Connect with us

Massachusetts

Mass. court rejects ballot re: gig workers as contractors – TechCrunch

Published

on

Mass. court rejects ballot re: gig workers as contractors – TechCrunch


In a serious setback for app-based gig economic system firms like Uber, Lyft and DoorDash, a Massachusetts courtroom dominated on Tuesday to throw out a proposed poll measure that will, if handed, outline gig staff as impartial contractors slightly than staff.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Courtroom’s unanimous resolution discovered that the poll initiative violated state legislation and was subsequently ineligible to place to voters this fall. The transfer, which has ended a $17.8 million marketing campaign by gig firms to help the measure, signifies a serious win for labor rights activists who argue that firms have been failing to offer correct employee protections and advantages, like staff’ compensation or perhaps a fundamental minimal wage. The truth is, one research discovered staff in Massachusetts might earn $4.82 per hour if the measure handed.

The Massachusetts Coalition for Unbiased Work, the coalition of app-based gig firms that proposed the poll initiative, didn’t affirm whether or not or not it could proceed to combat in Massachussetts, however Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi has acknowledged a number of occasions that the corporate would help and promote related proposals throughout america. Uber and different firms are actively working to do exactly that in states like Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Washington.

Advertisement

In September 2021, Lawyer Common Maura Healey gave the coalition the inexperienced gentle to start out accumulating signatures wanted to place the measure earlier than voters, regardless of having sued Uber and Lyft up to now to problem their defining of drivers as contractors.

Justice Scott Kafker stated on Tuesday that Healey, a Democrat working for governor, was unsuitable to say the proposal complied with state constitutional necessities limiting poll measures to associated topics. Kafker stated the coalition included a vaguely worded, unrelated proposal to restrict firms’ legal responsibility for accidents by their drivers. This can be a notably scorching matter within the wake of analysis that has documented not less than 50 deaths of gig staff on the job since 2017, with minimal effort from the businesses to offer help to households of victims.

The proposed invoice mirrors a lot of California’s Proposition 22, which handed in California in 2020 however has since been dominated unconstitutional and now hangs in authorized limbo. It known as for establishing an earnings flooring equal to 120% of the state minimal wage, or $18 an hour, earlier than suggestions. Crucially, nonetheless, the businesses solely rely the hours when a employee is actively driving to select up a rider or meals and drop the rider or meals off — that means on a regular basis spent driving round, utilizing fuel and in search of work goes unpaid.

Per the now-moot poll measure, the businesses would have been required to pay healthcare stipends if drivers work not less than 15 hours per week, and drivers would have been eligible for paid sick time and paid household and medical depart.

Flexibility & Advantages for Massachusetts Drivers, the poll query committee below the coalition, stated the courtroom’s ruling subverts “the democratic course of and [denies] voters the correct to make their very own resolution.”

Advertisement

A survey of about 400 Massachusetts drivers, paid for by the gig firms, discovered 81% of staff backed the poll measure. Nevertheless, labor activists have argued that as a result of huge sums of cash gig firms spent on convincing drivers their livelihood and adaptability was at stake, drivers have been offered with a false and deceptive alternative between having flexibility and advantages, each of which could possibly be achieved as staff.

“It’s laughable that these firms would falsely attempt to place themselves as advancing democracy whereas within the midst of making an attempt to spend tens of tens of millions of {dollars} to purchase a deceitful legislation that will do hurt not simply to our democracy and communities, but additionally to taxpayers, drivers, and passengers,” stated Wes McEnany, marketing campaign director of theMassachusetts isn’t on the market” coalition, in a press release.  



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

This Bedroom Activity is Very Risky in Massachusetts

Published

on

This Bedroom Activity is Very Risky in Massachusetts


Massachusetts is home to some strange laws. Many of the laws were passed years, and years ago so they don’t hold up or are enforced today, yet they are still on the books.

There’s One Bedroom Activity That’s Technically Illegal in Massachusetts

One particular Massachusetts law I found interesting is something that people do every day in the privacy of theirhomes: snoring. Believe it or not, there’s a law in Massachusetts (according to multiple sources) that prohibits snoring in your home unless all bedroom windows are closed and securely locked.

Is There Any Logic Behind This Massachusetts Law? 

Okay, in one small way I get that you don’t want to disturb the peace hence, the closing of the windows, but does one snore so loudly that neighbors throughout the neighborhood are disturbed by it? I find that hard to believe but then again maybe it has happened. Laws are formed for a reason. Furthermore, is the locking of windows really going to make that big of a difference?

Another question I have about this is what if I fall asleep in my kitchen, living room and/or basement and those windows are open but the bedroom windows are closed and locked? Is the act of snoring still illegal? Technically the state of the bedroom windows would be following the law.

Advertisement

This is a lot of silliness but it is fun to examine these strange Massachusetts laws and poke holes in them. Residents of Boston, Worcester, the Berkshires, and everywhere in between better take note and keep the snoring to a low roar.

Could you imagine if this Massachusetts snoring law was strictly enforced? Oh, my word. Many of my family members would be paying a fine or spending a night in the big house. This includes me. I wonder if it would be illegal for them/us to snore in jail…lol.

LOOK: 15 formerly popular foods in America that are rarely eaten today

Stacker researched the history of popular foods, from Jell-O salads to Salisbury steak, and highlighted 15 that are no longer widely consumed.

Gallery Credit: Stacker

LOOKS: Things you’d likely see in an awesomely ’80s garage

From scandalous bikini calendars to your dad’s AMC Gremlin, ’80s garages were a treasure trove of adventure, good fun, and sometimes downright danger.

Gallery Credit: Stephen Lenz

Advertisement

LOOK: 35 Vintage Cereals That Perfectly Captured Pop Culture Moments

Movies and TV shows have always found ways to partner with cereal companies as part of their promotion strategy. While some may have come up with a giveaway in boxes, others went big by having their own cereal connected to the movie or TV show title. Here are vintage cereals that were used to promote some of pop culture’s biggest moments (and some you probably forgot about).

Gallery Credit: Rob Carroll





Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

California man charged with threatening to ‘shoot up’ Massachusetts businesses in explicit voicemails

Published

on

California man charged with threatening to ‘shoot up’ Massachusetts businesses in explicit voicemails


A California man is charged with threatening to shoot up Massachusetts companies over five extremely explicit phone calls.

Subscribe to continue reading this article.

Already subscribed? To login in, click here.

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Treasure mystery: Who found the gold statue in Mass. woods — and who gets the bounty?

Published

on

Treasure mystery: Who found the gold statue in Mass. woods — and who gets the bounty?


We now know the identity of the clever treasure hunter who tracked down a gold statue worth more than $25,000 — though whether he gets to keep tens of thousands more in bounty money apparently remains up in the air.

Dan Leonard, a meteorologist in Andover, Massachusetts, was identified as the winner, not by the founders of Project Skydrop, but by NBC affiliate News Center Maine, which actually introduced Leonard and the people whose puzzle he solved in the woods of Wendell State Forest.

Leonard described the moment to founders Jason Rohrer and Tom Bailey like this: “I’m kind of in disbelief that this is happening. I see the camera so expertly hidden in that stump, and I think, ‘Oh my god.’”

The digital treasure hunt for the gold statue whose value was appraised at $26,536.25 sparked widespread speculation from puzzle enthusiasts and more. The founders created clues to make the search hard, but not too hard, specifying an area where the 10-ounce, 24-karat gold statue could be that shrank every day. People could also pay $20 to receive a daily clue, which helped fund the bounty.

Advertisement

People are searching for a golden statue worth more than $25,000.

The circle was centered roughly on Greenfield, Massachusetts, north along the Connecticut River from Springfield.

The person who tracked the statue down was seen on cameras grabbing the puzzle off the floor, but the Skydrop organizers didn’t hear from him until News Center Maine reached out. Leonard explained that he narrowed down where the treasure could be based on the temperature recorded in the camera, plus the cloud cover and plant life seen in the stream.


Advertisement

Project Skydrop

The winner claiming the gold statue at the heart of Project Skydrop’s treasure hunt on Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2024, at 5:19 p.m.

When they did meet, Leonard learned there was a catch to claiming the bounty, as News Center Maine reported: the prize could only be accessed by solving clues written onto the trophy itself, which technically meant that anyone with access to the statue could crack the code and claim the money.

Leonard was surprised, but not particularly bothered, saying, “Let’s say I don’t get it: I still had a really good time and got a treasure out of it.”

Rohrer shared more about the circumstances around Leonard’s victory in a message to the game’s official Discord server, a social media chat site where players were able to get more information about what happened.

The winner’s name is Dan Leonard. A news channel up in Maine figured out who he was, based on their meteorologist connections. They connected us with him, and we got to talk to him on camera yesterday. That encounter should appear on the news soon.

Advertisement

Dan joined Project Skydrop for $20 on October 25. He explained how he solved it. Along with weather patterns, temperature data, and cloud cover stuff from the trail cameras, he also depended heavily on the aerial image clues. He said it would have been impossible to solve if:

  1. He had no aerial clues
    or
  2. We had cropped the temperature sensor data off the camera images.

The aerial clues helped him in two ways. First, they showed him that the treasure was in a large, deciduous beech grove, and there aren’t many large beech groves in the Erving area. Second, they showed him a “map” of what the scene looked like around the treasure (the logs, etc.)

He never had an exact GPS coordinate figured out. He was simply walking the (few) large beech groves in Wendell, looking for the distinctive logs that he saw in the clues.

The temperature sensor data and weather patterns just helped him narrow down the area.

Also, he actually stared right at the treasure and didn’t see it. He walked away, thinking he had found the wrong logs. He was about to leave (he walked off-camera for 1 min and 30 seconds), and then he came back to take one more look, because those logs looked like such a close match. Then, staring at the leaves in the spot he had already checked, he suddenly saw that the treasure was there after all. He said it was almost impossible to see.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending