Connect with us

Massachusetts

MA advocate groups are calling legislators to ensure equal access to menstrual products

Published

on

MA advocate groups are calling legislators to ensure equal access to menstrual products


When women and girls don’t have access to menstrual products, they have to “just bleed and pray” that their pants will hold. Many in Massachusetts are forced to use toilet paper as a substitute for period products. 

“I think it’s a matter of dignity and allowing menstruators to have the option to not have to free bleed or just giving them that bodily autonomy of how they want to deal with their periods,” said Olivia Toscano, the community organizing co-op of the Massachusetts chapter of the National Organization for Women.

Advocacy groups in Massachusetts such as MassNOW are calling on House lawmakers to pass the I AM bill, to ensure access to free menstrual products, without stigma, to all women and girls in all public schools, homeless shelters, prisons, and county jails. 

Advertisement

“It’s about making sure that these products which are part of health care, which a part of our life, are available,” said Sen. Robyn Kennedy, D-Worcester, one of the sponsors of the bill.” “It’s a basic need that all menstruating individuals have. And it’s about making sure that those products for that care are available to all individuals to help break down the disparities.”

How much spent on feminine hygiene products?

The average woman spends about $20 on feminine hygiene products per cycle, adding up to about $18,000 over a lifetime, according to estimates from the National Organization of Women. 

“It costs a lot to buy these products,” said Toscano. “There are menstruators out there who have to choose between food, rent, and menstrual products. That’s not a choice that should have to be made. I think we need to stop looking at it as a luxury; it’s a necessity.”

In October, the Senate passed the I AM bill, originally introduced in 2019, but it has not yet been passed in the House.

Advertisement

Kate Barker Swindell, Service & Operations Manager of PERIOD. said Massachusetts has done some work, but it could do better. 

The Alliance for Period Supplies reports that Massachusetts is considering nine bills related to menstrual access, while New Jersey leads with a total of 24 bills.

Rep. Natalie Higgins, D-Leominster, said the bill is “critical” because menstrual products are essential, but they are too expensive for many, especially those in schools, prisons, and shelters. 

“I think I AM Bill really focuses on some of the places where institutionally there can be access issues. So starting with our schools, starting with our shelters, and starting with our jails and prisons, makes a lot of sense,” she said.

Kyla Speizer, the community organizer of MassNOW, said the measure is the first in the country to call for providing free menstrual products for all three places: schools, shelters and jails. 

Advertisement

“Those three places are some of the places that period poverty is shown the most, so they are some of the most vulnerable populations,” she said.

Lack of education and awareness

“I’ve been working with public schools, libraries, and just connecting with either the head of the department to kind of see what is the need, who actually needs these products and supplying these products,” said Magdelene Barjolo, the Worcester regional organizer of MassNOW.  When people donate to the needy, they think first of food and clothing, she said.

“Menstrual products are not a part of the conversation,” she said

PERIOD’s Swindell said through years of advocacy the conversations and the attention around the problem is “growing exponentially,” but the stigma is still a real thing. 

“I will say that’s across all ages, all races, all cultures, all religions. It’s like universal,” she said.

Advertisement

As of right now, Barjolo said she hasn’t seen any schools implement the concept of period poverty within their curriculum. “They kind of steer away from it,” she said. 

Even when menstrual products are provided in some places, the stigma creates “an extra barrier” for people who need them, Speizer said

“They’re afraid to ask for a menstrual product or they’re afraid to take a day off of work when they are having really bad cramps. Maybe they have a mental disorder and they can’t make it to work that day, or whatever it is,” she said. “The stigma is something that prevents a lot of folks from maybe achieving their goals.”

Grassroots organizing looks to meet interim needs

In December, Worcester City Manager Eric Batista said he was going to implement the first phase of providing free menstrual products within public spaces in the city early this year.

Barjolo said before anything happens, grassroots organizers will provide communities and public spaces with products.

Advertisement

“A lot of people have said something of what their initiatives are going to do in terms of menstrual health,” she said. “We’re actually doing the work aside from waiting for elected officials to do what they can do.”

Ali Civilikas, vice president of Menstrual Equity Alliance, a Clark University-affiliated student-led club, said the Alliance installed nine dispensers for menstrual products in school two years ago, and hand-fill those dispensers once a month.

“We just keep pads and tampons on us usually, and whoever has time to go around and fill them,” she said. 

In an email, Lesa McWalters, social justice chair of First Unitarian Church of Worcester, said parishioners have set up a subscription to purchase pads each month (at $300 per month) and distribute them to sheltered women.

“There are approximately 100 women and teens in that shelter, and since SNAP benefits do not cover feminine products we have begun a program called Sister-to-Sister Cycle Connection at our church,” she wrote in the email. “This is a very basic need, and legislation should change the qualification of pads from a “luxury item” to a basic human right to have access to free feminine products as part of the SNAP benefits.”

Advertisement

Consistent supply can be an issue

Many school districts, lockups and shelters already provide free menstrual products, but consistently providing them can be challenging, Speizer said.

“Many of them do offer it for free or have procedures in place to offer it, but maybe they don’t have the stable resources to be consistently offering it,” she said. 

As a student-led club, Menstrual Equity Alliance has struggled working with school administration and getting it to help fund clean menstrual products on campus, Civilikas said. 

“I don’t think they’ve ever provided free menstrual products like we are right now.” she said.

According to the Alliance for Period Supplies, in the past three years, nine states passed laws to require and fund schools to provide period products. That does not include Massachusetts. 

Advertisement

Kennedy said the bill would make sure that they’re required to be provided and that there’s funding available.

“This bill, and the additional work we need to do is really making sure that those products are available holistically and automatically for all individuals to be able to access,” she said. 

Only a few people to help

Not having enough labor can also create an issue for grassroots or student-led organizations that depend on members to keep doing the work. 

“It can be like logistically very difficult to deal with so much product and so much distribution that needs to happen with only a few people who have the ability to do this kind of thing full time,” Toscano said. “With the state stepping in, it’ll fix those problems.”

Advertisement

This is the third session since the I AM bill was first introduced, and it’s approaching the last few months of the second year of this legislative session. Speizer said the biggest hurdle is not lack of support, but making the bill a top priority for legislators. 

“This is a bipartisan bill that everyone supports for the most part, but the issue is just making sure that it’s the number one priority for enough legislators that it gets passed quickly,” she said.

Higgins said she doesn’t have a projected timeline for the bill, but hopes the measure gets through the House and onto the governor’s desk. 

“We’re getting so close to the end of the session that we’re not maybe as confident as we were six months ago. But we’re really proud of how far it’s come this session and proud of the work that has been done by everyone involved,” Speizer said. “At this point, it’s just did our efforts make as much of a difference as we wanted to or will we be trying again next year? It’s really hard to know.”

The  Cape Cod Times is providing this coverage for free as a public service. Please take a moment to support local journalism by subscribing. 

Advertisement





Source link

Massachusetts

Massachusetts Senate passes bill to ban sale of dogs, cats from pet stores

Published

on

Massachusetts Senate passes bill to ban sale of dogs, cats from pet stores


Changes could be on the way in Massachusetts when it comes to where you buy ‘Buddy’ or ‘Rocky’ as the Senate passes legislation banning pet stores from selling dogs and cats.

It’s part of the ‘PETS Act’, which still needs approval from the House of Representatives and Gov. Maura Healey.

Several municipalities including Attleboro have already adopted similar regulations at a local level, with the goal being to prevent a puppy mill to pet shop pipeline.

Advertisement

Alisa Clements, the Director of Government Affairs for the Pet Advocacy Network spoke with NBC 10’s Devin Bates about the bill. (WJAR)

“If it will help stop puppy mills and maybe help put a crimp in that distribution and force people to think of other ways to acquire pets, especially rescues, that would be great,” said dog owner Linda Taylor.

However, those against the legislation claimed it would hurt small businesses who rely on pet sales. The non-profit Pet Advocacy Network believes it could even end up shifting demand to shady online sellers or out-of-state dealers.

“New York’s ban went into effect a little over a year ago, and we’re already seeing folks selling dogs out of their cars in Manhattan and importing dogs from Taiwan to apartments in Queens and selling them,” said Alisa Clements, the Director of Government Affairs for the Pet Advocacy Network.

Advertisement

Clements said these sellers are not inspected or regulated.

“All the things that our pet stores do, because they are the most highly regulated and inspected place to get a dog in this country,” she said.

The MSPCA has voiced its support for the PETS Act, adding that state and federal records show dogs from, “some of the worst puppy mills in the country have been sold to Massachusetts consumers at pet shops.”

The Pet Advocacy Network, while agreeing with some other measures of the sweeping PETS Act, like allowing seniors in state-funded housing to have a companion animal of their choosing, was disappointed the ban on dog and cat sales was included in the package.

A dog running inside a park in North Attleborough. (WJAR)

Advertisement

Instead, the organization is throwing its support behind another bill under consideration, H.2256, which would essentially require pet stores to source their dogs and cats from U.S.D.A-licensed breeders while tightening up inspection requirements.

“They’re going to have to be licensed, inspected and transparent about the health and origins of every animal that they sell, so it’s really this great, comprehensive bill that will strengthen the regulations,” Clements said. “This is actually something that will help increase protections, would do something for animal welfare and help combat that problem we’re seeing of bad actors.”

If the PETS Act does pass, store owners who sell a dog or a cat could face a $1,000 fine, with repeat offenders risking losing their shop’s license altogether.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts man charged with threatening girlfriend of FBI Director Patel

Published

on

Massachusetts man charged with threatening girlfriend of FBI Director Patel


A Massachusetts man was arrested last week after authorities said he sent FBI Director Kash Patel’s girlfriend an email ​saying he would be “happy” when her face is “canoed by an assault ‌rifle,” court records unsealed on Thursday showed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

20 new charges brought against former Massachusetts doctor accused of rape

Published

on

20 new charges brought against former Massachusetts doctor accused of rape


A former Brigham and Women’s Doctor who was charged with raping two patients last year has been indicted on new charges. Derrick Todd, 52, from Wayland, Massachusetts, was indicted by a grand jury on three charges of rape and 17 counts of indecent assault and battery. He is expected to be arraigned on Wednesday, March 25.

“The allegations outlined in those indictments reflect just an extraordinary exploitation of a patient’s vulnerability and abuse of a position of trust,” Middlesex County District Attorney Marian Ryan told reporters.

The new charges stem from allegations by 11 women from the ages of 20 to 60 years old, Ryan said. The crimes allegedly occurred between 2022 and 2023 while Todd was a practicing rheumatologist and primary care physician at Charles River Medical Associates, a private practice in Framingham.

“Allegations include him making inappropriate sexual comments during exams, conducting exams that were excessively painful, and conducting examinations that lasted an unusual and unnecessary amount of time,” Ryan said.

Advertisement

Todd first faced criminal charges last year when he was indicted on charges of raping a 39-year-old woman and 26-year-old woman, both patients at Charles River.

Dozens more women accuse Todd of abuse, some during his time at Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital in Boston, with more than 270 plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit against him.

“He was a master manipulator. And his ability to groom patients, giving them access, seeing them early hours, late in the evening, texting with them by cellphone privately,” said attorney William Thompson who is representing his accusers.

Faulker Hospital conducted its own investigation and fired Todd. He also relinquished his license to practice.

DA Ryan said her office has completed its investigation but that still leaves room for others to come forward and for other counties to bring charges.

Advertisement

“It’s a journey. It’s day by day, and everyone is a survivor, and everyone is healing in their own way,” Thompson said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending