Connect with us

Maine

Rooks: School construction in Maine needs a major overhaul

Published

on

Rooks: School construction in Maine needs a major overhaul


Before leaving for Norway last week, Gov. Janet Mills announced a new commission to study the state’s school construction program and report to the Legislature by next April, to which one might respond, “It’s about time.”

The state’s existing construction model simply isn’t working, and has left towns and cities, and Maine’s regional school districts, with crumbling and outdated buildings and no clear path to replacing or renovating them.

Mills noted that in her first six years, there’s been $580 million committed, which sounds impressive until one realizes a single new high school often costs $100 million.

Advertisement

With dozens if not hundreds of inadequate buildings, replacing a handful won’t accomplish much, and the backlog of applications keeps growing.

The new commission, chaired by King Administration Labor Commissioner Valerie Landry, has a tall task, and should start with two major flaws in how school projects are financed.

The first is a peculiar compromise by which the state reimburses the local districts that actually borrow the money. Rather than a separate capital construction budget, funding is carved out from the mammoth General Purpose Aid account that goes mostly for operating expenses.

Construction is constrained by a debt ceiling – rarely increased – that limits new projects to debt retired from previous awards. Maine ends up being generous with operating support and stingy for capital spending.

Advertisement

The second flaw was introduced through adoption of the Essential Programs and Services (EPS) system in the late 1990s.

Previously, construction costs were shared between the state and the local district on a sliding scale. Towns and cities with robust tax bases, as in Cumberland County, would pay more, while those in Aroostook and Washington were mostly state-funded – but all districts paid something.

Under the EPS calculations the state pays 100% for almost every project, meaning it can fund even fewer projects than when local districts contributed.

Now, a few lucky districts effectively win the lottery, while everyone else is left out in the cold.

The infrastructure crisis has become so severe that some districts have tried to do without state funding and asked property taxpayers to pick up the entire tab. Even in Cumberland County, the results have been dismal.

Advertisement

While some local bonds have been approved, most have been turned down – not necessarily because voters don’t support schools but because they rightly see this as a state responsibility.

It makes little sense for Maine to provide 55% of all approved school spending but make construction projects wait a decade or longer. Students will have started school and graduated by then.

What can be done? There are other models.

When voters turned down several state prison bond issues during the McKernan administration, lawmakers created the Maine Governmental Facilities Authority, operating “off budget” and apart from General and Highway Fund bonds more familiar to voters.

Later expanded to courthouses, the authority has replaced or renovated nearly the entire state correctional system, and has built impressive judicial centers in several counties.

Advertisement

That’s all well and good, but most parents and taxpayers would place a higher priority on schools. That’s not the way things are working.

A School Facilities Authority may not be the answer, in part because we have an existing system, however flawed – but mostly because the authority has no real accountability to taxpayers and citizens.

One possibility: a robust General Fund bond that voters could approve to jumpstart the process, along with a real capital budget for the first time in decades.

There are other matters for the Landry commission to take up. Current rules require a perhaps excessive amount of acreage, eliminating sites close to urban and village centers and creating sprawl.

Kids can’t walk to school, and schools are increasingly remote from the communities that support them.

Advertisement

Finally, no amount of tinkering with construction funding can ignore Maine’s hopelessly decentralized school districts, well over 200 for fewer than 200,000 students – less than 1,000 per district.

A Baldacci administration initiative to consolidate failed because it ignored the proven formula for success: the Sinclair Act, passed in 1957 during the administration of Gov. Ed Muskie.

Implemented during the 1960s, Sinclair created 68 regional districts with generous support for mergers, and provided the first adequate rural high schools in Maine. The 2007 consolidation plan, by contrast, penalized districts for not merging while provided no state plan to do so.

The next administration could dust off Sinclair and see what will work in a high-tech era where public schools face unprecedented challenges.

Mainers have shown time and again they value public education and are willing to pay. Now the state must make sure they’re getting their money’s worth.

Advertisement

Douglas Rooks has been a Maine editor, columnist and reporter for 40 years. He is the author of four books, most recently a biography of U.S. Chief Justice Melville Fuller, and welcomes comment at drooks@tds.net.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Mud, beer and cash: Annual wife-carrying championship takes Maine by storm

Published

on

Mud, beer and cash: Annual wife-carrying championship takes Maine by storm


While its origins are not exactly politically correct – more than 30 couples competed in the North American Wife Carrying Championship in front of cheering crowds.

The event sees competitors splash through water, leap over logs and trudge through mud – all while carrying their partner like a sack of potatoes.

It is believed to be based on a 19th century Finnish legend involving a man known as “Ronkainen the Robber”, whose gang was known to pillage villages and carry away the women.

Image:
Pic: AP Photo/Robert F Bukaty

Traditionally, the Finnish event featured male competitors carrying a woman.

Advertisement

On Saturday, competing couples did not have to be married, nor did they have to be a man and a woman.

One contestant – the carrier – was dressed as Mr Incredible, while his “wife” was dressed entirely in pink.

They and others were cheered on by crowds on both sides of the 254-metre course at Sunday River ski resort.

Molly Sunburn carries Megan Crowley over a sand pile during the North American Wife Carrying Championship. Pic: AP Photo/Robert F Bukaty
Image:
Molly Sunburn carries Megan Crowley over a sand pile during the North American Wife Carrying Championship. Pic: AP Photo/Robert F Bukaty

Read more from Sky News:
Former rock musician convicted of killing girlfriend
Hot air balloon hits radio tower causing it to collapse

Most of the participants use a technique in which the “wife” is carried like a backpack – upside down – to ensure the runners’ arms are free for the greatest agility.

The champion leaves with the weight of the “wife” in beer and five times the “wife’s” weight in cash.

Advertisement

To estimate the amount they win, the winning “wife” is put on one side of a see-saw-like scale that organisers balance out on the other side with cases of beer.

“We come each year for the fun,” said Wade Porterfield of Cuba, New York, who competed with his wife, Sara Porterfield.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine High School Field Hockey Scores – Friday October 11

Published

on

Maine High School Field Hockey Scores – Friday October 11


Here are the High School Field Hockey Scores for games played and reported on Friday October 11th.

  • Belfast 4 Leavitt 0
  • Brewer 5 John Bapst 0
  • Camden Hills 2 Hampden Academy 0
  • Cheverus 7 Noble 0
  • Cony 1 Mt. Blue 0
  • Dirigo 4 Boothbay 0
  • Gorham 3 Scarborough 1
  • Gray-New Gloucester 3 Edward Little 0
  • Lake Region 5 Mountain Valley 1
  • Lawrence 11 Lincoln Academy 0
  • Lisbon 0 St. Dominic 0
  • Massabesic 6 South Porlland 1
  • Nokomis 9 Oceanside 0
  • Oak Hill 3 Morse 0
  • Old Town 4 Bangor 0
  • Poland 3 Traip Academy 0
  • Sanford 3 Kennebunk 0
  • Thornton Academy 5 Portland 0
  • Traip Academy 2 Sacopee Valley 2
  • Winthrop 3 Gardiner 2

We are taking nominations for outstanding performances for Week 6 for the week October 7th- October 12th.. Please nominate a athlete by sending a email to Chris Popper.. In your nomination please include stats, the school and why they should be athlete of the week. Nominations will be accepted through Sunday, October 13th, with voting taking place October 14th-17th with the winner of Week 6 being announced on October 18th.

LOOK: 8 TV Shows You Totally Forgot Existed

Think your memory’s playing tricks on you? Think again. These TV shows were 100% real. How many of them do you remember tuning into?

Gallery Credit: Stephen Lenz





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

6 facts about false noncitizen voting claims and the election

Published

on

6 facts about false noncitizen voting claims and the election


This presidential campaign, former President Donald Trump and other Republicans have been repeating the false narrative that Democrats are purposefully letting migrants into the country so they will vote.

There’s no evidence for the claim, which echoes a racist conspiracy theory known as the “great replacement.”

In fact, allegations about voter fraud and noncitizens have been floating around American politics for more than a century.

The GOP has made it a legislative priority to update federal law to require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal races. Opponents point out that millions of eligible voters — about 1 in 10 adult U.S. citizens, according to one recent survey — don’t have ready access to documents that prove their citizenship, such as a birth certificate or passport, and would face hurdles to vote.

Advertisement

Here are 6 things to know about the false narratives circulating.

There are severe penalties for noncitizens who illegally try to vote

It’s illegal for people who are not U.S. citizens to vote in federal or state elections. And the federal voter registration form asks registrants to affirm, under penalty of perjury, that they are eligible citizens. The form warns those who make false statements could be fined, imprisoned or deported. Noncitizens who register to vote can also lose the ability to ever become U.S. citizens.

Voting rights advocates say these penalties have worked as effective deterrents. “Anybody who is on a green card or attempting to get citizenship in America, they are not trying to be arrested or to be tossed out of the country,” said Sylvia Albert, the director of voting and elections for Common Cause.

Election officials regularly verify voter registration information and remove ineligible voters from voter rolls. Some states verify citizenship by cross-checking voter information with other databases, such as state motor vehicle data or the federal SAVE database. Election officials must be careful not to mistakenly remove eligible voters from voter rolls, since some databases may be outdated and may not show if an immigrant has become a naturalized citizen. Such errors resulted in large numbers of eligible citizens wrongly flagged for removal in Texas in 2019.

Available data shows noncitizen voting is incredibly rare

After the 2016 election, the Brennan Center for Justice, which advocates for voting rights, surveyed local election officials in 42 jurisdictions with high immigrant populations and found just 30 cases of suspected noncitizens voting out of 23.5 million votes cast, or 0.0001%.

Advertisement

The Brennan Center survey did not include North Carolina, where a state audit after the 2016 election found 41 cases of green card holders who voted out of nearly 4.8 million votes in the state. The same report said many of the noncitizen voters had been misinformed that they could vote.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger launched an audit in 2022 that found over the previous 25 years, fewer than 1,700 people believed to be noncitizens had attempted to register to vote. None were able to cast ballots.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images / Getty Images North America

/

Advertisement

Getty Images North America

Ballot drop off instructions are displayed near the entrance of the Maricopa County Elections Department on Oct. 11, 2024 in Phoenix, Arizona. Early voting is underway in the state of Arizona ahead of the Nov. 5th elections.

After a federal trial last year over Arizona’s documentary proof of citizenship laws, the federal judge concluded, “though it may occur, non-citizens voting in Arizona is quite rare, and non-citizen voter fraud in Arizona is rarer still.”

While the conservative Heritage Foundation has actively promoted claims about the risk of noncitizens voting this campaign season, its own data suggests how rare these cases are. The Washington Post reviewed a Heritage database of voter fraud cases and found 85 cases relating to allegations of noncitizens voting between 2002 and 2023.

The American Immigration Council, which advocates for immigrant rights, also analyzed the Heritage data and found most noncitizen voting cases involve legal immigrants and many had been incorrectly told they could vote. That analysis found only 10 cases involving undocumented immigrants since the 1980s. Heritage has said the database is just a sampling of fraud cases and is not comprehensive.

Flawed studies have fueled false claims

A widely contested 2014 paper by researchers at Old Dominion University has fueled exaggerated claims about noncitizen voting rates. The study, which was led by political scientist Jesse Richman, drew its conclusions from an online survey known as the Cooperative Election Survey. A small number of respondents had indicated they were noncitizens and that they had voted. Richman’s paper used that data to estimate that 6.4% of noncitizens voted in 2008.

Advertisement

But that estimate immediately came under fire. The developers of the CES survey wrote a rebuttal, detailing how Richman’s research was methodologically unsound because the small subset of people who reported being noncitizen voters could easily have been citizens who had simply selected the wrong box.

Nevertheless, Trump seized on and distorted Richman’s estimates to fuel false claims in 2016 that millions of noncitizens had illegally voted. In the aftermath, some 200 fellow political scientists wrote an open letter rejecting the 2014 paper. That didn’t stop the website Just Facts from publishing a report in May based on the paper’s discredited estimates. That report made the disputed claim that 10% to 27% of noncitizens are illegally registered to vote, which went viral on X and was cited in congressional testimony.

Richman has since revised down his estimate for national noncitizen voter registration rates to just under 1%, and participation to half a percent.

Voters line up to cast their ballot as early voting starts in Arlington, Va., on Sept. 20, 2024.

-/AFP via Getty Images / AFP

Advertisement

/

AFP

Voters line up to cast their ballot as early voting starts in Arlington, Va., on Sept. 20, 2024.

A small number of localities allow noncitizens to vote in municipal races only

Washington, D.C., and a small number of municipalities in California, Maryland and Vermont do allow noncitizens to vote in some local elections, such as city council or school board races. But so far, turnout has been low from this population. Noncitizens are still barred from voting in federal and state elections in all of these places, and there are systems in place to ensure they do not receive ballots for those other races.

Most people who arrived at the border in recent years have no path to citizenship

One false narrative this campaign season suggests that the people who arrived at the U.S.-Mexico border during the Biden administration can quickly become citizens and vote legally. But the vast majority of migrants have no path to citizenship. For the minority who will ultimately be granted asylum, it often takes more than a decade from the time they enter the country to go through all the steps to win their cases and ultimately naturalize. Furthermore, changes to asylum protocols during the Biden administration have made it harder to pursue asylum in this country and eventually become a citizen.

Misleading claims about noncitizens voting can undermine confidence in the 2024 election

By focusing on baseless allegations about noncitizens voting in the upcoming election, Trump and his allies appear to be laying the groundwork for potentially contesting the election.

Advertisement

“You can absolutely bet if Trump loses, he will claim there was widespread noncitizen voting without any evidence whatsoever,” David Becker, the executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research told NPR last month. “And that is going to incite anger and potentially violence.”

Copyright 2024 NPR





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending