel,” said state Representative Susannah Whipps, an independent from Athol whose family has lived in the town for seven generations. “John Murray was a loyalist, and he got chased out of Massachusetts because he sided with the British during the Revolutionary War.”

When news of Murray’s disloyalty to the Colonies and continued love of the Crown became known, a mob of hundreds gathered at his home. According to records in the Loyalist Collection at the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton, he fled to Boston. All of his property was seized, and he was banished to Canada. In 1780, the Massachusetts General Assembly denounced him as a traitor.

Advertisement

“He was a shyster, a real shady character. So this might change your entire story,” Whipps said, sensing my disappointment at the news. “I would hate for you to write about Athol with this great sense of nobility. Maybe we’re still paying John Murray’s debt of dishonesty with the name. Also, I don’t want you to give us a better reputation than we actually deserve. I kind of like the scandal of it.”

‘I kind of like the scandal of it’

Massachusetts State Rep. Susannah Whipps on how Athol got its name.

Advertisement

Murray’s face appears on Athol’s official town seal. A traitor who could be best described as “odious” is Athol’s founding father. That’s one way to look at it.

The ballroom inside Blair Castle, in Blair Atholl, Scottland. The ballroom was commissioned by the seventh Duke of Atholl and designed by David Bryce.Christopher Muther/Globe Staff

But I prefer to think of Athol and its direct connection to the beauty of Scotland. In 1703, Queen Anne created the title Duke of Atholl, and in 1844, Queen Victoria granted the duke permission to raise Europe’s only legal private army (the unit had previously disbanded). The army, called the Atholl Highlanders, is still active today, although it’s purely ceremonial and is best known for its bagpipers. The Highlanders have marched in Athol twice and are coming back in April 2025 to celebrate Athol’s famed River Rat parade, along with traveling to perform in New York City and Washington, D.C.

The current Duke of Atholl doesn’t reside in Blair Castle; he lives in South Africa, but the 30-room castle is open for viewing. You can tour the ornate structure (tickets to tour the castle and gardens are $22) or take a whiskey tour to learn about Blair Castle’s illicit distilling past and sample some hooch (tickets are $75). If you fall in love with the castle and surrounding area the way I did, you can even stay at the Atholl Estates. There are lodges, cabins, and huts available. You can also camp there.

The dining room in Blair Castle, located in Blair Atholl, Scotland.Christopher Muther/Boston Globe

The walls of the 755-year-old castle are filled with portraits of past dukes, earls, viscounts, lords, ladies, and marquesses. An audio tour, which you can download before visiting, explains hundreds of years of history and rooms of well-curated artifacts. I’m not a descendant of the Duke of Atholl, but I felt a kinship walking through the castle.

This is where it all began for humble Athol. All giggling aside, if my hometown was going to be named after a location on Earth, I’m glad it was this beautiful place.

Advertisement

Christopher Muther can be reached at christopher.muther@globe.com. Follow him @Chris_Muther and Instagram @chris_muther.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending