Connect with us

Massachusetts

Keller @ Large: Massachusetts Ballot Question 1 Debate

Published

on

Keller @ Large: Massachusetts Ballot Question 1 Debate


Query 1 on the Massachusetts poll would set up a further 4% revenue tax on annual taxable incomes of $1 million or extra — an revenue stage that may be adjusted yearly to replicate will increase in the price of dwelling. Revenues from this tax can be used, topic to appropriation by the state legislature, for public training, public faculties, and for the restore and upkeep of roads, bridges, and public transportation. If accepted, it will take impact subsequent 12 months.

Jon Keller introduced in two specialists to debate the main points of Query 1: Honest Share Massachusetts Communications Director Steve Crawford and Pioneer Institute Government Director Jim Stergios. The next solutions are edited for readability. 

Keller: C comes earlier than S, so I will begin with you, Steve. You’re feeling that is wanted, why? 

Crawford: Nobody argues that we’d like more cash for training and transportation on this state. Our increased training system has been divested from during the last 20 years. Youngsters getting back from the pandemic wouldn’t have sufficient lecturers within the school rooms. Many children in gateway cities are in faculties which might be 100 years outdated. We have now virtually 650 bridges which might be in determined want of restore, that is structural repairs, we’re not simply speaking about potholes. So what Query 1 would do is ask the wealthiest in our state to pay a bit of bit extra, when you make over 1,000,000 {dollars} a 12 months you’ll pay a bit of bit extra, that cash can be devoted to transportation and training — constitutionally devoted to go to these functions.

Advertisement

Keller: Jim, you do not really feel it is wanted. Why not?

Stergios: I might ask viewers to consider it each within the brief time period and long run. During the last 12-13 years, we have doubled our finances, we’re spending $53 billion final 12 months, our finances went up 10%. I do not assume there are that many individuals in Massachusetts to really feel like their revenue goes up 10% in a single 12 months that shortly, they might have extra revenues they might spend. Final 12 months we had a $5 billion surplus due to financial progress. Ditto for the 12 months earlier than. We have now billions in COVID funding from the federal authorities that has not been expended. In training, there is a particular pool, it is effectively over a billion {dollars} not been expended, we have solely expended a fraction of it. We have now the assets to do what we wish to do. And in reality, this proposal, whereas it says on paper, what you learn is precisely the way it’s worded, the lawyer basic herself in 2018 argued that it is only a tax, it is not going to go to training and transportation. 

Keller: Rebuttal? 

Crawford: That is simply not what was stated on the listening to, which the opponents misplaced within the Anderson vs. Healey case. What Justice Kafker stated throughout that listening to is sure, it’s devoted to transportation and training. You may return and examine the tape. It’s devoted. It is no totally different from different devoted funds that we’ve just like the gasoline tax, besides it is written into the Structure. It is that there is nothing that may be modified about that.

Stergios: What the Justice has stated is that the topic to appropriation signifies that voters perceive that the legislature can get rid of the revenue in any method during which they wish to. In 2018, earlier than the Supreme Judicial Court docket of Massachusetts, the argument from the Legal professional Normal and her written argument says clearly it is a tax. That is all it’s, it is not assured to go to training or transportation. The legislature has the flexibility to get rid of it. And I might lastly say, the legislature twice had the flexibility to earmark the funding to training, transportation, there are two amendments they voted it down, two occasions 4 to 1. It isn’t a small margin. They stated we’re not going to place it there.

Advertisement

Keller: Can or cannot the legislature take this cash and spend it on one thing unrelated to training or transportation? 

Crawford: Cash raised by this tax? No, they can’t. 

Stergios: The cash from this tax goes to training, transportation, however the legislature’s totally succesful, totally empowered to redirect cash presently spent, there’s 18 billion, this raises a few billion and a half max, they’ll redirect that cash to different functions. That’s what occurred in California, and lots of different states which have carried out this. These two amendments they rejected, make it very clear, that is what the legislature intends to do. 

Watch Half Two of the talk: 


Advertisement

Debate Half 2: Massachusetts Poll Query 1

10:53



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

United Way of Massachusetts Bay Honors Payano and Vargas at State House Ceremony

Published

on

United Way of Massachusetts Bay Honors Payano and Vargas at State House Ceremony


(Additional photograph below.) United Way of Massachusetts Bay honored Sen. Pavel M. Payano and Rep. Andy X. Vargas, both representing Haverhill, as inaugural “Legislative Champions” last month. Payano and Vargas were presented awards for their “demonstrated strong leadership and commitment to education, food security and economic justice, including transformative policy solutions such as Baby Bonds



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts teacher charged after police sting operation, accused of trying to meet girl for ‘sex acts’

Published

on

Massachusetts teacher charged after police sting operation, accused of trying to meet girl for ‘sex acts’


A Salem teacher has been charged following a police sting operation after he allegedly tried to meet up with an underage girl for “sex acts.”

Gym and health teacher Darren Benedick, 42, was apparently unaware that the person he was communicating with online was not a 14-year-old girl, but rather an undercover Newbury cop who had been monitoring a “teens-only” chat room.

The teacher at Salem Academy Charter School was arrested by Newbury Police, with help from Salem Police. He was charged with one count of child enticement and one count of dissemination of matter harmful to minors.

“At this time, authorities have no allegations that any students at the school were subject to the defendant’s alleged misconduct,” the Essex DA’s Office said in a statement.

Advertisement

Benedick was arraigned in Newburyport District Court on Wednesday following the sting operation.

“The defendant is alleged to have engaged in online conversations with the undercover officer expressing a desire to meet in person and engage in sexual activities, to have sent an obscene image to the officer, and to have described the sex acts that he wished to perform,” the Essex DA’s Office said.

Benedick made plans to meet the person on Wednesday, and he was taken into custody when he arrived for the intended encounter.

Prosecutors at the arraignment requested cash bail of $50,000 with GPS monitoring, home confinement, and no contact with children. The court set bail at $5,000 and granted the non-monetary terms, including the no contact with children order.

The Essex DA and the police chiefs in Salem and Newbury “advise parents and guardians to engage youth in age-appropriate discussions about proper online and social media behavior, and to encourage them to speak up if they encounter inappropriate contact from an adult.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell: A Reproductive Justice Champion

Published

on

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell: A Reproductive Justice Champion


During her time in office, the AG has helped create an abortion legal hotline for the state, helped implement the state’s abortion provider shield law, and more.

Andrea Joy Campbell (Mass.Gov)

Shortly after taking office last year, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell created a Reproductive Justice Unit that has worked tirelessly to protect and expand reproductive health, rights and justice. This Unit has focused on eliminating disparities in maternal health, combatting anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers, working across state lines to respond to national attacks on reproductive health care, and defending and enforcing Massachusetts’ strong legal protections for reproductive rights.

“We are doing this work with a hands-on and expert-led approach,” said AG Campbell, the first Black woman to hold statewide office in Massachusetts. Upon taking office, she pledged to “be a national leader in protecting reproductive rights and gender affirming care.”

On June 18, AG Campbell and her Reproductive Justice Unit (headed by Sapna Khatri) convened more than 120 reproductive justice experts at Western New England Law School in Springfield, Massachusetts.

Participants included community organizations, healthcare providers, legal advocates and academics. During a listening session, Campbell heard how her office could better champion reproductive justice on a local, state and national level, particularly with national efforts to roll back these rights. 

Advertisement

“As bodily autonomy is under relentless attack nationwide, Massachusetts is doubling down on its efforts to champion, defend and expand access to sexual and reproductive health care,” said AG Campbell.

Before the convening, Campbell toured Seven Sisters Midwifery and Community Birthing Center in Florence, Massachusetts—the state’s only midwife-owned and operated independent birth center. 

At the convening, Campbell announced the release of five new “Know Your Rights” guides focused on abortion, gender affirming care, contraception, the state shield law and anti-abortion clinics.

“To help ensure that people in Massachusetts know their rights in the confusing and evolving post-Dobbs world, I am glad to release new resources to help people navigate common issues associated with reproductive care,” said AG Campbell.

As one of her first actions in office, AG Campbell worked with Reproductive Equity Now to create the Abortion Legal Hotline—a free and confidential hotline that assists Massachusetts healthcare providers and patients by providing legal advice related to abortion access and care. 

Advertisement

The AG has also led efforts to fully implement and operationalize the state’s abortion provider shield law, including Massachusetts’ first-of-its-kind telehealth provider shield provision, which protects clinicians in the state who serve patients living in states banning abortion. Seven other states have since passed similar telehealth provider shield laws (WA, CO, VT, NY, CA, ME, RI) and four practices—Aid Access, Abuzz, The MAP, and Armadillo Clinic—are now serving over 12,000 women living in ban states each month with telehealth abortion and FDA-approved pills by mail.

AG Campbell has filed amicus briefs with the Supreme Court of the United States to protect access to medication abortion and emergency abortion care, fought to defend access to gender affirming care on behalf of trans youth, and leveraged the tools of her office to address the maternal health crisis in Massachusetts. This is evident in her launching and distributing a $1.5 million maternal health equity grant. AG Campbell’s predecessor, now-Governor Maura Healey, issued a consumer advisory on anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers in July 2022, and the AG has aggressively pursued complaints filed against these centers. 

AG Andrea Campbell and Loretta Ross speak at Smith College. (@MassAGO / Twitter)

The reproductive justice convening concluded with a fireside chat between AG Campbell and the nationally renowned reproductive justice activist Loretta J. Ross, now a professor of women’s and gender studies at Smith College in Northampton, Massachusetts. Campbell and Ross discussed the history of the reproductive justice movement, the state of reproductive care access today and the government’s role in sustaining long-term systemic change.

“True reproductive justice is all-encompassing and accounts for liberties such as the right to have or not have a child, along with the opportunity to raise children in environments where they can thrive,” said Ross. “Attorney General Campbell is one of few leaders nationwide to use a truly comprehensive and expert-based approach to championing reproductive justice, and it is my deep honor to support her in this work.” 

Read more:

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending