September 9, 2024

FRAMINGHAM – JJ Facey was a star on the soccer field and a champion in the classroom and in his community. Now the family of the 18-year-old is heartbroken but determined. “JJ was bright. He was a kindhearted person. Although he was very athletic and competitive, he was also humble and championed the success of others,” his father Jason Facey said.

The freshman at Framingham State University died earlier this month shortly after his first college soccer practice. On the way back to the dorm he began to complain about shortness of breath.

“He was walking and ending up getting picked up by a senior but then he had a seizure in the car, and things snowballed,” Jason Facey said. “And we were given a diagnosis of HOCM, which is a malady of the heart, which enlarged the walls in his heart and didn’t allow his heart to appropriately pump blood to his organs.”

JJ Facey, a freshman at Framingham State University, died after his first college soccer practice/CBS Boston

Massachusetts and Rhode Island have published the results of their first multi-state offshore wind solicitation, selecting nearly 2.9 GW of offshore wind power. As a part of the procurement, Massachusetts selected 2,678 MW in total from three projects and Rhode Island awarded 200 MW to one project.

Massachusetts selected 1,087 MW of the multi-state 1,287 MW SouthCoast Wind project, with Rhode Island Energy awarding the remaining 200 MW. Massachusetts also selected the 791 MW New England Wind 1 project and up to 800 MW of the 1,260 MW Vineyard Wind 2 project.

Through this procurement, offshore wind is said to power over 125,000 Rhode Island homes and 1.4 million Massachusetts households. All three projects intend to utilise Project Labor Agreements (PLAs).

“Today marks a historic milestone for Rhode Island and Massachusetts as we join forces to drive the largest offshore wind procurement in New England’s history,” said Rhode Island Governor Dan McKee.

The SouthCoast Wind project, with a total capacity of 1,287 MW, will be shared between Massachusetts, receiving 1,087 MW, and Rhode Island, which will take the remaining 200 MW.

The offshore wind project is being developed by Ocean Winds, a 50/50 joint venture owned by EDP Renewables and ENGIE.

The permitting is on schedule with several important milestones in the coming months, including the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) progressing the project’s Final Environmental Impact Statement, said Ocean Winds.

The project’s bid includes numerous commitments and investments with partners and the community, featuring USD 93 million allocated to initiatives such as local workforce development, fisheries and marine science research, environmental justice, and ratepayer support.

SouthCoast Wind plans to marshall its turbines at the New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal, have its operations and maintenance (O&M) port at Foss Terminal in New Bedford, and open a crew transfer and administrative hub in Rhode Island.

Project construction, which is expected in late 2025, will commence once it has received all federal, state, and local permits and a pending final investment decision.

Iberdrola’s Avangrid Renewables has been awarded 791 MW by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the multi-state regional offshore wind solicitation. New England Wind 1 is an offshore wind development located in the federal lease area OCS-A-0534, about 30 miles south of Barnstable, Massachusetts, and making landfall under the Craigville Beach parking lot in Barnstable.

The project will border Vineyard Wind 1, the nation’s first large-scale offshore wind farm currently under construction 15 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard.

BOEM approved the Construction and Operations Plan (COP) for the New England Wind 1 and 2 offshore projects in July, following the federal agency’s Record of Decision (ROD) in April.

According to Avangrid, New England Wind 1 will create more than 4,400 full-time equivalent jobs and bring USD 3 billion of local investment, including a new marshalling port in Salem and a new offshore wind manufacturing facility in New Bedford.

If a power purchase agreement (PPA) is signed and approved, then the offshore wind farm can begin construction in 2025, with a majority of investment taking place between 2027 and 2029, and reach full commercial operation in 2029, according to the developer.

The third project selected, Vineyard Wind 2, will deliver up to 800 MW of its 1,200 MW capacity. The offshore wind farm will be located 29 miles south of Nantucket in lease area OCS-522, held by funds managed by Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP).

The project is expected to reduce carbon pollution in New England by 2.1 million tonnes per year, equivalent to taking 414,000 cars off the road, according to Vineyard Offshore.

The Salem Offshore Wind Terminal will be the staging site for the project’s wind turbine installation, and O&M will be located in New Bedford.

In October 2023, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on employing a coordinated selection of offshore wind projects through each of their respective offshore wind energy generation solicitations – the first time neighbouring US states teamed up to procure offshore wind capacity.

Massachusetts launched its fourth and largest offshore wind solicitation to date on 30 August 2023, seeking 3.6 GW of new generation capacity, and Rhode Island and Connecticut opened their offshore wind solicitations in October 2023 for 1.2 GW and 2 GW of offshore wind, respectively.

In March this year, Connecticut and Rhode Island revealed they received proposals from Avangrid Renewables, Ørsted, SouthCoast Wind Energy, and Vineyard Offshore, while Massachusetts received bids from Avangrid Renewables, SouthCoast Wind Energy, and Vineyard Offshore.

Last month, the US Department of Energy (DOE) selected the New England states’ Power Up New England proposal for USD 389 million in federal funding to support investments in offshore wind transmission and multi-day batter storage infrastructure.

Follow offshoreWIND.biz on:

BOSTON – During an interview on the Sunday edition of “Keller At Large,” Massachusetts AFL-CIO president Chrissy Lynch talked about the state of labor in Massachusetts. Lynch also discussed why the organization is backing Democrat Kamala Harris this November.

Protecting the Right to Organize Act

“It’s really hard to organize a union,” said Lynch, a South Shore native and veteran labor activist who’s been busy trying to change that for the past 11 months since stepping into her current role.

Lynch discussed the importance of passing the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, a bill filed in Congress several years ago that establish and expand a range of protections of workers’ rights to organize and bargain collectively. 

“Corporations have figured out how to make it impossible for workers who want to join a union to join,” Lynch said. “The PRO Act would really level the playing field.”

Who is the Massachusetts AFL-CIO backing for president?

Lynch said the AFL-CIO’s top priority this election season is electing Democratic nominee Kamala Harris president, and she had a message for rank-and-file union members who are considering supporting Republican nominee Donald Trump. 

“I would ask them to please look at the issues, because that’s what we do. We don’t look at the personalities. We look at where do you stand?” Lynch said. “And on issue after issue, Donald Trump has a playbook to sew working class division to keep us fighting with each other over the crumbs. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz throughout their time in public office have consistently stood with working people, have consistently fought for and effectively passed laws to actually help working people to grow the middle class. And it’s very clear to me and to many of our leaders, when you look at the issues, who is with working people and who pays working people lip service.”

Should Massachusetts end MCAS requirement?

As for the Massachusetts ballot questions, Lynch said the labor group is “all in” supporting Question Two, which would end the state’s use of MCAS test passage as a graduation requirement.

“We hear from our educator members and unions that high stakes testing is bad for classrooms,” she says. “These classrooms are the working conditions of our educators, and they’re the learning conditions of our kids. I’ve got two kids in public schools. This is very personal to me, and when teachers see that students are struggling to learn the basics because they are stressing out, they are teaching to a test that’s not good for classrooms, that’s not good for kids.”