Connect with us

Maine

Opinion:Maine population growth shows changing economic choices

Published

on

Opinion:Maine population growth shows changing economic choices


The BDN Opinion part operates independently and doesn’t set newsroom insurance policies or contribute to reporting or enhancing articles elsewhere within the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com.

KPOOM.

Within the Nineteen Seventies, that was a preferred Maine bumper sticker. It meant “Maintain Individuals Out Of Maine.”

A drastic slowdown within the state’s inhabitants progress occurred in following a long time. In 2020, the pattern reversed. This may very well be a part of an historic nationwide financial transformation.

Advertisement

The inhabitants grew within the Nineteen Seventies by an annual common of 1.27 p.c, greater than most states within the Northeast. Some Mainers apprehensive about modifications that may include the inflow of individuals “from away.”

With none formal motion to discourage progress, the speed dropped. By the 2010-2019 decade it had fallen to a 0.12 p.c annual improve, not even one-tenth of the precedent days. The share of the state’s inhabitants born in Maine was additionally declining.

The current turnaround has been abrupt and sharp. It might change Maine and its economic system.

Whereas there isn’t any formal evaluation of the shift, it’s price contemplating 4 elements: local weather warming, COVID-19, mass electronics and evolving values. Maine could present clues to demographic change throughout the nation.

Judging from the outcomes on serps, persons are more and more concerned with discovering the  greatest locations to stay because the local weather modifications. They’re searching for locations the place the impression of warming can be restricted and maybe the place it’ll produce advantages.

Advertisement

Except you actually appreciated winter a long time in the past, Maine was not the place you’d transfer. Mid-winter temperatures had been usually beneath zero. However now, in lots of locations, that’s a rarity.

Let’s take January 31, often a day within the coldest week of the yr, in 1970 and the identical date in 2020, a half-century later. The typical 2020 temperatures in Bangor and Portland had been every about 10 levels hotter than in 1970. Neglect about zero; in Portland it was 30, simply two levels beneath freezing.

Research forecast that among the many greatest locations to stay within the U.S. because the planet warms goes to be the Northeast. That produces a good ranking for Maine, making it much less difficult for individuals who dislike significantly chilly climate.

COVID-19 made working remotely a necessity for some who discovered it yielded a surprisingly enticing life-style. In case you don’t need to be within the workplace, the widespread office in a service economic system, it might not matter the place you reside. Because the lockdowns prolonged, for some individuals working at house grew to become a fascinating a part of the “new regular.”

The elevated velocity and capability of digital communications and knowledge transfers are key to the flexibility to work remotely. Authorities has more and more targeted on helping the speedy improve of broadband for the broad inhabitants.

Advertisement

Not solely does that encourage individuals to consider transferring to locations providing life-style benefits particularly for households, but it surely opens new places for employers. They don’t need to arrange the place the employees are positioned; the employees could come to them electronically.

Lastly, Mainers themselves could also be altering. A newly printed novel, “The Midcoast” by Adam White, takes Damariscotta for instance. The city goes mainstream, to “commerce ‘authenticity’ for what looks like an airbrushed portrait of itself,” as White writes. Maine itself turns into more and more as if “from away,” a part of a culturally homogenized nation.

Every year, United Van Traces, a serious nationwide transferring firm, conducts a survey of who’s transferring (not solely their clients) and why. Its newest research revealed that in 2021, Maine grew to become a number one state for in-migration. Final yr, 58 p.c of all strikes had been inbound and solely 42 p.c outbound.

Who’s coming?  Retirees and other people searching for a brand new life-style and new jobs.  They’re closely 45-54 years previous and with incomes of $100,000 or extra.  Who’s leaving? Those that transfer for household causes and retirees. They’re 65 and older with incomes beneath $100,000.

The state main in provide of recent Mainers is Massachusetts, whereas the main vacation spot is Florida.

Advertisement

Gained’t Maine’s excessive value of dwelling together with taxes stop an actual turnaround? The price distinction with different states is basically a fantasy, as a result of sellers take market situations into consideration after they worth their merchandise. Today, gasoline prices primarily the identical in Maine as in Boston.

Maine’s value of dwelling was discovered to be a plus slightly than a destructive for movers, regardless of the state having larger taxes than Northeast opponents and Florida. Movers could contemplate taxes as a part of the general value of dwelling. And extra larger earnings residents might increase tax revenues, eradicating the necessity for future tax will increase.

The underside line, if one is already rising, is that Maine is altering and it might replicate broader nationwide developments. The character of the American economic system could also be remodeled by the warming  local weather and the consequences of COVID-19 plus the broader unfold of superior communications and know-how.

The consequence for Maine could also be elevated inhabitants and prosperity, however at some value to its distinctive character.

 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen

Published

on

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen


Maine Department of Marine Resources Commissioner Patrick Keliher said “f— you” to a man during a Thursday meeting at which fishermen assailed him for a state plan to raise the size limit for lobster.

The heated exchange came on the same day that Keliher withdrew the proposal, which came in response to limits from regional regulators concerned with data showing a 35 percent decrease in lobster population in the state’s biggest fishing area.

It comes on the heels of fights between the storied fishery and the federal government over proposed restrictions on fishing gear that are intended to preserve the population of endangered whales off the East Coast. It was alleviated by a six-year pause on new whale rules negotiated in 2022 by Gov. Janet Mills and the state’s congressional delegation.

“I think this is the right thing to do because the future of the industry is at stake for a lot of different reasons,” Keliher told the fishermen of his now-withdrawn change at a meeting in Augusta on Thursday evening, according to a video posted on Facebook.

Advertisement

After crosstalk from the crowd, Keliher implored them to listen to him. Then, a man yelled that they don’t have to listen to him because the commission “sold out” to federal regulators and Canada.

“F— you, I sold out,” Keliher yelled, prompting an angry response from the fishermen.

“That’s nice. Foul language in the meeting. Good for you. That’s our commissioner,” a man shouted back.

Keliher apologized to the crowd shortly after making the remark and will try to talk with the man he directed the profanity to, department spokesperson Jeff Nichols said. The commissioner issued a Friday statement saying the remarks came as a result of his passion for the industry and criticisms of his motives that he deemed unfair, he said.

“I remain dedicated to working in support of this industry and will continue to strengthen the relationships and build the trust necessary to address the difficult and complex tasks that lay ahead,” Keliher said.

Advertisement

Spokespeople for Gov. Janet Mills did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether she has spoken to Keliher about his remarks.

Lobstermen pushed back in recent meetings against the state’s plan, challenging the underlying data. Now, fishermen can keep lobsters that measure 3.25 inches from eye socket to tail. The proposal would have raised that limit by 1/16 of an inch and would have been the first time the limit was raised in decades.

The department pulled the limit pending a new stock survey, a move that U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Democrat from Maine’s 2nd District, hailed in a news release that called the initial proposal “an unnecessary overreaction to questionable stock data.”

Keliher is Maine’s longest-serving commissioner. He has held his job since former Gov. Paul LePage hired him in 2012. Mills, a Democrat, reappointed the Gardiner native after she took office in 2019. Before that, he was a hunting guide, charter boat captain and ran the Coastal Conservation Association of Maine and the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters

Published

on

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Anna Kellar is the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Maine.

This past November, my 98-year-old grandmother was determined that she wasn’t going to miss out on voting for president. She was worried that her ballot wouldn’t arrive in the mail in time. Fortunately, her daughter — my aunt — was able to pick up a ballot for her, bring it to her to fill out, and then return it to the municipal office.

Thousands of Maine people, including elderly and disabled people like my grandmother, rely on third-party ballot delivery to be able to vote. What they don’t know is that a referendum heading to voters this year wants to take away that ability and install other barriers to our constitutional right to vote.

Advertisement

The “Voter ID for Maine” citizen’s initiative campaign delivered their signatures to the Secretary of State this week, solidifying the prospect of a November referendum. The League of Women Voters of Maine (LWVME) opposes this ballot initiative. We know it is a form of voter suppression.

The voter ID requirement proposed by this campaign would be one of the most restrictive anywhere in the county. It would require photo ID to vote and to vote absentee, and it would exclude a number of currently accepted IDs.

But that’s not all. The legislation behind the referendum is also an attack on absentee voting. It will repeal ongoing absentee voting, where a voter can sign up to have an absentee ballot mailed to them automatically for each election cycle, and it limits the use and number of absentee ballot dropboxes to the point where some towns may find it impractical to offer them. It makes it impossible for voters to request an absentee ballot over the phone. It prevents an authorized third party from delivering an absentee ballot, a service that many elderly and disabled Mainers rely on.

Absentee voting is safe and secure and a popular way to vote for many Mainers. We should be looking for ways to make it more convenient for Maine voters to cast their ballots, not putting obstacles in their way.

Make no mistake: This campaign is a broad attack on voting rights that, if implemented, would disenfranchise many Maine people. It’s disappointing to see Mainers try to impose these barriers on their fellow Mainers’ right to vote when this state is justly proud of its high voter participation rates. These restrictions can and will harm every type of voter, with senior and rural voters experiencing the worst of the disenfranchisement. It will be costly, too. Taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for a new system that is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters.

Advertisement

All of the evidence suggests that voter IDs don’t prevent voter fraud. Maine has safeguards in place to prevent fraud, cyber attacks, and other kinds of foul play that would attempt to subvert our elections. This proposal is being imported to Maine from an out-of-state playbook (see the latest Ohio voter suppression law) that just doesn’t fit Maine. The “Voter ID for Maine” campaign will likely mislead Mainers into thinking that requiring an ID isn’t a big deal, but it will have immediate impacts on eligible voters. Unfortunately, that may be the whole point, and that’s what the proponents of this measure will likely refuse to admit.

This is not a well-intentioned nonpartisan effort. And we should call this campaign what it is: a broad attack on voting rights in order to suppress voters.

Maine has strong voting rights. We are a leader in the nation. Our small, rural, working-class state has one of the highest voter turnout rates in the country. That’s something to be proud of. We rank this high because of our secure elections, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee ballots, and no photo ID laws required to vote. Let’s keep it this way and oppose this voter suppression initiative.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Published

on

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection


Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Bev Uhlenhake Maine Democratic Party

The chair of the Maine Democratic Party announced Thursday she won’t seek reelection when members select leaders later this month.

Bev Uhlenhake, a former city councilor and mayor in Brewer and former chair of the Penobscot County Democrats, has served as chair of the state party since January 2023. She is also a previous vice chair of the party.

In a written statement, Uhlenhake noted some of the recent successes and challenges facing Democrats, including the reelection of Democratic majorities in both the Maine House and Senate last November, though by narrower margins, and winning three of Maine’s four electoral votes for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Advertisement

“While we have laid a solid foundation from which Maine Democrats can build toward even greater success in 2026 and beyond, I have decided to step away from Maine Democratic Party leadership for personal and professional reasons, and will not seek reelection,” Uhlenhake said.

Party Vice Chair Julian Rogers, who was also elected to his post in 2023, announced he also won’t seek reelection to leadership, but will resume a previous role he held as vice chair of the party’s committee on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging.

Democratic State Committee members will vote for the party’s next leaders in elections to be held on Sunday, Jan. 26.

« Previous

South Portland debates natural vs. artificial grass at planned athletic facility



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending