Connect with us

Massachusetts

Families, physicians fear what Medicaid cuts could mean for children in Massachusetts – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Families, physicians fear what Medicaid cuts could mean for children in Massachusetts – The Boston Globe


Now, parents, policy makers, and health providers are holding their breath as Republicans in Congress weigh potentially billions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid. Federal dollars pay for more than half of MassHealth’s $20 billion annual budget.

“MassHealth is a cornerstone for children’s health in Massachusetts,“ said Katherine Howitt, director of the Massachusetts Medicaid Policy Institute, an independent policy analysis program of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation.

The consequences of significant cuts to Medicaid, and the potential for voter outrage, have some doubtful Congress will ultimately cut from the public insurance program.

The information coming out of Washington is too vague to act upon, said Mike Levine, assistant secretary for MassHealth.

Advertisement

“We do not have specific contingency plans around what services we offer kids and what we might do if Congress or CMS takes actions we don’t like,” he said in an interview Monday.

Still, the possibility frightens Bernard. When her daughter, Victoria, was 2, before doctors had figured out what prescriptions and dosages would best control her epilepsy, she routinely had multiple seizures a week, her mother said. The child’s speech is delayed, but with the therapy MassHealth pays for, she is learning to express herself verbally.

“Without MassHealth I don’t know how I would do,” Bernard said. “I’m very concerned about it.”

Congressional Republicans have said they want to balance tax cuts by, in part, eliminating $880 billion in federal spending over 10 years. Leading Republicans, including President Trump, have said that won’t include cuts to Medicaid benefits. US House Speaker Mike Johnson has said his party is seeking only to reduce “fraud, waste, and abuse.”

But experts on health policy say there’s no way Republicans can achieve their budget goals without impacting Medicaid. At more than $600 billion a year, the program is among the federal government’s largest expenses.

Advertisement

“We know that the only way to achieve $880 billion in cuts is through catastrophic cuts to the Medicaid program as we know it,” said Megan Cole Brahim, a Boston University professor and co-director of the school’s Medicaid Policy Lab. “There’s really no way it wouldn’t have harmful implications for children.”

Massachusetts expanded MassHealth in 2006 to include children in households earning up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level, extending coverage to more children than in all but a few states.

As of 2023, only 0.6 percent of Massachusetts children were uninsured, according to a report from the state Center for Health Information and Analysis on insurance coverage in the state.

The state’s post-pandemic review of MassHealth eligibility led to about 363,000 people removed from membership last year, including almost 59,000 children ages 17 and younger, the state reported.

Even if Congress took a hatchet to Medicaid, Cole Brahim said she anticipated Massachusetts would seek to protect children from the brunt of the consequences. Officials could be forced to reduce access to some optional benefits, such as physical therapy, case management, and community health workers, and could reduce the kinds of prescription drugs, or the dosage amounts, covered by MassHealth.

Advertisement

Losing even partial Medicaid reimbursements would be devastating to community health centers and hospitals. On average, the health centers receive about 31 percent of their revenue from MassHealth, according to the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers. MassHealth paid about 18 percent of all hospital revenue in the state as of 2022, according to the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation. Boston Children’s Hospital reported roughly 46 percent of its Massachusetts patients are MassHealth members. Substantial cuts to Medicaid, hospital officials said, would create financial aftershocks that would affect every patient in the hospital.

“The danger for any children’s hospital in the country, [if] you start cutting Medicaid, you’re going to affect care delivery for every patient,” said Joshua Greenberg, Boston Children’s vice president of government relations.

On Monday, Governor Maura Healey and her partner, Joanna Lydgate, toured Children’s to highlight how potential cuts to Medicaid, as well as halts to millions in National Institutes of Health research grants, could affect patients. Kevin B. Churchwell, the hospital’s president and chief executive, said federal funding cuts have already disrupted clinical trials and research, including work with vaccines.

“We have patients in clinical trials who had their treatments stop because of this,” Healey said. “Can you imagine the cruelty of that?”

Among the groups Medicaid supports, including seniors and some people with disabilities, children are a relatively inexpensive clientele. They account for about 16 percent of the state’s total MassHealth expense. The families of some children enrolled also have private insurance but rely on MassHealth as secondary coverage to help with medical-related bills their insurer doesn’t cover.

Advertisement

For many children, MassHealth membership means more than covered doctor visits. The program pays whatever is needed to ensure children with disabilities have the equipment, care, and support they need. It allows children to receive Medicaid-covered services through their school’s health services and pays for behavioral health care in the community or home.

In addition, families on MassHealth get screenings to identify dental, aural, visual, or developmental concerns. Such wide-ranging and widely accessible insurance coverage can benefit children their whole lives. Children with good health care do better in school, a 2021 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation report stated, and those with access to Medicaid tend to have fewer hospital stays, emergency room visits, and chronic conditions in adulthood.

Victoria Bernard’s doctor, Laura Livaditis, director of pediatrics at Mattapan Community Health Center, said about 90 percent of the children treated at the center are enrolled in MassHealth. Most of her patients are also from families living at or below the poverty line. MassHealth’s wide-ranging coverage has helped them to avoid evictions, she said. And for immigrants, the program has helped them make connections to ensure they have stable food and housing.

“I’m continuously impressed with the breadth and depth of services MassHealth covers for my patients,” Livaditis said. “I can’t remember the last time I had to fight with [MassHealth] insurance for needed services.”

Correspondent Emily Spatz contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Jason Laughlin can be reached at jason.laughlin@globe.com. Follow him @jasmlaughlin.





Source link

Massachusetts

Think you’re middle class in Massachusetts? Here’s the income range

Published

on

Think you’re middle class in Massachusetts? Here’s the income range


play

Your household can earn more than $200,000 a year and still be considered part of the “middle class” in Massachusetts, according to a recent study by SmartAsset.

Massachusetts ranks as the top state with the highest income range for households to be considered middle class, based on SmartAsset’s analysis using 2024 income data from the U.S. Census Bureau. The Pew Research Center defines the middle class as households earning roughly two-thirds to twice the national median household income.

Advertisement

According to a 2022 Gallup survey, about half of U.S. adults consider themselves middle class, with 38% identifying as “middle class” and 14% as “upper-middle class.” Higher-income Americans and college graduates were most likely to identify with the “middle class” or “upper-middle class,” while lower-income Americans and those without a college education generally identified as “working class” or “lower class.”

Here’s how much money your household would need to bring in annually to be considered middle class in Massachusetts.

How much money would you need to make to be considered middle class in MA?

In Massachusetts, households would need to earn between $69,900 and $209,656 annually to be considered middle class, according to SmartAsset. The Bay State has the highest income range in the country for middle-class households. The state’s median household income is $104,828.

In Boston, the range is slightly lower. Households need to earn between $65,194 and $195,582 annually to qualify as middle class, giving the city the 19th-highest income range among the 100 largest U.S. cities. Boston’s median household income is $97,791.

Advertisement

How do other New England states compare?

Massachusetts has the highest income range for middle-class households in New England. Here’s what households would have to earn in neighboring states:

  1. Massachusetts (#1 nationally) – $69,885 to $209,656 annually; median household income of $104,828
  2. New Hampshire (#6 nationally) – $66,521 to $199,564 annually; median household income of $99,782
  3. Connecticut (#10 nationally) – $64,033 to $192,098 annually; median household income of $96,049
  4. Rhode Island (#17 nationally) – $55,669 to $167,008 annually; median household income of $83,504
  5. Vermont (#19 nationally) – $55,153 to $165,460 annually; median household income of $82,730
  6. Maine (#30 nationally) – $50,961 to $152,884 annually; median household income of $76,442

Which state has the lowest middle-class income range?

Mississippi ranks last for the income range needed to be considered middle class, according to SmartAsset. Households there would need to earn between $39,418 and $118,254 annually. The state’s median household income is $59,127.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts AG Campbell accused of breaking professional conduct amid audit lawsuit

Published

on

Massachusetts AG Campbell accused of breaking professional conduct amid audit lawsuit


AG Andrea Campbell called Diana DiZoglio’s personal cell phone a day after an SJC justice moved the legislative audit legal case to the full court, a call that the auditor alleges violates the state’s professional conduct rules.

DiZoglio’s fight with Campbell is steaming ahead, even as the attorney general claims that there’s a “path forward” for the voter-approved audit of the state Legislature, over 15 months after 72% of the state signed off on the ballot measure.

DiZoglio’s office argues that Campbell’s attempt to call the auditor on her personal cell phone violates Rule 4.2 of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits lawyers from communicating directly about a case with an individual represented by another attorney without consent.

“The Attorney General is our state’s top law enforcement officer and should follow the Rules of Professional Conduct,” DiZoglio said in a statement on Wednesday. “I will not participate in dark, shadow conversations with the AG about this lawsuit.”

Advertisement

“That she is trying to get me to speak with her alone, via private cell phone, without my legal counsel present, is unacceptable,” the auditor added.

Campbell’s office is firing back at DiZoglio’s claim, which it says is a “false and baseless accusation.”

“If the Auditor is interested in a solution,” the office said in a statement shared with the Herald, “the AG is available to speak with her or the Auditor’s staff can speak with our office – but as it stands, her office refuses to engage with us directly on a path forward.”

DiZoglio and Campbell have been locked in a legal tug-of-war since voters approved the audit in November 2024.

Siding with legislative leadership, Campbell has claimed that DiZoglio has not answered basic questions on the scope of the legislative audit. The AG argues that the auditor’s review may also violate the state Constitution.

Advertisement

In February, DiZoglio sued House Speaker Ron Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka for refusing to comply with the audit. The auditor is asking the SJC to allow her to appoint an outside attorney, as Campbell is representing the top Beacon Hill Democrats.

DiZoglio spotlighted Campbell’s attempt to talk with her on her personal cell phone after the AG appeared on GBH’s Boston Public Radio on Wednesday. The auditor also released emails between the two offices regarding the call.

In her radio segment, Campbell admitted to calling the auditor after seeing her at a recent event in Worcester and that she had yet to hear back from DiZoglio. The AG said the message that she is trying to convey to the auditor is that “there’s a pathway forward.”

Speaking at an event on March 16, DiZoglio said, “I have only asked for financial receipts and state contracts. There is nothing unconstitutional about …  getting access to that information.”

Campbell argues DiZoglio has “changed” her stance on the audit’s scope.

Advertisement

Deputy Auditor Michael Leung-Tat expressed his concerns about Campbell’s call to DiZoglio in an email on Monday to Assistant Attorney General Anne Sterman and First Assistant Attorney General Pat Moore.

Leung-Tat emphasized that the last time DiZoglio and Campbell spoke via phone was allegedly in November 2023, when the AG informed the auditor of her support of the legislative audit.

“They don’t have a relationship beyond our office’s official communications,” Leung-Tat wrote, “and, as you know, official business between our offices is conducted at the staff level. … it appears that the Attorney General was calling the Auditor about the pending litigation before the SJC.”

“As you are aware,” the deputy auditor added, “we have been engaged with your office seeking assistance in our efforts to audit the Legislature since 2023, so it is curious that the Attorney General only just now decided to call.

In an email reply, Moore said there was “nothing unethical” about Campbell’s call and that the AGO was “surprised to see” the auditor’s “unfounded assertion.”

Advertisement

“The Auditor has also used her time in those forums make false allegations against the Attorney General and officers of every other branch of state government, recently including judges,” Moore wrote. “Having now heard multiple variations of these comments, the Attorney General felt it appropriate to reach to talk with the Auditor.”

After multiple exchanges back and forth, Moore refuted Leung-Tat’s claims that DiZoglio has answered Campbell’s questions to help the legislative audit proceed. The first assistant AG added that the office “takes pride in our professionalism.”

“We do not, just to pick one example,” Moore wrote, “claim that every state agency funded by legislative appropriation is corrupt; nor that the courts adjudicating our cases are.”

“Nor do we take exception to conferring with those against whom we are litigating,” he added. “We do that every day.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts faces World Cup-test with friendly match in Foxboro

Published

on

Massachusetts faces World Cup-test with friendly match in Foxboro


Massachusetts will get a taste of World Cup action in Foxboro on Thursday.

There is a friendly match between Brazil and France at Gillette Stadium.

It’s being considered a test ahead of World Cup matches in June.

Massachusetts governor Maura Healey says dozens of agencies are involved in making sure the 7 World Cup matches are safe and secure.

Advertisement

Thursday is a test for transportation for the World Cup.

The MBTA will have 4 trains going from South Station to Foxboro.

MassDOT expects heavy traffic to begin later this morning with new traffic patterns near Gillette for the match.

As for the teams, NBC 10 caught up with Team France at their practice.

Team France says it is excited to face off against one of the best teams in the world.

Advertisement

France is ranked 3rd worldwide while Brazil is ranked 5th.

Parking opens at noon while the game’s kickoff is at 4:00 p.m.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending