Connect with us

Massachusetts

Even middle-income families in Massachusetts struggle to pay for college – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Even middle-income families in Massachusetts struggle to pay for college – The Boston Globe


“Gig work is a blessing to people like me,” Strouth said. Still, her son graduated with about $90,000 in student loans.

While college tuition is broadly affordable for the rich, who have the wherewithal to pay the bills, and many poor students qualify for significant financial aid, especially at the wealthiest schools and state institutions, it’s a calamity for those in the middle. They face stratospheric prices but aren’t likely to get much help from colleges or the government.

The sticker price for a year at a private college in Massachusetts now exceeds the annual salary of most middle-income earners in the state. College officials say only the wealthiest families pay the full amount, but for those earning $150,000 to $200,000, which is at the upper end of the middle income range in the Boston area, the expected yearly contribution is often north of $30,000 a year, and can be much higher depending on the school.

“What the college thinks you need and what you think you need are often very different figures,” said Shannon Barry Vasconcelos, a college finance coach with Bright Horizons, the child care provider that also advises families on educational matters, including college admissions. “It can be a problem for those families who fall in the middle.”

Advertisement

New research from Phillip Levine at the Brookings Institution found price increases have made it especially difficult for families on the lower portion of the “higher-end of the income distribution,” Levine said in an interview.

“That is a range that has the most difficulty affording those increases,” Levine said. “They’re subject to the greatest extent of price increases, with income levels that can’t strongly support that.”

The high cost of living in Massachusetts also makes it hard for families to save when kids are young, as experts say they should. Day care costs are exorbitant, sometimes as much or even more than a year at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. College tuition and housing are costlier in the Northeast, too — families in the region spent an average of $33,668 on higher education last year, 20 percent more than the national average, according to a 2023 report from student loan provider Sallie Mae.

The Globe checked six popular universities’ online price calculators to see what each school would charge a hypothetical family of four earning $170,000 a year, the equivalent of two average public school teacher salaries, with a $600,000 home, roughly the average Massachusetts home value, and college savings of $20,000. The findings show they could expect to pay anywhere from $32,600 a year to attend Williams College to $45,800 a year for Boston College. UMass Amherst’s price, which falls in between, still costs close to $3,000 a month. And many families have more than one child to put through school.

To be sure, affording college can be even more challenging for some lower middle income and poor families, particularly if they attend colleges with less robust resources for aid. Financial aid for lower-income families is easier to come by at some of the most selective colleges, though, especially for strong students; those from households earning less than $85,000 a year do not pay anything at all to attend well-endowed schools in the region, including Harvard College. And last fall, Governor Maura Healey stepped in to help less affluent families afford public institutions; she expanded the state’s MASSGrant Plus program, which now covers tuition, fees, and books for students eligible for federal Pell Grants at public universities, and reduces the cost for middle-income families.

Advertisement

Still, many middle- and upper middle-income families have fewer options and often find themselves resorting to large loans.

Although Strouth wishes she and her son did not have to turn to loans, especially private ones with high interest rates, Strouth, whose parents were Cornell University graduates who emphasized the importance of higher education, gets frustrated when she hears people say “you shouldn’t go to a school you can’t afford.”

“That really shouldn’t be the deciding factor,” Strouth said. “If your kid is fortunate enough to get into the school of their dreams, that you know is going to lead to more success, if you can just get through the next four years … as a parent, you need to figure it out.”

Laurie and Tom Stanley in Medford tried to plan, but looking back, they say, their efforts to save were almost laughable. They put away $30 a week — $10 per child — for future college costs while their three daughters were growing up, plus whatever else they could scrape together, ultimately saving $16,000 for each of their daughters’ college educations.

“We saved every single dime that we could,” said Laurie Stanley, a nurse at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. “We collected bottles and cans, and we’d go weekly to the liquor store [to redeem them] … every penny we found, their birthday money — everything went into their education accounts.”

Advertisement

Two of their daughters decided to live at home for college to save money and commute to the University of Massachusetts Boston and the University of Massachusetts Lowell.

“We wanted them to come out with good jobs, but with minimal or no loans,” Stanley said.

The couple, who are nearing retirement, have spent $100,000 on sending their youngest daughter, Emily, to a much more expensive school, Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida, to study aerospace engineering. They had to dip into their retirement savings to pull it off, said Tom Stanley, a teacher at Lynn Classical High School. Emily, who is currently working as a substitute teacher at her father’s school, recently applied to finish her studies at UMass Lowell while living at home.

“My only regret is the money,” she said. “As cool as it was to go to school out of state, it’s just too expensive.”

The Stanleys said they spoke with their kids candidly about the high costs of college — something families today are increasingly doing, compared to past generations, said Karen E. Van Voorhis, a financial planner based in Norwell.

Advertisement

“It’s become much more of a collaborative process,” Van Voorhis said.

David Thibault-Muñoz, a Gardner resident who works at Mount Wachusett Community College, said his daughter took a practical approach in her college search. She enrolled at Framingham State last fall as a junior after completing a dual enrollment program in high school, graduating with an associate degree. The family is taking out loans to pay for the two years at Framingham State, which is about half the price of UMass Amherst, where she was also accepted.

“When a student graduates with a lot of debt, they’re several steps away from being able to save money to purchase a first car, to purchase a home,” Thibault-Muñoz said. “It’s harder for young people to get on their feet because they have this debt.”

Some Massachusetts parents continue to make big sacrifices to pay for college.

Juraci Capataz recently left a job she loves working for the Massachusetts attorney general’s office after just a year to earn a higher salary in the private sector so she can afford her son’s college tuition next year. Capataz, a Portuguese immigrant, said her son is hoping to study health care finance at the University of Connecticut next year, a program not offered at UMass.

Advertisement

The family is still waiting to receive their FAFSA information, but Capataz is not expecting much aid beyond loans based on their six-figure income level. UConn currently charges $58,092 for out-of-state students.

Capataz hopes her son could qualify for a lower regional price for residents of the Northeast outside Connecticut in a couple years if he commits to the program, which is not available at UMass.

“We aren’t poor enough for financial aid, not rich enough to write out a check,” Capataz said. “If I didn’t have this opportunity of a job that happened to fall onto my lap, the stress would be so much more.”

Liz Polay-Wettengel’s oldest son is heading to college in the fall but she doesn’t yet know how they will pay for tuition.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff

Even families that seem to be doing pretty well financially are worried about paying for college. Liz Polay-Wettengel works in public relations, earning about $130,000 a year; her husband David’s job at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt pays $90,000. The reality, though, is that the cost of living in Greater Boston is high, and most of their money goes to paying the bills, she said, not luxuries, and they have a high debt load.

Advertisement

They are still waiting for the financial aid information to come through, but they’re not likely to get much based on their salaries, Polay-Wettengel said. They’ve already decided they can’t afford one of their son’s top choices, Syracuse University, which posts a sticker price of $85,214 a year and has offered him no scholarships. Instead, he has committed to UMass Amherst, which will likely cost more than $140,000 over four years.

“We will figure it out somehow,” Polay-Wettengel said.


Hilary Burns can be reached at hilary.burns@globe.com. Follow her @Hilarysburns.





Source link

Advertisement

Massachusetts

Newton judge accused of helping man evade ICE has hearing

Published

on

Newton judge accused of helping man evade ICE has hearing


A Newton judge accused of helping an undocumented immigrant evade federal immigration custody in April 2018 had a hearing before the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct on Monday.

Judge Shelley Joseph allegedly allowed Jose Medina-Perez, a Dominican national, to escape out a downstairs back door while an ICE agent waited in the lobby to detain him. Medina-Perez was facing a fugitive from justice charge on a warrant out of Pennsylvania along with two misdemeanor drug charges.

“This case is about the integrity, impartiality and independence of the Massachusetts judiciary,” said Judith Fabricant, special counsel for the commission.

“Judge Joseph that day was trying to respect the rights of everybody before her,” said Elizabeth Mulvey, Joseph’s attorney.

Advertisement

Joseph was first indicted on federal charges of obstruction of justice in 2019 under the first Trump administration. After admitting to certain facts, those charges were dropped under the Biden administration, and her case was referred to the commission.

Monday’s hearing started with a viewing at Newton District Court, with Denis J. McInerney, the hearing officer appointed by the Supreme Judicial Court for this case. Fabricant and Mulvey then presented opening statements in Suffolk Superior Court.

The defense claims Joseph had nothing to do with the conspiracy to help Medina-Perez escape, laying blame on David Jellinek, who was his defense lawyer.

“Before Judge Joseph even knew that David Jellinek was in the courthouse, he had already made a deal with court officer Wes MacGregor,” Mulvey said. “He had this deal that if he could get his client back downstairs, the court officer would let him out the sallyport door,” Mulvey said.

Jellinek was the first to take the stand. In his testimony, he described feeling as though he had Joseph’s permission to bring Medina-Perez downstairs to help him sneak out.

Advertisement

“He told the judge that if his client could go back downstairs, he thought he could get him released through the back,” Fabricant said. “The judge said something to the effect of, ‘Yes, that’s what we’ll do.’”

Joseph’s team said otherwise.

“Nobody told her that Medina-Perez had gone out the back door. She knew nothing about it,” Mulvey said.

Much of this debate stems from what exactly was said when the court recording was shut off for 52 seconds. Fabricant asked Jellinek why he requested to speak to Joseph off the record.

“I wanted to go off the record because I knew that the next phase of our conversation and what I was going to suggest or ask for as a defense lawyer was perhaps right on the edge of acceptable or appropriate,” Jellinek said.

Advertisement

The hearing could last several days. The Commission on Judicial Conduct has the power to recommend discipline but does not have the power to remove Joseph from the bench.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Cool temps, scattered showers in Mass. as wildfire smoke lingers statewide

Published

on

Cool temps, scattered showers in Mass. as wildfire smoke lingers statewide


Chilly air, wildfire smoke and scattered showers will shroud Massachusetts Monday before more widespread rain comes later in the week.

While no air quality alerts were issued by the National Weather Service as of 6 a.m. on Monday, smoke from fires in Canada was still in the atmosphere statewide. Air quality alerts were issued for parts of New Hampshire near the border.

The air quality was at a “moderate” level and considered “unhealthy for sensitive groups” in parts of Eastern, Central and Western Massachusetts and on the Cape & the Islands as of 6 a.m., according to data from the DEP map. Those affected should take precautions in spending too long outside.

Temperatures were cool in the mid to upper 50s after sunrise on Monday morning. They’re expected to reach just the 60s and high 70s throughout the day, with the warmest areas in Western Massachusetts.

Advertisement

Under the overcast skies, there’s a chance for scattered showers statewide during the daytime and into Monday night, forecasters said.

This comes before more widespread, heavy rain and thunder move into the state on Tuesday. Forecasters are eyeing up to two inches of rain that could fall throughout the day on Tuesday and bring some street flooding.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

What went wrong for Democrats in 2024? Massachusetts party chairman on what needs to change.

Published

on

What went wrong for Democrats in 2024? Massachusetts party chairman on what needs to change.


Steve Kerrigan, the chairman of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, said his party needs to listen to voters more, because it cost them elections in during the 2024 campaign cycle.

The headline on a Washington Post column last week summed up the identity crisis preoccupying Democrats these days: “LET US COUNT THE 3,515 WAYS IN WHICH DEMOCRATS ARE LAME.” 

The piece went on to compile a list of the multitude of advice Democrats are getting, things like “go on the offensive,” “find plausible candidates,” “sound less judgmental,” “rethink the words they use,” “take a ‘specific and granular’ approach,” and “nominate someone who is ‘more mainstream.’”

What are Democrats doing different?

WBZ-TV asked Massachusetts Democratic party chairman Kerrigan what he takes away from it all. 

Advertisement

“It’s not surprising to me that that article or those lists come out of Washington,” he said. “The word that matters most to me is win. And if you look at all of the elections that have taken place since November of 2024, Democrats have outperformed and, in many cases, we have flipped seats from Republicans to Democrats in state legislatures all across the country.”

What are they doing differently in from the debacle of the fall of 2024?  

“We’re continuing to organize and talk to people where they are and, frankly, listen more, which is what our party, and any party who wishes to win elections needs to do. You have to be willing to talk to the voters and to listen,” says Kerrigan. “What we didn’t do in the wake of 2016 was listen to why a Trump voter existed in the first place, how he got elected in the first place. I really think we fell down on the job. We took data points throughout time, the midterms of ’18, the win in ’20 and the no-red-wave in ’22 and figured out that we had figured it out, when, in fact, we hadn’t.”

What have they figured out now? The Trump voters “feel like they did not have their voice heard,” Kerrigan said. 

“We’ve got a Washington, DC [where] the last time they fought for or increased the minimum wage, my former boss, Ted Kennedy led that battle, and he died in August of 2009. You’ve got a Congress that doesn’t pass a budget through regular order since 1997. The American people are frustrated, and they’re showing it by saying ‘You’re in power, we now are going to try the other guy,’ even though they knew what the other guy was up to,” Kerrigan said.

Advertisement

Should Maura Healey re-elected?

On the local front, Kerrigan was asked about recent polling showing only 37% of Massachusetts voters believe Gov. Maura Healey deserves re-election next year. He waved off that results and cited other pols that are more favorable for the incumbent.

“Governor Healey is going to earn re-election because she understands Massachusetts people need someone who’s going to fight to lower costs for them, going to fight to increase housing opportunities for them, going to fight back against Donald Trump. And frankly, neither Mike Kennealy nor Brian Shortsleeve [the two announced GOP candidates for governor] are willing to do any of that,” Kerrigan said.

Kerrigan also discussed the impact President Trump and his policies are likely to have on the campaign here, and gave his reaction to recent reporting on the handling of then-President Joe Biden’s decision to seek re-election. 

You can watch the entire conversation here, and join us every Sunday morning at 8:30 a.m. for more discussion with political and policy newsmakers on the weekend edition of “Keller At Large.” Next week’s guest will be Massachusetts GOP chair Amy Carnevale.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending